Britt-Marie Larsson
Karolinska Institutet
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Britt-Marie Larsson.
Thorax | 1998
Lena Palmberg; Britt-Marie Larsson; Per Malmberg; Kjell Larsson
BACKGROUND Exposure to swine dust causes an intense airway inflammation with increased levels of interleukin 8 (IL-8) and predominantly neutrophils in the nasal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids of healthy human subjects. It is not clear which components in the swine house environment are responsible for the airway reaction. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effect in vitro of swine dust components on human alveolar macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells. METHODS Normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE), human pulmonary epithelial carcinoma cell line (A549), and human alveolar macrophages were stimulated with swine dust, lipopolysaccharides (LPS; present in Gram negative bacteria), grain dust (swine feed components), and glucans (a structural component of fungi) in a dose response manner (1–100 μg/ml). RESULTS Swine dust at a concentration of 100 μg/ml increased IL-8 production 20 fold in NHBE cells, 28 fold in A549 cells, and 15 fold in macrophages. LPS (100 μg/ml) stimulated all three cell types significantly, in macrophages to the same extent as swine dust, but in NHBE and A549 cells swine dust was 5–8 times as potent. Grain dust (100 μg/ml) had no effect in A549 cells but stimulated NHBE cells and macrophages. Glucans (100 μg/ml) stimulated A549 cells and macrophages but not NHBE cells. Both glucans and grain dust were weaker stimuli than swine dust and LPS. The LPS content of swine dust solution was 2.16 (0.2) ng/100 μg and of grain dust was 0.53 (0.04) ng/100 μg. CONCLUSIONS Swine dust is a strong stimulus for IL-8 production in both bronchial epithelial cells and human alveolar macrophages, whereas LPS has different potency in these cells.
Inflammation | 1999
Britt-Marie Larsson; Kjell Larsson; Per Malmberg; Lena Palmberg
Background and Objective: Inhalation of dust from swine confinement buildings results in an acute inflammatory reaction in the respiratory tract. The dust has a high microbial content, dominated by Gram positive bacteria. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the significance of bacteria in the induction of IL-6 and IL-8 release from respiratory epithelial cells and alveolar macrophages. The results would give an indication to what extent the bacteria contribute to the toxic inflammation following exposure to swine dust. Methods: Epithelial cells from a human lung carcinoma cell line (A549) and human alveolar macrophages obtained from healthy subjects by bronchoalveolar lavage, were stimulated with swine dust, LPS, one Gram negative and four Gram positive bacteria strains. The dose-response release of IL-6 and IL-8 were studied. In addition, a bacteria-free supernatant was prepared from each strain and used for stimulation. Results: With a few exceptions, a dose-dependent IL-6 and IL-8 release was demonstrated from both cell types after stimulation with bacteria. In epithelial cells, Escherichia coli was the most potent bacteria at the highest concentration of 400 bacteria/cell regarding secretion of both IL-6 and IL-8 (P < 0.001), followed by Staphylococcus hominis and Staphylococcus lentus. In alveolar macrophages, S. lentus was the most potent strain (P < 0.001) in inducing cytokine release (P < 0.001), followed by S. hominis and E. coli concerning IL-6 secretion or Micrococcus luteus and E. coli with respect to IL-8 secretion (P < 0.001). Differences in potency between the various bacteria could be demonstrated, both within the two cell types as well as between the epithelial cells and macrophages. Bacteria-free supernatants were also able to induce cytokine release in both cell types. In macrophages the supernatants were even more potent stimuli than whole bacteria. Conclusions: The results indicate that bacteria or bacterial products could be an important contributing factor to the inflammatory reaction following exposure to swine dust.
Aiha Journal | 2002
Stephen J. Reynolds; Peter S. Thorne; Kelley J. Donham; Elizabeth A. Croteau; Kevin M. Kelly; Daniel M. Lewis; Mike Whitmer; Dick Heederik; Jeroen Douwes; Ian Connaughton; Sharon Koch; Per Malmberg; Britt-Marie Larsson; Donald K. Milton
Endotoxins from gram-negative bacteria pose a significant respiratory hazard. Establishing dose-response relationships is problematic because there are no standard procedures for sampling and analysis. The goal of this study was to compare endotoxin analyses in six laboratories using Limulus-based assays for analysis of organic dusts from three agricultural environments: chicken barns, swine barns, and corn processing facilities. For each dust generation experiment 14 side-by-side air samples were collected on 37-mm glass fiber filters at flows of 1.8 L/min. Each laboratory was randomly allocated two filters from each of seven experiments per dust type. Three laboratories used the QCL-1000 endpoint assay, and three used the kinetic-QCL method. To eliminate variability among different lots, a single lot of Limulus amebocyte lysate for endpoint assays and one similar lot for kinetic assays was provided. Precision of assays performed within labs was very good, with pooled coefficients of variation for replicate samples ranging from 1 to 11% over all labs and all dust types. There were significant differences between laboratories for all three dust types (p < 0.01). The pattern of differences between labs varied by dust type. For chicken dust, labs using the endpoint method reported higher results than those using kinetic methods. For swine and corn dusts, labs using the kinetic method reported the highest endotoxin values. For chicken dust, results from all labs except A and B were highly correlated (r = 0.86-1.00). For swine dust, only labs B and E, and C and D were correlated. For corn, A, B, and D were significantly correlated with most other labs. In conclusion, statistical differences in performance between laboratories were apparent and may be related to the extraction and analytical methods. The results of this study will be useful for standardization of sampling and analysis of airborne endotoxin in agriculture.
Inhalation Toxicology | 2012
Anna Klepczynska-Nyström; Alejandro Sanchez-Crespo; Martin Andersson; Rolf Falk; Anders Lundin; Britt-Marie Larsson; Magnus Svartengren
Context: Particulate air pollution, for example, from ultrafine (UF) particles, has negative health effects. However, there is still limited knowledge regarding the fate of inhaled particles in the human body. Objectives: To describe the normal lung deposition and 1 week particle retention of indium-111 labeled UF carbon particles in healthy subjects. Additionally, the possibility to extend the follow-up period to 4 weeks was also investigated for one of the subjects. Results: The cumulative pulmonary particle clearance 1 week post-administration, corrected for activity leaching and mucocilliary transport of activity deposited in the central airways, was 4.3 ± 8.5% (average ± standard deviation at group level), with marginal translocation of particles from lungs to blood, 0.3%. There was no observable elimination of particles from the body via urine. Seven days after exposure, the cumulated activity leaching was 3% (group level), which indicates a stable bonding between the particles and Indium-111. The volunteer followed for a total of 4 weeks, showed a cumulative decrease of activity retention in the lungs of 10.5%. After correction for activity leaching and clearance from central airway deposition, the estimated particle clearance was about 2%. Conclusions: No evidence for particle translocation from the lungs could be proven 7 days after exposure. It is possible to follow-up Indium-111 labeled UF carbon particles at least 1 month post-administration without increasing the administered activity.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | 1996
Wang Zhiping; Per Malmberg; Britt-Marie Larsson; Kjell Larsson; Lennart Larsson; Anita Saraf
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2013
Bettina Levänen; Nirav R. Bhakta; Patricia Torregrosa Paredes; Rebecca Barbeau; Stefanie Hiltbrunner; Joshua L. Pollack; C. Magnus Sköld; Magnus Svartengren; Johan Grunewald; Susanne Gabrielsson; Anders Eklund; Britt-Marie Larsson; Prescott G. Woodruff; David J. Erle; Åsa M. Wheelock
Journal of Environmental Monitoring | 2005
Stephen J. Reynolds; Donald K. Milton; Dick Heederik; Peter S. Thorne; Kelley J. Donham; Elizabeth A. Croteau; Kevin M. Kelly; Jeroen Douwes; Daniel M. Lewis; Mike Whitmer; Ian Connaughton; Sharon Koch; Per Malmberg; Britt-Marie Larsson; James A. Deddens; Anita Saraf; Lennart Larsson
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health | 2004
Britt-Marie Sundblad; Britt-Marie Larsson; Fernando Acevedo; Lena Ernstgård; Gunnar Johanson; Kjell Larsson; Lena Palmberg
American Journal of Industrial Medicine | 1999
Britt-Marie Larsson; Kjell Larsson; Per Malmberg; Lennart Mårtensson; Lena Palmberg
American Journal of Industrial Medicine | 2002
Britt-Marie Larsson; Kjell Larsson; Per Malmberg; Lena Palmberg