Bridgette Soileau
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bridgette Soileau.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2009
Jannine D. Cody; Patricia Heard; AnaLisa C. Crandall; Erika Carter; John Li; L. Jean Hardies; Jack L. Lancaster; Brian Perry; Robert F. Stratton; Courtney Sebold; Rebecca L. Schaub; Bridgette Soileau; Annice Hill; Minire Hasi; Peter T. Fox; Daniel E. Hale
One of our primary goals is to help families who have a child with an 18q deletion anticipate medical issues in order to optimize their childs medical care. To this end we have narrowed the critical regions for four phenotypic features and determined the penetrance for each of those phenotypes when the critical region for that feature is hemizygous. We completed molecular analysis using oligo‐array CGH and clinical assessments on 151 individuals with deletions of 18q and made genotype–phenotype correlations defining or narrowing critical regions. These nested regions, all within 18q22.3 to q23, were for kidney malformations, dysmyelination of the brain, growth hormone stimulation response failure, and aural atresia. The region for dysmyelination and growth hormone stimulation response failure were identical and was narrowed to 1.62 Mb, a region containing five known genes. The region for aural atresia was 2.3 Mb and includes an additional three genes. The region for kidney malformations was 3.21 Mb and includes an additional four genes. Penetrance rates were calculated by comparing the number of individuals hemizygous for a critical region with the phenotype to those without the phenotype. The kidney malformations region was 25% penetrant, the dysmyelination region was 100% penetrant, the growth hormone stimulant response failure region was 90% penetrant with variable expressivity, and the aural atresia region was 78% penetrant. Identification of these critical regions suggest possible candidate genes, while penetrance calculations begin to create a predictive phenotypic description based on genotype.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2010
Courtney Sebold; Elizabeth Roeder; Marsha Zimmerman; Bridgette Soileau; Patricia Heard; Erika Carter; Martha P. Schatz; W. Abraham White; Brian Perry; Kent A. Reinker; Louise O'Donnell; Jack L. Lancaster; John Li; Minire Hasi; Annice Hill; Lauren Pankratz; Daniel E. Hale; Jannine D. Cody
Thus far, the phenotype of tetrasomy 18p has been primarily delineated by published case series and reports. Findings reported in more than 25% of these cases include neonatal feeding problems, growth retardation, microcephaly, strabismus, muscle tone abnormalities, scoliosis/kyphosis, and variants on brain MRI. Developmental delays and cognitive impairment are universally present. The purpose of this study was to more fully describe tetrasomy 18p at both the genotypic and the phenotypic levels. Array CGH was performed on 43 samples from individuals with tetrasomy 18p diagnosed via routine karyotype. The medical records of 42 of these 43 individuals were reviewed. In order to gain additional phenotypic data, 31 individuals with tetrasomy 18p underwent a series of clinical evaluations at the Chromosome 18 Clinical Research Center. Results from the molecular analysis indicated that 42 of 43 samples analyzed had 4 copies of the entire p arm of chromosome 18; one individual was also trisomic for a section of proximal 18q. The results of the medical records review and clinical evaluations expand the phenotypic description of tetrasomy 18p to include neonatal jaundice and respiratory distress; recurrent otitis media; hearing loss; seizures; refractive errors; constipation and gastroesophageal reflux; cryptorchidism; heart defects; and foot anomalies. Additional findings identified in a small number of individuals include hernias, myelomeningocele, kidney defects, short stature, and failure to respond to growth hormone stimulation testing. Additionally, a profile of dysmorphic features is described. Lastly, a series of clinical evaluations to be considered for individuals with tetrasomy 18p is suggested.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2007
Jannine D. Cody; Courtney Sebold; Amtul Malik; Patricia Heard; Erika Carter; AnaLisa C. Crandall; Bridgette Soileau; Margaret Semrud-Clikeman; Catherine M. Cody; L. Jean Hardies; Jinqi Li; Jack L. Lancaster; Peter T. Fox; Robert F. Stratton; Brian Perry; Daniel E. Hale
Most deletions of the long arm of chromosome 18 involve some part of the most distal 30 Mb. We have identified five individuals with cytogenetically diagnosed interstitial deletions that are all proximal to this commonly deleted region. The extent of their deletions was characterized using molecular and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Each participant was assessed under the comprehensive clinical evaluation protocol of the Chromosome 18 Clinical Research Center. Three of the five individuals were found to have apparently identical interstitial deletions between positions of 37.5 and 42.5 Mb (18q12.3 → 18q21.1). One individuals deletion was much larger and extended from a more proximal breakpoint position of 23 Mb (18q11.2) to a more distal breakpoint at 43 Mb (18q21.1). The fifth individual had a proximal breakpoint identical to the other three, but a distal breakpoint at 43.5 Mb (18q21.1). The clinical findings were of interest because the three individuals with the smaller deletions lacked major anomalies. All five individuals were developmentally delayed; however, the discrepancy between their expressive and receptive language abilities was striking, with expressive language being much more severely affected. This leads us to hypothesize that there are genes in this region of chromosome 18 that are specific to the neural and motor planning domains necessary for speech. Additionally, this may represent a previously underappreciated syndrome since these children do not have the typical clinical abnormalities that would lead to a chromosome analysis.
Human Genetics | 2014
Jannine D. Cody; Minire Hasi; Bridgette Soileau; Patricia Heard; Erika Carter; Courtney Sebold; Louise O'Donnell; Brian Perry; Robert F. Stratton; Daniel E. Hale
Abstract Although constitutional chromosome abnormalities have been recognized since the 1960s, clinical characterization and development of treatment options have been hampered by their obvious genetic complexity and relative rarity. Additionally, deletions of 18q are particularly heterogeneous, with no two people having the same breakpoints. We identified 16 individuals with deletions that, despite unique breakpoints, encompass the same set of genes within a 17.6-Mb region. This group represents the most genotypically similar group yet identified with distal 18q deletions. As the deletion is of average size when compared with other 18q deletions, this group can serve as a reference point for the clinical and molecular description of this condition. We performed a thorough medical record review as well as a series of clinical evaluations on 14 of the 16 individuals. Common functional findings included developmental delays, hypotonia, growth hormone deficiency, and hearing loss. Structural anomalies included foot anomalies, ear canal atresia/stenosis, and hypospadias. The majority of individuals performed within the low normal range of cognitive ability but had more serious deficits in adaptive abilities. Of interest, the hemizygous region contains 38 known genes, 26 of which are sufficiently understood to tentatively determine dosage sensitivity. Published data suggest that 20 are unlikely to cause an abnormal phenotype in the hemizygous state and five are likely to be dosage sensitive: TNX3, NETO1, ZNF407, TSHZ1, and NFATC. A sixth gene, ATP9B, may be conditionally dosage sensitive. Not all distal 18q- phenotypes can be attributed to these six genes; however, this is an important advance in the molecular characterization of 18q deletions.
Human Genetics | 2010
Louise O’Donnell; Bridgette Soileau; Patricia Heard; Erika Carter; Courtney Sebold; Jon Gelfond; Daniel E. Hale; Jannine D. Cody
Previous research has suggested that individuals with constitutional hemizygosity of 18q have a higher risk of autistic-like behaviors. We sought to identify genomic factors located on chromosome 18 as well as other loci that correlate with autistic behaviors. One hundred and five individuals with 18q- were assessed by high-resolution oligo aCGH and by parental ratings of behavior on the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale. Forty-five individuals (43%) had scores within the “possibly” or “very likely” categories of risk for an autism diagnosis. We searched for genetic determinants of autism by (1) identifying additional chromosome copy number changes (2) Identifying common regions of hemizygosity on 18q, and (3) evaluating four regions containing candidate genes located on 18q (MBD1, TCF4, NETO1, FBXO15). Three individuals with a “very likely” probability of autism had a captured 17p telomere in addition to the 18q deletion suggesting a possible synergy between hemizygosity of 18q and trigosity of 17p. In addition, two of the individuals with an 18q deletion and a “very likely” probability of autism rating had a duplication of the entire short arm of chromosome 18. Although no common region of hemizygosity on 18q was identified, analysis of four regions containing candidate genes suggested that individuals were significantly more likely to exhibit autistic-like behaviors if their region of hemizygosity included TCF4, NETO1, and FBXO15 than if they had any other combination of hemizygosity of the candidate genes. Taken together, these findings identify several new potential candidate genes or regions for autistic behaviors.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2015
Minire Hasi-Zogaj; Courtney Sebold; Patricia Heard; Erika Carter; Bridgette Soileau; Annice Hill; David Rupert; Brian Perry; Sidney W. Atkinson; Louise O'Donnell; Jonathan Gelfond; Jack L. Lancaster; Peter T. Fox; Daniel E. Hale; Jannine D. Cody
Since 18p‐ was first described in 1963, much progress has been made in our understanding of this classic deletion condition. We have been able to establish a fairly complete picture of the phenotype when the deletion breakpoint occurs at the centromere, and we are working to establish the phenotypic effects when each gene on 18p is hemizygous. Our aim is to provide genotype‐specific anticipatory guidance and recommendations to families with an 18p‐ diagnosis. In addition, establishing the molecular underpinnings of the condition will potentially suggest targets for molecular treatments. Thus, the next step is to establish the precise effects of specific gene deletions. As we look forward to deepening our understanding of 18p‐, our focus will continue to be on the establishment of robust genotype–phenotype correlations and the penetrance of these phenotypes. We will continue to follow our 18p‐ cohort closely as they age to determine the presence or absence of some of these diagnoses, including spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA), facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), and dystonia. We will also continue to refine the critical regions for other phenotypes as we enroll additional (hopefully informative) participants into the research study and as the mechanisms of the genes in these regions are elucidated. Mouse models will also be developed to further our understanding of the effects of hemizygosity as well as to serve as models for treatment development.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars in Medical Genetics | 2015
Jannine D. Cody; Courtney Sebold; Patricia Heard; Erika Carter; Bridgette Soileau; Minire Hasi-Zogaj; Annice Hill; David Rupert; Brian Perry; Louise O'Donnell; Jonathan Gelfond; Jack L. Lancaster; Peter T. Fox; Daniel E. Hale
Providing clinically relevant prognoses and treatment information for people with a chromsome18q deletion is particularly challenging because every unrelated person has a unique region of hemizygosity. The hemizygous region can involve almost any region of 18q including between 1 and 101 genes (30 Mb of DNA). Most individuals have terminal deletions, but in our cohort of over 350 individuals 23% have interstitial deletions. Because of this heterogeneity, we take a gene by gene approach to understanding the clinical consequences. There are 196 genes on 18q. We classified 133 of them as dosage insensitive, 15 (8%) as dosage sensitive leading to haploinsufficiency while another 10 (5%) have effects that are conditionally haploinsufficient and are dependent on another factor, genetic or environmental in order to cause an abnormal phenotype. Thirty‐seven genes (19%) have insufficient information to classify their dosage effect. Phenotypes attributed to single genes include: congenital heart disease, minor bone morphology changes, central nervous system dysmyelination, expressive speech delay, vesicouretreral reflux, polyposis, Pitt‐Hopkins syndrome, intellectual disability, executive function impairment, male infertility, aural atresia, and high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Additionally, identified critical regions for other phenotypes include: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and pectus excavatum, Virchow‐Robin perivascular spaces, small corpus callosum, strabismus, atopic disorders, mood disorder, IgA deficiency, nystagmus, congenital heart disease, kidney malformation, vertical talus, CNS dysmyelination growth hormone deficiency and cleft palate. Together these findings make it increasingly feasible to compile an individualized syndrome description based on each persons individuated genotype. Future work will focus on understanding molecular mechanisms leading to treatment.
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2015
Courtney Sebold; Bridgette Soileau; Patricia Heard; Erika Carter; Louise O'Donnell; Daniel E. Hale; Jannine D. Cody
Deletions of the short arm of chromosome 18 have been well‐described in case reports. However, the utility of these descriptions in clinical practice is limited by varied and imprecise breakpoints. As we work to establish genotype–phenotype correlations for 18p‐, it is critical to have accurate and complete clinical descriptions of individuals with differing breakpoints. In addition, the developmental profile of 18p‐ has not been well‐delineated. We undertook a thorough review of the medical histories of 31 individuals with 18p‐ and a breakpoint in the centromeric region. We collected developmental data using mailed surveys and questionnaires. The most common findings included neonatal complications; cardiac anomalies; hypotonia; MRI abnormalities; endocrine dysfunction; strabismus; ptosis; and refractive errors. Less common features included holoprosencephaly and its microforms; hearing loss; and orthopedic anomalies. The developmental effects of the deletion appear to be less severe than reported in the literature, as average IQ scores were in the range of borderline intellectual functioning. Based on responses to standardized questionnaires, it appears this population has marked difficulty with activities of daily living, though several young adults were able to live independent of their parents. This manuscript represents the most comprehensive description of a cohort of 18p‐ individuals with identical breakpoints. Despite identical breakpoints, a great deal of phenotype variability remained among this population, suggesting that many of the genes on 18p‐ cause low‐penetrance phenotypes when present in a hemizygous state. Future efforts will focus on the clinical description of individuals with more distal breakpoints and the identification of critical regions and candidate genes.
American Journal of Medical Genetics | 2013
William B. Daviss; Louise O'Donnell; Bridgette Soileau; Patricia Heard; Erika Carter; Steven R. Pliszka; Jonathan Gelfond; Daniel E. Hale; Jannine D. Cody
We examined 36 participants at least 4 years old with hemizygous distal deletions of the long arm of Chromosome 18 (18q‐) for histories of mood disorders and to characterize these disorders clinically. Since each participant had a different region of 18q hemizygosity, our goal was also to identify their common region of hemizygosity associated with mood disorders; thereby identifying candidate causal genes in that region. Lifetime mood and other psychiatric disorders were determined by semi‐structured interviews of patients and parents, supplemented by reviews of medical and psychiatric records, and norm‐referenced psychological assessment instruments, for psychiatric symptoms, cognitive problems, and adaptive functioning. Sixteen participants were identified with lifetime mood disorders (ages 12–42 years, 71% female, 14 having had unipolar depression and 2 with bipolar disorders). From the group of 20 who did not meet criteria for a mood disorder; a comparison group of 6 participants were identified who were matched for age range and deletion size. Mood‐disordered patients had high rates of anxiety (75%) and externalizing behavior disorders (44%), and significant mean differences from comparison patients (P < 0.05), including higher overall and verbal IQs and lower autistic symptoms. A critical region was defined in the mood‐disordered group that included a hypothetical gene, C18orf62, and two known genes, ZADH2 and TSHZ1. We conclude that patients having terminal deletions of this critical region of the long arm of Chromosome 18 are highly likely to have mood disorders, which are often comorbid with anxiety and to a lesser extent with externalizing disorders.
Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2015
Bridgette Soileau; Minire Hasi; Courtney Sebold; Annice Hill; Louise O’Donnell; Daniel E. Hale; Jannine D. Cody
The identification of an underlying chromosome abnormality frequently marks the endpoint of a diagnostic odyssey. However, families are frequently left with more questions than answers as they consider their child’s future. In the case of rare chromosome conditions, a lack of longitudinal data often makes it difficult to provide anticipatory guidance to these families. The objective of this study is to describe the lifespan, educational attainment, living situation, and behavioral phenotype of adults with chromosome 18 abnormalities. The Chromosome 18 Clinical Research Center has enrolled 483 individuals with one of the following conditions: 18q-, 18p-, Tetrasomy 18p, and Ring 18. As a part of the ongoing longitudinal study, we collect data on living arrangements, educational level attained, and employment status as well as data on executive functioning and behavioral skills on an annual basis. Within our cohort, 28 of the 483 participants have died, the majority of whom have deletions encompassing the TCF4 gene or who have unbalanced rearrangement involving other chromosomes. Data regarding the cause of and age at death are presented. We also report on the living situation, educational attainment, and behavioral phenotype of the 151 participants over the age of 18. In general, educational level is higher for people with all these conditions than implied by the early literature, including some that received post-high school education. In addition, some individuals are able to live independently, though at this point they represent a minority of patients. Data on executive function and behavioral phenotype are also presented. Taken together, these data provide insight into the long-term outcome for individuals with a chromosome 18 condition. This information is critical in counseling families on the range of potential outcomes for their child.
Collaboration
Dive into the Bridgette Soileau's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs