Bruce E. Sands
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bruce E. Sands.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2001
Bruce E. Sands; William J. Tremaine; William J. Sandborn; Paul Rutgeerts; Stephen B. Hanauer; Lloyd Mayer; Stephan R. Targan; Daniel K. Podolsky
We report the experience of 11 patients (of 60 planned patients) enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of infliximab in patients with severe, active steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The study was terminated prematurely because of slow enrollment. Patients having active disease for at least 2 weeks and receiving at least 5 days of intravenous corticosteroids were eligible to receive a single intravenous infusion of infliximab at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg body weight. The primary endpoint used in this study was treatment failure at 2 weeks after infusion. Treatment failure was defined as 1) unachieved clinical response as defined by a modified Truelove and Witts severity score, 2) increase in corticosteroid dosage, 3) addition of immunosuppressants, 4) colectomy, or 5) death. Safety evaluations included physical examination, clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory tests, and occurrence of adverse experiences. Four of 8 patients (50%) who received infliximab were considered treatment successes at 2 weeks, compared with none of 3 patients who received placebo. Improvement in erythrocyte sedimentation rates and serum concentrations of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 correlated with the clinical response observed in patients receiving infliximab. Infusion with infliximab produced no significant adverse events. Infliximab was well tolerated and may provide clinical benefit for some patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2009
Corey A. Siegel; Sadie M. Marden; Sarah M. Persing; Robin J. Larson; Bruce E. Sands
BACKGROUND & AIMS Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy can effectively treat Crohns disease (CD), there is concern that it might increase the risk of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). A meta-analysis was performed to determine the rate of NHL in adult CD patients who have received anti-TNF therapy and to compare this rate with that of a population-based registry and a population of CD patients treated with immunomodulators. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration, and Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case series reporting on anti-TNF therapy in adult CD patients. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated by comparing the pooled rate of NHL with the expected rate of NHL derived from the Surveillance Epidemiology & End Results (SEER) database and a meta-analysis of CD patients treated with immunomodulators. RESULTS Twenty-six studies involving 8905 patients and 21,178 patient-years of follow-up were included. Among anti-TNF treated subjects, 13 cases of NHL were reported (6.1 per 10,000 patient-years). The majority of these patients had previous immunomodulator exposure. Compared with the expected rate of NHL in the SEER database (1.9 per 10,000 patient-years), anti-TNF treated subjects had a significantly elevated risk (SIR, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-6.9). When compared with the NHL rate in CD patients treated with immunomodulators alone (4 per 10,000 patient-years), the SIR was 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-7.1). CONCLUSIONS The use of anti-TNF agents with immunomodulators is associated with an increased risk of NHL in adult CD patients, but the absolute rate of these events remains low and should be weighed against the substantial benefits associated with treatment.
Gastroenterology | 2009
William J. Sandborn; Paul Rutgeerts; Brian G. Feagan; Walter Reinisch; Allan Olson; Jewel Johanns; Jiandong Lu; Kevin J. Horgan; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Stephen B. Hanauer; Gary R. Lichtenstein; Willem J. de Villiers; Daniel H. Present; Bruce E. Sands; Jean-Frederic Colombel
BACKGROUND & AIMS The efficacy of infliximab for treating patients with ulcerative colitis has been established. METHODS The Active Ulcerative Colitis Trial (ACT)-1 and ACT-2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluated infliximab induction and maintenance therapy in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Overall, 728 patients received placebo or infliximab (5 or 10 mg/kg) intravenously at weeks 0, 2, and 6, then every 8 weeks through week 46 (ACT-1) or 22 (ACT-2). Colectomy, hospitalization, and surgery/procedure data through 54 weeks after the first infusion were obtained from ACT-1, ACT-2, and associated data sources. In the prespecified analysis, all data were combined to ascertain time to colectomy. Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of colectomy, and log-rank test was used to compare the combined infliximab group and placebo. RESULTS Eighty-seven percent (630 of 728) of patients had complete colectomy follow-up; 13% (98 of 728) of patients had a median follow-up of 6.2 months. The cumulative incidence of colectomy through 54 weeks was 10% for infliximab and 17% for placebo (P = .02), yielding an absolute risk reduction of 7%. Compared with placebo, fewer ulcerative colitis-related hospitalizations and surgeries/procedures per 100 patient-years of treatment occurred with infliximab therapy: 40 vs 20 (P = .003) and 34 vs 21 (P = .03), respectively. Serious adverse events occurring in infliximab-treated patients included serious infections, tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, listeriosis, and malignancy. CONCLUSIONS Patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab were less likely to undergo colectomy through 54 weeks than those receiving placebo.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2011
Benjamin Pariente; Jacques Cosnes; Silvio Danese; William J. Sandborn; Maãté Lewin; Joel G. Fletcher; Yehuda Chowers; Geert R. D'Haens; Brian G. Feagan; Toshifumi Hibi; Daniel W. Hommes; E. Jan Irvine; Michael A. Kamm; Edward V. Loftus; Edouard Louis; Pierre Michetti; Pia Munkholm; T. Öresland; Julián Panés; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Walter Reinisch; Bruce E. Sands; Juergen Schoelmerich; Stefan Schreiber; Herbert Tilg; Simon Travis; Gert Van Assche; Maurizio Vecchi; Jean Yves Mary; Jean-Frederic Colombel
Crohns disease (CD) is a chronic progressive destructive disease. Currently available instruments measure disease activity at a specific point in time. An instrument to measure cumulative structural damage to the bowel, which may predict long-term disability, is needed. The aim of this article is to outline the methods to develop an instrument that can measure cumulative bowel damage. The project is being conducted by the International Program to develop New Indexes in Crohns disease (IPNIC) group. This instrument, called the Crohns Disease Digestive Damage Score (the Lémann score), should take into account damage location, severity, extent, progression, and reversibility, as measured by diagnostic imaging modalities and the history of surgical resection. It should not be “diagnostic modality driven”: for each lesion and location, a modality appropriate for the anatomic site (for example: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging enterography, and colonoscopy) will be used. A total of 24 centers from 15 countries will be involved in a cross-sectional study, which will include up to 240 patients with stratification according to disease location and duration. At least 120 additional patients will be included in the study to validate the score. The Lémann score is expected to be able to portray a patients disease course on a double-axis graph, with time as the x-axis, bowel damage severity as the y-axis, and the slope of the line connecting data points as a measure of disease progression. This instrument could be used to assess the effect of various medical therapies on the progression of bowel damage. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011)
The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2011
Geert R. D'Haens; Remo Panaccione; Peter D. Higgins; Severine Vermeire; Miquel Gassull; Yehuda Chowers; Stephen B. Hanauer; Hans H. Herfarth; Daan W. Hommes; Michael A. Kamm; Robert Löfberg; A. Quary; Bruce E. Sands; Ajit Sood; G. Watermayer; Bret A. Lashner; Marc Lemann; Scott E. Plevy; Walter Reinisch; Stefan Schreiber; Corey A. Siegel; S Targan; Mamoru Watanabe; Brian G. Feagan; William J. Sandborn; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Simon Travis
The advent of biological therapy has revolutionized inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care. Nonetheless, not all patients require biological therapy. Selection of patients depends on clinical characteristics, previous response to other medical therapy, and comorbid conditions. Availability, reimbursement guidelines, and patient preferences guide the choice of first-line biological therapy for luminal Crohns disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) has the most extensive clinical trial data, but other biological agents (adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CZP), and natalizumab (NAT)) appear to have similar benefits in CD. Steroid-refractory, steroid-dependent, or complex fistulizing CD are indications for starting biological therapy, after surgical drainage of any sepsis. For fistulizing CD, the efficacy of IFX for inducing fistula closure is best documented. Unique risks of NAT account for its labeling as a second-line biological agent in some countries. Patients who respond to induction therapy benefit from systematic re-treatment. The combination of IFX with azathioprine is better than monotherapy for induction of remission and mucosal healing up to 1 year in patients who are naïve to both agents. Whether this applies to other agents remains unknown. IFX is also effective for treatment-refractory, moderate, or severely active ulcerative colitis. Patients who have a diminished or loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy may respond to dose adjustment of the same agent or switching to another agent. Careful consideration should be given to the reasons for loss of response. There are insufficient data to make recommendations on when to stop anti-TNF therapy. Preliminary evidence suggests that a substantial proportion of patients in clinical remission for >1 year, without signs of active inflammation can remain in remission after stopping treatment.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2004
Bruce E. Sands; Marion Blank; Kam Patel; Sander J. H. van Deventer
BACKGROUND & AIMS The ACCENT II study (A Crohns Disease Clinical Trial Evaluating Infiximab in a New Long-term Treatment Regimen in Patients With Fistulizing Crohns Disease) evaluated the efficacy and safety of infliximab maintenance treatment in patients with fistulizing Crohns disease. This post hoc analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of infliximab therapy in women with rectovaginal fistulas. METHODS All patients received 5 mg/kg infliximab intravenously at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Patients who achieved response at weeks 10 and 14 then were randomized as responders if they had at least 50% of baseline fistulas closed, or as nonresponders, to receive placebo or infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks through week 54. RESULTS Of 282 patients in the ACCENT II study, 25 of 138 (18.1%) women had a total of 27 draining rectovaginal fistulas at baseline. After infusions of infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6, 60.7% (17 of 28) and 44.8% (13 of 29) of rectovaginal fistulas were closed at weeks 10 and 14, respectively. Among responders, 72.2% (13 of 18) of rectovaginal fistulas were no longer draining at week 14. The duration of rectovaginal fistula closure was longer in the infliximab 5-mg/kg maintenance group (median, 46 wk) than in the placebo group (33 wk). CONCLUSIONS Infliximab is effective in short-term closure of rectovaginal fistulas and maintenance treatment was more effective than placebo in prolonging rectovaginal fistula closure.
Gastroenterology | 2000
Bruce E. Sands
In the last decade, substantial gains have been made in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Refinements in drug formulation have provided the ability to target distinct sites of delivery, enhancing the safety and efficacy of older agents. Immunosuppressive agents beyond corticosteroids have assumed a routine part in the care of patients with IBD. Moreover, as the century closes, we stand at the threshold of unprecedented advances in knowledge of the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis and Crohns disease. Simultaneous progress in biotechnology has fostered the development of new agents that strategically target pivotal processes in disease pathogenesis. This review covers agents currently used in the treatment of IBD and seeks to provide an overview of emerging therapies.
Journal of Gastroenterology | 2007
Bruce E. Sands
Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, collectively known as the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), are largely diseases of the twentieth century, and are associated with the rise of modern, Westernized industrial society. Although the causes of these diseases remain incompletely understood, the prevailing model is that the intestinal flora drives an unmitigated intestinal immune response and inflammation in the genetically susceptible host. A review of the past and present of these diseases shows that detailed description preceded more fundamental elucidation of the disease processes. Working out the details of disease pathogenesis, in turn, has yielded dividends in more focused and effective therapy for IBD. This article highlights the key descriptions of the past, and the pivotal findings of current studies in disease pathogenesis and its connection to medical therapy. Future directions in the IBD will likely explicate the inhomogeneous causes of these diseases, with implications for individualized therapy.
Gastroenterology | 1999
Bruce E. Sands; Simmy Bank; Charles A. Sninsky; Malcolm K. Robinson; Seymour Katz; John W. Singleton; Philip B. Miner; Michael Safdi; Susan Galandiuk; Stephen B. Hanauer; Gary W. Varilek; Alan L. Buchman; Vance D. Rodgers; Bruce Salzberg; Bin Cai; John Loewy; Michael F. DeBruin; Holly Rogge; Mark Shapiro; Ullrich S. Schwertschlag
BACKGROUND & AIMS Recombinant human interleukin 11 (rhIL-11) is a cytokine with thrombocytopoietic activity and anti-inflammatory and mucosal protective effects. The objectives of this study were to investigate the safety and tolerability of rhIL-11 in patients with Crohns disease and to explore the effects of dose and schedule on platelet count and Crohns disease activity. METHODS A multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of 76 patients with active Crohns disease was performed. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous placebo or rhIL-11 at doses of 5, 16, or 40 microgram. kg-1. wk-1 given 2 or 5 times weekly for 3 weeks. Clinical and laboratory safety data were recorded, and disease activity was measured at each visit. RESULTS Subcutaneous injection of rhIL-11 generally was well tolerated. Significantly greater increases in platelet counts were found among patients receiving rhIL-11 40 microgram. kg-1. wk-1 as 2 or 5 weekly doses and 16 microgram. kg-1. week-1 as 5 weekly doses compared with patients receiving placebo (P < 0.05). Patients receiving 16 microgram. kg-1. wk-1 had the highest clinical response rates, with a response seen in 42% of patients (5/12) receiving 5 weekly doses and 33% of patients (4/12) receiving 2 weekly doses, compared with 7% of patients (1/15) receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS Short-term treatment with rhIL-11 is well tolerated in patients with active Crohns disease. The thrombocytopoietic effect of rhIL-11 seems to be both dose and schedule dependent and may be minimized with retained clinical benefit in Crohns disease at 16 microgram. kg-1. wk-1 given in 2 equal doses.
Gastroenterology | 2008
Gilaad G. Kaplan; Ellen P. McCarthy; John Z. Ayanian; Joshua R. Korzenik; Richard A. Hodin; Bruce E. Sands
BACKGROUND & AIMS Postoperative morbidity and mortality following a colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) has been primarily reported from tertiary care referral centers that perform a high volume of operations; however, the postoperative outcomes among nonselected hospitals are not known. We set out to evaluate postoperative morbidity and mortality using a nationally representative database and to determine the factors that influenced outcomes. METHODS We analyzed the 1995-2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify 7108 discharges for UC patients who underwent a total abdominal colectomy. The effects of hospital volume on postoperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated in logistic regression models adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 2.3% and 30.8%, respectively. Most operations were performed in low-volume hospitals that had an increased risk of death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-4.63). In-hospital mortality was increased in patients who were admitted emergently (aOR, 5.40; 95% CI: 3.48-8.40), aged 60-80 years (aOR, 8.70; 95% CI: 3.30-22.92), and those with Medicaid (aOR, 4.29; 95% CI: 2.13-8.66). Emergently admitted UC patients whose surgery was performed 6 days after their admission had significantly increased likelihood of in-hospital death (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI: 1.13-3.97). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative mortality was lowest in hospitals that performed the highest volume of operations. Increasing the proportion of total colectomies performed in high-volume hospitals may improve clinical outcomes for patients with UC.