Brigitte Henrica Wilhelmina Faas

The R0Har Rh:33 phenotype results from substitution of exon 5 of the RHCE gene by the corresponding exon of the RHD gene

The highly polymorphic Rh (Rhesus) system is encoded by two homologous genes, one encoding the D polypeptide and the other the CcEe polypeptides. Partial D antigens may be caused by gene rearrangements, deletions or point mutations. In this study the molecular basis of R0Har Rh:33, a Rh phenotype of low frequency, is described. The R0Har Rh:33 phenotype is characterized by partial expression of D, altered expression of e, absence of G and the presence of two antigens of low frequency: Rh33 and FPTT. Southern blot analysis, RHD typing by PCR and sequence analysis of Rh transcripts revealed that the RHD gene is absent in subjects with this phenotype. Apart from the expected RHCE transcripts, a new Rh transcript, RHc(D)(e), was identified in three unrelated individuals expressing R0Har Rh:33. The RHc(D)(e) transcript showed the same sequence as the RHce transcript, with the exception of exon 5, which was substituted by the corresponding exon of the RHD gene. A method for PCR‐based genotyping was developed to determine specifically the c(D)(e) haplotype. The c(D)(e) PCR proved to be a reliable alternative method for R0Har Rh:33 typing.

The genetic basis of a new partial D antigen: DDBT

The Rh system, the most polymorphic system on red cells, is genetically controlled by two different but highly homologous genes on chromosome 1. The RHCE gene encodes different RhCcEe polypeptides and the RHD gene encodes D antigens. It is well established that in D negative individuals the RHD gene is either absent or grossly deleted. The D antigen comprises at least nine serologically defined D epitopes. The D antigen can be divided into different partial D categories, reflecting a different pattern of specific D epitopes.

Lower antigen site density and weak D immunogenicity cannot be explained by structural genomic abnormalities or regulatory defects of the RHD gene.

BACKGROUND: The weak D phenotype is characterized serologically by a weak or negative agglutination reaction with polyclonal anti‐D in an immediate‐spin test. Agglutination is enhanced in the indirect antiglobulin test. Red cells that are typed weak D have a much lower number of apparently complete D antigens at their cell surface and are associated with considerably weaker immunogenicity than are red cells with normal D. In a previous study, the number of D sites per cell was determined in eight unrelated weak D individuals to range from 490 to 1870 D sites per cell, which corresponded to 4 to 14.2 percent of the number of D sites in CcDee samples. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The RHD gene was investigated for structural abnormalities by Southern blot experiments and polymerase chain reaction‐based RHD typing in these individuals. In addition, abnormalities in the transcription process were studied by sequence analysis of RH transcripts and by comparing the relative amounts of RHD mRNA in weak D to those in CcDee, CcDEe, and ‐D‐ samples by using a semiquantitative reverse transcriptase‐ polymerase chain reaction analysis. RESULTS: The RHD gene in weak D phenotypes does not show any abnormalities at either the genomic or the transcriptional level when compared to the RHD gene in normal D phenotypes. CONCLUSION: The weaker immunogenicity of weak D is not explained by structural difference in the RHD gene itself. The weaker expression of D might be caused by factors involved in the Rh‐related complex or by an as yet unidentified suppressor gene. This study supports the concept that weak D phenotypes carry complete D polypeptides and reflect a quantitative rather than a qualitative variation of D.

Partial expression of RHc on the RHD polypeptide

BACKGROUND: In the human Rh blood group system, c is, after D, the most immunogenic antigen.

Rhd and C/cE/e genotyping in Slovenian population

Abstract The Rhesus (Rh) blood group system is, after ABO, clinically most important. Alloantibodies directed against Rh antigens are the major cause of a haemolytic disease of newborn (HDN) and of transfusion reactions. In search for novel methods for Rh genotyping we started to compare Rh genotypes identified from different tissues and Rh phenotypes. Genotypes determined from blood samples with PCR based RhD, C/c and E/e genotyping methods were compared with serologically identified phenotypes (N=32). With two exceptions the results of phenotyping and genotyping were in concordance. Two Rh serotypes from a Slovenian family that were unexpected according to the Mendelian laws were characterised genotypically. The two family members were suspected to have a chromosomal deletion on RH gene locus.