Bruna Grizzetti

Summary for policy makers

Over the past century humans have caused unprecedented • changes to the global nitrogen cycle, converting atmospheric di-nitrogen (N 2 ) into many reactive nitrogen (N r ) forms, doubling the total fi xation of N r globally and more than tripling it in Europe. Th e increased use of N • r as fertilizer allows a growing world population, but has considerable adverse eff ects on the environment and human health. Five key societal threats of N r can be identifi ed: to water quality, air quality, greenhouse balance, ecosystems and biodiversity, and soil quality. Cost–benefi t analysis highlights how the overall environ• mental costs of all N r losses in Europe (estimated at €70–€320 billion per year at current rates) outweigh the direct economic benefi ts of N r in agriculture. Th e highest societal costs are associated with loss of air quality and water quality, linked to impacts on ecosystems and especially on human health.

The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty- first century

Global nitrogen fixation contributes 413 Tg of reactive nitrogen (Nr) to terrestrial and marine ecosystems annually of which anthropogenic activities are responsible for half, 210 Tg N. The majority of the transformations of anthropogenic Nr are on land (240 Tg N yr−1) within soils and vegetation where reduced Nr contributes most of the input through the use of fertilizer nitrogen in agriculture. Leakages from the use of fertilizer Nr contribute to nitrate (NO3−) in drainage waters from agricultural land and emissions of trace Nr compounds to the atmosphere. Emissions, mainly of ammonia (NH3) from land together with combustion related emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), contribute 100 Tg N yr−1 to the atmosphere, which are transported between countries and processed within the atmosphere, generating secondary pollutants, including ozone and other photochemical oxidants and aerosols, especially ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) and ammonium sulfate (NH4)2SO4. Leaching and riverine transport of NO3 contribute 40–70 Tg N yr−1 to coastal waters and the open ocean, which together with the 30 Tg input to oceans from atmospheric deposition combine with marine biological nitrogen fixation (140 Tg N yr−1) to double the ocean processing of Nr. Some of the marine Nr is buried in sediments, the remainder being denitrified back to the atmosphere as N2 or N2O. The marine processing is of a similar magnitude to that in terrestrial soils and vegetation, but has a larger fraction of natural origin. The lifetime of Nr in the atmosphere, with the exception of N2O, is only a few weeks, while in terrestrial ecosystems, with the exception of peatlands (where it can be 102–103 years), the lifetime is a few decades. In the ocean, the lifetime of Nr is less well known but seems to be longer than in terrestrial ecosystems and may represent an important long-term source of N2O that will respond very slowly to control measures on the sources of Nr from which it is produced.

The European nitrogen assessment : sources, effects and policy perspectives

In what case do you like reading so much? What about the type of the the european nitrogen assessment book? The needs to read? Well, everybody has their own reason why should read some books. Mostly, it will relate to their necessity to get knowledge from the book and want to read just to get entertainment. Novels, story book, and other entertaining books become so popular this day. Besides, the scientific books will also be the best reason to choose, especially for the students, teachers, doctors, businessman, and other professions who are fond of reading.New updated! The latest book from a very famous author finally comes out. Book of the european nitrogen assessment, as an amazing reference becomes what you need to get. Whats for is this book? Are you still thinking for what the book is? Well, this is what you probably will get. You should have made proper choices for your better life. Book, as a source that may involve the facts, opinion, literature, religion, and many others are the great friends to join with.List of contributors Preface Summary for policymakers Technical summary 1. Assessing our nitrogen inheritance Part I. Nitrogen in Europe: The Present Position: 2. The European nitrogen problem in a global perspective 3. Benefits of nitrogen for food fibre and industrial production 4. Nitrogen in current European policies 5. The challenge to integrate nitrogen science and policies Part II. Nitrogen Processing in the Biosphere: 6. Nitrogen processes in terrestrial ecosystems 7. Nitrogen processes in aquatic ecosystems 8. Nitrogen processes in coastal and marine ecosystems 9. Nitrogen processes in the atmosphere Part III. Nitrogen Flows and Fate at Multiple Scales: 10. Nitrogen flows in farming systems across Europe 11. Nitrogen flows and fate in rural landscapes 12. Nitrogen flows and fate in urban landscapes 13. Nitrogen flows from European watersheds to coastal marine waters 14. Atmospheric transport and deposition of nitrogen in Europe 15. Geographic variation in terrestrial nitrogen budgets across Europe 16. Integrating nitrogen fluxes at the European scale Part IV. Key Societal Threats of Nitrogen: 17. Nitrogen as a threat to European water quality 18. Nitrogen as a threat to European air quality 19. Nitrogen as a threat to the European greenhouse balance 20. Nitrogen as a threat to European terrestrial biodiversity 21. Nitrogen as a threat to European soil quality Part V. European Nitrogen Policies and Future Challenges: 22. Costs and benefits of nitrogen in the environment 23. Developing integrated approaches to nitrogen management 24. Future scenarios of nitrogen in Europe 25. Coordinating European nitrogen policies between directives and international conventions 26. Societal choice and communicating the European nitrogen challenge Glossary Index.

50 year trends in nitrogen use efficiency of world cropping systems: the relationship between yield and nitrogen input to cropland

Nitrogen (N) is crucial for crop productivity. However, nowadays more than half of the N added to cropland is lost to the environment, wasting the resource, producing threats to air, water, soil and biodiversity, and generating greenhouse gas emissions. Based on FAO data, we have reconstructed the trajectory followed, in the past 50 years, by 124 countries in terms of crop yield and total nitrogen inputs to cropland (manure, synthetic fertilizer, symbiotic fixation and atmospheric deposition). During the last five decades, the response of agricultural systems to increased nitrogen fertilization has evolved differently in the different world countries. While some countries have improved their agro-environmental performances, in others the increased fertilization has produced low agronomical benefits and higher environmental losses. Our data also suggest that, in general, those countries using a higher proportion of N inputs from symbiotic N fixation rather than from synthetic fertilizer have a better N use efficiency.

Modelling diffuse emission and retention of nutrients in the Vantaanjoki watershed (Finland) using the SWAT model

Abstract The nitrogen and phosphorus natural removal in the Vantaanjoki basin (Finland) was modelled using the SWAT hydrological model, which simulates the water cycle and the movement and transformations of nutrients. The model was first calibrated and then validated. In a daily time step, the Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient for the simulations of flow, nitrogen and phosphorus loads ranges between 0.59 and 0.81 for calibration and from 0.43 to 0.57 for validation. The simulation of the whole Vantaanjoki basin over a period of 9 years (1989–1997) allowed an estimation of the annual average diffuse emissions and nutrient removal in the basin. Diffuse emissions predicted by SWAT were compared with those evaluated by traditional statistical methods, confirming the reasonable predictions of the model. The nitrogen and phosphorus load values measured at the final outlet were compared with the load reaching the surface waters, coming from both diffuse and point sources, obtaining an estimation of retention of 24% for total nitrogen and 51% for total phosphorus.

Nitrogen as a threat to European water quality

Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F., Billen, G., van Grinsven, H., Cardoso, A. C., Thieu, V., Garnier, J., Curtis, C., Howarth, R. W. and Johnes, P. (2011) Nitrogen as a threat to European water quality. In: Sutton, M. A., Howard, C. M., Erisman, J. W., Billen, G., Bleeker, A., Grennfelt, P., van Grinsven, H. and Grizzetti, B. (eds.) European Nitrogen Assessment. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp. 379-404. ISBN 9781107006126 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/20869/

Long term change of nutrient concentrations of rivers discharging in European seas

Cases of severe eutrophication are still observed in European surface waters even though tough regulation has been in place since the beginning of the 1990s to control nutrient losses and inputs in the environment. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the evolution since 1991 of the quality of the water entering European seas in terms of the concentration of major nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus), and to analyze the effectiveness of implemented national/international measures and EU legislation in reducing water nutrient pollution. Despite the reduction in large portions of the European territory of agricultural nutrient applications and nutrient point source emissions, the impact on water quality is limited. It is shown using two large river basins that this lack of response for nitrogen, and nitrate in particular, between the reduction of the nitrogen surplus and the recovery of water quality is partly explained by the lag time due to transfer of nitrates in the unsaturated and saturated zones and storage in the soils and aquifers. In order to monitor efficiently the impact of policy implementation on water quality, the Nitrates Directive and the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive in particular, it is recommended to use long term permanent monitoring stations to be able to separate the impact of climate variability from that of policy implementation. It is also recommended to investigate and develop harmonized methodologies for estimating the lag time in order to come up with realistic estimates of response time of water bodies due to the implementation of measures.

Modelling mitigation options to reduce diffuse nitrogen water pollution from agriculture

Agriculture is responsible for large scale water quality degradation and is estimated to contribute around 55% of the nitrogen entering the European Seas. The key policy instrument for protecting inland, transitional and coastal water resources is the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Reducing nutrient losses from agriculture is crucial to the successful implementation of the WFD. There are several mitigation measures that can be implemented to reduce nitrogen losses from agricultural areas to surface and ground waters. For the selection of appropriate measures, models are useful for quantifying the expected impacts and the associated costs. In this article we review some of the models used in Europe to assess the effectiveness of nitrogen mitigation measures, ranging from fertilizer management to the construction of riparian areas and wetlands. We highlight how the complexity of models is correlated with the type of scenarios that can be tested, with conceptual models mostly used to evaluate the impact of reduced fertilizer application, and the physically-based models used to evaluate the timing and location of mitigation options and the response times. We underline the importance of considering the lag time between the implementation of measures and effects on water quality. Models can be effective tools for targeting mitigation measures (identifying critical areas and timing), for evaluating their cost effectiveness, for taking into consideration pollution swapping and considering potential trade-offs in contrasting environmental objectives. Models are also useful for involving stakeholders during the development of catchments mitigation plans, increasing their acceptability.

Impacts of European livestock production: nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, water eutrophication and biodiversity

Livestock production systems currently occupy around 28% of the land surface of the European Union (equivalent to 65% of the agricultural land). In conjunction with other human activities, livestock production systems affect water, air and soil quality, global climate and biodiversity, altering the biogeochemical cycles of nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon. Here, we quantify the contribution of European livestock production to these major impacts. For each environmental effect, the contribution of livestock is expressed as shares of the emitted compounds and land used, as compared to the whole agricultural sector. The results show that the livestock sector contributes significantly to agricultural environmental impacts. This contribution is 78% for terrestrial biodiversity loss, 80% for soil acidification and air pollution (ammonia and nitrogen oxides emissions), 81% for global warming, and 73% for water pollution (both N and P). The agriculture sector itself is one of the major contributors to these environmental impacts, ranging between 12% for global warming and 59% for N water quality impact. Significant progress in mitigating these environmental impacts in Europe will only be possible through a combination of technological measures reducing livestock emissions, improved food choices and reduced food waste of European citizens.

Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020

Environment Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Summary The second MAES report presents indicators that can be used at European and Member States level to map and assess biodiversity, ecosystem condition and ecosystem services according to the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES v4.3). This work is based on a review of data and indicators available at national and European level and is applying the MAES analytical framework adopted in 2013.