Bruce G. Green

Intravesical Resiniferatoxin for Refractory Detrusor Hyperreflexia: A Multicenter, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Abstract Objective: Resiniferatoxin (RTX) is an analogue of capsaicin with more than 1,000 times its potency in desensitizing C-fiber bladder afferent neurons. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of intravesical RTX in patients with refractory detrusor hyperreflexia (DH). Methods: Thirty-six (22 males, 14 females) neurologically impaired patients (20 spinal cord injury, 7 multiple sclerosis, 9 other neurologic diseases) with urodynamically verified DH and intractable urinary symptoms despite previous anticholinergic drug use were treated prospectively with intravesical RTX using dose escalation in a double-blind fashion at 4 centers. Patients received a single instillation of 100 ml of placebo (n = 8 patients) or 0.005, 0.025, 0.05 , 0.10 , 0.2, 0.5, or 1.0 fLM of RTX (n = 4 each group). A visual analog pain scale (VAPS) (0-10; 10 = highest level of pain) was used to quantify discomfort of application. Treatment effect was monitored using a bladder diary and cystometric bladder capacity at weeks 1, 3, 6, and 1 2 posttreatment. Results: Mean VAPS scores revealed minimal to mild discomfort with values of 2.85 and 2.28 for the 0.5-j-LM and 1.0-j-LM RTX treatment groups, respectively. Due to the small sample size, there were no statistically significant changes in mean cystometric capacity (MCC) or incontinence episodes in each treatment dose group. However, at 3 weeks, MCC increased by 53% and 48% for the 0.5-j-μM and 1.0-j-μM RTX treatment groups, respectively. Patients in the 0.5-j-μM and 1.0-j-μM groups with MCC < 300 ml at baseline showed greater improvements in MCC at 120.5% and 48%, respectively. In some patients, MCC increased up to 500% over baseline, despite a low RTX dose. Incontinence episodes decreased by 51.9% and 52.7% for the 0.5-j-LM and 1.0-j-LM RTX treatment groups, respectively. There were no long-term complications. Conclusion: Intravesical RTX administration, in general, is a well-tolerated new therapy for DH. This patient group was refractory to all previous oral pharmacologic therapy, yet some patients responded with significant improvement in bladder capacity and continence function shortly after RTX administration. Patients at risk for autonomic dysreflexia require careful monitoring during RTX therapy.

LONG-TERM FOLLOWUP OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MULTICENTER UROLUME* TRIAL FOR THE TREATMENT OF EXTERNAL DETRUSOR-SPHINCTER DYSSYNERGIA

PURPOSE We determine the long-term efficacy and safety of the UroLume stent as minimally invasive treatment for external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia in spinal cord injured men. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 160 spinal cord injured men with a mean age plus or minus standard deviation of 36.3 +/- 12.1 years (range 16 to 74) were prospectively treated with an endoprosthesis at 15 centers as part of the North American UroLume trial for external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. Urodynamic parameters, including voiding pressure, residual urine volume and bladder capacity, were compared before treatment and at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment. RESULTS Mean voiding pressure was 75.1 +/- 28.2 cm. water before treatment in the 160 patients, and 37.4 +/- 23.9 at year 1 in 97, 39.5 +/- 22.2 at year 2 in 84, 42.6 +/- 27.3 at year 3 in 61, 46.3 +/- 33.2 at year 4 in 57 and 44.2 +/- 28.9 cm. at year 5 in 41 after stent insertion (p <0.001). Residual urine volume decreased after stent placement and was maintained throughout the 5-year followup (p <0.001). Mean cystometric capacity remained constant from 269 +/- 155 before insertion to 337 +/- 182 ml. 5 years later (p = 0.17). Hydronephrosis and autonomic dysreflexia improved or stabilized in most patients with functioning stents. Stent explant was necessary in 24 patients (15%), of whom 4 (16.7%) had another stent implanted. CONCLUSIONS The UroLume stent demonstrates long-term safety and efficacy for the treatment of external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. The outcome was similar in men with and without previous sphincterotomy.

SPHINCTERIC STENT VERSUS EXTERNAL SPHINCTEROTOMY IN SPINAL CORD INJURED MEN: PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL

PURPOSE In a prospective randomized multicenter trial we compared the treatment results of conventional external sphincterotomy with those of UroLume sphincteric stent prosthesis placement in men with spinal cord injury and external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. MATERIALS AND METHODS We randomized 57 men with spinal cord injury in whom urodynamics verified external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia into 2 groups to undergo either sphincter defeating procedure. We compared the primary urodynamic parameter of maximum detrusor pressure, and secondary urodynamic parameters of bladder capacity and post-void residual urine volume in men who underwent sphincterotomy or sphincteric stent placement. Parameters were measured preoperatively, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Patients completed questionnaires regarding voiding sensation and quality of life issues at each followup visit. RESULTS Demographic data of the 26 patients treated with sphincterotomy and the 31 treated with sphincteric stent placement were statistically similar. Preoperatively mean maximum detrusor pressure plus or minus standard deviation in sphincterotomy and stent cases was 98.3 +/- 27.6 and 95.7 +/- 27.7 cm. water, respectively (p = 0.73). At 12 months mean maximum detrusor pressure decreased to 48.9 +/- 16.4 and 52.6 +/- 31.6 cm. water in the sphincterotomy and stent groups, respectively (p = 0). Preoperatively mean bladder capacity in sphincterotomy and stent cases was 245 +/- 158 and 251 +/- 145 ml., respectively (p = 0.87). Bladder capacity did not change significantly in either treatment group throughout followup. Preoperatively mean post-void residual urine volume in the sphincterotomy and stent groups was 212 +/- 163 and 168 +/- 114 ml., respectively (p = 0.33). Residual urine volume decreased in each group at some but not all followup evaluations. The duration of hospitalization was greater for sphincterotomy than stenting (p = 0.036). Six stents required explantation. CONCLUSIONS The UroLume stent is as effective as conventional external sphincterotomy for treating external detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia. However, sphincteric stent placement is advantageous because it involves shorter hospitalization and is potentially reversible.

Multicenter trial in North America of UroLume urinary sphincter prosthesis.

We investigated the effectiveness and associated complications of treatment with an endoluminal urethral sphincter prosthesis in 153 spinal cord injury men (mean age 36 years, range 16 to 74 years) with urodynamically diagnosed detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. These patients were prospectively treated with a urethral sphincter stent at 15 centers in North America. Followup ranged from 2 to 33 months. Voiding pressures averaged 76 +/- 28, 42 +/- 21, 44 +/- 38, 35 +/- 18 and 32 +/- 20 cm. water, respectively, before prosthesis insertion in 153 patients and at 3 months in 123, 6 months in 114, 12 months in 98 and 24 months in 22. A significant decrease in voiding pressure was noted in the 22 patients at 24 months compared with matched preoperative data (80 +/- 25 cm. water, p = 0.03). The residual urine decreased from 181 +/- 154 ml. before insertion to 82 +/- 93 ml. at 24 months (p = 0.01). Maximum cystometric capacity remained constant, with a mean of 195 +/- 158 ml. before insertion to 248 +/- 122 ml. at 24 months (p = 0.17). No significant differences were apparent after 24 months of followup in any of the urodynamic parameters between 44 patients with and 109 without previous external sphincterotomy. Hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, obstructive hyperplastic epithelial overgrowth and soft tissue erosion did not occur. No deleterious effects were observed on renal or erectile function. Of the patients 43 (28.1%) required 2 prostheses to bridge the external sphincter completely. Stent removal was required in 10 patients. Seven explantations were required for prosthesis migration, 1 for pain and urethral edema, 1 for inability to maintain a condom catheter, and 1 for nonepithelialization and secondary bladder neck obstruction. A total of 13 patients (8.5%) required a subsequent operation for bladder neck obstruction. Therefore, the sphincter prosthesis is an attractive modality for the treatment of external sphincter dyssynergia in patients with and without previous external sphincterotomy because of its ease of deployment and minimal associated morbidity.

REMOVAL OF UROLUME ENDOPROSTHESIS: EXPERIENCE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN STUDY GROUP FOR DETRUSOR-SPHINCTER DYSSYNERGIA APPLICATION

PURPOSE We present the experience of the North American UroLume Multicenter Study Group with removal of the UroLume endoprosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 160 neurologically impaired patients were enrolled in the North American UroLume Multicenter Study Group for detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia application. Analysis was performed in 2 groups of patients in which the device was removed during insertion and after implantation, respectively. RESULTS Device retrieval was required during insertion in 21 patients (13%) mainly due to misplacement or migration in 17. Extraction was done with minimal complications and in all but 2 cases subsequent UroLume implantation was successful. Of 158 men with the device in place 31 (19.6%) required removal. In 34 procedures 44 devices were removed, mainly due to migration. Time from implantation to removal ranged from 4 days to 66 months (mean 22 months). The UroLume was removed en bloc in 20 cases and in parts or wire by wire in 19. The majority of patients had no or minimal complications after extraction. Only 2 patients had serious temporary complications, including bleeding and urethral injury, with no lasting consequences. No malignancy developed as a result of UroLume insertion. CONCLUSIONS While there is a potential for urethral injury and bleeding, UroLume endoprosthesis removal is largely a simple procedure with minimal complications and consequences.

Electroejaculation in combination with in vitro fertilization and gamete micromanipulation for treatment of anejaculatory male infertility

Objective: Failure to ejaculate may be overcome by use of electroejaculation. However, such semen samples are often unsuitable for therapies like intrauterine insemination. The combination of electroejaculation with in vitro fertilization, including gamete micromanipulation, should improve chances of fertilization and pregnancy in such cases. Study Design: Within a private infertility clinic electroejaculation in combination with intrauterine insemination was carried out in 18 cycles (10 couples). Four couples went on to receive therapy by electroejaculation plus in vitro fertilization, along with six other couples (15 cycles total) with semen too poor for intrauterine insemination. Results: One term pregnancy arose in the electroejaculation-intrauterine insemination group, and one term pregnancy plus one continuing pregnancy arose from two couples (three cycles) who underwent in vitro fertilization with conventional insemination after electroejaculation. Six couples (nine cycles) had embryos arising only from gamete micromanipulation transferred, and this yielded two term pregnancies, one spontaneous abortion, and a biochemical pregnancy. Two couples (three cycles) failed to achieve fertilization even with micromanipulation; however, donor-inseminated eggs gave rise to two term pregnancies and one continuing pregnancy in these patients. Conclusions: This report confirms the feasibility of in vitro fertilization in conjunction with electroejaculation and extends the therapy to incorporate gamete micromanipulation.

Puboprostatic Sling Repair for Treatment of Urethral Incompetence in Adult Neurogenic incontinence

PURPOSE An incompetent urethral sphincter can be a significant factor contributing to urinary incontinence in patients with neurogenic bladders. We review our experience with 12 men who underwent a puboprostatic sling. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 12 men (mean age 37.1 years) with neurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury in 9 and spina bifida in 3. All patients were diagnosed with urethral incompetence based on fluorourodynamic evaluation. Medical therapy failed in all 12 patients and all complained of urine leakage with activity. All patients underwent placement of an autologous fascial sling distal to the prostatic urethra via an abdominal approach. Ten patients also underwent simultaneous bladder augmentation to correct high intravesical pressures. RESULTS Followup ranged from 1 to 39 months (average 14.25). All patients manage the bladder with intermittent catheterization. Of the patients 8 are completely dry between catheterizations and 2 had significant improvement with only minimal leakage (1 pad per day), with an overall success rate of 83%. One patient improved initially but subsequently underwent placement of an artificial urinary sphincter for residual stress incontinence. In 1 patient several external sphincterotomies failed despite adequate sling placement. There were no complications related to the placement of the sling and all patients are able to perform intermittent catheterization without difficulty. CONCLUSIONS In select male patients the puboprostatic sling can be an effective and safe method to treat urethral incompetence secondary to neurogenic voiding dysfunction.

Epidemiology of current treatment for sexual dysfunction in spinal cord injured men in the USA model spinal cord injury centers.

This study is a prospective multicenter cooperative survey of the evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with spinal cord injury (SCI). Uniform database questionnaires were completed prospectively by patients seeking therapy for erectile dysfunction. Eighty-five SCI men aged 17-68 years (mean age = 26 +/- 17) were enrolled. Mean duration of traumatic SCI was 3 +/- 3.2 years (Range = 0.3-18 years). The level of injury was cervical in 20 patients, thoracic in 31, lumbar in 29 and sacral in five. Patients were fully evaluated and then counseled as to their therapeutic options. Twenty-eight chose to use a vacuum erection device (VED), 26 preferred pharmacological penile injection and five used both intracorporeal therapy and VED. The remainder were managed with marriage and sexual counseling in 10 patients, three underwent penile prosthesis placement and two used topical pharmacotherapy. Four patients used other forms of treatment and in nine no therapy was recommended. Of the patients that used pharmacologic injection only, 74 percent used papaverine as a single agent, 20 percent used papaverine with phentolamine, five percent used prostaglandin E (PGE1) alone and one percent used a mixture. Patients using injection therapy report sexual intercourse a mean of 3 +/- 3.4 times per month as compared with 5 +/- 3.2 times per month in those using VED. Five intracorporeal injection patients developed priapism while two patients using the VED developed subcutaneous bleeding and one developed penile ischemia. We conclude that although a spectrum of erectile dysfunction treatment is present among SCI centers, VED and pharmacological penile injection are by far the two most popular methods of treatment and papaverine is the most common drug. The incidence of complications is small in the model centers.

The Nonrefluxing Ileal Conduit: A New Form of Urinary Diversion

PURPOSE We describe a variation of the ileal conduit that includes a nonrefluxing nipple valve designed to protect the upper urinary tracts. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 13 patients underwent urinary diversion with the nonrefluxing ileal conduit. The nonrefluxing nipple valve is created by intussuscepting the ileum into the conduit. RESULTS Followup ranged from 3 to 35 months. No patient demonstrated radiographic deterioration of the upper tracts or a clinically significant increase in serum creatinine level during followup. CONCLUSIONS The nonrefluxing ileal conduit appears to be a viable treatment option in select patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction.