Bruce A. Ebersole
Engineer Research and Development Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bruce A. Ebersole.
Monthly Weather Review | 2010
Shintaro Bunya; J. C. Dietrich; Joannes J. Westerink; Bruce A. Ebersole; J. M. Smith; J. H. Atkinson; Robert E. Jensen; Donald T. Resio; Richard A. Luettich; Clint Dawson; V. J. Cardone; Andrew T. Cox; Mark D. Powell; H. J. Westerink; H. J. Roberts
Abstract A coupled system of wind, wind wave, and coastal circulation models has been implemented for southern Louisiana and Mississippi to simulate riverine flows, tides, wind waves, and hurricane storm surge in the region. The system combines the NOAA Hurricane Research Division Wind Analysis System (H*WIND) and the Interactive Objective Kinematic Analysis (IOKA) kinematic wind analyses, the Wave Model (WAM) offshore and Steady-State Irregular Wave (STWAVE) nearshore wind wave models, and the Advanced Circulation (ADCIRC) basin to channel-scale unstructured grid circulation model. The system emphasizes a high-resolution (down to 50 m) representation of the geometry, bathymetry, and topography; nonlinear coupling of all processes including wind wave radiation stress-induced set up; and objective specification of frictional parameters based on land-cover databases and commonly used parameters. Riverine flows and tides are validated for no storm conditions, while winds, wind waves, hydrographs, and high wa...
Coastal Engineering | 2002
Ping Wang; Bruce A. Ebersole; Ernest R. Smith; Bradley D. Johnson
Temporal and spatial variations of surf-zone currents and suspended sediment concentrations were investigated at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Centers Large-scale Sediment Transport Facility (LSTF). A longshore-uniform fine-sand beach, 35 m alongshore, 20 m cross-shore, and 25 cm thick was placed in the facility for these experiments. Two unidirectional, long-crested irregular wave conditions were examined, one resulted in predominantly spilling breakers and one in plunging breakers. Waves and currents, and sediment concentrations were measured at 20 and 16 Hz, respectively, at various longshore and cross-shore locations and throughout the water column. Both currents and sediment concentrations exhibit great temporal and spatial variations in the surf zone. The variation patterns, however, of the longshore current, cross-shore current, and sediment concentration are substantially different. Caution should be exercised when averaging these parameters over time and space. For the two wave cases examined, the temporal variations of longshore current, including those at principal incident-wave frequencies, were relatively small across most of the surf zone. Over 70% of the variations are within approximately F60% of the mean value. The wave motion, with a strong peak at principal incident-wave frequencies, dominated the temporal variations of cross-shore current. Temporal variations of suspended sediment concentration under the irregular waves were episodic, characterized by occasional large values induced by suspension events or due to horizontal advection. The variance of the concentration at the peak incident-wave frequency was not significant except very near the bed. Time-averaged longshore-current profiles over the predominantly rippled sand bed were logarithmic in shape below the wave trough. Depth-averaged longshore current (excluding the portion of water column above wave trough) matched well with the current measured at an elevation of 1/3 of the water depth from the bed. Time-averaged cross-shore current profiles were characterized by an onshore mass flux near the surface, and a balancing offshore flow below the wave-trough level (undertow). Sediment concentration decreased very rapidly upward through the water column across most of the surf zone except at the plunging breaker line where relatively homogeneous concentration was measured throughout much of the water column above 4 cm from the bed. Depth-averaged sediment concentration over the range from 1 cm above the bed to the bottom of wave trough roughly equaled the concentration measured at an elevation from the bed equal to 20% of the still- water depth.
Coastal Engineering | 2001
David G. Hamilton; Bruce A. Ebersole
A large-scale laboratory facility for conducting research on surf-zone sediment transport processes has been constructed at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Successful execution of sediment transport experiments, which attempt to replicate some of the important coastal processes found on long straight beaches, requires a method for establishing the proper longshore current. An active pumping and recirculation system comprised of 20 independent pumps and pipelines is used to control the cross-shore distribution of the mean longshore current. Pumping rates are adjusted in an iterative manner to converge toward the proper settings, based on measurements along the beach. Two recirculation criteria proposed by Visser [Coastal Eng. 15 (1991) 563] were also used, and they provided additional evidence that the proper total longshore flow rate in the surf zone was obtained. The success of the external recirculation system and its operational procedure, and the degree of longshore uniformity achieved along the beach, are the subjects of this paper. To evaluate the performance of the recirculation system, and as a precursor to sediment transport experiments, two comprehensive test series were conducted on a concrete beach with straight and parallel contours (1:30 slope), one using regular waves and the other using irregular waves. In the regular wave case, the wave period was 2.5 s and the average wave height at breaking was approximately 0.25 m. In the irregular wave case, the peak wave period was 2.5 s and the significant breaking wave height was approximately 0.21 m. The longshore current recirculation system proved to be very effective in establishing uniform mean longshore currents along the beach in both cases. This facility and the data presented here are unique for the following reasons: (1) the high cross-shore resolution of the recirculation system and the ease with which changes can be made to the longshore current distribution, (2) the degree of longshore uniformity achieved as a percentage of the length of the basin (even near the downdrift boundary), (3) the scale of the wave conditions generated, and (4) the relatively gentle beach slope used in the experiments (compared to previous laboratory studies of the longshore current). Measured data are provided in an appendix for use in theoretical studies and numerical model development and validation.
Journal of Coastal Research | 2009
Ernest R. Smith; Ping Wang; Bruce A. Ebersole; Jun Zhang
Abstract Experiments were conducted in the Large-scale Sediment Transport Facility (LSTF) at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center to investigate the importance of wave height, period, and breaker type (spilling and plunging breakers) on total rate of longshore sediment transport (LST) and the cross-shore distribution of LST. Estimates computed by the CERC formula and Kamphius were compared to the accurately measured total LST rates. Several K-values were used with the CERC formula, including the recommended value of 0.39 and calculated values by Kamphuis and Readshaw, Ozhan, Bailard, and Del Valle et al. The recommended K-value and most of the calculated K-values overpredicted the measured total LST rates, but methods that included parameters to indicate breaker type gave good estimates. The Kamphuis and Readshaw equation, in which K is a function of surf similarity parameter, gave consistent estimates with measurements. The Kamphuis equation, which includes wave period and beach slope that in turn influences wave breaking, also compared well with the measurements. Additionally, the CERC formula has been used successfully if K is calibrated, and the formula gave excellent results if K was calibrated with measured data and applied to similar breaker types. The findings indicate that total LST rate is strongly influenced by breaker type. The cross-shore distribution of LST indicated three distinct zones of transport: the incipient breaker zone, the inner surf zone, and the swash zone. Transport in the incipient breaker zone was influenced by breaker type. Transport in the inner surf zone indicated that wave height was the dominating factor and independent of wave period. Swash zone transport, which accounted for a significant percentage of the total transport, showed a dependence on wave height, period, and beach slope.
Coastal Engineering | 2003
Ib A. Svendsen; Wenkai Qin; Bruce A. Ebersole
The main objective of the paper is to use the detailed measurements of wave and current motions in the Large-scale Sediment Transport Facility (LSTF) at the Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (CHL), ERDC, Vicksburg, to compare with model simulations and particularly to investigate the accuracy of two wave models used for driving nearshore circulation computations. The major questions asked are how accurate are the models? And how do the inevitable inaccuracies in the prediction of the wave quantities influence the current predictions? The LSTF is one of a few large-scale facilities around the world designed to accurately reproduce the 2-D horizontal flow and sediment conditions in the nearshore region of a littoral coast. The measurements include all relevant wave data such as wave heights, setup variations, 2-D current distributions across the basin, and a detailed cross-shore array of measurements of the 3-D current structures. The two wave model formulations used for the comparisons are versions of the kinematic wave model, one using sinusoidal the other using non-sinusoidal wave shapes both before and after wave breaking, as wave drivers in the quasi-3-D model SHORECIRC (SC). The comparisons with the measurements are aimed at providing an overall picture of both the flow conditions and the model performance. The discussions provide insight into the mechanisms behind the complex nearshore dynamics and demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of the two methods in a comprehensive comparison of available wave and current data. The comparisons also reveal that an essential requirement for a wave driver is its capability to represent the phase motion of the wave and its capability to correctly predict the phase speed of waves.
Natural Hazards | 2009
Ty V. Wamsley; Mary A. Cialone; Jane McKee Smith; Bruce A. Ebersole; Alison Sleath Grzegorzewski
Ocean Engineering | 2010
Bruce A. Ebersole; Joannes J. Westerink; Shintaro Bunya; J. C. Dietrich; Mary A. Cialone
Journal of Coastal Research | 2002
Ping Wang; Ernest R. Smith; Bruce A. Ebersole
This Digital Resource was created from scans of the Print Resource. | 2002
Ping Wang; Bruce A. Ebersole; Ernest R. Smith
This Digital Resource was created from scans of the Print Resource | 2001
David G. Hamilton; Bruce A. Ebersole; Ernest R. Smith; Ping Wang