Bruce Salzberg
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bruce Salzberg.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2012
Gary R. Lichtenstein; Brian G. Feagan; Russell D. Cohen; Bruce Salzberg; Robert H. Diamond; Samiyeh Price; Wayne Langholff; Anil Londhe; William J. Sandborn
OBJECTIVES:The objective of this study was to contribute long-term safety data for infliximab and other therapies in Crohns disease (CD).METHODS:We prospectively evaluated CD patients enrolled in the large, observational Crohns Therapy, Resource, Evaluation, and Assessment Tool registry, established to compare infliximab safety with conventional nonbiological medications in CD.RESULTS:A total of 6,273 patients were enrolled and evaluated on or before 23 February 2010; 3,420 received infliximab (17,712 patient-years; 89.9% received ≥2 infusions) and 2,853 received other-treatments-only (13,251 patient-years). Mean length of patient follow-up was 5.2 years. More infliximab- than other-treatments-only-treated patients had moderate-to-severe (30.6% vs. 10.7%) or severe-to-fulminant (2.5% vs. 0.6%) disease severity (P<0.001). In the year before enrollment, more infliximab- than other-treatments-only-treated patients required surgical intervention (17.4% vs. 13.6%), medical hospitalization (14.2% vs. 8.8%), prednisone (47.8% vs. 31.4%), immunomodulators (52.0% vs. 32.1%), and narcotic analgesics (17.3% vs. 9.1%). Patient mortality was similar for infliximab- and other-treatments-only-treated patients (0.58 vs. 0.59/100 patient-years). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, treatment with prednisone (hazard ratio (HR)=2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.55, 2.95; P<0.001) or narcotic analgesics (HR=1.79, 95% CI=1.29, 2.48; P<0.001) and age (HR=1.08, 95% CI=1.07, 1.09; P<0.001) were associated with increased mortality risk. Neither infliximab nor immunomodulator treatment was associated with increased mortality risk. Factors independently associated with serious infections included moderate-to-severe disease activity (HR=2.24, 95% CI=1.57, 3.19; P<0.001), narcotic analgesic treatment (HR=1.98, 95% CI=1.44, 2.73; P<0.001), prednisone therapy (HR=1.57, 95% CI=1.17, 2.10; P=0.002), and infliximab treatment (HR=1.43, 95% CI=1.11, 1.84; P=0.006).CONCLUSIONS:Mortality was similar between infliximab- and other-treatments-only-treated CD patients. An increased risk of serious infection with infliximab was observed, although CD severity and use of prednisone or narcotic analgesics carried higher risks.
The New England Journal of Medicine | 2016
Brian G. Feagan; William J. Sandborn; Christopher Gasink; Douglas Jacobstein; Yinghua Lang; Joshua R. Friedman; Marion Blank; Jewel Johanns; Long-Long Gao; Ye Miao; Omoniyi J. Adedokun; Bruce E. Sands; Stephen B. Hanauer; Severine Vermeire; Stephan R. Targan; Subrata Ghosh; Willem J. de Villiers; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Zsolt Tulassay; Ursula Seidler; Bruce Salzberg; Pierre Desreumaux; Scott D. Lee; Edward V. Loftus; Levinus A. Dieleman; Seymour Katz; Paul Rutgeerts
BACKGROUND Ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody to the p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, was evaluated as an intravenous induction therapy in two populations with moderately to severely active Crohns disease. Ustekinumab was also evaluated as subcutaneous maintenance therapy. METHODS We randomly assigned patients to receive a single intravenous dose of ustekinumab (either 130 mg or approximately 6 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo in two induction trials. The UNITI-1 trial included 741 patients who met the criteria for primary or secondary nonresponse to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or had unacceptable side effects. The UNITI-2 trial included 628 patients in whom conventional therapy failed or unacceptable side effects occurred. Patients who completed these induction trials then participated in IM-UNITI, in which the 397 patients who had a response to ustekinumab were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous maintenance injections of 90 mg of ustekinumab (either every 8 weeks or every 12 weeks) or placebo. The primary end point for the induction trials was a clinical response at week 6 (defined as a decrease from baseline in the Crohns Disease Activity Index [CDAI] score of ≥100 points or a CDAI score <150). The primary end point for the maintenance trial was remission at week 44 (CDAI score <150). RESULTS The rates of response at week 6 among patients receiving intravenous ustekinumab at a dose of either 130 mg or approximately 6 mg per kilogram were significantly higher than the rates among patients receiving placebo (in UNITI-1, 34.3%, 33.7%, and 21.5%, respectively, with P≤0.003 for both comparisons with placebo; in UNITI-2, 51.7%, 55.5%, and 28.7%, respectively, with P<0.001 for both doses). In the groups receiving maintenance doses of ustekinumab every 8 weeks or every 12 weeks, 53.1% and 48.8%, respectively, were in remission at week 44, as compared with 35.9% of those receiving placebo (P=0.005 and P=0.04, respectively). Within each trial, adverse-event rates were similar among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with moderately to severely active Crohns disease, those receiving intravenous ustekinumab had a significantly higher rate of response than did those receiving placebo. Subcutaneous ustekinumab maintained remission in patients who had a clinical response to induction therapy. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01369329 , NCT01369342 , and NCT01369355 .).
Gastroenterology | 1999
Bruce E. Sands; Simmy Bank; Charles A. Sninsky; Malcolm K. Robinson; Seymour Katz; John W. Singleton; Philip B. Miner; Michael Safdi; Susan Galandiuk; Stephen B. Hanauer; Gary W. Varilek; Alan L. Buchman; Vance D. Rodgers; Bruce Salzberg; Bin Cai; John Loewy; Michael F. DeBruin; Holly Rogge; Mark Shapiro; Ullrich S. Schwertschlag
BACKGROUND & AIMS Recombinant human interleukin 11 (rhIL-11) is a cytokine with thrombocytopoietic activity and anti-inflammatory and mucosal protective effects. The objectives of this study were to investigate the safety and tolerability of rhIL-11 in patients with Crohns disease and to explore the effects of dose and schedule on platelet count and Crohns disease activity. METHODS A multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of 76 patients with active Crohns disease was performed. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous placebo or rhIL-11 at doses of 5, 16, or 40 microgram. kg-1. wk-1 given 2 or 5 times weekly for 3 weeks. Clinical and laboratory safety data were recorded, and disease activity was measured at each visit. RESULTS Subcutaneous injection of rhIL-11 generally was well tolerated. Significantly greater increases in platelet counts were found among patients receiving rhIL-11 40 microgram. kg-1. wk-1 as 2 or 5 weekly doses and 16 microgram. kg-1. week-1 as 5 weekly doses compared with patients receiving placebo (P < 0.05). Patients receiving 16 microgram. kg-1. wk-1 had the highest clinical response rates, with a response seen in 42% of patients (5/12) receiving 5 weekly doses and 33% of patients (4/12) receiving 2 weekly doses, compared with 7% of patients (1/15) receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS Short-term treatment with rhIL-11 is well tolerated in patients with active Crohns disease. The thrombocytopoietic effect of rhIL-11 seems to be both dose and schedule dependent and may be minimized with retained clinical benefit in Crohns disease at 16 microgram. kg-1. wk-1 given in 2 equal doses.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2006
Gary R. Lichtenstein; Allan Olson; Suzanne Travers; Robert H. Diamond; Donny M. Chen; Michelle L. Pritchard; Brian G. Feagan; Russell D. Cohen; Bruce Salzberg; Stephen B. Hanauer; William J. Sandborn
OBJECTIVE:Theoretical concern exists that rapid luminal healing in Crohns disease (CD) with therapies like infliximab increases the risk of intestinal stenosis, stricture, or obstruction (SSOs).METHODS:Data were analyzed from the ongoing observational TREAT (the Crohns Therapy, Resource, Evaluation, and Assessment Tool) Registry and ACCENT I (A Crohns Disease Clinical Trial Evaluating Infliximab in a New Long-Term Treatment Regimen) study. Investigators reported SSOs as adverse events or serious adverse events.RESULTS:In TREAT, SSOs occurred at a significantly higher rate in patients treated with infliximab compared with patients who received other treatments only (1.95 events/100 patient-years vs 0.99 events/100 patient-years; p < 0.001). Using multivariable analyses, however, infliximab therapy was not associated with SSO development. CD severity at the time of event onset (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.35, 95% confidence internal (CI) 1.35–4.09); CD duration (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.04); ileal disease (HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.04–2.36); and new corticosteroid use (HR = 2.85, 95% CI 1.23–6.57) were associated with SSOs. In ACCENT I, no increase in SSOs was reported in patients who received infliximab maintenance therapy compared with those who received episodic therapy, despite higher median cumulative infliximab exposure. Additionally, there was no increase in SSO development with rapid mucosal healing (healing at week 10).CONCLUSIONS:Although unadjusted analyses suggested that patients who received infliximab were twice as likely to develop SSOs, multivariable analysis adjusting for other factors demonstrated that only disease duration, disease severity, ileal disease, and new corticosteroid use were significantly associated with SSO development.
Gut | 2006
G. Van Assche; William J. Sandborn; Brian G. Feagan; Bruce Salzberg; D Silvers; W M Pandak; F H Anderson; John F. Valentine; Gary Wild; D J Geenen; R Sprague; S Targan; P. Rutgeerts; V Vexler; D Young; R S Shames
Background: An uncontrolled pilot study demonstrated that daclizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody to the interleukin 2 receptor (CD25), might be effective for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Methods: A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of daclizumab induction therapy in patients with active ulcerative colitis. A total of 159 patients with moderate ulcerative colitis were randomised to receive induction therapy with daclizumab 1 mg/kg intravenously at weeks 0 and 4, or 2 mg/kg intravenously at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6, or placebo. The primary end point was induction of remission at week 8. Remission was defined as a Mayo score of 0 on both endoscopy and rectal bleeding components and a score of 0 or 1 on stool frequency and physician’s global assessment components. Response was defined as a decrease from baseline in the Mayo score of at least 3 points. Results: Two per cent of patients receiving daclizumab 1 mg/kg (p = 0.11 v placebo) and 7% of patients receiving 2 mg/kg (p = 0.73) were in remission at week 8, compared with 10% of those who received placebo. Response occurred at week 8 in 25% of patients receiving daclizumab 1 mg/kg (p = 0.04) and in 33% of patients receiving 2 mg/kg (p = 0.30) versus 44% of those receiving placebo. Daclizumab was well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events in daclizumab treated patients compared with placebo treated patients were nasopharyngitis (14.6%) and pyrexia (10.7%). Conclusion: Patients with moderate ulcerative colitis who are treated with daclizumab are not more likely to be in remission or response at eight weeks than patients treated with placebo.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2002
Bruce E. Sands; B. D. Winston; Bruce Salzberg; Michael Safdi; C. Barish; L. Wruble; R. Wilkins; Mark Shapiro; Ullrich S. Schwertschlag
Interleukin‐11 is a mesenchymally derived cytokine with pleiotropic activities. A pilot study suggested therapeutic benefit of recombinant human interleukin‐11 (rhIL‐11) in patients with Crohns disease.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2014
Gary R. Lichtenstein; Brian G. Feagan; Russell D. Cohen; Bruce Salzberg; Robert H. Diamond; Wayne Langholff; Anil Londhe; William J. Sandborn
OBJECTIVES:We assessed potential associations between malignancy and antitumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with Crohns disease (CD), as this relationship is currently poorly defined.METHODS:Utilizing data from the Crohns Therapy, Resource, Evaluation, and Assessment Tool (TREAT™) Registry, a prospective cohort study examining long-term outcomes of CD treatments in community and academic settings, infl uences of baseline patient/disease characteristics and medications were assessed by survival analysis and multivariate models. Standardized incidence ratios and exact 95 % confi dence intervals were determined as the ratio of events observed (TREAT) vs. expected (general population of USA).RESULTS:As of 23 February 2010, 6,273 CD patients (infliximab during registry=3,420 (during or within 1 year before registry=3,764); other-treatments-only: 2,509), were enrolled and, on average, had been followed for 5.2/7.6 years, respectively, for all/currently active patients. Crude cancer incidences were similar between infliximab- and other-treatments-only-exposed patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that baseline age (hazard ratio (HR)=1.59/10 years; P<0.001), disease duration (HR=1.64/10 years; P=0.012), and smoking (HR=1.38; P=0.045) but neither immunosuppressive therapy alone (HR=1.43; P=0.11), infliximab therapy alone (HR=0.59; P=0.16), nor their combination (HR=1.22, P=0.34) were independently associated with the risk of malignancy. When compared with the general population, no significant increase in incidence was observed in any malignancy category. In an exposure-based analysis, use of immunosuppressants alone (odds ratio=4.19) or in combination with infliximab (3.33) seemed to be associated with a numerically, but not significantly, greater risk of malignancy than did treatment with infliximab alone (1.96) relative to treatment with neither.CONCLUSIONS:In the TREAT Registry, age, disease duration, and smoking were independently associated with increased risk of malignancy. Although results for immunosuppressant use were equivocal, no significant association between malignancy and infliximab was observed.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology | 2013
William A. Faubion; Joel G. Fletcher; Sharon O'Byrne; Brian G. Feagan; Willem J. de Villiers; Bruce Salzberg; Scott E. Plevy; Deborah D. Proctor; John F. Valentine; Peter D. Higgins; Jeffrey M. Harris; Lauri Diehl; Lilyan Wright; Gaik Wei Tew; Diana Luca; Karen Basu; Mary E. Keir
Objectives:In Crohns disease (CD), clinical symptoms correspond poorly to inflammatory disease activity. Biomarkers reflective of mucosal and bowel wall inflammation would be useful to monitor disease activity. The EMBARK study evaluated disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and CD, and used endoscopy with or without cross-sectional imaging for biomarker discovery.Methods:UC (n=107) and CD (n=157) patients were characterized and underwent ileocolonoscopy (ICO). A subset of CD patients (n=66) also underwent computed tomography enterography (CTE). ICO and CTE were scored by a gastroenterologist and radiologist who incorporated findings of inflammation into a single score (ICO-CTE) for patients that underwent both procedures. Serum and fecal biomarkers were evaluated for association with the Mayo Clinic endoscopy score in UC patients and with ICO alone or ICO-CTE in CD patients. Individual biomarkers with a moderate degree of correlation (P≤0.3) were evaluated using multivariate analysis with model selection using a stepwise procedure.Results:In UC, ordinal logistic regression using Mayo Clinic endoscopy subscore selected the combination of fecal calprotectin and serum matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9; pseudo R2=0.353). In CD, we found that use of the ICO-CTE increased specificity of known biomarkers. Using ICO-CTE as the dependent variable for biomarker discovery, the selected biomarkers were the combination of fecal calprotectin, serum MMP9, and serum IL-22 (r=0.699).Conclusions:Incorporation of both ICO and CTE into a single measure increased biomarker performance in CD. Combinations of fecal calprotectin and serum MMP9 for UC, and combinations of fecal calprotectin, serum MMP9, and serum interleukin-22 in CD, demonstrated the strongest association with imaging/endoscopy-defined inflammation.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2010
Daniel C. Baumgart; Stephan R. Targan; Axel Dignass; Lloyd Mayer; Gert Van Assche; Daan W. Hommes; Stephen B. Hanauer; Uma Mahadevan; W. Reinisch; Scott E. Plevy; Bruce Salzberg; Alan L. Buchman; Grigor M. Mechkov; Zahariy A. Krastev; James Lowder; Matthew Frankel; William J. Sandborn
Background: Visilizumab is a humanized IgG2 monoclonal anti‐CD3 antibody. We evaluated its safety and dose response in severe intravenous steroid‐refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: In all, 104 patients were treated. In Stage I, 73 patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous visilizumab 5, 7.5, 10, or 12.5 &mgr;g/kg/day for 2 consecutive days. In Stage II, 33 patients received visilizumab at the optimal clinical dose (OCD) of 5 &mgr;g/kg/day for 2 days. Symptomatic response and remission were defined by the modified Truelove–Witts severity index. Clinical response and remission were defined by the Mayo score. Results: The rates of symptomatic response at day 15 in the 5, 7.5, 10, or 12.5 &mgr;g/kg dose groups were 71%, 70%, 50%, and 61%, respectively, in Stage I and in 54% in Stage II. The symptomatic remission rates were 35%, 5%, 22%, and 11% in Stage I and 18% in Stage II. The rates of clinical response at day 30 in the 5, 7.5, 10, or 12.5 &mgr;g/kg dose groups were 71%, 65%, 50%, and 67%, respectively, in Stage I and 55% in Stage II. The clinical remission rates were 6%, 5%, 0%, and 11% in Stage I and 6% in Stage II. All patients experienced adverse events. Serious adverse events included abdominal abscess, cytomegalovirus infection, atrial fibrillation, herpes zoster, and esophageal candidiasis. Conclusions: Treatment with visilizumab induced symptomatic response and clinical response. Results with 5 &mgr;g/kg/day were similar to those observed with higher doses (NCT00267306 at www.clinicaltrials.gov). (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009;)
The Lancet | 2017
Severine Vermeire; William J. Sandborn; S. Danese; Xavier Hébuterne; Bruce Salzberg; Maria Kłopocka; Dino Tarabar; Tomas Vanasek; Miloš Greguš; Paul Hellstern; Joo Sung Kim; Miles Sparrow; Kenneth J. Gorelick; Michelle Hinz; Alaa Ahmad; Vivek Pradhan; Mina Hassan-Zahraee; Robert Clare; Fabio Cataldi; W. Reinisch
BACKGROUND PF-00547659 is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to human mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) to selectively reduce lymphocyte homing to the intestinal tract. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PF-00547659 in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial recruited patients aged 18-65 years from 105 centres in 21 countries, with a history (≥3 months) of active ulcerative colitis extending more than 15 cm beyond the anal verge (with a total Mayo score ≥6 and a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥2) who had failed or were intolerant to at least one conventional therapy. Patients were stratified by previous anti-TNFα treatment, and randomly assigned by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive a subcutaneous injection of 7·5 mg, 22·5 mg, 75 mg, or 225 mg PF-00547659 or placebo at baseline, then every 4 weeks. Patients, investigators, and sponsors were blinded to the treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving remission (total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1 and rectal bleeding subscore ≤1) at week 12. The efficacy analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of the randomised treatment; the safety analysis was done according to treatment received. All p values were one-sided and multiplicity-adjusted. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01620255. FINDINGS Between Nov 2, 2012, and Feb 4, 2016, we screened 587 patients; 357 were eligible and randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=73) or PF-00547659 at doses of 7·5 mg (n=71), 22·5 mg (n=72), 75 mg (n=71), or 225 mg (n=70). Remission rates at week 12 were significantly greater in three of four active-treatment groups than in the placebo group (2·7% [two of 73]): 7·5 mg (11·3% [eight of 71]), 22·5 mg (16·7% [12 of 72]), 75 mg (15·5% [11 of 71]), and 225 mg (5·7% [four of 70]). These rates corresponded to a stratum-adjusted (anti-TNFα-naive and anti-TNFα-experienced) risk difference versus placebo of 8·0% for 7·5 mg (90% CI 1·9 to 14, p=0·0425), 12·8% for 22·5 mg (5·6 to 19·9, p=0·0099), 11·8% for 75 mg (4·8 to 18·8, p=0·0119), and 2·6% for 225 mg (-1·2 to 6·4, p=0·1803). Four of 73 (5·5%) patients had a serious adverse event in the placebo group, ten of 71 (14·1%) in the 7·5 mg group, one of 70 (1·4%) in the 22·5 mg group, three of 73 (4·1%) in the 75 mg group, and three of 70 (4·3%) in the 225 mg group. No safety signal was observed for the study drug. INTERPRETATION PF-00547659 was safe and well tolerated in this patient population, and better than placebo for induction of remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. The greatest clinical effects were observed with the 22·5 mg and 75 mg doses. FUNDING Pfizer.