Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
University College of Southeast Norway
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Hotspot
Dive into the research topics where Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad is active.
Publication
Featured researches published by Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad.
International Journal of Energy Production and Management | 2017
Nora Cecilie Ivarsdatter Furuvik; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Deep geologic injection of supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been widely used for improved oil recovery from depleted oilfields since early 1970s. The CO2 injection maintains the pressure, mobilize the oil and release the petroleum resources that would otherwise be inaccessible. In addition to improving the oil recovery, the CO2-EOR contributes to minimize the impact of CO2-emissions to the atmosphere. The injected CO2 will be remained trapped in the underground geological formations, as the CO2 replace the oil and water in the pores. Carbonate reservoirs are characterized by low permeability and high heterogeneity, resulting in early breakthrough of gas and water and hence low oil recovery. The presence of naturally fractures in carbonate reservoirs is a major problem for the oil industry using CO2-EOR, because significant amount of CO2 are recycled to the well, and thereby not distributes in the reservoir. This study focuses on CO2 injection into a naturally fractured carbonate reservoir, including near-well simulations of CO2-distribution in the rock matrix. The simulations are carried out using the reservoir simulation software Rocx in combination with OLGA. The simulations show that CO2-injection into a naturally fractured carbonate reservoir in combination with closing of the fractured zones result in good distribution of CO2 in the reservoir.
ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENT ASSESSMENT 2006 | 2016
Hildegunn H. Haugen; Nora Cecilie Ivarsdatter Furuvik; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Biomass is a renewable energy resource and can replace the use of fossil fuels, such as coal. Overgrown forests and fields are about to become a noticeable problem, because the rate of woodcutting is too low compared with the incremental growth of new forests. It is important to consider that there can be a time lag of many years related to the uptake of CO2 in the new biomass. The time lag is caused by planting of new growing plants and a long growing period. Organic materials can be used as raw material for the gasification process in a biomass combined heat and power plant. Combined heat and power systems (CHP), produce electric energy and thermal energy far more efficiently and with lower emissions than systems where electricity and thermal energy is produced separately. Based on the measured HHV and the density of the different types of wood, the daily need of fuel in a 10 MW power plant was calculated. Oak corresponds to a need of 70.8 m3/day. Pine, birch and spruce correspond to 88.7 m3/day, 78.1 m3/day and 98.2 m3/day respectively. Characterization of biomass from wood is studied. Chips from oak, birch, pine, and spruce were used as raw materials to find the gasification and the combustion properties of the wood. Analyses of pulverized wood chips from oak, pine, birch and spruce were performed in a bomb calorimeter, thermogravimetric analyzer and muffle furnace. Important factors that influence the gasification and the combustion properties of biomass are moisture, heating value, content of volatile components and ash residue. The heating values of oak, pine, birch and spruce were measured to 17.7 MJ/kg, 19.1 MJ/kg, 17.6 MJ/kg and 18.7 MJ/kg respectively. The thermogravimetric analyses of wood indicate that biomass is highly reactive due to the fast pyrolysis process. The volatile matter content varied from 73–79%. The ash content from samples with long residence time was almost the same as for samples with shorter residence time. The ash content is less than 1% for all samples.
Chemical Engineering Science | 2018
Jana Chladek; Chameera K. Jayarathna; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad; Lars-André Tokheim
International Journal of Modeling and Optimization | 2017
Widuramini Sameendranath Amarasinghe; Chameera K. Jayarathna; Bovinda S Ahangama; Lars Andre Tokheim; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Chemical Engineering Journal | 2017
Cornelius Emeka Agu; Lars-André Tokheim; Marianne Sørflaten Eikeland; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Powder Technology | 2019
Chameera K. Jayarathna; Michael Balfe; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad; Lars-André Tokheim
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research | 2018
Cornelius Emeka Agu; Christoph Pfeifer; Marianne Sørflaten Eikeland; Lars-André Tokheim; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Proceedings of the 58th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 58) Reykjavik, Iceland, September 25th – 27th, 2017 | 2017
Janitha Chandimal Bandara; Marianne Sørflaten Eikeland; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Proceedings of the 58th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 58) Reykjavik, Iceland, September 25th – 27th, 2017 | 2017
Janitha Chandimal Bandara; Marianne Sørflaten Eikeland; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Proceedings of the 58th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 58) Reykjavik, Iceland, September 25th – 27th, 2017 | 2017
Prasanna Welahettige; Bernt Lie; Knut Vaagsaether; Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad
Collaboration
Dive into the Britt Margrethe Emilie Moldestad's collaboration.
Nora Cecilie Ivarsdatter Furuvik
University College of Southeast Norway
View shared research outputs