Bruce G. Redman

Activity of SU11248, a Multitargeted Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor, in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is characterized by loss of von Hippel Lindau tumor suppressor gene activity, resulting in high expression of pro-angiogenic growth factors: vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). SU11248 (sunitinib malate), a small molecule inhibitor with high binding affinity for VEGF and PDGF receptors, was tested for clinical activity in patients with metastatic RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic RCC and progression on first-line cytokine therapy were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial. SU11248 monotherapy was administered in repeated 6-week cycles of daily oral therapy for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off. Overall response rate was the primary end point, and time to progression and safety were secondary end points. Results Twenty-five (40%) of 63 patients treated with SU11248 achieved partial responses; 17 additional patients (27%) demonstrated stable disease lasting > or = 3 months. Median time to progression in the 63 patients was 8.7 months. Dosing was generally tolerated with manageable toxicities. CONCLUSION SU11248, a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGF and PDGF receptors, demonstrates antitumor activity in metastatic RCC as second-line therapy, a setting where no effective systemic therapy is presently recognized. The genetics of RCC and these promising clinical results support the hypothesis that VEGF and PDGF receptor-mediated signaling is an effective therapeutic target in RCC.

Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial

PURPOSE Nivolumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody that restores T-cell immune activity. This phase II trial assessed the antitumor activity, dose-response relationship, and safety of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clear-cell mRCC previously treated with agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway were randomly assigned (blinded ratio of 1:1:1) to nivolumab 0.3, 2, or 10 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate the dose-response relationship as measured by progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS A total of 168 patients were randomly assigned to the nivolumab 0.3- (n = 60), 2- (n = 54), and 10-mg/kg (n = 54) cohorts. One hundred eighteen patients (70%) had received more than one prior systemic regimen. Median PFS was 2.7, 4.0, and 4.2 months, respectively (P = .9). Respective ORRs were 20%, 22%, and 20%. Median OS was 18.2 months (80% CI, 16.2 to 24.0 months), 25.5 months (80% CI, 19.8 to 28.8 months), and 24.7 months (80% CI, 15.3 to 26.0 months), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse event (AE) was fatigue (24%, 22%, and 35%, respectively). Nineteen patients (11%) experienced grade 3 to 4 treatment-related AEs. CONCLUSION Nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile across the three doses studied in mRCC. No dose-response relationship was detected as measured by PFS. These efficacy and safety results in mRCC support study in the phase III setting.

Adjuvant High-Dose Bolus Interleukin-2 for Patients With High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cytokine Working Group Randomized Trial

PURPOSE This prospective, randomized, controlled phase III trial assessed high-dose bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) postoperatively in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligibility requirements were resected locally advanced (LA; T3b-4 or N1-3) or metastatic (M1) RCC, no prior systemic therapy, and excellent organ function. Randomized assignment was to one course of IL-2 (600,000 U/kg every 8 hours on days 1 to 5 and days 15 to 19 [maximum 28 doses]) or observation. The study was designed and powered to show an improvement in predicted 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) from 40% for the observation group to 70% for the treatment group. The accrual goal was 68 patients with LA disease, with 34 patients per treatment arm. Metastasectomy patients were to be analyzed separately because of their unpredictable natural history. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were enrolled onto the study (44 LA and 25 M1 patients). Toxic effects of IL-2 were as anticipated; no unexpected serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. Early closure occurred when an interim analysis determined that the 30% improvement in 2-year DFS could not be achieved despite full accrual. Sixteen of 21 LA patients receiving IL-2 experienced relapse, compared with 15 of 23 patients in the observation arm (P =.73); in the LA group, three deaths occurred in the IL-2 arm, and five deaths occurred in the observation arm (P =.38). Analysis including metastasectomy patients made no difference in DFS or overall survival. CONCLUSION One course of high-dose bolus IL-2, though feasible, did not produce the ambitious clinically meaningful benefit anticipated when administered postoperatively to patients with resected high-risk RCC.

Phase I/II Trial of Tremelimumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

PURPOSE Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) blockade with tremelimumab (CP-675,206), a fully human anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody, was tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in a single dose, dose-escalation phase I trial in patients with solid tumors. This phase I/II trial was conducted to examine safety of multiple doses of tremelimumab, to further assess efficacy, and to identify an appropriate dosing regimen for further development. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-eight patients with metastatic melanoma received monthly intravenous infusions of tremelimumab at 3, 6, or 10 mg/kg for up to 1 year to determine recommended monthly phase II dose. During phase II, 89 patients received tremelimumab 10 mg/kg once every month or 15 mg/kg every 3 months. RESULTS No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in phase I once every month dosing. In phase II, 8 (10%) of 84 response-assessable patients attained objective antitumor responses; best overall objective response was one complete response and three partial responses in each dosing regimen. Most responses were durable (range, 3 to 30+ months). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, rash, and pruritus. Frequency of grade 3/4 AEs was 13% in the 15 mg/kg every 3 months arm and 27% in the 10 mg/kg once every month. Serious AEs were also less frequent in the 15 mg/kg once every 3 months cohort (9% v 23% in 10 mg/kg arm). CONCLUSION Multiple infusions of tremelimumab were generally tolerable and demonstrated single-agent antitumor activity. Both phase II regimens generated durable tumor responses. Based on its more favorable safety profile, 15 mg/kg every 3 months was selected for further clinical testing.

Adjuvant immunotherapy of resected, intermediate-thickness, node-negative melanoma with an allogeneic tumor vaccine: Overall results of a randomized trial of the Southwest Oncology Group

PURPOSE Patients with clinically negative nodes constitute over 85% of new melanoma cases. There is no adjuvant therapy for intermediate-thickness, node-negative melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The Southwest Oncology Group conducted a randomized phase III trial of an allogeneic melanoma vaccine for 2 years versus observation in patients with intermediate-thickness (1.5 to 4.0 mm or Clarks level IV if thickness unknown), clinically or pathologically node-negative melanoma (T3N0M0). RESULTS Six hundred eighty-nine patients were accrued over 4.5 years; 89 patients (13%) were ineligible. Surgical node staging was performed in 24%, the remainder were clinical N0. Thirteen eligible patients refused assigned treatment: seven on the observation arm and six on the vaccine arm. Most vaccine patients experienced mild to moderate local toxicity, but 26 (9%) experienced grade 3 toxicity. After a median follow-up of 5.6 years, there were 107 events (tumor recurrences or deaths) among the 300 eligible patients randomized to vaccine compared with 114 among the 300 eligible patients randomized to observation (hazard ratio, 0.92; Cox-adjusted P(2) = 0.51). There was no difference in vaccine efficacy among patients with tumors < or = 3 mm or > 3 mm. CONCLUSION This represents one of the largest randomized, controlled trials of adjuvant vaccine therapy in human cancer reported to date. Compliance with randomization was excellent, with only 2% refusing assigned therapy. There is no evidence of improved disease-free survival among patients randomized to receive vaccine, although the power to detect a small but clinically significant difference was low. Future investigations of adjuvant vaccine approaches for patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma should involve larger numbers of patients and ideally should include sentinel node biopsy staging.

A phase II trial of oral diethylstilbesterol as a second-line hormonal agent in advanced prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES To test the use of 1 mg/day of oral diethylstilbesterol (DES) as a treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer who had failed primary hormonal therapy. Approximately 40,000 men this year will experience first-line hormonal therapy failure for their metastatic prostate cancer. At this time there is no standard therapy for men whose first-line hormonal manipulation has failed. This clinical problem has been exacerbated by the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a proved biomarker to follow disease progression. Patients who are experiencing hormonal therapy failure now present with a rising PSA, and virtually all are asymptomatic. The dilemma of how to treat these patients represents a new clinical problem for the medical oncologist and urologist that needs to be answered. METHODS We conducted a Phase II trial of oral DES in 21 patients. Patients were followed for response by PSA criteria and toxicity. A decrease in two serial measurements of PSA of greater than 50% from baseline was judged to be a partial response. RESULTS Nine of 21 patients achieved a PSA response (43% response rate with 95% confidence intervals of 22% to 64%) leading to early cessation of this Phase II trial. Eight of 13 patients (62%) who had only one prior hormone manipulation that failed demonstrated a PSA response, whereas only 1 of 8 patients (13%) who had received two or more hormone treatments responded (P = 0.07). The median follow-up is 82 weeks (range 8 to 122) among 16 surviving patients. The survival rate at 2 years is 63% (95% confidence interval 41% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS DES appears to be an active agent for second-line hormone therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. Because it has been taken off the market for economic reasons, DES should be considered for development under the orphan drug strategy.

Psychiatric Side Effects of Interferon Therapy: Prevalence, Proposed Mechanisms, and Future Directions

The increasing use of interferon (IFN) in treating a variety of disorders including, malignant melanoma and hepatitis C, has resulted in the identification and increasing concern about the psychiatric side effects that can result from treatment. These effects can occur either shortly after beginning IFN therapy or later as a result of continued treatment. Studies have reported the incidence of later side effects, which include symptoms of depression, anxiety, and occasional suicidal ideation, to be from 0% to 70%. Case studies have demonstrated that pharmacologic interventions are beneficial in reducing iatrogenic psychiatric symptoms while allowing patients to maintain IFN therapy. The present article provides an overview of the psychiatric effects of IFN therapy, the proposed mechanisms of these side effects, and case studies that provide mechanistic support. In addition, limitations of the current literature are provided with suggestions for treating physicians and a discussion of possible future research directions.

Phase II Trial of Oral Estramustine, Oral Etoposide, and Intravenous Paclitaxel in Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate the combination of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel, oral estramustine, and oral etoposide in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty patients with carcinoma of the prostate that was progressing despite hormonal therapy and who had undergone antiandrogen withdrawal (if previously treated with an antiandrogen) were enrolled onto this phase II trial. Patients were treated with oral estramustine 280 mg tid and oral etoposide 100 mg/d for 7 days, with paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) IV over 1 hour on day 2 of each 21-day treatment cycle. Patients received a maximum of six cycles of therapy. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients were assessable for response. Twenty-two had measurable disease at baseline; response was not assessable in six of these patients. Overall response was 45% (10 of 22 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24% to 68%), and response was 63% (10 of 16) in assessable patients. Twenty-six patients had a > or = 50% decrease from their baseline prostate-specific antigen levels during therapy, for a response rate of 65% (95% CI, 48% to 79%) by this criterion. Median duration of response was 3.2 months, with an estimated median survival of 12.8 months. Major toxicities of therapy were leukopenia (eight patients had > or = grade 4 leukopenia) and anemia. Hematologic toxicity seemed to be associated with liver metastases. Serial measurements in 24 patients using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) showed no significant change in quality of life (QOL) as a result of therapy. CONCLUSION The combination of IV paclitaxel, oral estramustine, and oral etoposide is active in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The regimen is tolerable and does not have a significant impact on QOL as measured by the FACT-P in a limited sample of patients.

Phase I Study of Recombinant Interleukin-21 in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE A phase I study of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) evaluated the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor activity of recombinant human interleukin-21 (rIL-21). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who had one or fewer prior systemic treatments for metastatic MM or RCC were treated with rIL-21 administered for two 5-day cycles on days 1 through 5 and 15 through 19 of a treatment course; rIL-21 was administered by rapid intravenous infusion in an outpatient setting. Cohorts of patients received doses ranging from 3 to 100 microg/kg/dose, and an expanded cohort was treated at the MTD. Patients with stable disease (SD) or better could receive additional treatment cycles. RESULTS Forty-three patients were treated (24 MM; 19 RCC), including 28 in the expanded cohort. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted primarily of transient grade 3 laboratory abnormalities. The MTD was estimated to be 30 microg/kg. The most common adverse events included flu-like symptoms, pruritus, and rash. Twelve patients received up to five additional two-cycle courses of treatment without cumulative toxicity, except for one patient with reversible grade 4 hepatotoxicity. Serum concentrations of rIL-21 increased in a dose-proportional manner. Dose-dependent increases in soluble CD25 reflected lymphocyte activation. Antitumor activity was observed in both MM (one complete response and 11 SD) and RCC (four partial responses, 13 SD). CONCLUSION Outpatient therapy with rIL-21 at 30 microg/kg was well tolerated, had dose-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and was associated with antitumor activity in patients with MM and RCC.

FOXP3 Defines Regulatory T Cells in Human Tumor and Autoimmune Disease

Activated T cells may express FOXP3. It is thought that FOXP3 is not a specific marker to determine regulatory T cells (Treg) in humans. Here, we examined the functional phenotype and cytokine profile of the in vitro induced FOXP3(+) T cells, primary FOXP3(+) and FOXP3(-) T cells in patients with ulcerative colitis and tumors including colon carcinoma, melanoma, hepatic carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. We observed similar levels of suppressive capacity of primary FOXP3(+) T cells in blood, tumors, and colitic tissues. Compared with primary FOXP3(-) T cells in the same microenvironment, these primary FOXP3(+) T cells expressed minimal levels of effector cytokines, negligible amount of cytotoxic molecule granzyme B, and levels of suppressive molecules interleukin-10 and PD-1. Although the in vitro activated T cells expressed FOXP3, these induced FOXP3(+) T cells expressed high levels of multiple effector cytokines and were not functionally suppressive. The data reinforce the fact that FOXP3 remains an accurate marker to define primary Tregs in patients with cancer and autoimmune disease. We suggest that the combination of FOXP3 and cytokine profile is useful for further functionally distinguishing primary Tregs from activated conventional T cells.