Bruno O. Villoutreix

The anticoagulant protein C pathway.

The anticoagulant protein C system regulates the activity of coagulation factors VIIIa and Va, cofactors in the activation of factor X and prothrombin, respectively. Protein C is activated on endothelium by the thrombin–thrombomodulin–EPCR (endothelial protein C receptor) complex. Activated protein C (APC)‐mediated cleavages of factors VIIIa and Va occur on negatively charged phospholipid membranes and involve protein cofactors, protein S and factor V. APC also has anti‐inflammatory and anti‐apoptotic activities that involve binding of APC to EPCR and cleavage of PAR‐1 (protease‐activated receptor‐1). Genetic defects affecting the protein C system are the most common risk factors of venous thrombosis. The protein C system contains multi‐domain proteins, the molecular recognition of which will be reviewed.

A cluster of positively charged amino acids in the C4BP alpha-chain is crucial for C4b binding and factor I cofactor function.

C4b-binding protein (C4BP) is a regulator of the classical complement pathway, acting as a cofactor to factor I in the degradation of C4b. Computer modeling and structural analysis predicted a cluster of positively charged amino acids at the interface between complement control protein modules 1 and 2 of the C4BP α-chain to be involved in C4b binding. Three C4BP mutants, R39Q, R64Q/R66Q, and R39Q/R64Q/R66Q, were expressed and assayed for their ability to bind C4b and to function as factor I cofactors. The apparent affinities of R39Q, R64Q/R66Q, and R39Q/R64Q/R66Q for immobilized C4b were 15-, 50-, and 140-fold lower, respectively, than that of recombinant wild type C4BP. The C4b binding site demonstrated herein was also found to be a specific heparin binding site. In C4b degradation, the mutants demonstrated decreased ability to serve as factor I cofactors. In particular, the R39Q/R64Q/R66Q mutant was inefficient as cofactor for cleavage of the Arg937-Thr938 peptide bond in C4b. In contrast, the factor I mediated cleavage of Arg1317-Asn1318 bond was less affected by the C4BP mutations. In conclusion, we identify a cluster of amino acids that is part of a C4b binding site involved in the regulation of the complement system.

Proposed lipocalin fold for apolipoprotein M based on bioinformatics and site-directed mutagenesis

Apolipoprotein M (apoM) is a novel apolipoprotein that is predominantly present in high‐density lipoprotein. Sensitive sequence searches, threading and comparative model building experiments revealed apoM to be structurally related to the lipocalin protein family. In a 3D model, characterized by an eight‐stranded anti‐parallel β‐barrel, a segment including Asn135 could adopt a closed or open conformation. Using site‐directed mutagenesis, we demonstrated Asn135 in wild‐type apoM to be glycosylated, suggesting that the segment is solvent exposed. ApoM displays two strong acidic patches of potential functional importance, one around the N‐terminus and the other next to the opening of the β‐barrel.

Human C4b-Binding Protein Has Overlapping, But Not Identical, Binding Sites for C4b and Streptococcal M Proteins

Many strains of Streptococcus pyogenes bind C4b-binding protein (C4BP), an inhibitor of complement activation. The binding is mediated by surface M proteins in a fashion that has been suggested to mimic the binding of C4b. We have previously shown that a positively charged cluster at the interface between complement control protein domains 1 and 2 of C4BP α-chain is crucial for the C4b-C4BP interaction. To extend this observation, and to investigate the interaction with M proteins, we constructed and characterized a total of nine mutants of C4BP. We identified a key recognition surface for M proteins that overlaps with the C4b binding site because substitution of R64 and H67 by Gln dramatically reduces binding to both ligands. However, the analysis of all mutants indicates that the binding sites for C4b and M proteins are only overlapping, but not identical. Furthermore, M proteins were able to displace C4BP from immobilized C4b, whereas C4b only weakly affected binding of C4BP to immobilized M proteins. We found that the molecular mechanisms involved in these two interactions differ because the binding between M proteins and C4BP is relatively insensitive to salt in contrast to the C4BP-C4b binding. In addition, six mAbs directed against the α-chain interfered with C4b-C4BP interaction, whereas only two of them efficiently inhibited binding of C4BP to M proteins. Collectively, our results suggest that binding between C4b and C4BP is governed mostly by electrostatic interactions, while additional noncovalent forces cause tight binding of C4BP to streptococcal M proteins.

Molecular recognition in the protein C anticoagulant pathway

Summary.  The protein C (PC) anticoagulant system provides specific and efficient control of blood coagulation. The system comprises circulating or membrane‐bound protein components that take part in complicated multimolecular protein complexes being assembled on specific cellular phospholipid membranes. Each of the participating proteins is composed of multiple domains, many of which are known at the level of their three‐dimensional structures. The key component of the PC system, the vitamin K‐dependent PC, circulates in blood as zymogen to an anticoagulant serine protease. Activation is achieved on the surface of endothelial cells by thrombin bound to the membrane protein thrombomodulin. The endothelial PC receptor binds the Gla domain of PC and stimulates the activation. Activated PC (APC) modulates the activity of blood coagulation by specific proteolytic cleavages of a limited number of peptide bonds in factor (F)VIIIa and FVa, cofactors in the activation of FX and prothrombin, respectively. These reactions occur on the surface of negatively charged phospholipid membranes and are stimulated by the vitamin K‐dependent protein S. Regulation of FVIIIa activity by APC is stimulated not only by protein S but also by FV, which, like thrombin, is a Janus‐faced protein with both pro‐ and anticoagulant potential. However, whereas the properties of thrombin are modulated by protein–protein interactions, the specificity of FV function is governed by proteolysis by pro‐ or anti‐coagulant enzymes. The molecular recognition of the PC system is beginning to be unravelled and provides insights into a fascinating and intricate molecular scenario.

Structural and energetic characteristics of the heparin-binding site in antithrombotic protein C

Human activated protein C (APC) is a key component of a natural anticoagulant system that regulates blood coagulation. In vivo, the catalytic activity of APC is regulated by two serpins, α1-antitrypsin and the protein C inhibitor (PCI), the inhibition by the latter being stimulated by heparin. We have identified a heparin-binding site in the serine protease domain of APC and characterized the energetic basis of the interaction with heparin. According to the counter-ion condensation theory, the binding of heparin to APC is 66% ionic in nature and comprises four to six net ionic interactions. To localize the heparin-binding site, five recombinant APC variants containing amino acid exchanges in loops 37, 60, and 70 (chymotrypsinogen numbering) were created. As demonstrated by surface plasmon resonance, reduction of the electropositive character of loops 37 and 60 resulted in complete loss of heparin binding. The functional consequence was loss in heparin-induced stimulation of APC inhibition by PCI, whereas the PCI-induced APC inhibition in the absence of heparin was enhanced. Presumably, the former observations were due to the inability of heparin to bridge some APC mutants to PCI, whereas the increased inhibition of certain APC variants by PCI in the absence of heparin was due to reduced repulsion between the enzymes and the serpin. The heparin-binding site of APC was also shown to interact with heparan sulfate, albeit with lower affinity. In conclusion, we have characterized and spatially localized the functionally important heparin/heparan sulfate-binding site of APC.

Structural investigation of C4b-binding protein by molecular modeling: Localization of putative binding sites

C4b‐binding protein (C4BP) contributes to the regulation of the classical pathway of the complement system and plays an important role in blood coagulation. The main human C4BP isoform is composed of one β‐chain and seven α‐chains essentially built from three and eight complement control protein (CCP) modules, respectively, followed by a nonrepeat carboxy‐terminal region involved in polymerization of the chains. C4BP is known to interact with heparin, C4b, complement factor I, serum amyloid P component, streptococcal Arp and Sir proteins, and factor VIII/VIIIa via its α‐chains and with protein S through its β‐chain. The principal aim of the present study was to localize regions of C4BP involved in the interaction with C4b, Arp, and heparin. For this purpose, a computer model of the 8 CCP modules of C4BP α‐chain was constructed, taking into account data from previous electron microscopy (EM) studies. This structure was investigated in the context of known and/or new experimental data. Analysis of the α‐chain model, together with monoclonal antibody studies and heparin binding experiments, suggests that a patch of positively charged residues, at the interface between the first and second CCP modules, plays an important role in the interaction between C4BP and C4b/Arp/Sir/heparin. Putative binding sites, secondary‐structure prediction for the central core, and an overall reevaluation of the size of the C4BP molecule are also presented. An understanding of these intermolecular interactions should contribute to the rational design of potential therapeutic agents aiming at interfering specifically some of these protein–protein interactions. Proteins 31:391–405, 1998.

Mutations in complement factor I as found in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome lead to either altered secretion or altered function of factor I

The complement system is regulated by inhibitors such as factor I (FI), a serine protease that degrades activated complement factors C4b and C3b in the presence of specific cofactors. Mutations and polymorphisms in FI and its cofactors are associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). All 14 complement factor I mutations associated with aHUS analyzed in this study were heterozygous and generated premature stop codons (six) or amino acid substitutions (eight). Almost all of the mutants were expressed by human embryonic kidney 293 cells but only six mutants were secreted into the medium, three of which were at lower levels than WT. The remaining eight mutants were not secreted but sensitive to deglycosylation with endoglycosidase H, indicating that they were retained early in the secretory pathway. Six secreted mutants were purified and five of them were functionally altered in degradation of C4b/C3b in the fluid‐phase in the presence of various cofactors and on endothelial cells. Three mutants cleaved surface‐bound C3b less efficiently than WT. The D501N mutant was severely impaired both in solution and on surface irrespective of the cofactor used. In conclusion, mutations in complement factor I affect both secretion and function of FI, which leads to impaired regulation of the complement system in aHUS.

Structure‐based virtual ligand screening with LigandFit: Pose prediction and enrichment of compound collections

Virtual ligand screening methods based on the structure of the receptor are extensively used to facilitate the discovery of lead compounds. In the present study, we investigated the LigandFit package on four different proteins (coagulation factor VIIa, estrogen receptor, thymidine kinase, and neuraminidase), a relatively large compound collection of 65,560 unique “drug‐like” molecules and four focused libraries (1950 molecules each). We performed virtual screening experiments with the large database and evaluated six scoring functions available in the package (DockScore, LigScore1, LigScore2, PLP1, PLP2, and PMF). The results showed that LigandFit is an efficient program, especially when used with LigScore1. Similar computations were carried out using focused libraries. In this situation the LigScore1 scoring function outperformed the other ones on three out of the four proteins tested. Even for the difficult neuraminidase case, the LigandFit/LigScore1 combination was still reasonably successful. Assessment of docking accuracy was also performed and again, we found that LigandFit (with DockScore and the CFF parameters) was performing well. On the basis of these results and observed increased enrichments after LigandFit/Ligscore1 screening on focused libraries, we suggest that using this program as a final step of a hierarchical protocol can be very beneficial to assist lead finding. Proteins 2007.

Defining the factor Xa-binding site on factor Va by site-directed glycosylation.

Activated Factor V (FVa) functions as a membrane-bound cofactor to the enzyme Factor Xa (FXa) in the conversion of prothrombin to thrombin, increasing the catalytic efficiency of FXa by several orders of magnitude. To map regions on FVa that are important for binding of FXa, site-directed mutagenesis resulting in novel potential glycosylation sites on FV was used as strategy. The consensus sequence for N-linked glycosylation was introduced at sites, which according to a computer model of the A domains of FVa, were located at the surface of FV. In total, thirteen different regions on the FVa surface were probed, including sites that are homologous to FIXa-binding sites on FVIIIa. The interaction between the FVa variants and FXa and prothrombin were studied in a functional prothrombin activation assay, as well as in a direct binding assay between FVa and FXa. In both assays, the four mutants carrying a carbohydrate side chain at positions 467, 511, 652, or 1683 displayed attenuated FXa binding, whereas the prothrombin affinity was unaffected. The affinity toward FXa could be restored when the mutants were expressed in the presence of tunicamycin to inhibit glycosylation, indicating the lost FXa affinity to be caused by the added carbohydrates. The results suggested regions surrounding residues 467, 511, 652, and 1683 in FVa to be important for FXa binding. This indicates that the enzyme:cofactor assembly of the prothrombinase and the tenase complexes are homologous and provide a useful platform for further investigation of specific structural elements involved in the FVa·FXa complex assembly.