Bruce E. Strober

Comparison of Ustekinumab and Etanercept for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

BACKGROUND Biologic agents offer a range of new therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis; however, the relative benefit-risk profiles of such therapies are not well known. We compared two biologic agents, ustekinumab (an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 blocker) and etanercept (an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor alpha), for the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS We randomly assigned 903 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis to receive subcutaneous injections of either 45 or 90 mg of ustekinumab (at weeks 0 and 4) or high-dose etanercept (50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least 75% improvement in the psoriasis area-and-severity index (PASI) at week 12; a secondary end point was the proportion with cleared or minimal disease on the basis of the physicians global assessment. Assessors were unaware of the treatment assignments. The efficacy and safety of a crossover from etanercept to ustekinumab were evaluated after week 12. RESULTS There was at least 75% improvement in the PASI at week 12 in 67.5% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 73.8% of patients who received 90 mg, as compared with 56.8% of those who received etanercept (P=0.01 and P<0.001, respectively). Similarly, 65.1% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 70.6% of patients who received 90 mg of ustekinumab had cleared or minimal disease according to the physicians global assessment, as compared with 49.0% of those who received etanercept (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Among patients who did not have a response to etanercept, 48.9% had at least 75% improvement in the PASI within 12 weeks after crossover to ustekinumab. One or more adverse events occurred through week 12 in 66.0% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 69.2% of patients who received 90 mg of ustekinumab and in 70.0% who received etanercept; 1.9%, 1.2%, and 1.2%, respectively, had serious adverse events. Safety patterns were similar before and after crossover from etanercept to ustekinumab. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of ustekinumab at a dose of 45 or 90 mg was superior to that of high-dose etanercept over a 12-week period in patients with psoriasis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00454584.)

The retinoblastoma protein and BRG1 form a complex and cooperate to induce cell cycle arrest

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB) binds several cellular proteins involved in cell cycle progression. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we found that RB bound specifically to the protein BRG1. BRG1 shares extensive sequence similarity to Drosophila brahma, an activator of homeotic gene expression, and the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SW12. BRG1 contains an RB-binding motif found in viral oncoproteins and bound to the A/B pocket and the hypophosphorylated form of RB. BRG1 did not bind RB in viral oncoprotein-transformed cells. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments suggested BRG1 associates with the RB family in vivo. In the human carcinoma cell line SW13, BRG1 exhibited tumor suppressor activity by inducing formation of flat, growth-arrested cells. This activity depended on the ability of BRG1 to cooperate and complex with RB, as both an RB-nonbinding mutant of BRG1 and the sequestration of RB by adenovirus E1A protein abolished flat cell formation.

Methotrexate and psoriasis: Consensus conference

To the Editor: We appreciate the comments of Dr Roenigk, Dr Auerbach, and Dr Maibach regarding our article, ‘‘Methotrexate andPsoriasis: 2009National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference.’’ We would like to acknowledge the work of these physicians who pioneered the use of methotrexate and developed the initial guidelines for its use. Their work was acknowledged with praise in our methotrexate article. We would like to apologize for not having consulted them directly. We welcome this opportunity to respond to their comments. The last methotrexate guidelines were a consensus statement of a small group of recognized experts, including two of the authors of the current guidelines (G. W. and M. L.). It was neither approved by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) nor reviewed by the AAD Board before its publication. The more recent psoriasis expert work group of the AAD guidelines did not deal exclusively with methotrexate. The brief portion of these guidelines concerning methotrexate was written by one of the authors of our methotrexate article (M. L.), and many of the recommendations (Tables I-VI) were used with permission from our article. We disagree that the article is largely unchanged from the 1998 methotrexate guidelines. Besides the change in liver biopsy guidelines new information was presented regarding the use of methotrexate in psoriasis, the role of folic acid supplementation, the importance of hematologic toxicity and the fact that this toxicity may be more clinically relevant than hepatotoxicity, and the significance of hepatic risk factors in the development of liver toxicity. Importantly, most of the newer information presented was primarily in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. It is admittedly difficult to put together a large group of experts without any conflicts of interest. The conflicts of interest must be declared, as they were in our article. As for conflicts of interest affecting content, our article, in fact, eased the biopsy criteria for patients receiving methotrexate, a drug that has been generic for many years. Therefore, our recommendations only have made it a drug that is easier to prescribe. None of the authors of our article or members of the National Psoriasis Foundation

National Psoriasis Foundation clinical consensus on psoriasis comorbidities and recommendations for screening

There have been several articles and reports in recent months about comorbidities and risks that affect psoriasis patients in addition to their underlying disease. This piece reviews the current literature and begins to address what should be done with this new information by updating the clinician about what health screening tests, preventative exams, and referrals should be considered in this population.

Functional interactions between the hBRM/hBRG1 transcriptional activators and the pRB family of proteins.

hBRG1 and hBRM are mammalian homologs of the SNF2/SW12 yeast transcriptional activator. These proteins exist in a large multisubunit complex that likely serves to remodel chromatin and, in so doing, facilitates the function of specific transcription factors. The retinoblastoma protein (pRB) inhibits cell cycle progression by repressing transcription of specific growth-related genes. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we demonstrate that the members of the hBRG1/hBRM family of proteins interact with the pRB family of proteins, which includes pRB, p107, and p130. Interaction between the hBRG1/hBRM family with the pRB family likely influences cellular proliferation, as both hBRG1 and hBRM, but not mutants of these proteins unable to bind to pRB family members, inhibit the formation of drug-resistant colonies when transfected into the SW13 human adenocarcinoma cell line, which lacks endogenous hBRG1 or hBRM. Further, hBRM and two isoforms of hBRG1 induce the formation of flat, growth-arrested cells in a pRB family-dependent manner when introduced into SW13 cells. This flat-cell inducing activity is severely reduced by cotransfection of the wild-type E1A protein and variably reduced by the cotransfection of mutants of E1A that lack the ability to bind to some or all members of the pRB family.

Phase 3 Studies Comparing Brodalumab with Ustekinumab in Psoriasis

BACKGROUND Early clinical studies suggested that the anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody brodalumab has efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS In two phase 3 studies (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3), patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive brodalumab (210 mg or 140 mg every 2 weeks), ustekinumab (45 mg for patients with a body weight ≤100 kg and 90 mg for patients >100 kg), or placebo. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab were randomly assigned again to receive a brodalumab maintenance dose of 210 mg every 2 weeks or 140 mg every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks, or every 8 weeks; patients receiving ustekinumab continued to receive ustekinumab every 12 weeks, and patients receiving placebo received 210 mg of brodalumab every 2 weeks. The primary aims were to evaluate the superiority of brodalumab over placebo at week 12 with respect to at least a 75% reduction in the psoriasis area-and-severity index score (PASI 75) and a static physicians global assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin), as well as the superiority of brodalumab over ustekinumab at week 12 with respect to a 100% reduction in PASI score (PASI 100). RESULTS At week 12, the PASI 75 response rates were higher with brodalumab at the 210-mg and 140-mg doses than with placebo (86% and 67%, respectively, vs. 8% [AMAGINE-2] and 85% and 69%, respectively, vs. 6% [AMAGINE-3]; P<0.001); the rates of sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were also higher with brodalumab (P<0.001). The week 12 PASI 100 response rates were significantly higher with 210 mg of brodalumab than with ustekinumab (44% vs. 22% [AMAGINE-2] and 37% vs. 19% [AMAGINE-3], P<0.001). The PASI 100 response rates with 140 mg of brodalumab were 26% in AMAGINE-2 (P=0.08 for the comparison with ustekinumab) and 27% in AMAGINE-3 (P=0.007). Rates of neutropenia were higher with brodalumab and with ustekinumab than with placebo. Mild or moderate candida infections were more frequent with brodalumab than with ustekinumab or placebo. Through week 52, the rates of serious infectious episodes were 1.0 (AMAGINE-2) and 1.3 (AMAGINE-3) per 100 patient-years of exposure to brodalumab. CONCLUSIONS Brodalumab treatment resulted in significant clinical improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. (Funded by Amgen; AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01708603 and NCT01708629.).

Substantial Alterations of the Cutaneous Bacterial Biota in Psoriatic Lesions

For psoriasis, an idiopathic inflammatory disorder of the skin, the microbial biota has not been defined using cultivation-independent methods. We used broad-range 16S rDNA PCR for archaea and bacteria to examine the microbiota of normal and psoriatic skin. From 6 patients, 19 cutaneous samples (13 from diseased skin and 6 from normal skin) were obtained. Extracted DNA was subjected to the broad range PCR, and 1,925 cloned products were compared with 2,038 products previously reported from healthy persons. Using 98% sequence identity as a species boundary, 1,841 (95.6%) clones were similar to known bacterial 16S rDNA, representing 6 phyla, 86 genera, or 189 species-level operational taxonomic unit (SLOTU); 84 (4.4%) clones with <98% identity probably represented novel species. The most abundant and diverse phylum populating the psoriatic lesions was Firmicutes (46.2%), significantly (P<0.001) overrepresented, compared to the samples from uninvolved skin of the patients (39.0%) and healthy persons (24.4%). In contrast, Actinobacteria, the most prevalent and diverse phylum in normal skin samples from both healthy persons (47.6%) and the patients (47.8%), was significantly (P<0.01) underrepresented in the psoriatic lesion samples (37.3%). Representation of Propionibacterium species were lower in the psoriatic lesions (2.9±5.5%) than from normal persons (21.1±18.2%; P<0.001), whereas normal skin from the psoriatic patients showed intermediate levels (12.3±21.6%). We conclude that psoriasis is associated with substantial alteration in the composition and representation of the cutaneous bacterial biota.

Obesity in psoriasis: the metabolic, clinical and therapeutic implications. Report of an interdisciplinary conference and review

Experts on psoriasis convened with authorities from other medical specialties to discuss the recently described association between psoriasis, obesity and subsequent cardiovascular comorbidity. Similar to other diseases of increased systemic inflammation, psoriasis has been linked to a heightened risk of myocardial infarction, especially in the more severely affected, younger patients. However, unlike in other inflammatory diseases – such as rheumatoid arthritis – more severely affected patients with psoriasis are much more likely to be obese. Importantly, the pathophysiology of both psoriasis and obesity shows many shared cytokines that are known to contribute to features of the metabolic syndrome, such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance. The strong association between psoriasis and obesity potentially makes psoriasis an important healthcare issue that requires an update in its standard of care. This meeting reviewed the evidence‐based literature and addressed how, moving forward, dermatologists and other specialists may redefine the magnitude of health risk associated with more severe psoriasis and its comorbidities, while clarifying both the epidemiology and pathophysiology of the association with obesity.

Methotrexate and psoriasis: 2009 National Psoriasis Foundation Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND Methotrexate remains a valuable option for the treatment of psoriasis. This report will summarize studies regarding the use of methotrexate since the last guidelines were published in 1998. OBJECTIVE A task force of the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board was convened to evaluate treatment options. Our aim was to achieve a consensus on new updated guidelines for the use of methotrexate in the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS Reports in the literature were reviewed regarding methotrexate therapy. RESULTS A consensus was achieved on use of methotrexate in psoriasis including specific recommendations on dosing and monitoring. The consensus received unanimous approval from members of the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation. LIMITATIONS There are few evidence-based studies on the treatment of psoriasis with methotrexate. Many of the reviewed reports are for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. CONCLUSIONS Methotrexate is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of psoriasis. Appropriate patient selection and monitoring will significantly decrease the risks of side effects. In patients without risk factors for hepatic fibrosis, liver biopsies may not be indicated or the frequency of liver biopsies may be markedly reduced.

Association between biologic therapies for chronic plaque psoriasis and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

CONTEXT Ustekinumab and briakinumab, monoclonal antibodies to the shared p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, have shown efficacy in treating chronic plaque psoriasis (CPP). Preliminary reports of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in psoriasis patients receiving anti-IL-12/23 agents have prompted concern. OBJECTIVE To evaluate a possible association between biologic therapies for CPP and MACEs via meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-IL-12/23 (ustekinumab and briakinumab) agents and anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) agents (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab) used in treating CPP were reviewed using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Ovid MEDLINE from database inception to May 2011. The results of registered nonpublished completed studies were procured through abstract publications or poster presentations. STUDY SELECTION Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, monotherapy studies (with safety outcome data for MACE) of IL-12/23 antibodies and anti-TNF-α agents in adults. Studies of psoriatic arthritis were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Two investigators independently searched data while 6 investigators reviewed the abstracted data. RESULTS A total of 22 RCTs comprising 10 183 patients met the predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measure was MACE, a composite end point of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or cardiovascular death during the placebo-controlled phase of treatment in patients receiving at least 1 dose of study agent or placebo. Absolute risk differences were used as an effect measure. There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity across the studies using the I(2) statistic (I(2) = 0), allowing for combination of trial results using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects method. During the placebo-controlled phases of the anti-IL-12/23 studies, 10 of 3179 patients receiving anti-IL-12/23 therapies experienced MACEs compared with zero events in 1474 patients receiving placebo (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, 0.012 events/person-year; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.001 to 0.026; P =.12). In the anti-TNF-α trials, only 1 of 3858 patients receiving anti-TNF-α agents experienced a MACE compared with 1 of 1812 patients receiving placebo (Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, -0.0005 events/person-year; 95% CI, -0.010 to 0.009; P = .94). CONCLUSIONS Compared with placebo, there was no significant difference in the rate of MACEs observed in patients receiving anti-IL-12/IL-23 antibodies or anti-TNF-α treatments. This study may have been underpowered to identify a significant difference.