Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bruce A.J. Ponder is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bruce A.J. Ponder.


American Journal of Human Genetics | 1998

Genetic Heterogeneity and Penetrance Analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes in Breast Cancer Families

Deborah Ford; Douglas F. Easton; Michael R. Stratton; StevenA Narod; David E. Goldgar; Peter Devilee; D.T. Bishop; Barbara L. Weber; Gilbert M. Lenoir; Jenny Chang-Claude; Hagay Sobol; M.D. Teare; Jeffrey P. Struewing; Adalgeir Arason; Siegfried Scherneck; Julian Peto; Timothy R. Rebbeck; Patricia N. Tonin; Susan L. Neuhausen; Rosa B. Barkardottir; J. Eyfjord; Henry T. Lynch; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Simon A. Gayther; J.M. Birch; Annika Lindblom; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Yves-Jean Bignon; Åke Borg; Ute Hamann

The contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to inherited breast cancer was assessed by linkage and mutation analysis in 237 families, each with at least four cases of breast cancer, collected by the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Families were included without regard to the occurrence of ovarian or other cancers. Overall, disease was linked to BRCA1 in an estimated 52% of families, to BRCA2 in 32% of families, and to neither gene in 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6%-28%), suggesting other predisposition genes. The majority (81%) of the breast-ovarian cancer families were due to BRCA1, with most others (14%) due to BRCA2. Conversely, the majority of families with male and female breast cancer were due to BRCA2 (76%). The largest proportion (67%) of families due to other genes was found in families with four or five cases of female breast cancer only. These estimates were not substantially affected either by changing the assumed penetrance model for BRCA1 or by including or excluding BRCA1 mutation data. Among those families with disease due to BRCA1 that were tested by one of the standard screening methods, mutations were detected in the coding sequence or splice sites in an estimated 63% (95% CI 51%-77%). The estimated sensitivity was identical for direct sequencing and other techniques. The penetrance of BRCA2 was estimated by maximizing the LOD score in BRCA2-mutation families, over all possible penetrance functions. The estimated cumulative risk of breast cancer reached 28% (95% CI 9%-44%) by age 50 years and 84% (95% CI 43%-95%) by age 70 years. The corresponding ovarian cancer risks were 0.4% (95% CI 0%-1%) by age 50 years and 27% (95% CI 0%-47%) by age 70 years. The lifetime risk of breast cancer appears similar to the risk in BRCA1 carriers, but there was some suggestion of a lower risk in BRCA2 carriers <50 years of age.


Genomics | 1992

Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: General amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primer

Ha˚kan Telenius; Nigel P. Carter; Charlotte E. Bebb; Magnus Nordenskjo¨ld; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Alan Tunnacliffe

A version of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), termed degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR (DOP-PCR), which employs oligonucleotides of partially degenerate sequence, has been developed for genome mapping studies. This degeneracy, together with a PCR protocol utilizing a low initial annealing temperature, ensures priming from multiple (e.g., approximately 10(6) in human) evenly dispersed sites within a given genome. Furthermore, as efficient amplification is achieved from the genomes of all species tested using the same primer, the method appears to be species-independent. Thus, for the general amplification of target DNA, DOP-PCR has advantages over interspersed repetitive sequence PCR (IRS-PCR), which relies on the appropriate positioning of species-specific repeat elements. In conjunction with chromosome flow sorting, DOP-PCR has been applied to the characterization of abnormal chromosomes and also to the cloning of new markers for specific chromosome regions. DOP-PCR therefore represents a rapid, efficient, and species-independent technique for general DNA amplification.


Nature Genetics | 2002

Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention

Paul Pharoah; Antonis C. Antoniou; Martin Bobrow; Ron Zimmern; Douglas F. Easton; Bruce A.J. Ponder

The knowledge of human genetic variation that will come from the human genome sequence makes feasible a polygenic approach to disease prevention, in which it will be possible to identify individuals as susceptible by their genotype profile and to prevent disease by targeting interventions to those at risk. There is doubt, however, regarding the magnitude of these genetic effects and thus the potential to apply them to either individuals or populations. We have therefore examined the potential for prediction of risk based on common genetic variation using data from a population-based series of individuals with breast cancer. The data are compatible with a log-normal distribution of genetic risk in the population that is sufficiently wide to provide useful discrimination of high- and low-risk groups. Assuming all of the susceptibility genes could be identified, the half of the population at highest risk would account for 88% of all affected individuals. By contrast, if currently identified risk factors for breast cancer were used to stratify the population, the half of the population at highest risk would account for only 62% of all cases. These results suggest that the construction and use of genetic-risk profiles may provide significant improvements in the efficacy of population-based programs of intervention for cancers and other diseases.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1998

Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Hereditary Ovarian Cancer

Steven A. Narod; Harvey A. Risch; Roxana Moslehi; Anne Dørum; Susan L. Neuhausen; Håkan Olsson; Diane Provencher; Paolo Radice; Gareth Evans; Susan Bishop; Jean Sébastien Brunet; Bruce A.J. Ponder; J.G.M. Klijn

Background Women with mutations in either the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene have a high lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Oral contraceptives protect against ovarian cancer in general, but it is not known whether they also protect against hereditary forms of ovarian cancer. Methods We enrolled 207 women with hereditary ovarian cancer and 161 of their sisters as controls in a case–control study. All the patients carried a pathogenic mutation in either BRCA1 (179 women) or BRCA2 (28 women). The control women were enrolled regardless of whether or not they had either mutation. Lifetime histories of oral-contraceptive use were obtained by interview or by written questionnaire and were compared between patients and control women, after adjustment for year of birth and parity. Results The adjusted odds ratio for ovarian cancer associated with any past use of oral contraceptives was 0.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 0.8). The risk decreased with increasing duration of use (P for trend, <0.001); use for six or...


Molecular Cell | 1998

Involvement of Brca2 in DNA Repair

Ketan J. Patel; Veronica Yu; Hyunsook Lee; Anne E. Corcoran; Fiona Thistlethwaite; Martin J. Evans; William H. Colledge; Lori Friedman; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Ashok R. Venkitaraman

Abnormalities precipitated by a targeted truncation in the murine gene Brca2 define its involvement in DNA repair. In culture, cells harboring truncated Brca2 exhibit a proliferative impediment that worsens with successive passages. Arrest in the G1 and G2/M phases is accompanied by elevated p53 and p21 expression. Increased sensitivity to genotoxic agents, particularly ultraviolet light and methylmethanesulfonate, shows that Brca2 function is essential for the ability to survive DNA damage. But checkpoint activation and apoptotic mechanisms are largely unaffected, thereby implicating Brca2 in repair. This is substantiated by the spontaneous accumulation of chromosomal abnormalities, including breaks and aberrant chromatid exchanges. These findings define a function of Brca2 in DNA repair, whose loss precipitates replicative failure, mutagen sensitivity, and genetic instability reminiscent of Bloom syndrome and Fanconi anemia.


Nature Genetics | 2003

The genetics and genomics of cancer

Allan Balmain; Joe W. Gray; Bruce A.J. Ponder

The past decade has seen great strides in our understanding of the genetic basis of human disease. Arguably, the most profound impact has been in the area of cancer genetics, where the explosion of genomic sequence and molecular profiling data has illustrated the complexity of human malignancies. In a tumor cell, dozens of different genes may be aberrant in structure or copy number, and hundreds or thousands of genes may be differentially expressed. A number of familial cancer genes with high-penetrance mutations have been identified, but the contribution of low-penetrance genetic variants or polymorphisms to the risk of sporadic cancer development remains unclear. Studies of the complex somatic genetic events that take place in the emerging cancer cell may aid the search for the more elusive germline variants that confer increased susceptibility. Insights into the molecular pathogenesis of cancer have provided new strategies for treatment, but a deeper understanding of this disease will require new statistical and computational approaches for analysis of the genetic and signaling networks that orchestrate individual cancer susceptibility and tumor behavior.


Nature Genetics | 2007

A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk

Angela Cox; Alison M. Dunning; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian; Malcolm Reed; Karen A. Pooley; Serena Scollen; Caroline Baynes; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Stephen J. Chanock; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A. Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Melissa C. Southey; John L. Hopper; Margaret McCredie; Graham G. Giles; Olivia Fletcher; Nichola Johnson; Isabel dos Santos Silva; Lorna Gibson; Stig E. Bojesen; Børge G. Nordestgaard; Christen K. Axelsson; Diana Torres; Ute Hamann; Christina Justenhoven; Hiltrud Brauch; Jenny Chang-Claude; Silke Kropp

The Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) has been established to conduct combined case-control analyses with augmented statistical power to try to confirm putative genetic associations with breast cancer. We genotyped nine SNPs for which there was some prior evidence of an association with breast cancer: CASP8 D302H (rs1045485), IGFBP3 −202 C → A (rs2854744), SOD2 V16A (rs1799725), TGFB1 L10P (rs1982073), ATM S49C (rs1800054), ADH1B 3′ UTR A → G (rs1042026), CDKN1A S31R (rs1801270), ICAM5 V301I (rs1056538) and NUMA1 A794G (rs3750913). We included data from 9–15 studies, comprising 11,391–18,290 cases and 14,753–22,670 controls. We found evidence of an association with breast cancer for CASP8 D302H (with odds ratios (OR) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval (c.i.): 0.85–0.94) and 0.74 (95% c.i.: 0.62–0.87) for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes, respectively, compared with common homozygotes; Ptrend = 1.1 × 10−7) and weaker evidence for TGFB1 L10P (OR = 1.07 (95% c.i.: 1.02–1.13) and 1.16 (95% c.i.: 1.08–1.25), respectively; Ptrend = 2.8 × 10−5). These results demonstrate that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles with small effects on risk can be identified, given sufficiently powerful studies.NOTE: In the version of this article initially published, there was an error that affected the calculations of the odds ratios, confidence intervals, between-study heterogeneity, trend test and test for association for SNP ICAM5 V301I in Table 1 (ICAM5 V301I); genotype counts in Supplementary Table 2 (ICAM5; ICR_FBCS and Kuopio studies) and minor allele frequencies, trend test and odds ratios for heterozygotes and rare homozygotes in Supplementary Table 3 (ICAM5; ICR_FBCS and Kuopio studies). The errors in Table 1 have been corrected in the PDF version of the article. The errors in supplementary information have been corrected online.


International Journal of Cancer | 1997

Family history and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Paul Pharoah; Nicholas E. Day; Stephen W. Duffy; Douglas F. Easton; Bruce A.J. Ponder

An increased risk of breast cancer in women with a family history of breast cancer has been demonstrated by many studies using a variety of study designs. However, the extent of this risk varies according to the nature of the family history (type of relative affected, age at which relative developed breast cancer and number of relatives affected) and may also vary according to age of the individual. The aim of our study was to identify all the published studies which have quantified the risk of breast cancer associated with a family history of the disease, and to summarise the evidence from these studies, with particular emphasis on age‐specific risks according to subject and relative age. Seventy‐four published studies were identified. The pooled estimate of relative risk (RR) associated with various family histories was as follows: any relative, RR = 1.9 (95% CI, 1.7‐2.0); a first‐degree relative, RR = 2.1 (CI = 2.0, 2.2); mother, RR = 2.0 (CI = 1.8, 2.1); sister, RR = 2.3 (CI = 2.1, 2.4); daughter, RR = 1.8 (CI = 1.6, 2.0); mother and sister, RR = 3.6 (CI = 2.5, 5.0); and a second‐degree relative, RR = 1.5 (CI = 1.4, 1.6). Risks were increased in subjects under age 50 and when the relative had been diagnosed before age 50. Int. J. Cancer 71: 800‐809, 1997.


Nature Genetics | 2000

Mutations truncating the EP300 acetylase in human cancers

Simon A. Gayther; Sarah J Batley; Lori Linger; Andy Bannister; Karen Thorpe; Suet-Feung Chin; Yataro Daigo; Paul Russell; Annie Wilson; Heidi M. Sowter; Joy D. A. Delhanty; Bruce A.J. Ponder; Tony Kouzarides; Carlos Caldas

The EP300 protein is a histone acetyltransferase that regulates transcription via chromatin remodelling and is important in the processes of cell proliferation and differentiation. EP300 acetylation of TP53 in response to DNA damage regulates its DNA-binding and transcription functions. A role for EP300 in cancer has been implied by the fact that it is targeted by viral oncoproteins, it is fused to MLL in leukaemia and two missense sequence alterations in EP300 were identified in epithelial malignancies. Nevertheless, direct demonstration of the role of EP300 in tumorigenesis by inactivating mutations in human cancers has been lacking. Here we describe EP300 mutations, which predict a truncated protein, in 6 (3%) of 193 epithelial cancers analysed. Of these six mutations, two were in primary tumours (a colorectal cancer and a breast cancer) and four were in cancer cell lines (colorectal, breast and pancreatic). In addition, we identified a somatic in-frame insertion in a primary breast cancer and missense alterations in a primary colorectal cancer and two cell lines (breast and pancreatic). Inactivation of the second allele was demonstrated in five of six cases with truncating mutations and in two other cases. Our data show that EP300 is mutated in epithelial cancers and provide the first evidence that it behaves as a classical tumour-suppressor gene.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2008

Polygenes, Risk Prediction, and Targeted Prevention of Breast Cancer

Paul Pharoah; Antonis C. Antoniou; Douglas F. Easton; Bruce A.J. Ponder

BACKGROUND New developments in the search for susceptibility alleles in complex disorders provide support for the possibility of a polygenic approach to the prevention and treatment of common diseases. METHODS We examined the implications, both for individualized disease prevention and for public health policy, of findings concerning the risk of breast cancer that are based on common genetic variation. RESULTS Our analysis suggests that the risk profile generated by the known, common, moderate-risk alleles does not provide sufficient discrimination to warrant individualized prevention. However, useful risk stratification may be possible in the context of programs for disease prevention in the general population. CONCLUSIONS The clinical use of single, common, low-penetrance genes is limited, but a few susceptibility alleles may distinguish women who are at high risk for breast cancer from those who are at low risk, particularly in the context of population screening.

Collaboration


Dive into the Bruce A.J. Ponder's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Pharoah

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Simon A. Gayther

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan J. Ramus

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Luben

University of Cambridge

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge