Bruno Vieira
University of Lisbon
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bruno Vieira.
GigaScience | 2013
Keith Bradnam; Joseph Fass; Anton Alexandrov; Paul Baranay; Michael Bechner; Inanc Birol; Sébastien Boisvert; Jarrod Chapman; Guillaume Chapuis; Rayan Chikhi; Hamidreza Chitsaz; Wen Chi Chou; Jacques Corbeil; Cristian Del Fabbro; Roderick R. Docking; Richard Durbin; Dent Earl; Scott J. Emrich; Pavel Fedotov; Nuno A. Fonseca; Ganeshkumar Ganapathy; Richard A. Gibbs; Sante Gnerre; Élénie Godzaridis; Steve Goldstein; Matthias Haimel; Giles Hall; David Haussler; Joseph Hiatt; Isaac Ho
BackgroundThe process of generating raw genome sequence data continues to become cheaper, faster, and more accurate. However, assembly of such data into high-quality, finished genome sequences remains challenging. Many genome assembly tools are available, but they differ greatly in terms of their performance (speed, scalability, hardware requirements, acceptance of newer read technologies) and in their final output (composition of assembled sequence). More importantly, it remains largely unclear how to best assess the quality of assembled genome sequences. The Assemblathon competitions are intended to assess current state-of-the-art methods in genome assembly.ResultsIn Assemblathon 2, we provided a variety of sequence data to be assembled for three vertebrate species (a bird, a fish, and snake). This resulted in a total of 43 submitted assemblies from 21 participating teams. We evaluated these assemblies using a combination of optical map data, Fosmid sequences, and several statistical methods. From over 100 different metrics, we chose ten key measures by which to assess the overall quality of the assemblies.ConclusionsMany current genome assemblers produced useful assemblies, containing a significant representation of their genes and overall genome structure. However, the high degree of variability between the entries suggests that there is still much room for improvement in the field of genome assembly and that approaches which work well in assembling the genome of one species may not necessarily work well for another.
GigaScience | 2013
Keith Bradnam; Joseph Fass; Anton Alexandrov; Paul Baranay; Michael Bechner; Inanc Birol; Sébastien Boisvert; Jarrod Chapman; Guillaume Chapuis; Rayan Chikhi; Hamidreza Chitsaz; Wen-Chi Chou; Jacques Corbeil; Cristian Del Fabbro; T. Roderick Docking; Richard Durbin; Dent Earl; Scott J. Emrich; Pavel Fedotov; Nuno A. Fonseca; Ganeshkumar Ganapathy; Richard A. Gibbs; Sante Gnerre; Élénie Godzaridis; Steve Goldstein; Matthias Haimel; Giles Hall; David Haussler; Joseph Hiatt; Isaac Ho
BackgroundThe process of generating raw genome sequence data continues to become cheaper, faster, and more accurate. However, assembly of such data into high-quality, finished genome sequences remains challenging. Many genome assembly tools are available, but they differ greatly in terms of their performance (speed, scalability, hardware requirements, acceptance of newer read technologies) and in their final output (composition of assembled sequence). More importantly, it remains largely unclear how to best assess the quality of assembled genome sequences. The Assemblathon competitions are intended to assess current state-of-the-art methods in genome assembly.ResultsIn Assemblathon 2, we provided a variety of sequence data to be assembled for three vertebrate species (a bird, a fish, and snake). This resulted in a total of 43 submitted assemblies from 21 participating teams. We evaluated these assemblies using a combination of optical map data, Fosmid sequences, and several statistical methods. From over 100 different metrics, we chose ten key measures by which to assess the overall quality of the assemblies.ConclusionsMany current genome assemblers produced useful assemblies, containing a significant representation of their genes and overall genome structure. However, the high degree of variability between the entries suggests that there is still much room for improvement in the field of genome assembly and that approaches which work well in assembling the genome of one species may not necessarily work well for another.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Mónica Sebastiana; Bruno Vieira; Teresa Lino-Neto; Filipa Monteiro; Andreia Figueiredo; Lisete Sousa; Maria Salomé Pais; R. M. Tavares; Octávio S. Paulo
Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis is essential for the life and health of trees in temperate and boreal forests where it plays a major role in nutrient cycling and in functioning of the forest ecosystem. Trees with ectomycorrhizal root tips are more tolerant to environmental stresses, such as drought, and biotic stresses such as root pathogens. Detailed information on these molecular processes is essential for the understanding of symbiotic tissue development in order to optimize the benefits of this natural phenomenon. Next generation sequencing tools allow the analysis of non model ectomycorrhizal plant-fungal interactions that can contribute to find the “symbiosis toolkits” and better define the role of each partner in the mutualistic interaction. By using 454 pyrosequencing we compared ectomycorrhizal cork oak roots with non-symbiotic roots. From the two cDNA libraries sequenced, over 2 million reads were obtained that generated 19552 cork oak root unique transcripts. A total of 2238 transcripts were found to be differentially expressed when ECM roots were compared with non-symbiotic roots. Identification of up- and down-regulated gens in ectomycorrhizal roots lead to a number of insights into the molecular mechanisms governing this important symbiosis. In cork oak roots, ectomycorrhizal colonization resulted in extensive cell wall remodelling, activation of the secretory pathway, alterations in flavonoid biosynthesis, and expression of genes involved in the recognition of fungal effectors. In addition, we identified genes with putative roles in symbiotic processes such as nutrient exchange with the fungal partner, lateral root formation or root hair decay. These findings provide a global overview of the transcriptome of an ectomycorrhizal host root, and constitute a foundation for future studies on the molecular events controlling this important symbiosis.
eLife | 2015
Guy Yachdav; Tatyana Goldberg; Sebastian Wilzbach; David Dao; Iris Shih; Saket Choudhary; Steve Crouch; Max Franz; Alexander Garcia; Leyla Garcia; Björn Grüning; Devasena Inupakutika; Ian Sillitoe; Anil Thanki; Bruno Vieira; Jose M. Villaveces; Maria Victoria Schneider; Suzanna E. Lewis; Steve Pettifer; Burkhard Rost; Manuel Corpas
BioJS is an open source software project that develops visualization tools for different types of biological data. Here we report on the factors that influenced the growth of the BioJS user and developer community, and outline our strategy for building on this growth. The lessons we have learned on BioJS may also be relevant to other open source software projects. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07009.001
F1000Research | 2014
Jelena Aleksic; Adrian Alexa; Teresa K. Attwood; Neil Chue Hong; Martin Dahlö; Robert Davey; Holger Dinkel; Konrad U. Förstner; Ivo Grigorov; Jean-Karim Hériché; Leo Lahti; Daniel MacLean; Michael Markie; Jenny Molloy; Maria Victoria Schneider; Camille Scott; Richard Smith-Unna; Bruno Vieira
One of the foundations of the scientific method is to be able to reproduce experiments and corroborate the results of research that has been done before. However, with the increasing complexities of new technologies and techniques, coupled with the specialisation of experiments, reproducing research findings has become a growing challenge. Clearly, scientific methods must be conveyed succinctly, and with clarity and rigour, in order for research to be reproducible. Here, we propose steps to help increase the transparency of the scientific method and the reproducibility of research results: specifically, we introduce a peer-review oath and accompanying manifesto. These have been designed to offer guidelines to enable reviewers (with the minimum friction or bias) to follow and apply open science principles, and support the ideas of transparency, reproducibility and ultimately greater societal impact. Introducing the oath and manifesto at the stage of peer review will help to check that the research being published includes everything that other researchers would need to successfully repeat the work. Peer review is the lynchpin of the publishing system: encouraging the community to consciously (and conscientiously) uphold these principles should help to improve published papers, increase confidence in the reproducibility of the work and, ultimately, provide strategic benefits to authors and their institutions.
Frontiers in Plant Science | 2014
Pedro Talhinhas; Helena Gil Azinheira; Bruno Vieira; Andreia Loureiro; Sílvia Tavares; Dora Batista; Emmanuelle Morin; Anne-Sophie Petitot; Octávio S. Paulo; Julie Poulain; Corinne Da Silva; Sébastien Duplessis; Maria do Céu Silva; Diana Fernandez
Hemileia vastatrix is the causal agent of coffee leaf rust, the most important disease of coffee Arabica. In this work, a 454-pyrosequencing transcriptome analysis of H. vastatrix germinating urediniospores (gU) and appressoria (Ap) was performed and compared to previously published in planta haustoria-rich (H) data. A total of 9234 transcripts were identified and annotated. Ca. 50% of these transcripts showed no significant homology to international databases. Only 784 sequences were shared by the three conditions, and 75% were exclusive of either gU (2146), Ap (1479) or H (3270). Relative transcript abundance and RT-qPCR analyses for a selection of genes indicated a particularly active metabolism, translational activity and production of new structures in the appressoria and intense signaling, transport, secretory activity and cellular multiplication in the germinating urediniospores, suggesting the onset of a plant-fungus dialogue as early as at the germ tube stage. Gene expression related to the production of carbohydrate-active enzymes and accumulation of glycerol in germinating urediniospores and appressoria suggests that combined lytic and physical mechanisms are involved in appressoria-mediated penetration. Besides contributing to the characterization of molecular processes leading to appressoria-mediated infection by rust fungi, these results point toward the identification of new H. vastatrix candidate virulence factors, with 516 genes predicted to encode secreted proteins.
BMC Bioinformatics | 2016
Francisco Pina-Martins; Bruno Vieira; Sofia G. Seabra; Dora Batista; Octávio S. Paulo
BackgroundNext-generation sequencing datasets are becoming more frequent, and their use in population studies is becoming widespread. For non-model species, without a reference genome, it is possible from a panel of individuals to identify a set of SNPs that can be used for further population genotyping. However the lack of a reference genome to which the sequenced data could be compared makes the finding of SNPs more troublesome. Additionally when the data sources (strains) are not identified (e.g. in datasets of pooled individuals), the problem of finding reliable variation in these datasets can become much more difficult due to the lack of specialized software for this specific task.ResultsHere we describe 4Pipe4, a 454 data analysis pipeline particularly focused on SNP detection when no reference or strain information is available. It uses a command line interface to automatically call other programs, parse their outputs and summarize the results. The variation detection routine is built-in in the program itself. Despite being optimized for SNP mining in 454 EST data, it is flexible enough to automate the analysis of genomic data or even data from other NGS technologies. 4Pipe4 will output several HTML formatted reports with metrics on many of the most common assembly values, as well as on all the variation found. There is also a module available for finding putative SSRs in the analysed datasets.ConclusionsThis program can be especially useful for researchers that have 454 datasets of a panel of pooled individuals and want to discover and characterize SNPs for subsequent individual genotyping with customized genotyping arrays. In comparison with other SNP detection approaches, 4Pipe4 showed the best validation ratio, retrieving a smaller number of SNPs but with a considerably lower false positive rate than other methods.4Pipe4’s source code is available at https://github.com/StuntsPT/4Pipe4.
Archive | 2013
Keith Bradnam; Joseph Fass; Anton Alexandrov; Paul Baranay; Michael Bechner; Inanc Birol; Sébastien Boisvert; Jarrod Chapman; Guillaume Chapuis; Rayan Chikhi; Hamidreza Chitsaz; Wen-Chi Chou; Jacques Corbeil; Cristian Del Fabbro; T Docking; Richard Durbin; Dent Earl; Scott J. Emrich; Pavel Fedotov; Nuno A. Fonseca; Ganeshkumar Ganapathy; Richard A. Gibbs; Sante Gnerre; Élénie Godzaridis; Steve Goldstein; Matthias Haimel; Giles Hall; David Haussler; Joseph Hiatt; Isaac Ho
BackgroundThe process of generating raw genome sequence data continues to become cheaper, faster, and more accurate. However, assembly of such data into high-quality, finished genome sequences remains challenging. Many genome assembly tools are available, but they differ greatly in terms of their performance (speed, scalability, hardware requirements, acceptance of newer read technologies) and in their final output (composition of assembled sequence). More importantly, it remains largely unclear how to best assess the quality of assembled genome sequences. The Assemblathon competitions are intended to assess current state-of-the-art methods in genome assembly.ResultsIn Assemblathon 2, we provided a variety of sequence data to be assembled for three vertebrate species (a bird, a fish, and snake). This resulted in a total of 43 submitted assemblies from 21 participating teams. We evaluated these assemblies using a combination of optical map data, Fosmid sequences, and several statistical methods. From over 100 different metrics, we chose ten key measures by which to assess the overall quality of the assemblies.ConclusionsMany current genome assemblers produced useful assemblies, containing a significant representation of their genes and overall genome structure. However, the high degree of variability between the entries suggests that there is still much room for improvement in the field of genome assembly and that approaches which work well in assembling the genome of one species may not necessarily work well for another.
Archive | 2015
Guy Yachdav; Tatyana Goldberg; Sebastian Wilzbach; David Dao; Iris Shih; Saket Choudhary; Steve Crouch; Max Franz; Devasena Inupakutika; Ian Sillitoe; Anil Thanki; Bruno Vieira; E M Villaveces; Maria Victoria Schneider; Suzanna E. Lewis; Steve Pettifer; Burkhard Rost; Manuel Corpas
Archive | 2015
Francisco Pina-Martins; Diogo N. Silva; Bruno Vieira