Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brooks R. Vostal is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brooks R. Vostal.


Intervention In School And Clinic | 2010

Using Active Listening to Improve Collaboration With Parents The LAFF Don’t CRY Strategy

David McNaughton; Brooks R. Vostal

251 Effective parent–teacher communication builds working relationships that can support strong home–school collaboration and improved educational outcomes (Gelfer & Perkins, 1987; Sheridan, Clarke, Knoche, & Edwards, 2007; Shivers, Howes, Wishard, & Ritchie, 2004; Turnbull & Turnbull, 1990). Christenson and Cleary (1990) repo rted that parents’ involvement improved students’ grades, test scores, attitudes, and behavior. These positive effects of parental involvement on students’ academic grades are apparent from the early years throughout high school (Keith et al., 1998). And, as teachers of students with disabilities know, the Individuals with Disabilities Educ ation Act (1990) emphasizes collaboration between parents and teachers, encouraging schools to recognize parents as key participants in educational decisions for their children (Turnbull & Turnbull, 1997). Bec ause many family members play important roles in providing care for a child, the term parent is used throughout this column to describe the family member or guardian who most typically communicates with teachers. Even though many teachers value the participation of parents, it can be challenging to communicate this positive intent. Pruitt, Wandry, and Hollums (1998) interviewed 78 parents and reported that many thought that both the quantity and the quality of communication bet ween parents and teachers should be improved. Several parents emphasized that teachers needed to use a “humane demeanor when discussing their children . . . interacting in an honest manner and treating them with dignity and respect” (p. 163). They found that parents wanted to know that professionals valued their contributions and suggestions about their children’s education. Martin et al. (2006) conducted observations of 109 middle and high school Individualized Education Program meetings and found that special education teachers talked 51% of the time, whereas family members talked only 15%. This lopsided ratio may be a product of the pressure teachers feel to report student progress to parents, but it does not leave much opportunity for parents to express their goals and interests. Parents may feel their concerns are not valued, eliminating any opportunities for meaningful collaboration (Valle & Aponte, 2002). Effective communication is central to authentic collaboration and relies on involving parents in the school


Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis | 2012

THE EFFECTS OF HIGH-PREFERENCE PROBLEMS ON THE COMPLETION OF NONPREFERRED MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS

David L. Lee; Brooke Lylo; Brooks R. Vostal; Youjia Hua

Failure to initiate and remain engaged in academic tasks can have long-lasting effects for students. In this study, we investigated the effects of high-preference sequences on both digits correct per minute and latency to initiate nonpreferred mathematics problems for 3 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. We found that high-preference sequences had negligible positive effects on rate of problem completion but had larger effects on problem initiation. This study replicates and extends prior work on the effects of high-preference sequences on mathematics problem initiation and completion.


Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals | 2018

Predicting College Completion Among Students With Learning Disabilities

Meifang Yu; Jeanne A. Novak; Matthew Ryan Lavery; Brooks R. Vostal; Julia M. Matuga

The authors analyzed National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2) data to examine the role of high school academic preparation and receipt of postsecondary academic support services (PASS) in predicting college completion among students with learning disabilities. Logistic regression analyses revealed that students who earned a 3.0 grade point average (GPA) in a college preparatory curriculum were more than twice as likely to complete college than those with a similar GPA who did not complete a college preparatory curriculum. Furthermore, among students who completed a college preparatory curriculum, earning a higher GPA and accessing PASS both dramatically increased the likelihood that they would complete college. Results underscore the importance of incorporating a college preparatory curriculum into transition planning for college-bound students with learning disabilities.


Beyond Behavior | 2011

Collecting Behavioral Data in General Education Settings: A Primer for Behavioral Data Collection.

David L. Lee; Brooks R. Vostal; Brooke Lylo; Youjia Hua


Learning Disabilities Research and Practice | 2008

A Content Analysis of Learning Disabilities Research & Practice: 1991–2007

Brooks R. Vostal; Charles A. Hughes; Kathy L. Ruhl; Elizabeth Benedek-Wood; Douglas D. Dexter


Reading Improvement | 2015

Effects of Oral Reading Fluency on Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders' Latency to Continue Reading

Brooks R. Vostal; David L. Lee


Journal of Curriculum and Instruction | 2014

Using a Mnemonic Strategy to Match Elements of Response to Intervention Lessons with Performance Assessment Requirements

Brooks R. Vostal; Trinka Messenheimer; David Hampton; Starr E. Keyes


Reading Improvement | 2017

Supplemental Computerized Reading Instruction in Oral Reading Fluency and Its Generalizable Effects on At-Risk Urban Second Graders.

Starr E. Keyes; Janet Jacobs; RaNae Bornhorst; Lenwood Gibson; Brooks R. Vostal


Archive | 2015

Preparing Teachers for Collaborative Communication:EvaluationofInstruction in an Active Listening Strategy

Brooks R. Vostal; David McNaughton; Katie Hoffman


Social Studies Review | 2014

Promoting Freedom Through Problem-Based Learning

Jonathan D. Bostic; Brooks R. Vostal; Brady Ruffer

Collaboration


Dive into the Brooks R. Vostal's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David L. Lee

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brooke Lylo

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David McNaughton

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles A. Hughes

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas D. Dexter

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeanne A. Novak

Bowling Green State University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge