Brigitte Andréo

Selection of chromosome-specific primers and their use in simple and double PRINS techniques for rapid in situ identification of human chromosomes

The PRimed IN Situ labeling (PRINS) technique is an alternative to in situ hybridization for rapid chromosome screening. We have defined and tested new specific oligonucleotide primers for alpha-satellite DNA of several chromosomes. When using a semiautomatic PRINS protocol, specific labeling was obtained in both metaphase cells and interphase nuclei in a 1-h reaction. PRINS may be a simple and reliable technique for rapidly detecting aneuploidies.

Use of the primed in situ labelling (PRINS) technique for a rapid detection of chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, X and Y

The primed in situ labelling (PRINS) technique is an alternative to in situ hybridization for chromosomal screening. We have developed a semi-automatic PRINS protocol, using a programmable thermocycler. The method has been successfully tested with specific primers for chromosomes, 13, 16, 18, 21, X and Y. Specific chromosome detection has been obtained on both metaphases and interphase nuclei. This suggests that PRINS may be a reliable technique for detecting aneuploidies and some chromosomal aberrations.

A polymorphic alpha satellite sequence specific for human chromosome 13 detected by oligonucleotide primed in situ labelling (PRINS).

The centromeric alpha satellite DNA subfamilies from chromosomes 13 and 21 are almost identical in sequence and cannot be easily distinguished by mean of probes for Southern blot or in situ hybridisation. We have used the oligonucleotide-primed in situ (PRINS) labelling technique with primers defined from the alpha satellite sequence of chromosome 13. One primer was found to label specifically the centromeric region of chromosomes 13 and allowed the detection of a polymorphism between two chromosome 13 homologues in one individual.

PNA on human sperm: a new approach for in situ aneuploidy estimation.

Peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) are a relatively new class of synthetic DNA mimics based on a peptide-like backbone. Since their introduction, PNA probes have become established as an efficient variation on the standard FISH procedure for chromosomal identification. In this report we have experimented with centromeric PNA probes on human sperm preparations. Both NaOH and DTT sperm decondensation procedures have been tested and comparative estimates of disomies X, Y and 1 have been performed in sperm from two donors using PNA, FISH and PRINS techniques. Similar results were obtained with the three methods, demonstrating the efficiency of PNA probes in the analysis of human sperm. The fast kinetics, stability and high specificity of PNA probes make PNA-based methodologies very valuable for in situ cytogenetic investigations.

FISH and PRINS, a strategy for rapid chromosome screening : application to the assessment of aneuploidy in human sperm

The co-utilization of FISH and PRINS techniques for in situ chromosome screening was tested on human sperm nuclei. We used a centromeric repeat probe specific for chromosome 4 for FISH. PRINS reactions were performed with alpha-satellite primers specific for either chromosomes 9 or chromosome 18. Double labeling was obtained and estimates of disomy rates were carried out for the three chromosomes.

Primed in situ (PRINS) labelling with Alu and satellite primers for rapid characterization of human chromosomes in hybrid cell lines.

The primed in situ (PRINS) labelling method was developed as an alternative to classical cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the characterization of interspecific somatic hybrids. Full karyotypes were performed by PRINS using Alu-specific primers to generate the painting of all human material associated with R-like banding. The representativity of individual human chromosomes was established using primers specific for discriminent α-satellite DNA sequences providing specific signals on the centromeres of the targeted chromosomes and corresponding spots in interphase nuclei. Using this methodology, a somatic hybrid clone was shown to be monochromosomal for the der(11) from a t(11;22) patient.

Direct detection of disomy in human sperm by the PRINS technique.

We report the use of the PRimedIN Situ (PRINS) labelling technique for the direct estimation of disomy rates for various chromosomes in human sperm. The PRINS technique provides a rapid and reliable method for chromosome screening since specific labelling may be obtained in less than 2 h. In the present study, the disomy rates of chromosomes 2, 5, 9, 12 and 18 were investigated. The incidences of disomy are similar for all these chromosomes, ranging from 0.27% to 0.33%. These findings suggest an equal distribution of aneuploidies among autosomes in human sperm.

Fetal cells in maternal blood: the use of primed in situ (PRINS) labelling technique for fetal cell detection and sex assessment

Prenatal diagnosis is presently performed following invasive procedures with variable risks of fetal loss; non‐invasive procedures using fetal cells in maternal blood would be welcome for the early detection of fetal sex or aneuploidy. We describe a simple and rapid protocol to detect fetal cells and thus to assess fetal sex. In a first step, nucleated blood cells were separated into mononuclear and polynuclear cells using a double density gradient centrifugation. In a second step primed in situ (PRINS) labelling technique was performed to label Y‐chromosomes. 15 samples were studied and correct gender assignment was made in 13/15. The number of labelled nuclei was higher in polynuclear cell phases than in mononuclear cell phases. Moreover, the polylobular aspect of labelled nuclei from polynuclear cell phases strongly suggested that they could belong to fetal polynuclear cells. The PRINS technique combines some advantages of FISH, such as visual assessment of in situ chromosome labelling and the powerful specificity and sensitivity of PCR. In association with a simple enrichment procedure it constitutes a rapid protocol for fetal cell detection, non‐invasive early prenatal sex assessment, and could further be applied to detect the main viable aneuploidies. Copyright

Cytogenetic analysis of meiotic segregation in sperm from two males heterozygous for reciprocal translocations using PRINS and humster techniques

The meiotic segregation patterns of 2 reciprocal translocations t(7;9)(q33;p21) and t(7;18)(q35;q11) were analyzed in sperm of 2 heterozygote carriers. Both sperm karyotyping and in situ PRINS labeling of sperm nuclei were performed on a sperm sample from each subject. Using the humster technique, 54 and 72 sperm chromosome complements were successfully analyzed for the t(7;9) and the t(7;18) respectively. The frequencies of alternate, adjacent 1, adjacent 2 and 3:1 segregations were 44.44%, 37.04%, 12.96% and 5.56% for the t(7;9) and 33.33%, 43.05%, 19.45% and 4.17% for the t(7;18). The PRINS procedure allowed the rapid screening of large samples of spermatozoa. However, alternate and adjacent 1 segregants were not discriminated because of the generation of centromeric signals. The segregation pattern was determined on 10,658 spermatozoa for the t(7;9) and 10,462 for the t(7;18). The distributions of segregants were similar to those obtained by sperm karyotyping. These data were pooled with results from 37 reciprocal translocations previously studied by sperm karyotyping and 6 recently investigated by FISH. The analysis of these compiled data demonstrates the particularity of the production of imbalances in male gametes; independent of the predisposition for a type of imbalance at term, there is a preferential production of adjacent 1 imbalance in sperm.

Interphasic Analysis of Aneuploidy in Cancer Cell Lines Using Primed In Situ Labeling

The primed in situ (PRINS) labeling technique has been adapted to chromosomal screening of interphasic tumoral cells. A panel of ten chromosome-specific alpha-satellite DNA primers was used to evaluate numerical chromosome abnormalities in two colon cancer cell lines (Caco-2 and HT-29) and in three of their subpopulations (PF11, TC7, and HT29-MTX). In each cell line, the copy number distribution for different chromosomes showed different patterns. The observation of significant variations in the chromosome constitutions between subpopulations derived from the same original tumor suggests the common occurrence of chromosome copy number heterogeneity in tumoral cell lines. This study demonstrates that the PRINS procedure offers a simple and reliable method for in situ chromosomal screening, which could be efficiently used for karyotypic analysis of tumoral cells.