Brigitte Schiller

In-center hemodialysis six times per week versus three times per week

BACKGROUND In this randomized clinical trial, we aimed to determine whether increasing the frequency of in-center hemodialysis would result in beneficial changes in left ventricular mass, self-reported physical health, and other intermediate outcomes among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to undergo hemodialysis six times per week (frequent hemodialysis, 125 patients) or three times per week (conventional hemodialysis, 120 patients) for 12 months. The two coprimary composite outcomes were death or change (from baseline to 12 months) in left ventricular mass, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and death or change in the physical-health composite score of the RAND 36-item health survey. Secondary outcomes included cognitive performance; self-reported depression; laboratory markers of nutrition, mineral metabolism, and anemia; blood pressure; and rates of hospitalization and of interventions related to vascular access. RESULTS Patients in the frequent-hemodialysis group averaged 5.2 sessions per week; the weekly standard Kt/V(urea) (the product of the urea clearance and the duration of the dialysis session normalized to the volume of distribution of urea) was significantly higher in the frequent-hemodialysis group than in the conventional-hemodialysis group (3.54±0.56 vs. 2.49±0.27). Frequent hemodialysis was associated with significant benefits with respect to both coprimary composite outcomes (hazard ratio for death or increase in left ventricular mass, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.82; hazard ratio for death or a decrease in the physical-health composite score, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.92). Patients randomly assigned to frequent hemodialysis were more likely to undergo interventions related to vascular access than were patients assigned to conventional hemodialysis (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.73). Frequent hemodialysis was associated with improved control of hypertension and hyperphosphatemia. There were no significant effects of frequent hemodialysis on cognitive performance, self-reported depression, serum albumin concentration, or use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. CONCLUSIONS Frequent hemodialysis, as compared with conventional hemodialysis, was associated with favorable results with respect to the composite outcomes of death or change in left ventricular mass and death or change in a physical-health composite score but prompted more frequent interventions related to vascular access. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00264758.).

Frequent Hemodialysis Schedules Are Associated with Reduced Levels of Dialysis-induced Cardiac Injury (Myocardial Stunning)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recurrent hemodialysis (HD)-induced ischemic cardiac injury (myocardial stunning) is common and associated with high ultrafiltration (UF) requirements, intradialytic hypotension, long-term loss of systolic function, increased likelihood of cardiovascular events, and death. More frequent HD regimens are associated with lower UF requirements and improved hemodynamic tolerability, improved cardiovascular outcomes, and reduced mortality compared with conventional thrice-weekly HD. This study investigated the hypothesis that modification of UF volume and rate with more frequent HD therapies would abrogate dialysis-induced myocardial stunning. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A cross-sectional study of 46 patients established on hemodialysis >3 months compared four groups receiving the current range of quotidian therapies: conventional thrice-weekly HD (CHD3); more-frequent HD five to six times/week in a center (CSD) and at home (HSD); and home nocturnal HD (HN). Serial echocardiography quantitatively assessed regional systolic function to identify intradialytic left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs). Cardiac troponin T (cTnT), N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and inflammatory markers were quantified. RESULTS More frequent HD regimens were associated with lower UF volumes and rates compared with CHD3. Intradialytic fall in systolic BP was reduced in CSD and HSD groups and abolished in HN group. Mean RWMAs per patient reduced with increasing dialysis intensity (CHD3 > CSD > HSD > HN). Home-based groups demonstrated lower high-sensitivity C-reative protein levels, with trends to lower cTnT and NT-proBNP levels in the more frequent groups. CONCLUSIONS Frequent HD regimes are associated with less dialysis-induced myocardial stunning compared with conventional HD. This may contribute to improved outcomes associated with frequent HD therapies.

Ferumoxytol as an Intravenous Iron Replacement Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Intravenous iron is a key component of anemia management for chronic kidney disease (CKD). Ferumoxytol is a unique intravenous iron product that can be administered as a rapid injection in doses up to 510 mg. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS This was a randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter Phase 3 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous ferumoxytol compared with oral iron. Anemic patients with CKD stage 5D on hemodialysis and on a stable erythropoiesis-stimulating agent regimen received either two injections of 510 mg of ferumoxytol within 7 d (n = 114) or 200 mg elemental oral iron daily for 21 d (n = 116). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in hemoglobin from baseline to day 35. Safety was closely monitored. RESULTS Ferumoxytol resulted in a mean increase in hemoglobin of 1.02 +/- 1.13 g/dl at day 35 compared with 0.46 +/- 1.06 g/dl with oral iron (P = 0.0002). Twice as many ferumoxytol-treated patients than oral iron-treated patients achieved a > or =1 g/dl hemoglobin increase at day 35 (P = 0.0002). There was a greater mean increase in transferrin saturation (TSAT) with ferumoxytol compared with oral iron at day 35 (P < 0.0001). The larger hemoglobin increase after ferumoxytol compared with oral iron at day 35 persisted after adjustment for baseline hemoglobin, TSAT, and serum ferritin. Overall adverse event rates were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS In patients on hemodialysis, rapid intravenous injection of 510 mg of ferumoxytol led to significantly greater hemoglobin increases compared with oral iron, with comparable tolerability.

At-home short daily hemodialysis improves the long-term health-related quality of life

Patients with chronic kidney disease treated by in-center conventional hemodialysis (3 times per week) have significant impairments in health-related quality of life measures, which have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. FREEDOM is an ongoing prospective cohort study measuring the potential benefits of at-home short daily (6 times per week) hemodialysis. In this interim report we examine the long-term effect of short daily hemodialysis on health-related quality of life, as measured by the SF-36 health survey. This was administered at baseline, 4 and 12 months after initiation of short daily hemodialysis to 291 participants (total cohort), of which 154 completed the 12-month follow-up (as-treated cohort). At the time of analysis, the mean age was 53 years, 66% were men, 58% had an AV fistula, 90% transitioned from in-center hemodialysis, and 45% had diabetes mellitus. In the total cohort analysis, both the physical- and mental-component summary scores improved over the 12-month period, as did all 8 individual domains of the SF-36. The as-treated cohort analysis showed similar improvements with the exception of the role-emotional domain. Significantly, in the as-treated cohort, the percentage of patients achieving a physical-component summary score at least equivalent to the general population more than doubled. Hence, at-home short daily hemodialysis is associated with long-term improvements in various physical and mental health-related quality of life measures.

Impact of Short Daily Hemodialysis on Restless Legs Symptoms and Sleep Disturbances

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Restless legs syndrome (RLS) and sleep disturbances are common among in-center hemodialysis patients and are associated with increased morbidity/mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS The FREEDOM study is an ongoing prospective cohort study investigating the benefits of home short daily hemodialysis (SDHD) (6 times/week). In this interim report, we examine the long-term effect of SDHD on the prevalence and severity of RLS, as measured by the International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Study Group rating scale, and sleep disturbances, as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study sleep survey. RESULTS 235 participants were included in this report (intention-to-treat cohort), of which 127 completed the 12-month follow-up (per-protocol cohort). Mean age was 52 years, 55% had an arteriovenous fistula, and 40% suffered from RLS. In the per-protocol analysis, among patients with RLS, the mean IRLS score improved significantly at month 12, after adjustment for use of RLS-related medications (18 versus 11). Among patients with moderate-to-severe RLS (IRLS score ≥15), there was an even greater improvement in the IRLS score (23 versus 13). The intention-to-treat analysis yielded similar results. Over 12 months, there was decline in the percentage of patients reporting RLS (35% versus 26%) and those reporting moderate-to-severe RLS (59% versus 43%). There was a similar and sustained 12-month improvement in several scales of the sleep survey, after adjustment for presence of RLS and use of anxiolytics and hypnotics. CONCLUSIONS Home SDHD is associated with long-term improvement in the prevalence and severity of RLS and sleep disturbances.

Peginesatide in patients with anemia undergoing hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND Peginesatide, a synthetic peptide-based erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), is a potential therapy for anemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. METHODS We conducted two randomized, controlled, open-label studies (EMERALD 1 and EMERALD 2) involving patients undergoing hemodialysis. Cardiovascular safety was evaluated by analysis of an adjudicated composite safety end point--death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, or serious adverse events of congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or arrhythmia--with the use of pooled data from the two EMERALD studies and two studies involving patients not undergoing dialysis. In the EMERALD studies, 1608 patients received peginesatide once monthly or continued to receive epoetin one to three times a week, with the doses adjusted as necessary to maintain a hemoglobin level between 10.0 and 12.0 g per deciliter for 52 weeks or more. The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from the baseline hemoglobin level to the mean level during the evaluation period; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was -1.0 g per deciliter or higher in the comparison of peginesatide with epoetin. The aim of evaluating the composite safety end point in the pooled cohort was to exclude a hazard ratio with peginesatide relative to the comparator ESA of more than 1.3. RESULTS In an analysis involving 693 patients from EMERALD 1 and 725 from EMERALD 2, peginesatide was noninferior to epoetin in maintaining hemoglobin levels (mean between-group difference, -0.15 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.30 to -0.01 in EMERALD 1; and 0.10 g per deciliter; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.26 in EMERALD 2). The hazard ratio for the composite safety end point was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.26) with peginesatide relative to the comparator ESA in the four pooled studies (2591 patients) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.77 to 1.17) in the EMERALD studies. The proportions of patients with adverse and serious adverse events were similar in the treatment groups in the EMERALD studies. The cardiovascular safety of peginesatide was similar to that of the comparator ESA in the pooled cohort. CONCLUSIONS Peginesatide, administered monthly, was as effective as epoetin, administered one to three times per week, in maintaining hemoglobin levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis. (Funded by Affymax and Takeda Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00597753 [EMERALD 1], NCT00597584 [EMERALD 2], NCT00598273 [PEARL 1], and NCT00598442 [PEARL 2].).

Dialysate sodium and sodium gradient in maintenance hemodialysis: a neglected sodium restriction approach?

BACKGROUND A higher sodium gradient (dialysate sodium minus pre-dialysis plasma sodium) during hemodialysis (HD) has been associated with sodium loading; however, its role is not well studied. We hypothesized that a sodium dialysate prescription resulting in a higher sodium gradient is associated with increases in interdialytic weight gain (IDWG), blood pressure (BP) and thirst. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study on 1084 clinically stable patients on HD. A descriptive analysis of the sodium prescription was performed and clinical associations with sodium gradient were analyzed. RESULTS The dialysate sodium prescription varied widely across dialysis facilities, ranging from 136 to 149 mEq/L, with a median of 140 mEq/L. The mean pre-HD plasma sodium was 136.7 ± 2.9 mEq/L, resulting in the majority of subjects (n = 904, 83%) being dialyzed against a positive sodium gradient, while the mean sodium gradient was 4.6 ± 4.4 mEq/L. After HD, the plasma sodium increased in nearly all patients (91%), reaching a mean post-HD plasma sodium of 141.3 ± 2.5 mEq/L. We found a direct correlation between IDWG and sodium gradient (r = 0.21, P < 0.0001). After adjustment for confounders and clustering by facilities, the sodium gradient was independently associated with IDWG (70 g/mEq/L, P < 0.0001). There were no significant associations among sodium gradient and BP, whether measured as pre-HD systolic (r = -0.02), diastolic (r = -0.06) or mean arterial pressure (r = -0.04). Post-HD thirst was directly correlated with sodium gradient (r = 0.11, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION Sodium gradient is associated with statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in IDWG in stable patients on HD.

Determinants of left ventricular mass in patients on hemodialysis: Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Trials.

Background— An increase in left ventricular mass (LVM) is associated with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease. Methods and Results— The Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Daily Trial randomized 245 patients to 12 months of 6 times per week daily in-center hemodialysis or conventional hemodialysis; the FHN Nocturnal Trial randomized 87 patients to 12 months of 6 times per week nocturnal hemodialysis or conventional hemodialysis. The main cardiac secondary outcome was change in LVM. In each trial, we examined whether several predefined baseline demographic or clinical factors as well as change in volume removal, blood pressure, or solute clearance influenced the effect of frequent hemodialysis on LVM. In the Daily Trial, frequent hemodialysis resulted in a significant reduction in LVM (13.1 g; 95% CI, 5.0–21.3 g; P=0.002), LVM index (6.9 g/m2; 95% CI, 2.4–11.3 g/m2; P=0.003), and percent change in geometric mean of LVM (7.0%; 95% CI, 1.0%–12.6; P=0.02). Similar trends were noted in the Nocturnal Trial but did not reach statistical significance. In the Daily Trial, a more pronounced effect of frequent hemodialysis on LVM was evident among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy at baseline. Changes in LVM were associated with changes in blood pressure (conventional hemodialysis: R=0.28, P=0.01, daily hemodialysis: R=0.54, P<0.001) and were not significantly associated with changes in other parameters. Conclusions— Frequent in-center hemodialysis reduces LVM. The benefit of frequent hemodialysis on LVM may be mediated by salutary effects on blood pressure. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00264758.Background— An increase in left ventricular mass (LVM) is associated with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease. Methods and Results— The Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Daily Trial randomized 245 patients to 12 months of 6 times per week daily in-center hemodialysis or conventional hemodialysis; the FHN Nocturnal Trial randomized 87 patients to 12 months of 6 times per week nocturnal hemodialysis or conventional hemodialysis. The main cardiac secondary outcome was change in LVM. In each trial, we examined whether several predefined baseline demographic or clinical factors as well as change in volume removal, blood pressure, or solute clearance influenced the effect of frequent hemodialysis on LVM. In the Daily Trial, frequent hemodialysis resulted in a significant reduction in LVM (13.1 g; 95% CI, 5.0–21.3 g; P =0.002), LVM index (6.9 g/m2; 95% CI, 2.4–11.3 g/m2; P =0.003), and percent change in geometric mean of LVM (7.0%; 95% CI, 1.0%–12.6; P =0.02). Similar trends were noted in the Nocturnal Trial but did not reach statistical significance. In the Daily Trial, a more pronounced effect of frequent hemodialysis on LVM was evident among patients with left ventricular hypertrophy at baseline. Changes in LVM were associated with changes in blood pressure (conventional hemodialysis: R =0.28, P =0.01, daily hemodialysis: R =0.54, P <0.001) and were not significantly associated with changes in other parameters. Conclusions— Frequent in-center hemodialysis reduces LVM. The benefit of frequent hemodialysis on LVM may be mediated by salutary effects on blood pressure. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: [http://www.clinicaltrials.gov][1]. Unique identifier: [NCT00264758][2]. [1]: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. [2]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00264758&atom=%2Fcirccvim%2F5%2F2%2F251.atom

A Randomized Trial Comparing Gentamicin/Citrate and Heparin Locks for Central Venous Catheters in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND Central venous catheters (CVCs) are used for vascular access in hemodialysis patients who have no alternative access or are awaiting placement or maturation of a permanent access. The major complications of CVCs are catheter-related bloodstream infection and clotting in the catheter lumen. STUDY DESIGN Parallel-group, randomized, multicenter clinical trial, with patients blinded to study intervention. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS 16 free-standing dialysis facilities in Northern California belonging to a single provider. 303 adult maintenance hemodialysis patients who were using a tunneled cuffed CVC for vascular access. INTERVENTION The treatment group received an antibiotic lock containing gentamicin 320 μg/mL in 4% sodium citrate, whereas the control group received the standard catheter lock containing heparin 1,000 U/mL. Both groups received triple-antibiotic ointment on the catheter exit site during dressing changes at each dialysis treatment. OUTCOMES Catheter-related bloodstream infection and catheter clotting. MEASUREMENTS Catheter-related bloodstream infection was defined as the occurrence of symptoms consistent with bacteremia together with positive blood culture results in the absence of another obvious source of infection. Catheter clotting was measured as the rate of thrombolytic agent use required to maintain adequate blood flow. A single patient could contribute more than one infection or clotting episode. RESULTS The rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.91 episodes/1,000 catheter-days in the control group and 0.28 episodes/1,000 catheter-days in the treatment group (P = 0.003). The time to the first episode of bacteremia was significantly delayed (P = 0.005). The rates of tissue plasminogen activator use were similar in the treatment and control groups: 2.36 versus 3.42 events/1,000 catheter-days, respectively (P = 0.2). LIMITATIONS The requirement for dialysis facility staff to prepare the treatment intervention prevented a completely blinded study. CONCLUSION Gentamicin 320 μg/mL in 4% sodium citrate used as a routine catheter lock in CVCs in patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy markedly decreases the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection and is as effective as heparin 1,000 U/mL in preventing catheter clotting.

Safety and Effectiveness of Ferumoxytol in Hemodialysis Patients at 3 Dialysis Chains in the United States Over a 12-Month Period

BACKGROUND Intravenous (IV) iron is the treatment of choice for iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD). However, IV iron products have been associated with serious adverse events (SAEs), including anaphylactoid reactions. Ferumoxytol is an IV iron preparation that can be injected over a short period of time. Although randomized clinical trials support ferumoxytols efficacy and safety, additional insights may be drawn from the acquisition of long-term, repeat dosing efficacy and safety data in a real-world setting. OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to characterize the effectiveness and safety profile of ferumoxytol as administered to adult DD-CKD patients with IDA in a real-world setting. The ability of ferumoxytol to maintain hemoglobin (Hb), transferrin saturation (TSAT), and ferritin treatment targets established by the 2006 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines was determined in 3 medium-sized US-based dialysis chains. METHODS This retrospective, observational study was conducted to examine laboratory and dosing data for all patients who received any dose of ferumoxytol at 3 US-based dialysis chains over a 12-month period. Investigators and/or physicians from each of the chains also made independent determinations regarding the seriousness of any adverse event (AE). Special attention was paid to the incidence and types of AEs and SAEs that were potentially associated with ferumoxytol. RESULTS Over the 12-month observation period, 8666 patients (mean [SD] age in chains A, B and C, 63.9 [14.8], 63.9 [14.9] and 63.6 [15.1], respectively), were treated with 33,358 doses of ferumoxytol across the 3 chains. Treatment with ferumoxytol corresponded to an increased mean monthly Hb level relative to baseline (0.13-0.69 g/dL) and led to an increase in the proportion of patients maintained within the target Hb range of 10 to 12 g/dL (61%-72%). Ferumoxytol was also associated with increases in TSAT and ferritin that stabilized throughout the observation period. Incidence of AEs was similar across the 3 chains; between 0.07% and 1.77% of all patients treated at each chain experienced an AE associated with ferumoxytol administration. SAEs were reported in 0.2% of patients. The most common AEs reported (≥6 patients) were nausea (0.37% of patients), pruritus (0.29%), vomiting (0.25%), hypotension (0.21%), and dyspnea (0.20%). Two patients (0.02%) experienced anaphylactoid reactions. The AE profile of ferumoxytol remained consistent with that reported from controlled clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS These long-term data, which include repeat dosing in a large number of DD-CKD patients with IDA in a real-world setting, confirm the effectiveness of ferumoxytol in increasing and maintaining Hb levels within the target range and with favorable assessments of long-term safety.