Brian Willard Gardner
Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Brian Willard Gardner.
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2008
M. E. Huber; Nicholas C. Koshnick; Hendrik Bluhm; Leonard J. Archuleta; Tommy Azua; Per G. Bjornsson; Brian Willard Gardner; Sean T. Halloran; Erik A. Lucero; Kathryn A. Moler
We have fabricated and characterized micro-SQUID susceptometers for use in low-temperature scanning probe microscopy systems. The design features the following: a 4.6 mum diameter pickup loop; an integrated field coil to apply a local field to the sample; an additional counterwound pickup-loop/field-coil pair to cancel the background signal from the applied field in the absence of the sample; modulation coils to allow setting the SQUID at its optimum bias point (independent of the applied field), and shielding and symmetry that minimizes coupling of magnetic fields into the leads and body of the SQUID. We use a SQUID series array preamplifier to obtain a system bandwidth of 1 MHz. The flux noise at 125 mK is approximately 0.25 mu Phi 0/ sqrt Hz above 10 kHz, with a value of 2.5 mu Phi 0/ sqrt Hz at 10 Hz. The nominal sensitivity to electron spins located at the center of the pickup loop is approximately 200 muB/ sqrt Hz above 10 kHz, in the white-noise frequency region.
Review of Scientific Instruments | 2001
Brian Willard Gardner; Janice C. Wynn; Per G. Bjornsson; Eric W. J. Straver; Kathryn A. Moler; J. R. Kirtley; Mark B. Ketchen
We report a scanning superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) microsusceptometer with a spatial resolution of 8 μm, tested by measuring the susceptibility of individual 3 μm diam tin disks. Images of the disks agree well with numerical modeling based on the known geometry of the SQUID microsusceptometers. The low-field spin sensitivity between 1.5 and 6 K is 1×105 μB/Hz while scanning.
Applied Physics Letters | 2002
Brian Willard Gardner; Janice C. Wynn; D. A. Bonn; Ruixing Liang; W. N. Hardy; J. R. Kirtley; Vladimir G. Kogan; Kathryn A. Moler
We demonstrate the controlled, reversible manipulation of individual vortices in a superconductor with a locally applied magnetic field. The local field is supplied by a field coil on a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). The SQUID is used to image the vortices before and after moving. This device can be used both to push individual vortices and to create individual vortex–antivortex pairs. We calculate the force applied on a rigid vortex and find that ∼0.5 pN is necessary to move vortices in underdoped single crystals of YBa2Cu3O6.354 with Tc∼ 12 K.We demonstrate the controlled, reversible manipulation of individual vortices in a superconductor with a locally applied magnetic field. The local field is supplied by a field coil on a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID). The SQUID is used to image the vortices before and after moving. This device can be used both to push individual vortices and to create individual vortex–antivortex pairs. We calculate the force applied on a rigid vortex and find that ∼0.5 pN is necessary to move vortices in underdoped single crystals of YBa2Cu3O6.354 with Tc∼ 12 K.
Nature | 2001
D. A. Bonn; Janice C. Wynn; Brian Willard Gardner; Yu-Ju Lin; Ruixing Liang; W. N. Hardy; J. R. Kirtley; Kathryn A. Moler
There is a long-standing debate about whether spin–charge separation is the root cause of the peculiar normal-state properties and high superconducting transition temperatures of the high-Tc materials. In the proposed state of matter, the elementary excitations are not electron-like, as in conventional metals, but rather the electron ‘fractionalizes’ to give excitations that are chargeless spin-1/2 fermions (spinons) and charge +e bosons (chargons). Although spin–charge separation has been well established in one dimension, the theoretical situation for two dimensions is controversial and experimental evidence for it in the high-Tc materials is indirect. A model with sharp experimental tests for a particular type of separation in two dimensions has recently been proposed. Here we report the results of those experimental tests, placing a conservative upper limit of 190 K on the energy of the proposed topological defects known as visons. There is still debate about the extent to which this experiment can settle the issue of spin–charge separation in the high-Tc copper oxides, because some forms of the separation are able to avoid the need for visons. But at least one class of theories that all predict a vortex-memory effect now are unlikely models for the copper oxides.
Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications | 2003
Brian Willard Gardner; Janice C. Wynn; Doug Bonn; Ruixing Liang; W. N. Hardy; Kathryn A. Moler
Abstract Locally applied magnetic fields can be used to create vortex–antivortex pairs in superconducting films and thin crystals. These pairs typically annihilate on some timescale which depends on temperature. We use a 21 μm diameter field coil integrated onto a scanning superconducting quantum interference device to create and observe vortex–antivortex pairs. We present measurements of the distribution of annihilation times as a function of temperature, which should allow us to determine the pinning forces for vortices in these highly underdoped samples of YBa 2 Cu 3 O 6.354 .
Physical Review Letters | 2001
Doug Bonn; Brian Willard Gardner; Ruixing Liang; Yu-Ju Lin; Janice C. Wynn
Physica C-superconductivity and Its Applications | 2003
Brian Willard Gardner; Janice C. Wynn; Doug Bonn; Ruixing Liang; W. N. Hardy; Kathryn A. Moler
Archive | 2003
Brian Willard Gardner; Cliford Hicks; Doug Bonn; Ruixing Liang; W. N. Hardy; Kathryn A. Moler
Archive | 2003
Janice Wynn Guikema; Clifford W. Hicks; Per G. Bjornsson; Brian Willard Gardner; Mark Allen Topinka; Rafael Baruch Dinner; M. R. Beasley; Kathryn A. Moler; Hadas Shtrikman; E. Zeldov
Archive | 2002
Brian Willard Gardner; Janice C. Wynn; Doug Bonn; Ruixing Liang; W. N. Hardy; Kathryn A. Moler