Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bryan E. Penprase is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bryan E. Penprase.


Nature | 2005

The afterglow of GRB 050709 and the nature of the short-hard gamma-ray bursts.

Derek B. Fox; Dale A. Frail; Paul A. Price; S. R. Kulkarni; Edo Berger; Tsvi Piran; Alicia M. Soderberg; S. B. Cenko; P. B. Cameron; Avishay Gal-Yam; Mansi M. Kasliwal; D.-S. Moon; Fiona A. Harrison; Ehud Nakar; Brian Paul Schmidt; Bryan E. Penprase; Roger A. Chevalier; Pawan Kumar; Kathy Roth; D. Watson; Brian Leverett Lee; Stephen A. Shectman; Mark M. Phillips; M. Roth; Patrick J. McCarthy; M Rauch; L. L. Cowie; Bruce A. Peterson; Joshua Rich; Nobuyuki Kawai

The final chapter in the long-standing mystery of the γ-ray bursts (GRBs) centres on the origin of the short-hard class of bursts, which are suspected on theoretical grounds to result from the coalescence of neutron-star or black-hole binary systems. Numerous searches for the afterglows of short-hard bursts have been made, galvanized by the revolution in our understanding of long-duration GRBs that followed the discovery in 1997 of their broadband (X-ray, optical and radio) afterglow emission. Here we present the discovery of the X-ray afterglow of a short-hard burst, GRB 050709, whose accurate position allows us to associate it unambiguously with a star-forming galaxy at redshift z = 0.160, and whose optical lightcurve definitively excludes a supernova association. Together with results from three other recent short-hard bursts, this suggests that short-hard bursts release much less energy than the long-duration GRBs. Models requiring young stellar populations, such as magnetars and collapsars, are ruled out, while coalescing degenerate binaries remain the most promising progenitor candidates.


Nature | 2006

Relativistic ejecta from X-ray flash XRF 060218 and the rate of cosmic explosions

Alicia M. Soderberg; S. R. Kulkarni; Ehud Nakar; Edo Berger; P. B. Cameron; Derek B. Fox; Dale A. Frail; Avishay Gal-Yam; R. Sari; S. B. Cenko; M. M. Kasliwal; R. A. Chevalier; Tsvi Piran; Paul A. Price; Brian Paul Schmidt; Guy G. Pooley; D.-S. Moon; Bryan E. Penprase; Eran O. Ofek; A. Rau; N. Gehrels; J. A. Nousek; D. N. Burrows; S. E. Persson; P. J. McCarthy

Over the past decade, long-duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs)—including the subclass of X-ray flashes (XRFs)—have been revealed to be a rare variety of type Ibc supernova. Although all these events result from the death of massive stars, the electromagnetic luminosities of GRBs and XRFs exceed those of ordinary type Ibc supernovae by many orders of magnitude. The essential physical process that causes a dying star to produce a GRB or XRF, and not just a supernova, is still unknown. Here we report radio and X-ray observations of XRF 060218 (associated with supernova SN 2006aj), the second-nearest GRB identified until now. We show that this event is a hundred times less energetic but ten times more common than cosmological GRBs. Moreover, it is distinguished from ordinary type Ibc supernovae by the presence of 1048 erg coupled to mildly relativistic ejecta, along with a central engine (an accretion-fed, rapidly rotating compact source) that produces X-rays for weeks after the explosion. This suggests that the production of relativistic ejecta is the key physical distinction between GRBs or XRFs and ordinary supernovae, while the nature of the central engine (black hole or magnetar) may distinguish typical bursts from low-luminosity, spherical events like XRF 060218.


Nature | 2005

The afterglow and elliptical host galaxy of the short gamma-ray burst GRB 050724.

Edo Berger; Paul A. Price; S. B. Cenko; Avishay Gal-Yam; Alicia M. Soderberg; Mansi M. Kasliwal; Douglas C. Leonard; P. B. Cameron; Dale A. Frail; S. R. Kulkarni; D W Murphy; Wojtek Krzeminski; Tsvi Piran; Brian Leverett Lee; K C Roth; D.-S. Moon; Derek B. Fox; Fiona A. Harrison; S. E. Persson; Brian Paul Schmidt; Bryan E. Penprase; Joshua Rich; Bruce A. Peterson; L. L. Cowie

Despite a rich phenomenology, γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are divided into two classes based on their duration and spectral hardness—the long-soft and the short-hard bursts. The discovery of afterglow emission from long GRBs was a watershed event, pinpointing their origin to star-forming galaxies, and hence the death of massive stars, and indicating an energy release of about 1051 erg. While theoretical arguments suggest that short GRBs are produced in the coalescence of binary compact objects (neutron stars or black holes), the progenitors, energetics and environments of these events remain elusive despite recent localizations. Here we report the discovery of the first radio afterglow from the short burst GRB 050724, which unambiguously associates it with an elliptical galaxy at a redshift z = 0.257. We show that the burst is powered by the same relativistic fireball mechanism as long GRBs, with the ejecta possibly collimated in jets, but that the total energy release is 10–1,000 times smaller. More importantly, the nature of the host galaxy demonstrates that short GRBs arise from an old (> 1 Gyr) stellar population, strengthening earlier suggestions and providing support for coalescing compact object binaries as the progenitors.


Nature | 2006

A novel explosive process is required for the gamma-ray burst GRB 060614.

Avishay Gal-Yam; Derek B. Fox; P. Price; Eran O. Ofek; M. Davis; Douglas C. Leonard; Alicia M. Soderberg; Brian Paul Schmidt; Karen Lewis; Bruce A. Peterson; S. R. Kulkarni; Edo Berger; S. B. Cenko; Re'em Sari; K. Sharon; Dale A. Frail; D.-S. Moon; Peter J. Brown; Antonino Cucchiara; Fiona A. Harrison; Tsvi Piran; S. Persson; Patrick J. McCarthy; Bryan E. Penprase; Roger A. Chevalier; Andrew I. MacFadyen

Over the past decade, our physical understanding of γ-ray bursts (GRBs) has progressed rapidly, thanks to the discovery and observation of their long-lived afterglow emission. Long-duration (≳2 s) GRBs are associated with the explosive deaths of massive stars (‘collapsars’, ref. 1), which produce accompanying supernovae; the short-duration (≲2 s) GRBs have a different origin, which has been argued to be the merger of two compact objects. Here we report optical observations of GRB 060614 (duration ∼100 s, ref. 10) that rule out the presence of an associated supernova. This would seem to require a new explosive process: either a massive collapsar that powers a GRB without any associated supernova, or a new type of ‘engine’, as long-lived as the collapsar but without a massive star. We also show that the properties of the host galaxy (redshift z = 0.125) distinguish it from other long-duration GRB hosts and suggest that an entirely new type of GRB progenitor may be required.


Nature | 2009

A γ-ray burst at a redshift of z ≈ 8.2

Nial R. Tanvir; Derek B. Fox; Andrew J. Levan; Edo Berger; K. Wiersema; J. P. U. Fynbo; A. Cucchiara; T. Krühler; N. Gehrels; J. S. Bloom; J. Greiner; P. A. Evans; E. Rol; F. E. Olivares; J. Hjorth; P. Jakobsson; J. Farihi; R. Willingale; Rhaana L. C. Starling; S. B. Cenko; Daniel A. Perley; Justyn R. Maund; J. Duke; R. A. M. J. Wijers; Andrew J. Adamson; A. Allan; M. N. Bremer; D. N. Burrows; A. J. Castro-Tirado; B. Cavanagh

Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are thought to result from the explosions of certain massive stars, and some are bright enough that they should be observable out to redshifts of z > 20 using current technology. Hitherto, the highest redshift measured for any object was z = 6.96, for a Lyman-alpha emitting galaxy. Here we report that GRB 090423 lies at a redshift of z approximately 8.2, implying that massive stars were being produced and dying as GRBs approximately 630 Myr after the Big Bang. The burst also pinpoints the location of its host galaxy.It is thought that the first generations of massive stars in the Universe were an important, and quite possibly dominant, source of the ultra-violet radiation that reionized the hydrogen gas in the intergalactic medium (IGM); a state in which it has remained to the present day. Measurements of cosmic microwave background anisotropies suggest that this phase-change largely took place in the redshift range z=10.8 +/- 1.4, while observations of quasars and Lyman-alpha galaxies have shown that the process was essentially completed by z=6. However, the detailed history of reionization, and characteristics of the stars and proto-galaxies that drove it, remain unknown. Further progress in understanding requires direct observations of the sources of ultra-violet radiation in the era of reionization, and mapping the evolution of the neutral hydrogen fraction through time. The detection of galaxies at such redshifts is highly challenging, due to their intrinsic faintness and high luminosity distance, whilst bright quasars appear to be rare beyond z~7. Here we report the discovery of a gamma-ray burst, GRB 090423, at redshift z=8.26 -0.08 +0.07. This is well beyond the redshift of the most distant spectroscopically confirmed galaxy (z=6.96) and quasar (z=6.43). It establishes that massive stars were being produced, and dying as GRBs, ~625 million years after the Big Bang. In addition, the accurate position of the burst pinpoints the location of the most distant galaxy known to date. Larger samples of GRBs beyond z~7 will constrain the evolving rate of star formation in the early universe, while rapid spectroscopy of their afterglows will allow direct exploration of the progress of reionization with cosmic time.Long-duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are thought to result from the explosions of certain massive stars, and some are bright enough that they should be observable out to redshifts of z > 20 using current technology. Hitherto, the highest redshift measured for any object was z = 6.96, for a Lyman-α emitting galaxy. Here we report that GRB 090423 lies at a redshift of z ≈ 8.2, implying that massive stars were being produced and dying as GRBs ∼630 Myr after the Big Bang. The burst also pinpoints the location of its host galaxy.


Science | 2011

Circumstellar Material in Type Ia Supernovae via Sodium Absorption Features

Assaf Sternberg; Avishay Gal-Yam; J. D. Simon; Douglas C. Leonard; Robert Michael Quimby; Mark M. Phillips; Nidia I. Morrell; Ian B. Thompson; Inese I. Ivans; J. L. Marshall; A. V. Filippenko; G. W. Marcy; J. S. Bloom; Ferdinando Patat; Ryan J. Foley; D. Yong; Bryan E. Penprase; Daniel Jay Beeler; C. Allende Prieto; Guy S. Stringfellow

Most of the progenitors of type Ia supernovae in nearby spiral galaxies may be white dwarf−normal star binary systems. Type Ia supernovae are key tools for measuring distances on a cosmic scale. They are generally thought to be the thermonuclear explosion of an accreting white dwarf in a close binary system. The nature of the mass donor is still uncertain. In the single-degenerate model it is a main-sequence star or an evolved star, whereas in the double-degenerate model it is another white dwarf. We show that the velocity structure of absorbing material along the line of sight to 35 type Ia supernovae tends to be blueshifted. These structures are likely signatures of gas outflows from the supernova progenitor systems. Thus, many type Ia supernovae in nearby spiral galaxies may originate in single-degenerate systems.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2007

A New Population of High-Redshift Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts

Edo Berger; Derek B. Fox; Paul A. Price; Ehud Nakar; Avishay Gal-Yam; Daniel E. Holz; Brian Paul Schmidt; A. Cucchiara; S. B. Cenko; S. R. Kulkarni; Alicia M. Soderberg; Dale A. Frail; Bryan E. Penprase; Eran O. Ofek; S. J. Bell Burnell; P. B. Cameron; L. L. Cowie; Michael A. Dopita; I. M. Hook; Bruce A. Peterson; Ph. Podsiadlowski; Kathy Roth; Robert E. Rutledge; Scott S. Sheppard; Antoinette Songaila

The redshift distribution of the short-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is a crucial, but currently fragmentary, cluetothenatureoftheirprogenitors.HerewepresentopticalobservationsofnineshortGRBsobtainedwithGemini, Magellan, and the Hubble Space Telescope. We detect the afterglows and host galaxies of two short bursts, and host galaxiesfortwoadditionalburstswithknownopticalafterglowpositions,andfivewithX-raypositions(P6 00 radius).In eightoftheninecaseswefindthatthemostprobablehostgalaxiesarefaint,R � 23 26:5mag,andarethereforestarkly different from the first few short GRB hosts with R � 17 22 mag and z P0:5. Indeed, we measure spectroscopic redshifts ofz � 0:4 1:1for the four brightest hosts. A comparison to largefield galaxy samples, as well as the hosts of longGRBsandpreviousshortGRBs,indicatesthatthefainterhostslikelyresideatz k1. Ourmostconservativelimit is that at least half of the five hosts without a known redshift reside at z > 0:7 (97% confidence level), suggesting that about 1 to 2 of all short GRBs originate at higher redshifts than previously determined. This has two important implications: (1) we constrain the acceptable age distributions to a wide lognormal (� k1) with � � � 4 8G yr, or to a powerlaw,P(� ) / � n ,with � 1Pn P0;and(2)theinferredisotropicenergies,E�; iso � 1050 10 52 ergs,aresignificantly larger than � 10 48 ‐10 49 ergs for the low-redshift, short GRBs, indicating a large spread in energy release or jet opening angles. Finally, we reiterate the importance of short GRBs as potential gravitational-wave sources and find a conservative detection rate with the advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) of � 2‐6 yr � 1 .


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

Afterglows, redshifts, and properties of Swift gamma-ray bursts

Edo Berger; S. R. Kulkarni; Derek B. Fox; Alicia M. Soderberg; Fiona A. Harrison; Ehud Nakar; D. Kelson; Michael D. Gladders; John S. Mulchaey; Augustus Oemler; A. Dressler; S. B. Cenko; Paul A. Price; Brian Paul Schmidt; Dale A. Frail; Nidia I. Morrell; Sergio Gonzalez; Wojtek Krzeminski; Re'em Sari; Avishay Gal-Yam; D.-S. Moon; Bryan E. Penprase; Ray Jayawardhana; Alexander Scholz; Joshua Rich; Bruce A. Peterson; G. Anderson; R. H. McNaught; Takeo Minezaki; Yuzuru Yoshii

We present optical, near-IR, and radio follow-up of 16 Swift bursts, including our discovery of nine afterglows and a redshift determination for three. These observations, supplemented by data from the literature, provide an afterglow recovery rate of 52% in the optical/near-IR, much higher than in previous missions (BeppoSAX, HETE-2, INTEGRAL, and IPN). The optical/near-IR afterglows of Swift events are on average 1.8 mag fainter at t = 12 hr than those of previous missions. The X-ray afterglows are similarly fainter than those of pre-Swift bursts. In the radio the limiting factor is the VLA threshold, and the detection rate for Swift bursts is similar to that for past missions. The redshift distribution of pre-Swift bursts peaked at z ~ 1, whereas the six Swift bursts with measured redshifts are distributed evenly between 0.7 and 3.2. From these results we conclude that (1) the pre-Swift distributions were biased in favor of bright events and low-redshift events, (2) the higher sensitivity and accurate positions of Swift result in a better representation of the true burst redshift and brightness distributions (which are higher and dimmer, respectively), and (3) ~10% of the bursts are optically dark, as a result of a high redshift and/or dust extinction. We remark that the apparent lack of low-redshift, low-luminosity Swift bursts and the lower event rate than prelaunch estimates (90 vs. 150 per year) are the result of a threshold that is similar to that of BATSE. In view of these inferences, afterglow observers may find it advisable to make significant changes in follow-up strategies of Swift events. The faintness of the afterglows means that large telescopes should be employed as soon as the burst is localized. Sensitive observations in RIz and near-IR bands will be needed to discriminate between a typical z ~ 2 burst with modest extinction and a high-redshift event. Radio observations will be profitable for a small fraction (~10%) of events. Finally, we suggest that a search for bright host galaxies in untriggered BAT localizations may increase the chance of finding nearby low-luminosity GRBs.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

Observations and modeling of the inner disk region of T tauri stars

R. L. Akeson; Christina Walker; Kenneth Wood; J. A. Eisner; Elena Scire; Bryan E. Penprase; David R. Ciardi; G. T. van Belle; Barbara A. Whitney; J. E. Bjorkman

We present observations of four T Tauri stars using long baseline infrared interferometry from the Palomar Testbed Interferometer. The target sources, T Tau N, SU Aur, RY Tau, and DR Tau, are all known to be surrounded by dusty circumstellar disks. The observations directly trace the inner regions (<1 AU) of the disk and can be used to constrain the physical properties of this material. For three of the sources observed, the infrared emission is clearly resolved. We first use geometric models to characterize the emission region size, which ranges from 0.04 to 0.3 AU in radius. We then use Monte Carlo radiation transfer models of accretion disks to jointly model the spectral energy distribution and the interferometric observations with disk models including accretion and scattering. With these models, we are able to reproduce the data set with extended emission arising from structures larger than 10 mas contributing less than 6% of the K-band emission, consistent with little or no envelope remaining for these class II sources [d log(λFλ)/d log λ ≈ -2-0 in the infrared]. The radiation transfer models have inner radii for the dust similar to the geometric models; however, for RY Tau, emission from gas within the inner dust radius contributes significantly to the model flux and visibility at infrared wavelengths. The main conclusion of our modeling is that emission from inner gas disks (between the magnetic truncation radius and the dust destruction radius) can be a significant component in the inner disk flux for sources with large inner dust radii.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

Multiwavelength observations of GRB 050820A : an exceptionally energetic event followed from start to finish

S. B. Cenko; Mansi M. Kasliwal; Fiona A. Harrison; Valentin Pal'Shin; Dale A. Frail; P. B. Cameron; Edo Berger; Derek B. Fox; Avishay Gal-Yam; S. R. Kulkarni; D.-S. Moon; Ehud Nakar; Eran O. Ofek; Bryan E. Penprase; Paul A. Price; Re'em Sari; Brian Paul Schmidt; Alicia M. Soderberg; R. L. Aptekar; Dmitry D. Frederiks; S. Golenetskii; D. N. Burrows; Roger A. Chevalier; N. Gehrels; Patrick J. McCarthy; John A. Nousek; Tsvi Piran

We present observations of the unusually bright and long γ-ray burst GRB 050820A, one of the best sampled broadband data sets in the Swift era. The γ-ray light curve is marked by a soft precursor pulse some 200 s before the main event; the lack of any intervening emission suggests that it is due to a physical mechanism distinct from the GRB itself. The large time lag between the precursor and the main emission enabled simultaneous observations in the γ-ray, X-ray, and optical bandpasses, something only achieved for a handful of events to date. While the contemporaneous X-rays are the low-energy tail of the prompt emission, the optical does not directly track the γ-ray flux. Instead, the early-time optical data appear consistent with the forward shock synchrotron peak passing through the optical and are therefore likely the beginning of the afterglow. On hour timescales after the burst, the X-ray and optical light curves are inconsistent with an adiabatic expansion of the shock into the surrounding region, but rather indicate that there is a period of energy injection. Observations at late times allow us to constrain the collimation angle of the relativistic outflow to 6°.8 ≾ θ ≾ 9°.3. Our estimates of both the kinetic energy of the afterglow (EKE = 5.2^(+7.9)_(4.1) × 10^(51) ergs) and the prompt γ-ray energy release (Eγ = 7.5^(+6.7)-(2.4) × 10^(51) ergs) make GRB 050820A one of the most energetic events for which such values could be determined.

Collaboration


Dive into the Bryan E. Penprase's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Derek B. Fox

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edo Berger

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. B. Cenko

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Mainzer

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bidushi Bhattacharya

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge