Bridgit Crews

Evaluation of High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Urine Toxicology Screening in a Pain Management Setting

To evaluate liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HR-MS) for urine toxicology screening, 29 analytes were quantitated in 152 urine specimens from patients with chronic pain using two unique mass spectrometry platforms. De-identified specimens were quantitated in April of 2011 by liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) and by full-scan LC-HR-MS at Millennium Laboratories. Considering LC-MS-MS as the reference method, false positive results were identified in 19 specimens measured by LC-HR-MS. Application of relative retention times using deuterium labeled internal standards improved the rate of false positive detection to only five specimens, with four occurring for the same analyte. Ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry (R = 100,000 at m/z 200) showed no improvement over high-resolution mass spectrometry (R = 10,000 at m/z 200) in the number of false positives detected. Quantitative results measured by LC-MS-MS and LC-HR-MS showed good agreement over four orders of dynamic range. This study demonstrates that LC-HR-MS is a suitable platform for toxicology screening for a pain management population and that quantitative accuracy and sensitivity are comparable to that achieved with LC-MS-MS. The specificity of LC-HR-MS is improved by the addition of deuterium labeled internal standards and the implementation of relative retention time matching.

LC-MS/MS extends the range of drug analysis in pain patients.

The current study addresses the distribution of low concentrations of excreted drugs in the pain patient population in an effort to establish a more rational set of cutoffs for this cohort. To wit, 19 analytes in approximately 8000 urine specimens from pain patients were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS) methodology. The lower limits of quantitation for the LC-MS/MS were set as the nominal cutoffs for the determination of positive and negative results. The measured concentrations were compared with the Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) nominal immunoassay cutoffs, and a subset of “missed samples” was identified for each of the 19 analytes. This “missed samples” subset contained all samples that measured above the LC MS/MS cutoff for a given analyte but below the SAMHSA immunoassay cutoff. The number of “missed samples” divided by the total number of samples measured positive by the LC-MS/MS method defines the percentage of this population that would have been found falsely negative if a prescreen by immunoassay using SAMHSA cutoffs had been conducted. For example, 69% of the specimens that were positive for hydromorphone by LC-MS/MS would have been falsely scored as negative by immunoassay.

Anomalous observations of codeine in patients on morphine.

Urine drug monitoring is used by physicians treating chronic pain patients with opioid therapy. Patients are tested in part to insure that they are not taking other drugs. Therefore, the finding of codeine in a patient who is only prescribed morphine has clinical implications. Morphine preparations are known to have small amounts of codeine as an impurity estimated to be about 0.04%. In a population of 535 pain patients prescribed morphine, Kadian, MS Contin, and/or Avinza, the investigators observed 24 samples that contained codeine >20 ng/mL. Fifteen of the 24 contained codeine >20 and <50 ng/mL. Of the 9 samples that were >50 ng/mL, 7 had high levels of codeine (indicating codeine use), 1 was from a patient who had a prescription for codeine, and 1 was also positive for 6-acetylmorphine, indicating heroin use. A control group of 680 patients taking oxycodone was negative for codeine. The finding of codeine was ascribed to the manufacturing process of the morphine medications. Clinicians and laboratories testing urine for drugs should be aware of this possibility.

Anomalous observations of hydrocodone in patients on oxycodone

BACKGROUND Urine drug monitoring is used by physicians treating chronic pain patients with opioid therapy. Patients are tested in part to insure that they are not taking other drugs. Therefore, the finding of hydrocodone in a patient who is only prescribed oxycodone has clinical implications. Oxycodone preparations are known to have small amounts of hydrocodone as an impurity estimated to be < 0.1%. We established the concentration of unexpected hydrocodone in patients taking oxycodone. METHODS Urine drug testing specimens from a population of 30,000 pain patients prescribed oxycodone in various formulations were quantitatively measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The frequency and concentration of hydrocodone as a function of oxycodone concentration were determined. RESULTS There were 187 specimens with > 100,000 ng/ml of oxycodone. Of these, 72% were positive for hydrocodone. Of the 311 specimens with oxycodone concentrations > 50,000-100,000 ng/ml, 33% were positive for hydrocodone. Of the 1067 specimens with oxycodone > 20,000-50,000 ng/ml, 16% were positive for hydrocodone. Of the 8508 specimens with oxycodone > 1000-20,000 ng/ml, 16% were positive for hydrocodone. CONCLUSIONS The high frequency of hydrocodone in samples containing high concentrations of oxycodone was ascribed to the manufacturing process of the oxycodone medications. However, a significant number of patients also took hydrocodone that was not listed on their prescribed medications. When oxycodone is > 100,000 ng/ml, hydrocodone should be <1500 ng/ml. When oxycodone is < 100,000 ng/ml then hydrocodone should be <500 ng/ml. Values greater than these indicate non-prescribed hydrocodone use. Clinicians and laboratories testing urine for drugs should be aware of the possibility of low concentrations of hydrocodone in the urine of patients taking high doses of oxycodone.

6-Acetylmorphine Detected in the Absence of Morphine in Pain Management Patients

Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry was used to identify and confirm the presence of 6-acetylmorphine and morphine in 22,361 urines of pain management patients. Thirty urines tested positive for 6-acetylmorphine above a cutoff of 10 ng/mL. Twenty-three percent of the patients with urinary concentrations of 6-acetylmorphine above 10 ng/mL had urinary morphine concentrations below 300 ng/mL.

Determination of illicit drug cutoff values in a pain patient population

BACKGROUND When properly selected, cutoff levels minimize the reporting of false negative and false positive test results and allow the laboratory to accurately determine the prevalence of marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine use. Selecting the ideal cutoff requires the collection of drug excretion data for a large patient population to determine the expected range of drug concentrations. The cutoff can then be set to capture a high percentage of positives at a concentration within the dynamic range of the method. We used quantitative urine drug excretion data to calculate cutoffs needed to best determine the presence of these illicit drugs in urine. METHODS This study used liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as the analytical method. The study group was the pain patient population which is well-known to have a significant incidence of use of these illicit drugs. Frequency distributions were plotted for the creatinine normalized and raw data for all positive specimens with values greater than or equal to the method limit of quantitation. A non-parametric 2.5% estimator was applied to each data set to establish the cutoff for each drug. RESULTS The urinary excretion data for the three drugs studied suggest cutoffs of approximately 30 ng/ml (benzoylecgonine), 10 ng/ml (carboxy-THC), and 50 ng/ml (methamphetamine) to identify 97.5% of the users of these drugs in this population. CONCLUSIONS Evaluation of urinary excretion data provides an objective method to validate the selection of cutoffs. These data provide additional support for the revised SAMHSA cutoffs which could increase the positivity rates for both benzoylecgonine and methamphetamine by 7%.

Analytical performance of three whole blood point-of-care lactate devices compared to plasma lactate comparison methods and a flow-injection mass spectrometry method

OBJECTIVES Point of care (POC) whole blood lactate testing may facilitate rapid detection of sepsis. We evaluated three POC methods against both plasma lactate comparison methods and a flow-injection mass spectrometric (MS) method. DESIGN AND METHODS Nova StatStrip, Abbott i-STAT CG4+ and Radiometer ABL90 POC lactate methods were evaluated against the mean of Cobas Integra 400 and Vitros 350 plasma lactate. POC methods were also compared to a flow-injection mass spectrometric assay measuring lactate in ZnSO4-precipitated whole blood extracts. Intra- and inter-assay precision was determined using quality control material. Method comparison included specimens from normal donors at rest, after exertion, and after spiking with lactic acid. RESULTS Intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation was <5% for i-STAT and ABL90; but ranged from 3.1-8.2% on two StatStrip meters. Mean (±SD) bias between POC and plasma lactate ranged from -0.2±0.9 (i-STAT and ABL90) to -0.4±1.2 (StatStrip) mmol/L. At concentrations >6mmol/L, all POC methods showed proportional negative bias compared to plasma methods; but this bias was not observed when compared to the MS method. Despite proportional negative bias, all POC methods demonstrated acceptable concordance (94-100%) with plasma lactate within the reference interval (<2.3mmol/L) and >4mmol/L, commonly used clinical cut-offs for detection of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS POC lactate methods demonstrate acceptable concordance with plasma lactate across commonly used clinical cut-offs for detection of sepsis. Due to systematic negative bias at higher lactate concentrations, POC and plasma lactate should not be used interchangeably to monitor patients with elevated lactate concentrations.

Circulating intact parathyroid hormone is suppressed at 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations >25 nmol/L in children.

Abstract Vitamin D status is best reflected by circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and D3 (25-OH-D). An adequate blood concentration of total 25-OH-D is commonly defined as that which maintains parathyroid hormone (PTH) within the normal range. Consensus from studies of adults with renal impairment indicates that 75 nmol/L of 25-OH-D maintains suppression of PTH. No similar consensus exists in children. We studied the correlation of PTH and 25-OH-D in 271 patients aged 2 months to 21 years (mean 11 years) in a tertiary care pediatric setting. Patients with renal impairment were excluded by elevated creatinine concentration and chart review. PTH did not significantly correlate with 25-OH-D concentrations >25 nmol/L. PTH was significantly elevated in specimens with <25 nmol/L of 25-OH-D (p=10–17). Using PTH suppression as indicator, these data suggest that 25-OH-D concentrations >25 nmol/L in children indicate vitamin D sufficiency.