Bruce Samuels

Safety of coronary reactivity testing in women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study.

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the safety of coronary reactivity testing (CRT) in symptomatic women with evidence of myocardial ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Microvascular coronary dysfunction (MCD) in women with no obstructive CAD portends an adverse prognosis of a 2.5% annual major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate. The diagnosis of MCD is established by invasive CRT, yet the risk of CRT is unknown. METHODS The authors evaluated 293 symptomatic women with ischemia and no obstructive CAD, who underwent CRT at 3 experienced centers. Microvascular function was assessed using a Doppler wire and injections of adenosine, acetylcholine, and nitroglycerin into the left coronary artery. CRT-related serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events (AEs), and follow-up MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) were recorded. RESULTS CRT-SAEs occurred in 2 women (0.7%) during the procedure: 1 had coronary artery dissection, and 1 developed MI associated with coronary spasm. CRT-AEs occurred in 2 women (0.7%) and included 1 transient air microembolism and 1 deep venous thrombosis. There was no CRT-related mortality. In the mean follow-up period of 5.4 years, the MACE rate was 8.2%, including 5 deaths (1.7%), 8 nonfatal MIs (2.7%), 8 nonfatal strokes (2.7%), and 11 hospitalizations for heart failure (3.8%). CONCLUSIONS In women undergoing CRT for suspected MCD, contemporary testing carries a relatively low risk compared with the MACE rate in these women. These results support the use of CRT by experienced operators for establishing definitive diagnosis and assessing prognosis in this at-risk population. (Womens Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE]; NCT00832702).

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging myocardial perfusion reserve index assessment in women with microvascular coronary dysfunction and reference controls

OBJECTIVE We sought to comparatively assess cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) in women with confirmed microvascular coronary dysfunction (MCD) cases and reference control women. BACKGROUND Women with signs or symptoms of myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) frequently have MCD which carries an adverse prognosis. Diagnosis involves invasive coronary reactivity testing (CRT). Adenosine CMRI is a non-invasive test that may be useful for the detection of MCD. METHODS Fifty-three women with MCD confirmed by CRT and 12 age- and estrogen-use matched reference controls underwent adenosine CMRI. CMRI was assessed for MPRI, calculated using the ratio of myocardial blood flow at hyperemia/rest for the whole myocardium and separately for the 16 segments as defined by the American Heart Association. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA models. RESULTS Compared to reference controls, MCD cases had lower MPRI values globally and in subendocardial and subepicardial regions (1.63±0.39 vs. 1.98±0.38, P=0.007, 1.51±0.35 vs. 1.84±0.34, P=0.0045, 1.68±0.38 vs. 2.04±0.41, P=0.005, respectively). A perfusion gradient across the myocardium with lower MPRI in the subendocardium compared to the subepicardium was observed for both groups. CONCLUSIONS Women with MCD have lower MPRI measured by perfusion CMRI compared to reference controls. CMRI may be a useful diagnostic modality for MCD. Prospective validation of a diagnostic threshold for MPRI in patients with MCD is needed.

A Prospective, Nonrandomized, Open-Labeled Pilot Study Investigating the Use of Magnesium in Patients Undergoing Nonacute Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Stent Implantation

Background: Magnesium has recently been shown to inhibit acute stent thrombosis in animal models. This study tested the feasibility of magnesium administration in patients undergoing nonacute percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. Methods: Twenty-one patients undergoing nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention were enrolled and received intravenous magnesium sulfate (2-g bolus over 20 minutes prepercutaneous coronary intervention, followed by 14 g over 12 hours infusion). Endpoints: safety outcomes-hypotension, bradycardia, bleeding complications and heart block within first 24 hours; angiographic outcomes-acute thrombotic occlusion and need for platelet glycoprotein Ilb/Illa inhibitor bailout; and clinical outcomes-death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia, and need for urgent revascularization at 48 hours and 30 days. Results: No significant effects on heart rate or blood pressure, major bleeding complication, or new electrocardiographic changes were observed. Angiographic thrombus was visualized in two cases, and coronary artery dissection in one case poststent deployment. None of these cases required the use of glycoprotein inhibitors for bailout. Death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia, and need for urgent revascularization were not observed. The serum magnesium level increased from 2.1 ± 0.3 mg/dL at baseline to 3.5 ± 0.8 mg/dL at the end of the infusion (P < .0001). Platelet activation was significantly inhibited at the end of the magnesium sulfate infusion. Conclusion: Intravenous magnesium sulfate has been demonstrated as a feasible and safe agent in patients undergoing nonacute percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. A randomized clinical trial comparing magnesium with glycoprotein inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention is warranted.

The State of the Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold: Consensus From an Expert Panel

Significant progress has been made in the percutaneous coronary intervention technique from the days of balloon angioplasty to modern-day metallic drug-eluting stents (DES). Although metallic stents solve a temporary problem of acute recoil following balloon angioplasty, they leave behind a permanent problem implicated in very late events (in addition to neoatherosclerosis). BRS were developed as a potential solution to this permanent problem, but the promise of these devices has been tempered by clinical trials showing increased risk of safety outcomes, both early and late. This is not too dissimilar to the challenges seen with first-generation DES in which refinement of deployment technique, prolongation of dual antiplatelet therapy, and technical iteration mitigated excess risk of very late stent thrombosis, making DES the treatment of choice for coronary artery disease. This white paper discusses the factors potentially implicated in the excess risks, including the scaffold consideration and deployment technique, and outlines patient and lesion selection, implantation technique, and dual antiplatelet therapy considerations to potentially mitigate this excess risk with the first-generation thick strut Absorb scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois). It remains to be seen whether these considerations together with technical iterations will ultimately close the gap between scaffolds and metal stents for short-term events while at the same time preserving options for future revascularization once the scaffold bioresorbs.

Comparison of low and high dose intracoronary adenosine and acetylcholine in women undergoing coronary reactivity testing: Results from the NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE)

Women with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia who are referred for invasive coronary angiography often have no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) [1]. Forty-five to sixty percent of these patients have abnormal coronary vasomotion due to endothelial or non-endothelial dependent macro- or microvascular coronary dysfunction [1–3]. Abnormal coronary vasomotion is linked with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, suggesting that additional coronary reactivity testing (CRT), beyond standard angiography, is needed in clinical practice to appropriately risk stratify these patients [2–6]. CRT with intra-coronary adenosine and acetylcholine (ACh) is used to identify vascular dysfunction, yet ascending dosing of these agents is time-consuming. We aimed to determine if 1) coronary flow reserve (CFR) was different after low or high dose adenosine, and 2) change in coronary artery cross sectional area (CSA) and coronary blood flow (CBF) was different after low or high dose ACh.

Role of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women With Suspected Ischemia But No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVE Signs and symptoms of ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) is often a diagnostic dilemma in women. The use of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) for advanced diagnostic assessment in these patients is a non-ionizing radiation option, but the diagnostic utility in this population is unknown. We examined the diagnostic role of stress CMRI in our patient population of these women. METHODS We analyzed 113 consecutive female patients from 2/2006-11/2007 who had prior cardiac evaluations for signs and symptoms of ischemia but no obstructive CAD who underwent stress CMRI, which included anatomic, functional, adenosine stress perfusion and delayed enhancement imaging. RESULTS The population demographics of 113 women included a mean age of 55±12.2 years with an average body mass index (BMI) of 25 ± 4.5. Overall, 43% had hypertension, 4% had diabetes and 3% were smokers. Overall, 80/113 (70%) demonstrated abnormal stress CMRI results. The majority of patients demonstrated findings consistent with subendocardial perfusion abnormalities suggestive of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Of note, 3 patients (4%) were diagnosed with congenital coronary anomalies or cardiomyopathy not detected in prior cardiac evaluations. CONCLUSION Among women with signs and symptoms of ischemia but no obstructive CAD, stress CMRI is frequently abnormal and is valuable in diagnosis of CMD. Stress CMRI appears useful for advanced diagnostic assessment in these diagnostically challenged patients.

Prior myocardial infarction is associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease

☆ This work was supported by contracts from the N Institutes nos. N01-HV-68161, N01-HV-68162, N01-HVU0164829, U01 HL649141, U01 HL649241, K23HL10 HL090957, 1R03AG032631 from the National Institute RR00425 from the National Center for Research Resou Advancing Translational Sciences with Grant UL1TR0 Gustavus and Louis Pfeiffer Research Foundation, Danv Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, The Ladies H Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, PA, and QMED, Inc., Laurence H and the Constance Ausetin Womens Heart Research Fel Center, Los Angeles, California, the Barbra Streisand Wo and Education Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Womens Health Research (SWHR), Washington, D.C., Heart Health Program, and the Erika Glazer Womens He Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. ⁎ Corresponding author at: 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, A32 E-mail address: Puja.Mehta@cshs.org (P.K. Mehta).

Dissection of the ascending aorta induced by coronary angiography.

We present a 75-year-old woman with an iatrogenic dissection of the ascendin aorta, induced by stenting of the right coronary artery. Coronary angiographic and transesophageal echocardiographic imaging and histology are presented.

Documentation by Intravascular Ultrasound of Thrombus Overlying a Small Atheromatous Plaque in a Coronary Artery in Unstable Angina Pectoris and in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Rupture of atheromatous plaques leading to acute coronary syndromes usually occur in lipid-reach and well-developed coronary lesions. We describe 2 unusual patients with acute coronary syndromes in whom there was angiographic and intravascular ultrasound evidence of an intraluminal thrombus overlying a small, nonocclusive plaque in an enlarged coronary artery.

Intracoronary Bolus Injection Versus Intravenous Infusion of Adenosine for Assessment of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Women With Signs and Symptoms of Myocardial Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Nonobstructive coronary artery disease is increasingly recognized, and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is often implicated, but there is no established approach to the evaluation of patients with signs and symptoms of ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease [(1)][1]. Coronary