Bruce A. Mattingly
Morehead State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bruce A. Mattingly.
Psychopharmacology | 1994
Bruce A. Mattingly; Tamara C. Hart; Karen Lim; Carmen Perkins
The objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine could be prevented by either D1 or D2 selective dopamine receptor antagonists. Male Wistar rats were treated daily for 7 days with either cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle in combination with the D1 dopamine antagonist SCH 23390 (0.3 mg/kg, SC), the D2 dopamine antagonist sulpiride (100 mg/kg, IP), or vehicle. After the daily injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas. Twenty-four hours after the last pre-exposure test session, all rats were given a challenge injection of cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) and tested for activity. Cocaine treatments produced a greater relative increase in locomotor activity with repeated exposure (i.e. sensitization). Moreover, this increase in cocaine-induced locomotor activity was attenuated by both SCH 23390 and sulpiride. In contrast, neither sulpiride nor SCH 23390 blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine. That is, rats pretreated with sulpiride or SCH 23390 and cocaine did not differ from rats pre-exposed only to cocaine when given a cocaine challenge injection. These results suggest that behavioral sensitization to cocaine may develop through either D1 or D2 dopamine receptor stimulation or possibly through stimulation of some non-dopaminergic receptor.
Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior | 1990
R.C. Pierce; Cynthia A. Crawford; Arthur J. Nonneman; Bruce A. Mattingly; Michael T. Bardo
Novelty-induced place preference behavior of rats was studied in two experiments. In the first experiment, separate groups of animals were habituated to a distinct environment 30 min daily for either zero, one, two, four or eight days. On the day following the last habituation day, animals were allowed 15 min free access to both the habituated (familiar) and a distinct novel environment. The results revealed a significant novelty preference in the two-, four- and eight-day habituation groups. In these same animals, the rate of horizontal and vertical activity was lower in the novel environment relative to the familiar environment. The influence of forebrain dopamine (DA) projections on novelty preference behavior was studied in the second experiment. Animals were given an injection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the nucleus accumbens or were given sham surgery, and then they were given four habituation days to one environment. Novelty-induced place preference was blocked in the lesioned animals, as the amount of time spent in the novel and familiar environments was not significantly different. Lesioned animals also failed to show a difference in locomotor activity between the novel and familiar environments. Subsequent assay data revealed that the 6-OHDA lesion reduced DA levels in the nucleus accumbens, anterior striatum and olfactory tubercles by over 65% as compared to sham surgery. These results suggest that novelty preference behavior may be mediated by a central DA pathway similar to that involved in other types of reinforcing stimuli, such as food, water and drugs of abuse.
Behavioral Neuroscience | 1989
Bruce A. Mattingly; James E. Gotsick
In 3 experiments, the role of conditioning and experiential factors in producing behavioral sensitization to apomorphine (APO) was examined. In each experiment, male rats received intermittent injections of APO (5.0 mg/kg s.c.) or vehicle (VEH) and were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas. Activity test experience was paired or unpaired with drug exposure or not given. After the pretreatment phase in each experiment, all rats were tested for activity after an APO injection. The results indicated that behavioral sensitization to APO develops with repeated treatments in the absence of drug-associated contextual environmental stimuli. The magnitude of the sensitization effect observed, however, was always greater in rats for which specific environmental cues were reliably associated with drug exposure. These findings indicate that behavioral sensitization to APO develops through both associational and non-associational mechanisms.
Behavioral Neuroscience | 1988
Bruce A. Mattingly; James E. Gotsick; Kerri Salamanca
In two experiments, the effect of repeated injections of apomorphine on locomotor activity of rats was determined. In each experiment, different groups of rats were injected with either apomorphine (0.2, 1.0, or 5.0 mg/kg) or vehicle at either 24 or 72 hr intervals and tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas. In Experiment 2, following 13 treatment sessions with various doses, all groups were first tested for activity following a 5.0 mg/kg dose of apomorphine and then given vehicle only prior to the final activity test session. Major findings were as follows: (a) repeated injections of 1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg apomorphine produced a progressively greater increase in activity with each injection (i.e., sensitization); (b) injections of 0.2 mg/kg of apomorphine produced a slight inhibition of activity, which did not change with repeated injections; (c) prior treatment with 0.2 mg/kg of apomorphine resulted in a significantly greater activity increase following a 5.0 mg/kg dose of apomorphine than did prior vehicle treatments; and (d) chronic pretreatment of rats with apomorphine did not affect their activity level following a vehicle injection. These findings suggest that sensitization to apomorphine is a graded, rather than an all or none, phenomenon dependent on the dose of apomorphine repeatedly administered. In addition, these results are inconsistent with autoreceptor tolerance and conditioning explanations of dopamine agonist-induced sensitization effects.
Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior | 1996
Bruce A. Mattingly; James K. Rowlett; Tracey Ellison; Kristin Rase
The objective of this study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine could be prevented by high doses of the dopamine receptor antagonists haloperidol and SCH 23390. In two experiments, male Wistar rats were injected daily for 4 days with either cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle in combination with haloperidol (1.0 mg/kg, IP), SCH 23390 (0.5 mg/kg, SC), or vehicle. After the daily injections, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas. At 24 h after the last preexposure test session, all rats were given a challenge injection of cocaine (15 mg/kg, IP) and tested for activity. Cocaine treatments produced a greater relative increase in locomotor activity with repeated exposure compared to vehicle treatments (i.e., sensitization). Moreover, the acute activating effects of cocaine over days were blocked by both haloperidol and SCH 23390. The coadministration of haloperidol, but not SCH 23390, blocked the development of behavioral sensitization to cocaine. That is, after the cocaine challenge injection, rats pretreated with SCH 23390 and cocaine did not differ from rats preexposed only to cocaine, whereas rats pretreated with haloperidol and cocaine did not differ from rats pretreated only with vehicle. Pretreatment with haloperidol or SCH 23390 without cocaine enhanced the locomotor-activating effects of the subsequent cocaine challenge injection. These findings suggest that cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization may develop as a result of repeated dopamine D1- or D2-type receptor stimulation, and that brief dopamine antagonist treatments enhance subsequent behavioral sensitivity to cocaine.
Psychopharmacology | 1991
Bruce A. Mattingly; James K. Rowlett; Jamison T. Graff; Billie Jo Hatton
The objective of the present study was to determine whether the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine could be blocked by either D1 or D2 selective dopamine antagonists. In three experiments, male rats received 10–21 daily injections of a selective D1 (SCH 23390; 0 or 0.5 mg/kg IP) or D2 (sulpiride; 0, 30, or 100 mg/kg IP) antagonist followed by an apomorphine (0 or 1.0 mg/kg SC) injection. In two experiments, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas after the daily injections. In all experiments, the rats were tested for sensitization to apomorphine following the training phase. The results indicated that apomorphine produced a progressively greater increase in locomotor activity with each injection, and this apomorphine-induced increase in activity was completely blocked by both sulpiride and SCH 23390 treatments. However, although both sulpiride and SCH 23390 blocked apomorphine-induced activity, only SCH 23390 injections prevented the development of sensitization to apomorphine. That is, rats pretreated with sulpiride and apomorphine displayed significant sensitization when subsequently tested with a challenge dose of apomorphine alone. These findings suggest that the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is related specifically to the stimulation of dopamine D1 receptors.
Psychopharmacology | 1993
Bruce A. Mattingly; James K. Rowlett; Greg Lovell
In three experiments, male Wistar rats (250–350 g) were injected (SC) daily with the D1-type dopamine receptor agonist, SKF 38393 (0.0, 4.0, 8.0, or 16.0 mg/kg), the D2-type dopamine receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.0, 0.3, or 3.0 mg/kg), and/or the D1-type dopamine receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.0 or 0.5 mg/kg) for 8–10 days. After each daily injection, the rats were tested for locomotor activity in photocell arenas for 20 min. Following this subchronic pretreatment, all rats were challenged with the mixed dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg, SC) and tested for locomotor activity. SKF 38393 treatments produced a dose-dependent decrease in locomotor activity which did not significantly change across days. Quinpirole also depressed locomotor activity when first injected, but this quinpirole-induced inhibition of activity progressively decreased across days. When subsequently challenged with apomorphine, rats in both the SKF 38393 and the quinpirole pretreatment groups displayed greater locomotor activity than rats pretreated with only vehicle. Although SCH 23390 pretreatments did not affect subsequent sensitivity to apomorphine, SCH 23390 completely blocked the effect of quinpirole. These results suggest that although repeated D1 receptor stimulation may be sufficient to induce behavioral sensitization to apomorphine, D2 receptor stimulation also contributes to the effect.
Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior | 1988
Bruce A. Mattingly; James E. Gotsick; Carlos Marin
In two experiments, the effects of repeated intermittent administration of a relatively high dose of apomorphine (5 mg/kg) on locomotor activity and/or stereotypic behavior in rats was determined. In Experiment 1, male rats were given ten subcutaneous (SC) injections of apomorphine or vehicle and tested for locomotor activity and stereotypy. The first nine injection test sessions were given at 3-day intervals and the tenth injection test session was given 18 days following the ninth session. In Experiment 2, male rats were tested for locomotor activity following ten SC injections of apomorphine or vehicle with either a one- or seven-day interval between injections. Major findings were as follows: a) apomorphine produced progressively greater increases in locomotor activity with each succeeding injection (i.e., sensitization); b) sensitization to the locomotor activity stimulating effects of apomorphine developed with interinjection intervals of one, three, and seven days; c) the sensitization effect was maintained over the 18-day drug-free break; and d) the effect of apomorphine on stereotypic behavior did not significantly change with repeated injections. These findings indicate that even a single dose of apomorphine induces relatively long-lasting neurobiological changes. Moreover, these findings are consistent with the view that separate neural pathways mediate locomotor activity and stereotypy in rats.
Psychopharmacology | 1997
Bruce A. Mattingly; C. Koch; Francis H. Osborne; James E. Gotsick
Abstract The present study was designed to assess the role of stimulus and response factors in the context-dependency of behavioral sensitization to the direct dopamine agonist apomorphine. In two experiments, male Wistar rats were given repeated injections of the direct dopamine agonist, apomorphine (5 mg/kg, SC), or vehicle at 24- to 72-h intervals and tested for locomotor activity for 30 min in either an openfield activity drum or a running wheel. In experiment 1, after eight activity sessions in either the activity drum or running wheel, one-half of the rats in each drug condition (apomorphine or vehicle) were tested in the alternate activity test environment. In both activity test environments, apomorphine produced progressively greater levels of locomotor activity with repeated treatment (i.e., sensitization). Moreover, sensitization to apomorphine transferred completely across test environments. That is, rats given apomorphine associated with one test environment (e.g., wheel) displayed equivalent sensitization when tested in the alternate environment (e.g., drum). Thus, changing external stimulus cues associated with repeated drug exposure did not affect the expression of sensitization. In experiment 2, rats were given either apomorphine or vehicle daily and tested for activity in a running wheel. For one-half the rats in each drug condition, the running wheel was free to move, but for the remainder the wheel was immobilized. After nine training sessions, all rats were given an apomorphine challenge injection and tested in a mobile wheel. After the challenge injection of apomorphine, rats previously treated with apomorphine and trained in the mobile wheel were significantly more active than rats previously treated with vehicle. In contrast, rats given equivalent apomorphine treatments and trained in the immobile wheel did not differ in activity from rats previously given only vehicle. Since the external stimulus cues associated with drug exposure for the mobile and immobile wheel groups were the same, this finding suggests that environmental factors affecting response expression are critical to the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine.
Neuropharmacology | 1991
J.K. Rowlett; Bruce A. Mattingly; Michael T. Bardo
In three experiments, rats were injected once daily with 5.0 mg/kg apomorphine or vehicle and tested for locomotor activity for 10-14 days. In each experiment, apomorphine produced behavioral sensitization, characterized by a progressively greater increase in locomotor activity with each succeeding injection. On day 11 of testing, in an experiment designed to assess the synthesis of dopamine (DA), rats were injected with 5.0 mg/kg apomorphine or vehicle, followed by 100 mg/kg NSD-1015, an inhibitor of the enzyme l-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase. After administration of NSD-1015, concentrations of dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) were determined in striatal and mesolimbic tissues by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection. The results revealed a significant decrease in accumulation of DOPA in both striatal and mesolimbic tissue after acute treatment with apomorphine. More important, chronic treatment with apomorphine produced a significant increase in accumulation of DOPA in both areas. In subsequent experiments, rats on day 14 of testing were sacrificed for determination of levels of DA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) or specific binding of [3H]spiperone in the striatum and mesolimbic region. Although levels of DOPAC were significantly reduced in the regions of the brain after an acute injection of apomorphine, chronic treatment with apomorphine did not significantly affect levels of DA, DOPAC or specific binding of [3H]spiperone. These findings suggest that the development of behavioral sensitization to apomorphine may be related to an alteration in the synthesis of DA.