Bruce J. Naughton

Hospital at Home: Feasibility and Outcomes of a Program To Provide Hospital-Level Care at Home for Acutely Ill Older Patients

Context Hospital care for older people often means iatrogenic complications and a decline in function. Home hospital care might reduce these adverse outcomes. Content Patients were 65 years of age or older and required hospital care for pneumonia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cellulitis. In phase I, they were hospitalized. In phase II, they could choose home hospital care (continuous nursing care followed by at least daily visits from a nurse and a physician). Sixty percent of patients chose home hospital care. Patients who received this type of care had shorter stays; fewer procedures, consultations, and indwelling devices; less delirium; greater satisfaction; and similar functional outcomes. Cautions The study was nonrandomized, and data were missing. Conclusion Home hospital care may be a good alternative for selected patients. The Editors Although the acute care hospital is the standard venue for providing acute medical care, it is expensive and may be hazardous for older persons, who commonly experience functional decline, iatrogenic illness, and other adverse events during care (1-3). Providing acute hospital-level care in a patients home is an alternative to hospital care (4, 5). Although several hospital-at-home models have been studied, there is controversy regarding the effectiveness of this method. In part, this reflects heterogeneity among hospital-at-home models (6). A recent Cochrane review examined surgical and medical early hospital discharge models, terminal care, and admission avoidance, that is, substitutive models. Overall, no differences were found in health outcomes. Patients, but not caregivers, had increased satisfaction with hospital-at-home care, and there was some evidence that substitutive models may be cost-effective (7). However, with some exceptions (8), most of these models would be difficult to distinguish from augmented skilled nursing services, community-based long-term care, or home-based primary care services in the United States. In addition, most studies have been done in countries with single-payer national health insurance systems (7-14). Previous research in the United States has been limited to a pilot study of a physician-led substitutive hospital-at-home model for older persons with acute medical illness (15). The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, clinical and functional outcomes, patient and caregiver satisfaction, and costs of providing acute hospital-level care in a hospital at home that substituted entirely for admission to an acute care hospital for older persons. Methods Patients The target sample was community-dwelling persons, age 65 years and older, who lived in a catchment area and who, in the opinion of a physician not involved in the study, required admission to an acute care hospital for 1 of 4 target illnesses: community-acquired pneumonia, exacerbation of chronic heart failure, exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cellulitis. Patients were required to meet validated criteria of medical eligibility for hospital-at-home care (16), which were designed to identify patients who would be medically suitable for this type of treatment. The most common reasons for medical ineligibility were uncorrectable hypoxemia (oxygen saturation <90%), suspected myocardial ischemia, and presence of an acute illness, other than the target illness, for which the patient was required to be hospitalized. Study Design This study was a prospective quasi-experiment conducted in 2 consecutive 11-month phases. During the acute care hospital observation phase (1 November 1990 to 30 September 2001), eligible patients were identified and followed through usual hospital care. Study coordinators verified the patients eligibility for hospital-at-home care using a standard protocol at the time of enrollment. During this observation phase of the study, most patients were identified the morning after admission. These patients made up the acute hospital observation comparison group. During the intervention phase (1 November 2001 to 30 September 2002), eligible patients were identified at the time of admission and were offered the option of receiving their care in hospital at home rather than in the acute care hospital. Patients who chose hospital-at-home treatment were never admitted to the acute care hospital but received treatment, after initial evaluation (usually in the emergency department), in their home. The intervention group comprised all patients eligible for hospital-at-home care, irrespective of where they were treated. Approval The institutional review boards from each study site, the coordinating center, and officials at the Center for Health Plans and Providers at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) gave their approval for the study. All participants provided informed written consent. Study Sites The study was conducted in 3 Medicare managed care (Medicare + Choice) plans at 2 sites and at a Veterans Administration medical center. Univera Health and Independent Health, in Buffalo, New York, are Medicare + Choice plans that operate in an independent practice association model. These 2 plans collaborated to provide hospital-at-home care and made up 1 study site (site 1). The Fallon Health Care System (site 2), in Worcester, Massachusetts, operates a not-for-profit Medicare + Choice plan, and the Fallon Clinic, a for-profit multispecialty physician group, provides care on a capitated basis to Medicare + Choice beneficiaries. The Portland, Oregon, Veterans Administration Medical Center (site 3) is a quaternary care and teaching facility. Assessments Age, gender, and primary diagnosis were obtained for all eligible patients. Informed written consent was required for all additional data collection: medical record review, cost data review, and interviews. Staff trained at the coordinating center used standard procedures outlined in a detailed training manual to conduct all interviews, assessments, and medical record reviews. At baseline, interrater reliability was verified among the staff. Quality checks of medical record reviews were done midway through the study. Interrater reliability for ratings on the components of the daily patient interview was confirmed in 13 paired observations ( = 0.91). Interrater reliability among study sites was similar. Medical Record Reviews Medical records were abstracted by using a standardized instrument that captured illness acuity, health status, medication use, results of laboratory tests, treatments, the hospital course and complications, health outcomes, and whether treatment standards were met. Illness acuity was determined by using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (17). Health status was measured by using clinical indicators appropriate to the diagnoses, a checklist of chronic medical conditions, and the Charlson comorbidity index (18). Medication use was defined as the number of prescribed medications taken on a daily basis at the time of admission. Diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were categorized as potentially difficult or not difficult to do in the home. The patients clinical course was characterized according to whether emergency situations (those that required physician evaluation within 30 minutes, such as the development of acute shortness of breath) or critical complications (death, transfer to intensive care setting, intubation, or myocardial infarction) occurred. Clinical care was examined with regard to completion of illness-specific standards of care (19-21). Eligible patients who consented to participate completed a baseline interview that included demographic information, self-reported health status, assessment of sleep, Katz activities (22), Lawton instrumental activities of daily living (23), continence, mobility, the Geriatric Depression Scale (24), Jaeger vision test, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (25), the Digit Span Test (26), and evaluation by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) (27). Subsequently, patients were evaluated daily until discharge by using a structured interview consisting of the MMSE, Digit Span Test, and CAM rating. A family member, caregiver, or person who knew the patient well was interviewed at the time of admission to complete the modified Blessed Dementia Rating Scale (28). At 2 weeks after admission, patients and family members were interviewed by telephone to obtain the patients current functional status and to assess his or her satisfaction with care. Intervention: The Hospital-at-Home Model of Care The hospital-at-home model of care has been described previously (15). Briefly, a patient requiring admission to the acute care hospital for a target illness was identified in an emergency department or ambulatory site and his or her eligibility status was determined. Nonstudy medical personnel, usually emergency department physicians, made the decision to hospitalize the patient. All patients who were offered but who declined hospital-at-home care were admitted to the acute care hospital. After informed consent was obtained, the patient was transported home by an ambulance. Patients were evaluated by the hospital-at-home physician either in the emergency department or shortly after arriving at home. Patients who required oxygen therapy were sent home with a portable oxygen apparatus pending delivery of home oxygen therapy. The hospital-at-home nurse met the ambulance at the patients home. The patient had subsequent direct one-on-one nursing supervision for an initial period of at least 8 hours at site 3 and for a period of 24 hours at sites 1 and 2. When direct nursing supervision was no longer required, the patient had intermittent nursing visits at least daily. The hospital-at-home physician made at least daily home visits and was available 24 hours a day for urgent or emergent visits. Nursing and other care components, such as durable medical equipme

Delirium and Other Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults in an Emergency Department

STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of delirium and other alterations in mental status in older adults in the emergency department setting. DESIGN Prospective, cross-sectional study. SETTING Private, nonprofit, academic medical center in a densely populated urban area. PARTICIPANTS One hundred eighty-eight adults 70 years or older who presented to the ED. INTERVENTIONS None. RESULTS Delirium and other alterations in mental status were present in 39.9% of the patients studied; 24% of these patients had delirium. Age and severity of illness were positively correlated with alteration in mental status. Patients with alterations in mental status were more likely to be admitted to an inpatient unit. Among those admitted from home, alterations in mental status in the ED were associated with a higher likelihood of institutionalization at discharge. CONCLUSION Alterations in mental status are prevalent in ED patients. Older adults with alterations in mental status, particularly alterations in consciousness and delirium, are at high risk for admission to an inpatient unit and institutionalization after discharge. Standardized mental status testing identified high-risk older adults in the ED.

A multifactorial intervention to reduce prevalence of delirium and shorten hospital length of stay.

Objectives: To improve outcomes for cognitively impaired and delirious older adults.

Validation and application of the pneumonia prognosis index to nursing home residents with pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictability of a pneumonia prognosis index in nursing home residents with pneumonia and to use the index to account for acute severity of pneumonia before comparing the short‐term outcome of residents with pneumonia treated with intravenous antibiotic therapy in two different settings: an inpatient geriatrics unit and a nursing home

Treatment Guideline for Nursing Home-Acquired Pneumonia Based on Community Practice

OBJECTIVES: To describe the findings of a retrospective study of the treatment of nursing home‐acquired pneumonia (NHAP) in 11 nursing homes in one community and the development of a treatment guideline for NHAP using data from the retrospective study.

Outcome of Nursing Home‐Acquired Pneumonia: Derivation and Application of a Practical Model to Predict 30 Day Mortality

OBJECTIVES: To derive a prediction model of 30 day mortality for nursing home‐acquired pneumonia (NHAP) based on factors that can be readily identified by nursing home staff at the time of diagnosis and to apply the model to management issues related to NHAP including clarifying the importance of prepneumonia functional status as a predictor of outcome of NHAP.

A comprehensive collaborative patient safety residency curriculum to address the ACGME core competencies

Context  Patient safety currently receives only scant attention in most residency curricula. Safety is a subject that transcends the US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Educations 6 core competencies.

Predicting stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcome using a classification tree approach

A classification tree, a nonparametric statistical analysis, was used to develop decision rules to predict a favorable inpatient stroke rehabilitation outcome. Descriptive and functional status data collected on admission from 225 patients were the predictor variables. Favorable outcome was defined as having met three criteria: discharged to community, survival greater than 3 months postdischarge, and no more than minimal physical assistance required in functional activities on discharge. The classification tree correctly classified 88% of the sample using only four of the predictor variables (level of independence in Toilet Management, Bladder Management, and Toilet Transfer, and adequacy of Financial Resources). The cross validation error rate was 18%. The advantages of the classification tree approach over parametric methods are that it is desirable for ordinal data, it readily identifies the interactions among predictor variables, the results are easily communicated, and it provides additional insights into the factors that predict outcome.

Satisfaction with Hospital at Home Care

OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in satisfaction with acute care between patients who received treatment in a physician‐led substitutive Hospital at Home program and those who received usual acute hospital care.

Self Report and Performance-Based Hand Function Tests as Correlates of Dependency in the Elderly

Preventing or minimizing functional dependency in older adults rests, in part, upon the ability to predict who is at risk. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of five tests of hand function to discriminate the degree of dependency in older adults. Seven hundred sixty four subjects were assessed for hand function on performance‐based (Williams Test of Hand Function, a test of Williams Board items only, Jebsen Test of Hand Function, grip strength), and self‐reported (Dexterity Scale of the Geriatrics‐Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale (GERI‐AIMS)) measures of hand function, and self‐reported multidimensional functional status (GERI‐AIMS). A trichotomous variable representing a continuum of dependency based upon living site (independent living, home‐bound, institutional) was used as the measure of dependency. Sixty‐two cases were dropped for incomplete data. Discriminant function analyses of the 702 subjects (age = 76.78 years, SD = 8.79) showed that basic demographic variables explain 40.8% of the variance in dependency; all hand function tests significantly correlated with dependency; the Williams Board correlated best (additional 12.5% variance explained). However, a multidimensional functional status measure explains substantially more variance in dependency (16.9%) after controlling for demographic variables and performance on the Williams Board. This comparison of methods and tests available for measuring hand function was made to provide criteria for selecting an instrument for a given setting.