Brigitte Maisonneuve

The Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E Controls Lettuce Susceptibility to the Potyvirus Lettuce mosaic virus

The eIF4E and eIF(iso)4E cDNAs from several genotypes of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) that are susceptible, tolerant, or resistant to infection by Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV; genus Potyvirus) were cloned and sequenced. Although Ls-eIF(iso)4E was monomorphic in sequence, three types of Ls-eIF4E differed by point sequence variations, and a short in-frame deletion in one of them. The amino acid variations specific to Ls-eIF4E1 and Ls-eIF4E2 were predicted to be located near the cap recognition pocket in a homology-based tridimensional protein model. In 19 lettuce genotypes, including two near-isogenic pairs, there was a strict correlation between these three allelic types and the presence or absence of the recessive LMV resistance genes mo11 and mo12. Ls-eIF4E1 and mo11 cosegregated in the progeny of two separate crosses between susceptible genotypes and an mo11 genotype. Finally, transient ectopic expression of Ls-eIF4E restored systemic accumulation of a green fluorescent protein-tagged LMV in LMV-resistant mo12 plants and a recombinant LMV expressing Ls-eIF4E° from its genome, but not Ls-eIF4E1 or Ls-eIF(iso)4E, accumulated and produced symptoms in mo11 or mo12 genotypes. Therefore, sequence correlation, tight genetic linkage, and functional complementation strongly suggest that eIF4E plays a role in the LMV cycle in lettuce and that mo11 and mo12 are alleles coding for forms of eIF4E unable or less effective to fulfill this role. More generally, the isoforms of eIF4E appear to be host factors involved in the cycle of potyviruses in plants, probably through a general mechanism yet to be clarified.

Sexual and somatic hybridization in the genus Lactuca

Various genes for disease resistance identified in wild Lactuca are difficult, even impossible to exploit in lettuce breeding, due to sexual incompatibility between L. sativa and wild Lactuca sp. We adapted two cellular biology techniques to overcome these interspecific barriers: in vitro embryo rescue and protoplast fusion. In vitro rescue of immature embryos was used successfully for sexual hybridization between L. sativa and L. virosa. Vigorous hybrid plants were produced between L. sativa and seven accessions of L. virosa. Protoplast fusion permitted the regeneration of somatic hybrids between L. sativa and either L. tatarica or L. perennis. Hybrids between L. sativa and L. tatarica were backcrossed to L. sativa.

Successful Gene Tagging in Lettuce Using the Tnt1 Retrotransposon from Tobacco

The tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) element Tnt1 is one of the few identified active retrotransposons in plants. These elements possess unique properties that make them ideal genetic tools for gene tagging. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of gene tagging using the retrotransposon Tnt1 in lettuce (Lactuca sativa), which is the largest genome tested for retrotransposon mutagenesis so far. Of 10 different transgenic bushes carrying a complete Tnt1 containing T-DNA, eight contained multiple transposed copies of Tnt1. The number of transposed copies of the element per plant was particularly high, the smallest number being 28. Tnt1 transposition in lettuce can be induced by a very simple in vitro culture protocol. Tnt1 insertions were stable in the progeny of the primary transformants and could be segregated genetically. Characterization of the sequences flanking some insertion sites revealed that Tnt1 often inserted into genes. The progeny of some primary transformants showed phenotypic alterations due to recessive mutations. One of these mutations was due to Tnt1 insertion in the gibberellin 3β-hydroxylase gene. Taken together, these results indicate that Tnt1 is a powerful tool for insertion mutagenesis especially in plants with a large genome.

Coat protein gene-mediated protection in Lactuca sativa against lettuce mosaic potyvirus strains.

Lettuce mosaic potyvirus (LMV) can be very destructive on lettuce crops worldwide. The LMV strain 0 (LMV-0) coat protein (CP) gene was engineered for expression in plants. It was introduced into three susceptible cultivars of Lactuca sativa using an improved procedure for transformation and regeneration of lettuce, by co-cultivation of leaf explants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Several transformants accumulated detectable levels of LMV CP. The R1 progeny of twelve R0 transformants (four plants per cultivar) with T-DNA integration at one single locus, was studied for protection against LMV. The progeny from five R0 transformants showed resistance to LMV-0, with the effectiveness of resistance depending on the development stage of the plants at the time of inoculation. The R1 and R2 progeny from one of these R0 transformants, Cocarde-9a, were more extensively analysed. The homozygous but not the hemizygous R1 plants displayed protection to LMV-0. The R2 progeny from one homozygous R1 plant were shown to be resistant to infection by LMV-0 and other LMV strains. As previously observed in other cases of potyvirus sequence-mediated protection, a phenomenon of recovery was observed in some plants, as well as complete resistance. However, this recovery phenotype was not always maintained, as opposed to the previous described cases, leading to a late progression of viral infection.

The Use of Green Fluorescent Protein-Tagged Recombinant Viruses to Test Lettuce mosaic virus Resistance in Lettuce

ABSTRACT Seed certification and the use of cultivars containing one of two, probably allelic, recessive genes, mo1(1) and mo1(2), are the principal control methods for Lettuce mosaic virus (LMV) in lettuce. Although for a few LMV isolates, mo1(2) confers resistance with most isolates, the genes mo1(1) or mo1(2) confer a tolerance, and virus accumulation is readily detected in mo1-carrying plants. This phenotype complicates evaluation of the resistance status, in particular for mo1(1), for which there are no viral strains against which a true resistance is expressed. Two green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged viruses were constructed, derived from a non-resistance breaking isolate (LMV-0) and from a resistance-breaking isolate (LMV-E). An evaluation of 101 cultivars of known status was carried out with these recombinant viruses. Using the LMV-0-derived recombinant, identification of mo1-carrying cultivars was simple because, contrary to its wild-type parent, systemic movement of LMV-0-GFP was abolished in resistant plants. This assay detected four cases of misidentification of resistance status. In all these cases, further tests confirmed that the prior resistance status information was incorrect, so that a 100% correlation was observed between LMV-0-GFP behavior and the mo1 resistance status. Similarly, the LMV-E-derived recombinant allowed the identification of mo1(2) lettuce lines because its systemic movement was restricted in mo1(2) lines but not in susceptible or in mo1(1) lines. The tagged viruses were able to systemically invade another host, pea, irrespective of its resistance status against another member of the genus Potyvirus, Pea seed-borne mosaic virus. The use of these recombinant viruses could therefore greatly facilitate LMV resistance evaluation and speed up lettuce breeding programs.

A Lactuca universal hybridizer, and its use in creation of fertile interspecific somatic hybrids

A Lactuca sativa cv. Ardente line heterozygous for a gene encoding resistance to kanamycin, a positive and dominant trait, was crossed with cv. Girelle, which is heterozygous for a recessive albinism marker. The resulting seeds yielded 25% albino seedlings, of which 50% were also resistant to kanamycin. Such plantlets (KR, a) grown in vitro were used for preparation of universal hybridizer protoplasts, since green buds that can develop on kanamycin containing-medium should result from fusion with any wild-type protoplast. To test the practicability of this selection scheme, we fused L. sativa KR, a protoplasts with protoplasts derived from various wild Lactuca as well as various other related species. Protoplast-derived cell colonies were selected for resistance to kanamycin at the regeneration stage. Green buds were regenerated after fusion with protoplasts of L. tatarica and of L. perennis. So far, 9 interspecific hybrid plants have been characterized morphologically. In addition, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis with selected primers confirmed that these plants are indeed interspecific hybrids. Some plants are female-fertile and production of backcross progenies with L. sativa is in progress. Since many desirable traits such as resistances to viruses, bacteria and fungi (Bremia lactucae) have been characterized in wild Lactuca species, the use of somatic hybridization in breeding programmes now appears a practical possibility.

Lettuce cropping with less pesticides. A review

Agricultural intensification has increased crop productivity but decreased agroecosystem services. Agricultural intensification is occurring notably for horticultural crops such as lettuce. In conventional agriculture, lettuce protection is achieved mostly by preventive applications of pesticides with about eight treatments for a 60–90-day-long cycle in the Mediterranean region. However, new sustainable control strategies are needed due to pesticide impact on environment and human health, emerging pesticide resistance, and stricter policies on levels of pesticide residues in food. Here, we review knowledge and methods allowing to grow lettuce with less pesticides. Advances shown are based on pest ecology and pathogen control by the agroecosystem. The major points are as follows: (1) pest and pathogen community composition depends partly on climatic conditions. The identification of pests and pathogens that can threaten the crop is the first step to design innovative lettuce cropping systems less dependent on pesticides. (2) The numerous alternative techniques currently available should be combined to control lettuce pests and pathogens. The effects of alternative techniques on non-target organisms including non-target pests are poorly known so far. (3) Designing sustainable systems requires taking into account ecological interactions and suitability of different management techniques of low impact.

Virus Susceptibility and Resistance in Lettuce

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) is a widely cultivated crop. Historically, the ancient Egyptians cultivated lettuce for its seed oil, which they believed had relaxing and aphrodisiac properties. Later, the Victorian English and others used its latex as a substitute for opium (“lactucarium”). Although stem lettuce is still cultivated in some Asian countries, lettuce is nowadays best known as a leafy vegetable and a raw ingredient in salads (Ryder, 1999; Maisonneuve, 2003). Lettuce is a member of the family Asteraceae in the subfamily Cichorioideae and the tribe Lactuceae. The family Asteraceae also contains such crops as endive, chicory, artichoke, sunflower, safflower and many ornamental plants such as Chrysanthemum, Gazania, Osteospermum, etc. Lettuce shows a broad phenotypic diversity with several distinct horticultural types identified such as crisphead (or iceberg lettuce), romaine (cos lettuce), leaf lettuce, Batavia and butterhead lettuce (Ryder, 1999; Maisonneuve, 2003). L. sativa is closely related to its common relative L. serriola L. (wild or prickly lettuce) and, more distantly, to two other wild species, L. saligna. and L. virosa. Lettuce is a naturally self-pollinating species so that the principal breeding strategies used with this species are pedigree breeding and back-crossing. Because it is possible to produce interspecific crosses between L. sativa and the three other species of the compatibility group (L. serriola, L. saligna and L. virosa), these have sometimes been used in lettuce breeding programs, in particular as sources of resistance to pathogens and pests.