Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bruno Paiva is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bruno Paiva.


Lancet Oncology | 2014

International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma

S. Vincent Rajkumar; Meletios A. Dimopoulos; Antonio Palumbo; Joan Bladé; Giampaolo Merlini; Maria Victoria Mateos; Shaji Kumar; Jens Hillengass; Efstathios Kastritis; Paul G. Richardson; Ola Landgren; Bruno Paiva; Angela Dispenzieri; Brendan M. Weiss; Xavier Leleu; Sonja Zweegman; Sagar Lonial; Laura Rosiñol; Elena Zamagni; Sundar Jagannath; Orhan Sezer; Sigurdur Y. Kristinsson; Jo Caers; Saad Z Usmani; Juan José Lahuerta; Hans Erik Johnsen; Meral Beksac; Michele Cavo; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Evangelos Terpos

This International Myeloma Working Group consensus updates the disease definition of multiple myeloma to include validated biomarkers in addition to existing requirements of attributable CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia, and bone lesions). These changes are based on the identification of biomarkers associated with near inevitable development of CRAB features in patients who would otherwise be regarded as having smouldering multiple myeloma. A delay in application of the label of multiple myeloma and postponement of therapy could be detrimental to these patients. In addition to this change, we clarify and update the underlying laboratory and radiographic variables that fulfil the criteria for the presence of myeloma-defining CRAB features, and the histological and monoclonal protein requirements for the disease diagnosis. Finally, we provide specific metrics that new biomarkers should meet for inclusion in the disease definition. The International Myeloma Working Group recommends the implementation of these criteria in routine practice and in future clinical trials, and recommends that future studies analyse any differences in outcome that might occur as a result of the new disease definition.


Lancet Oncology | 2010

Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and prednisone as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib and thalidomide versus bortezomib and prednisone in elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma: a randomised trial

Maria-Victoria Mateos; Albert Oriol; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Norma C. Gutiérrez; Ana-Isabel Teruel; José García-Laraña; Enrique Bengoechea; Alejandro Martín; Joaquín Díaz Mediavilla; Luis Palomera; Felipe de Arriba; Yolanda Gonzalez; Jm Hernandez; Ana Sureda; Jose-Luis Bello; Joan Bargay; Francisco-Javier Peñalver; José-María Ribera; María-Luisa Martín-Mateos; Ramón García-Sanz; Mt Cibeira; M. Ramos; María-Belén Vidriales; Bruno Paiva; María-Angeles Montalbán; Juan-José Lahuerta; Joan Bladé; Jesús-Fernando San Miguel

BACKGROUND Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone (VMP) is significantly better than melphalan plus prednisone alone for elderly patients with untreated multiple myeloma; however, toxic effects are high. We investigated a novel and less intensive bortezomib-based regimen to maintain efficacy and to reduce toxic effects. METHODS Between March, 2006, and October, 2008, 260 patients with untreated multiple myeloma, 65 years and older, from 63 Spanish centres, were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of VMP (n=130) or bortezomib plus thalidomide and prednisone (VTP; n=130) as induction therapy, consisting of one cycle of bortezomib twice per week for 6 weeks (1·3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32), plus either melphalan (9 mg/m² on days 1-4) or daily thalidomide (100 mg), and prednisone (60 mg/m² on days 1-4). The first cycle was followed by five cycles of bortezomib once per week for 5 weeks (1·3 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) plus the same doses of melphalan plus prednisone and thalidomide plus prednisone. 178 patients completed the six induction cycles and were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy with bortezomib plus prednisone (n=87) or bortezomib plus thalidomide (n=91), consisting of one conventional cycle of bortezomib for 3 weeks (1·3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) every 3 months, plus either prednisone (50 mg every other day) or thalidomide (50 mg per day), for up to 3 years. Treatment codes were generated with a computerised random number generator, and neither participants nor study personnel were masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was response rate in induction and maintenance phases. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00443235. FINDINGS In the induction phase, 105 (81%) patients in the VTP group and 104 (80%) in the VMP group achieved partial responses or better (p=0·9), including 36 (28%) and 26 (20%) complete remissions, respectively (p=0·2). Treatment with VTP resulted in more serious adverse events (40 [31%] vs 20 [15%], p=0·01) and discontinuations (22 [17%] vs 15 [12%], p=0·03) than did treatment with VMP. The most common toxicities (grade 3 or worse) were infections (one [1%] in the VTP group vs nine [7%] in the VMP group), cardiac events (11 [8%] vs 0), and peripheral neuropathy (nine [7%] vs 12 [9%]). After maintenance therapy, the complete remission rate was 42% (40 [44%] patients in complete remission in the bortezomib plus thalidomide group, 34 [39%] in the bortezomib plus prednisone group). No grade 3 or worse haematological toxicities were recorded during maintenance therapy; two (2%) patients in the bortezomib plus prednisone group and six (7%) in the bortezomib plus thalidomide group developed peripheral neuropathy. INTERPRETATION Reduced-intensity induction with a bortezomib-based regimen, followed by maintenance, is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients with multiple myeloma. FUNDING Pethema (Spanish Program for the Treatment of Hematologic Diseases).


Blood | 2008

Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

Bruno Paiva; María-Belén Vidriales; Jorge Cerveró; Gema Mateo; Jose J. Perez; Maria Angeles Montalbán; Anna Sureda; Laura Montejano; Norma C. Gutiérrez; Alfonso García de Coca; Natalia de las Heras; Maria Victoria Mateos; Maria Consuelo López-Berges; Raimundo García-Boyero; Josefina Galende; José Antonio Hernández; Luis Palomera; Dolores Carrera; Rafael Martínez; Javier de la Rubia; Alejandro Martín; Joan Bladé; Juan José Lahuerta; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F. San Miguel

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is standard in many hematologic malignancies but is considered investigational in multiple myeloma (MM). We report a prospective analysis of the prognostic importance of MRD detection by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in 295 newly diagnosed MM patients uniformly treated in the GEM2000 protocol VBMCP/VBAD induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation [ASCT]). MRD status by MFC was determined at day 100 after ASCT. Progression-free survival (PFS; median 71 vs 37 months, P < .001) and overall survival (OS; median not reached vs 89 months, P = .002) were longer in patients who were MRD negative versus MRD positive at day 100 after ASCT. Similar prognostic differentiation was seen in 147 patients who achieved immunofixation-negative complete response after ASCT. Moreover, MRD(-) immunofixation-negative (IFx(-)) patients and MRD(-) IFx(+) patients had significantly longer PFS than MRD(+) IFx(-) patients. Multivariate analysis identified MRD status by MFC at day 100 after ASCT as the most important independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR = 3.64, P = .002) and OS (HR = 2.02, P = .02). Our findings demonstrate the clinical importance of MRD evaluation by MFC, and illustrate the need for further refinement of MM re-sponse criteria. This trial is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov under identifier NCT00560053.


Lancet Oncology | 2016

International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma

Shaji Kumar; Bruno Paiva; Kenneth C. Anderson; Brian G. M. Durie; Ola Landgren; Philippe Moreau; Nikhil C. Munshi; Sagar Lonial; Joan Bladé; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Meletios A. Dimopoulos; Efstathios Kastritis; Mario Boccadoro; Robert Z. Orlowski; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Andrew Spencer; Jian Hou; Wee Joo Chng; Saad Z Usmani; Elena Zamagni; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Sundar Jagannath; Hans Erik Johnsen; Evangelos Terpos; Anthony Reiman; Robert A. Kyle; Pieter Sonneveld; Paul G. Richardson; Philip L. McCarthy; Heinz Ludwig

Treatment of multiple myeloma has substantially changed over the past decade with the introduction of several classes of new effective drugs that have greatly improved the rates and depth of response. Response criteria in multiple myeloma were developed to use serum and urine assessment of monoclonal proteins and bone marrow assessment (which is relatively insensitive). Given the high rates of complete response seen in patients with multiple myeloma with new treatment approaches, new response categories need to be defined that can identify responses that are deeper than those conventionally defined as complete response. Recent attempts have focused on the identification of residual tumour cells in the bone marrow using flow cytometry or gene sequencing. Furthermore, sensitive imaging techniques can be used to detect the presence of residual disease outside of the bone marrow. Combining these new methods, the International Myeloma Working Group has defined new response categories of minimal residual disease negativity, with or without imaging-based absence of extramedullary disease, to allow uniform reporting within and outside clinical trials. In this Review, we clarify several aspects of disease response assessment, along with endpoints for clinical trials, and highlight future directions for disease response assessments.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2013

Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

Maria-Victoria Mateos; Miguel-Teodoro Hernández; Pilar Giraldo; Javier de la Rubia; Felipe de Arriba; Lucía López Corral; Laura Rosiñol; Bruno Paiva; Luis Palomera; Joan Bargay; Albert Oriol; Felipe Prosper; Javier López; Eduardo Olavarria; Nuria Quintana; José-Luis García; Joan Bladé; Juan-José Lahuerta

BACKGROUND For patients with smoldering multiple myeloma, the standard of care is observation until symptoms develop. However, this approach does not identify high-risk patients who may benefit from early intervention. METHODS In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 119 patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma to treatment or observation. Patients in the treatment group received an induction regimen (lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg per day on days 1 to 21, plus dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg per day on days 1 to 4 and days 12 to 15, at 4-week intervals for nine cycles), followed by a maintenance regimen (lenalidomide at a dose of 10 mg per day on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle for 2 years). The primary end point was time to progression to symptomatic disease. Secondary end points were response rate, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 40 months, the median time to progression was significantly longer in the treatment group than in the observation group (median not reached vs. 21 months; hazard ratio for progression, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.32; P<0.001). The 3-year survival rate was also higher in the treatment group (94% vs. 80%; hazard ratio for death, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.91; P=0.03). A partial response or better was achieved in 79% of patients in the treatment group after the induction phase and in 90% during the maintenance phase. Toxic effects were mainly grade 2 or lower. CONCLUSIONS Early treatment for patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma delays progression to active disease and increases overall survival. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00480363.).


Blood | 2012

High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

Bruno Paiva; Norma C. Gutiérrez; Laura Rosiñol; María-Belén Vidriales; María-Angeles Montalbán; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Mt Cibeira; Lourdes Cordon; Albert Oriol; María-José Terol; María-Asunción Echeveste; Felipe de Arriba; Luis Palomera; Javier de la Rubia; Joaquín Díaz-Mediavilla; Anna Sureda; Ana Gorosquieta; Alegre A; Alejandro Martín; Miguel T. Hernandez; Juan-José Lahuerta; Joan Bladé; Jesús F. San Miguel

The achievement of complete response (CR) after high-dose therapy/autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) is a surrogate for prolonged survival in multiple myeloma; however, patients who lose their CR status within 1 year of HDT/ASCT (unsustained CR) have poor prognosis. Thus, the identification of these patients is highly relevant. Here, we investigate which prognostic markers can predict unsustained CR in a series of 241 patients in CR at day +100 after HDT/ASCT who were enrolled in the Spanish GEM2000 (n = 140) and GEM2005 < 65y (n = 101) trials. Twenty-nine (12%) of the 241 patients showed unsustained CR and a dismal outcome (median overall survival 39 months). The presence of baseline high-risk cytogenetics by FISH (hazard ratio 17.3; P = .002) and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry at day +100 after HDT/ASCT (hazard ratio 8.0; P = .005) were the only independent factors that predicted unsustained CR. Thus, these 2 parameters may help to identify patients in CR at risk of early progression after HDT/ASCT in whom novel treatments should be investigated.


Blood | 2014

Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma

Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; Juan José Lahuerta; Francois Pepin; Marcos González; Santiago Barrio; Rosa Ayala; Noemi Puig; Maria Angeles Montalbán; Bruno Paiva; Li Weng; Cristina Jiménez; María Sopena; Martin Moorhead; Teresa Cedena; Immaculada Rapado; Maria Victoria Mateos; Laura Rosiñol; Albert Oriol; María Jesús Blanchard; Rafael Martínez; Joan Bladé; Jesús F. San Miguel; Malek Faham; Ramón García-Sanz

We assessed the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) detection in multiple myeloma (MM) patients using a sequencing-based platform in bone marrow samples from 133 MM patients in at least very good partial response (VGPR) after front-line therapy. Deep sequencing was carried out in patients in whom a high-frequency myeloma clone was identified and MRD was assessed using the IGH-VDJH, IGH-DJH, and IGK assays. The results were contrasted with those of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (ASO-PCR). The applicability of deep sequencing was 91%. Concordance between sequencing and MFC and ASO-PCR was 83% and 85%, respectively. Patients who were MRD(-) by sequencing had a significantly longer time to tumor progression (TTP) (median 80 vs 31 months; P < .0001) and overall survival (median not reached vs 81 months; P = .02), compared with patients who were MRD(+). When stratifying patients by different levels of MRD, the respective TTP medians were: MRD ≥10(-3) 27 months, MRD 10(-3) to 10(-5) 48 months, and MRD <10(-5) 80 months (P = .003 to .0001). Ninety-two percent of VGPR patients were MRD(+). In complete response patients, the TTP remained significantly longer for MRD(-) compared with MRD(+) patients (131 vs 35 months; P = .0009).


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2011

Comparison of Immunofixation, Serum Free Light Chain, and Immunophenotyping for Response Evaluation and Prognostication in Multiple Myeloma

Bruno Paiva; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez; María-Belén Vidriales; Maria-Victoria Mateos; María-Angeles Montalbán; Lourdes Alonso; Albert Oriol; Ana-Isabel Teruel; José-Garcia Laraña; Enrique Bengoechea; Alejandro Martín; Joaquín Díaz Mediavilla; Luis Palomera; Felipe de Arriba; Joan Bladé; Alberto Orfao; Juan-José Lahuerta; Jesús F. San Miguel

PURPOSE To investigate the impact of immunophenotypic response (IR) versus complete response (CR) and CR plus normal serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio (stringent CR) in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with novel agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS From a total of 260 elderly patients newly diagnosed with MM included in the GEM05>65y trial, 102 patients achieving at least a partial response with ≥ 70% reduction in M-component after the six planned induction cycles were simultaneously analyzed by immunofixation, sFLC, and multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) immunophenotyping; this population is the focus of this study. RESULTS Forty-three percent of patients achieved CR, 30% achieved stringent CR, and 30% achieved IR. Patients in stringent CR showed no significant survival advantage compared with those in CR, whereas patients in IR showed significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) compared with those in stringent CR or CR; this was confirmed by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 4.1; P = .01 for PFS). Discrepancies between the three techniques were relatively common. Notably, in all seven patients achieving IR but remaining immunofixation positive, the M-component disappeared in follow-up analysis. In contrast, MFC-positive patients who were immunofixation negative (n = 20) showed a tendency toward early reappearance of the M-component (median, 3 months). Similarly, in five of 11 stringent CR but MFC-positive patients, symptomatic disease progression was recorded at a median of 13 months after induction. CONCLUSION Achieving an IR translates into superior PFS and TTP compared with conventional CR or stringent CR. These techniques provide complementary information and thus, an effort should be made to refine response criteria in MM.


Haematologica | 2010

Circulating human B and plasma cells. Age-associated changes in counts and detailed characterization of circulating normal CD138− and CD138+ plasma cells

Anouk Caraux; Bernard Klein; Bruno Paiva; Caroline Bret; Alexander Schmitz; Gwenny M. Fuhler; Nico A. Bos; Hans Erik Johnsen; Alberto Orfao; Martin Perez-Andres

Generation of B and plasma cells involves several organs with a necessary cell trafficking between them. A detailed phenotypic characterization of four circulating B-cell subsets (immature-, naïve-, memory- B-lymphocytes and plasma cells) of 106 healthy adults was realized by multiparametric flow cytometry. We show that CD10, CD27 and CD38 is the minimal combination of subsetting markers allowing unequivocal identification of immature (CD10+CD27−CD38+, 6±6 cells/μL), naïve (CD10−CD27−CD38−, 125±90 cells/μL), memory B lymphocytes (CD10−CD27+CD38−, 58±42 cells/μL), and plasma cells (CD10−CD27++CD38++, 2.1±2.1 cells/μL) within circulating CD19+ cells. From these four subsets, only memory B lymphocytes and plasma cells decreased with age, both in relative and absolute counts. Circulating plasma cells split into CD138− (57±12%) and CD138+ (43±12%) cells, the latter displaying a more mature phenotypic profile: absence of surface immunoglobulin, lower CD45 positivity and higher amounts of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin, CD38 and CD27. Unlike B lymphocytes, both populations of plasma cells are KI-67+ and show weak CXCR4 expression.


Leukemia | 2013

MYD88 L265P is a marker highly characteristic of, but not restricted to, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia.

Cristina Jiménez; Elena Sebastián; M C Chillón; Pilar Giraldo; J Mariano Hernández; F. Escalante; Tomás J. González-López; Carmen Aguilera; A G de Coca; Ilda Murillo; Miguel Alcoceba; A. Balanzategui; M. E. Sarasquete; Rocío Corral; Luis Marín; Bruno Paiva; Enrique M. Ocio; Norma C. Gutiérrez; M. Gonzalez; J. F. San Miguel; Ramón García-Sanz

We evaluated the MYD88 L265P mutation in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM) and B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders by specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (sensitivity ∼10−3). No mutation was seen in normal donors, while it was present in 101/117 (86%) WM patients, 27/31 (87%) IgM monoclonal gammapathies of uncertain significance (MGUS), 3/14 (21%) splenic marginal zone lymphomas and 9/48 (19%) non-germinal center (GC) diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). The mutation was absent in all 28 GC-DLBCLs, 13 DLBCLs not subclassified, 35 hairy cell leukemias, 39 chronic lymphocytic leukemias (16 with M-component), 25 IgA or IgG-MGUS, 24 multiple myeloma (3 with an IgM isotype), 6 amyloidosis, 9 lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas and 1 IgM-related neuropathy. Among WM and IgM-MGUS, MYD88 L265P mutation was associated with some differences in clinical and biological characteristics, although usually minor; wild-type MYD88 cases had smaller M-component (1.77 vs 2.72 g/dl, P=0.022), more lymphocytosis (24 vs 5%, P=0.006), higher lactate dehydrogenase level (371 vs 265 UI/L, P=0.002), atypical immunophenotype (CD23−CD27++FMC7++), less Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Variable gene (IGHV) somatic hypermutation (57 vs 97%, P=0.012) and less IGHV3–23 gene selection (9 vs 27%, P=0.014). These small differences did not lead to different time to first therapy, response to treatment or progression-free or overall survival.

Collaboration


Dive into the Bruno Paiva's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joan Bladé

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Norma C. Gutiérrez

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albert Oriol

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Noemi Puig

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ramón García-Sanz

Spanish National Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joaquin Martinez-Lopez

Complutense University of Madrid

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juan José Lahuerta

Complutense University of Madrid

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge