Brunhilde Steinger
University of Regensburg
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Brunhilde Steinger.
British Journal of Cancer | 2012
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Michael Koller; Brunhilde Steinger; Christoph Ehret; Brigitte Ernst; Jeremy C. Wyatt; Ferdinand Hofstädter; W. Lorenz
Background:Despite thousands of papers, the value of quality of life (QoL) in curing disease remains uncertain. Until now, we lacked tools for the diagnosis and specific treatment of diseased QoL. We approached this problem stepwise by theory building, modelling, an exploratory trial and now a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) in breast cancer, whose results we report here.Methods:In all, 200 representative Bavarian primary breast cancer patients were recruited by five hospitals and treated by 146 care professionals. Patients were randomised to either (1) a novel care pathway including diagnosis of ‘diseased’ QoL (any QoL measure below 50 points) using a QoL profile and expert report sent to the patients coordinating practitioner, who arranged QoL therapy consisting of up to five standardised treatments for specific QoL defects or (2) standard postoperative care adhering to the German national guideline for breast cancer. The primary end point was the proportion of patients in each group with diseased QoL 6 months after surgery. Patients were blinded to their allocated group.Results:At 0 and 3 months after surgery, diseased QoL was diagnosed in 70% of patients. The QoL pathway reduced rates of diseased QoL to 56% at 6 months, especially in emotion and coping, compared with 71% in controls (P=0.048). Relative risk reduction was 21% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0–37), absolute risk reduction 15% (95% CI: 0.3–29), number needed to treat (NNT)=7 (95% CI: 3–37). When QoL therapy finished after successful treatment, diseased QoL often returned again, indicating good responsiveness of the QoL pathway.Conclusion:A three-component outcome system including clinician-derived objective, patient-reported subjective end points and qualitative analysis of clinical relevance was developed in the last 10 years for cancer as a complex intervention. A separate QoL pathway was implemented for the diagnosis and treatment of diseased QoL and its effectiveness tested in a community-based, pragmatic, definitive RCT. While the pathway was active, it was effective with an NNT of 7.
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | 2007
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Michael Koller; Jeremy C. Wyatt; Brunhilde Steinger; Christoph Ehret; Brigitte Ernst; Ferdinand Hofstädter; W. Lorenz
Background and aimsA system for quality of life (QoL) diagnosis and therapy in breast cancer patients was developed according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework of complex interventions. Along MRC’s five phases in the continuum of evidence, the present paper deals with phase I: modeling (i.e., delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements).Basic elementsTheoretical background is a new conceptualization of QoL that provides a rational basis to diagnose “diseased” QoL. A care pathway as the central part of modeling is composed of the following interrelated structural elements: patients (n = 170), clinicians (n = 10), experts in a quality of life unit (n = 5), coordinating practitioners (n = 38), local opinion leaders (n = 12), and professional therapists for QoL enhancing therapies (n = 75). Networking of these structural elements was achieved by clinical algorithm. In the clinical center, the patient and doctor delivered a questionnaire (EORTC) and health status report. The QoL unit transformed it into a profile and experts’ report. The coordinating practitioner transformed the latter into a decision on QoL therapy and the care pathway ended with the professional therapists. Implementation of this system used a multifaceted strategy including educational outreach visits, local opinion leaders, and quality circles.ConclusionThe suffering cancer patient is the main focus of this QoL diagnosis and therapy system. It will have to pass the rigorous test of a definitive randomized trial.
British Journal of Cancer | 2008
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Michael Koller; Christoph Ehret; Brunhilde Steinger; Brigitte Ernst; Jeremy C. Wyatt; Ferdinand Hofstädter; W. Lorenz
A system for quality-of-life diagnosis and therapy (QoL system) was implemented for breast cancer patients. The system fulfilled the criteria for complex interventions (Medical Research Council). Following theory and modeling, this study contains the exploratory trial as a next step before the randomised clinical trial (RCT) answering three questions: (1) Are there differences between implementation sample and general population? (2) Which amount and type of disagreement exist between patient and coordinating practitioners (CPs) in assessed global QoL? (3) Are there empirical reasons for a cutoff of 50 points discriminating between healthy and diseased QoL? Implementation was successful: 74% of CPs worked along the care pathway. However, CPs showed preferences for selecting patients with lower age and UICC prognostic staging. Patients and CPs disagreed considerably in values of global QoL, despite education in QoL assessment by outreach visits, opinion leaders and CME: Zero values of QoL were only expressed by patients. Finally, the cutoff of 50 points was supported by the relationship between QoL in single items and global QoL: no patients with values above 50 dropped global QoL below 50, but values below 50 and especially at 0 points in single items, induced a dramatic fall of global QoL down to below 50. The exploratory trial was important for defining the complex intervention in the definitive RCT: control for age and prognostic stage grading, support for a QoL unit combining patients and CPs assessment of QoL and support for the 50-point cutoff criterion between healthy and diseased QoL.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Patricia Lindberg; Petra Netter; Michael Koller; Brunhilde Steinger; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Background The recollections of survivors of breast cancer are an important source of information about the disease for their family, friends, and newly diagnosed patients. So far, little is known about these memories. This study investigated how accurately survivors of breast cancer remember their past quality of life (QoL) during the disease and if this memory is modified by women`s present QoL and negative affect. Material and methods The longitudinal population-based study included 133 survivors of breast cancer (response rate 80%). Participants were asked for their present QoL and to recall their baseline QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23) that had been assessed about seven years ago before discharge from hospital. The dependent variable was recall bias in ten QoL dimensions. Present QoL and negative affect (PANAS) were investigated as predictor variables. Results Overall, baseline QoL was retrospectively underrated on seven out of ten scales whereas no significant overestimation was found. In multiple linear regression analyses, controlling for confounders, a stronger underrating of QoL was significantly predicted by a lower present QoL on nine out of ten scales and by higher negative affect on six scales. Conclusions Survivors of breast cancer tend to underestimate their past QoL during the disease when asked about seven years later. Lower present QoL and higher negative affect contribute to this recall bias. This needs to be considered when interpreting retrospectively reported QoL data. Results are discussed in relation to theory of change or stability and mood congruency theory.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; C. Ehret; Michael Koller; Brunhilde Steinger; B. Ernst; F. Hofstädter; W. Lorenz
9630 Background: Quality of life (QoL) is an accepted endpoint in clinical trials, but not yet systematically utilized as a diagnostic tool in routine patient care. The Tumor Centre Regensburg deve...
Trials | 2015
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Patricia Lindberg; Michael Koller; Jeremy C. Wyatt; Ferdinand Hofstädter; W. Lorenz; Brunhilde Steinger
BMC Cancer | 2015
Patricia Lindberg; Michael Koller; Brunhilde Steinger; W. Lorenz; Jeremy C. Wyatt; Elisabeth C. Inwald; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; W. Lorenz; Brunhilde Steinger; C. Jakob; B. Ernst; F. Hofstädter; Michael Koller
Archive | 2014
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Patricia Lindberg; M. Koller; Brunhilde Steinger; Andrea Hofstädter; Anton Scharl; Elisabeth C. Inwald; W. Lorenz
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Brunhilde Steinger; Michael Koller; Alois Fürst; Pompiliu Piso; Manfred Kästel; Julia Gumpp; Robert Obermaier; Ferdinand Hofstaedter; Patricia Lindberg