Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bryan F. Warren is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bryan F. Warren.


Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology | 2005

Toward an Integrated Clinical, Molecular and Serological Classification of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology

Mark S. Silverberg; Jack Satsangi; Tariq Ahmad; Ian D. Arnott; Charles N. Bernstein; Steven R. Brant; Renzo Caprilli; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Christoph Gasche; Karel Geboes; Derek P. Jewell; Amir Karban; Edward V. Loftus; A. Salvador Peña; Robert H. Riddell; David B. Sachar; Stefan Schreiber; A. Hillary Steinhart; Stephan R. Targan; Severine Vermeire; Bryan F. Warren

The discovery of a series of genetic and serological markers associated with disease susceptibility and phenotype in inflammatory bowel disease has led to the prospect of an integrated classification system involving clinical, serological and genetic parameters. The Working Party has reviewed current clinical classification systems in Crohns disease, ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis, and provided recommendations for clinical classification in practice. Progress with respect to integrating serological and genetic markers has been examined in detail, and the implications are discussed. While an integrated system is not proposed for clinical use at present, the introduction of a widely acceptable clinical subclassification is strongly advocated, which would allow detailed correlations among serotype, genotype and clinical phenotype to be examined and confirmed in independent cohorts of patients and, thereby, provide a vital foundation for future work.


Journal of Crohns & Colitis | 2008

European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis: Definitions and diagnosis

Eduard F. Stange; Simon Travis; Severine Vermeire; W. Reinisch; K. Geboes; A. Barakauskiene; R. Feakins; Jean-François Fléjou; Hans H. Herfarth; Daan W. Hommes; Peter L. Lakatos; Gerassimos J. Mantzaris; Stefan Schreiber; V. Villanacci; Bryan F. Warren

### 1.1 Introduction Ulcerative colitis is a life long disease arising from an interaction between genetic and environmental factors, but observed predominantly in the developed countries of the world. The precise aetiology is unknown and therefore medical therapy to cure the disease is not yet available. Within Europe there is a North–South gradient, but the incidence appears to have increased in Southern and developing countries in recent years.1,2 Patients may live with a considerable symptom burden despite medical treatment (66% describe interference with work and 73% with leisure activities3) in the hope that the aetiology of ulcerative colitis will shortly be revealed and a cure emerges. Although this is conceivable in the next decade, clinicians have to advise patients on the basis of information available today. Despite randomized trials there will always be many questions that can only be answered by the exercise of judgement and opinion. This leads to differences in practice between clinicians, which may be brought into sharp relief by differences in emphasis between countries. The Consensus endeavours to address these differences. The Consensus is not meant to supersede the guidelines of different countries (such as those from the UK,4 or Germany5), which reach broadly the same conclusions since they are, after all, based on the same evidence. Rather, the aim of the Consensus is to promote a European perspective on the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and its dilemmas. Since the development of guidelines is an expensive and time-consuming process, it may help to avoid duplication of effort in the future. A European Consensus is also considered important because an increasing number of therapeutic trials recruit from Central and Eastern European countries where practice guidelines have yet to be published. This document sets out the current European Consensus on the diagnosis and management …


British Journal of Surgery | 2009

A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer.

Simon Bach; J. Hill; John R. T. Monson; J. N. L. Simson; L. Lane; A. Merrie; Bryan F. Warren; N. J. McC. Mortensen

The outcome of local excision of early rectal cancer using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) lacks consensus. Screening has substantially increased the early diagnosis of tumours. Patients need local treatments that are oncologically equivalent to radical surgery but safer and functionally superior.


The Journal of Pathology | 2003

Raman spectroscopy, a potential tool for the objective identification and classification of neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus

Catherine Kendall; Nicholas Stone; Neil A. Shepherd; Karel Geboes; Bryan F. Warren; Robert Bennett; Hugh Barr

Histopathology remains the gold standard technique for the diagnosis of intraepithelial neoplasia (dysplasia) in Barretts oesophagus, but it is highly subjective and relies on blind biopsy targeting. The aim of this study was to evaluate Raman spectroscopy, a rapid, non‐invasive, molecular, specific analytical technique, for the objective identification and classification of Barretts neoplasia in vitro. A secondary objective was to demonstrate the need for a rigorous gold standard in the development of new diagnostic techniques. Forty‐four patients with a mean age of 69 years (range 34–89 years) undergoing surveillance for Barretts oesophagus were included in the study. Three consultant pathologists independently assessed snap‐frozen oesophageal biopsy specimens. Raman spectra were measured on 87 histopathologically homogeneous samples. Spectral classification models were developed using multivariate analysis for the prediction of pathology. Histopathology and Raman classification results were compared. Raman spectral prediction with a consensus pathology classification model gave sensitivities between 73% and 100% and specificities of 90–100%. A high level of agreement (κ = 0.89) was demonstrated between the three‐subset biopsy targeting model and consensus pathology opinion. This compares favourably with the agreement measured between an independent pathologist and the consensus pathology opinion for the same spectra (κ = 0.76). Raman spectroscopy appears to provide a highly sensitive and specific technique for the identification and classification of neoplasia in Barretts oesophagus. Copyright


American Journal of Pathology | 2001

The Transmembrane Form of the CX3CL1 Chemokine Fractalkine Is Expressed Predominantly by Epithelial Cells in Vivo

Andrew Lucas; Nicholas Chadwick; Bryan F. Warren; Derek P. Jewell; Siamon Gordon; Fiona Powrie; David R. Greaves

Fractalkine (CX3CL1) is synthesized as a type I transmembrane protein. Its unique CX(3)C chemokine domain is attached to a 241-amino acid mucin stalk, a 19-amino acid transmembrane domain, and a 37-amino acid intracellular domain of unknown function. A soluble form of fractalkine can be generated by proteolytic cleavage at the base of the mucin stalk. Novel monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies that specifically recognize only the amino- or carboxyl-terminal ends of the human fractalkine molecule have revealed that epithelial cells are the predominant cell type expressing transmembrane forms of fractalkine in human skin, the tonsil, and the large intestine. Using these specific anti-fractalkine reagents we do not detect high-level expression of fractalkine on endothelial cells in normal or inflamed colon samples obtained from patients with Crohns disease or ulcerative colitis. In contrast to previous reports we do not detect fractalkine expression by Langerhans cells or immature dendritic cells in mucosal-associated lymphoid tissues in vivo. We show that the reagent used in previous studies, an anti-fractalkine N-terminal peptide antisera, cross-reacts with human CD84. Finally we discuss potential roles for fractalkine in constitutive leukocyte trafficking based on its observed pattern of expression in epithelia.


Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2005

RDP58 is a novel and potentially effective oral therapy for ulcerative colitis

Simon Travis; Lee Min Yap; Christopher J. Hawkey; Bryan F. Warren; Mirella Lazarov; Tim Fong; R J Tesi

Background: RDP58 is a novel anti‐inflammatory d‐amino acid decapeptide that inhibits synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines by disrupting cell signaling at the pre‐MAPK MyD88‐IRAK‐TRAF6 protein complex. We therefore evaluated its efficacy and safety in parallel multicenter, double‐blind, randomized concept studies in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: In the first trial, 34 patients with mild to moderate active UC were randomized (1:2) to placebo (n = 13) or RDP58 100 mg (n = 21). In the second trial, 93 similar patients were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo (n = 30) RDP58 200 mg (n = 31), or RDP 300 mg (n = 32). In both studies, treatment success was defined as a simple clinical colitis activity index score of no more than 3 at 28 days. Sigmoidoscopy and rectal biopsy (at baseline and 28 days) and safety measures (baseline and 28 and 56 days) were other endpoints. Results: Treatment success on RDP 100 mg was 29% versus 46% on placebo (P = 0.46). There were no significant differences in sigmoidoscopy or histology score. In the second study, treatment success on the higher doses of RDP58 (200 and 300 mg) was 71% and 72%, respectively, versus 43% on placebo (P = 0.016). Improvements in sigmoidoscopy scores (41% on 200 mg and 46% on 300 mg versus 32% on placebo) did not reach significance, but histology scores improved significantly (P = 0.002) versus placebo. Overall, adverse events were no different between placebo (3.3 ± 2.4) and RDP58 (2.7 ± 1.4, 300‐mg group). Conclusions: RDP58 at a dose of 200 or 300 mg, but not 100 mg, was effective in mild‐to‐moderate UC. RDP58 was safe and well tolerated, and its novel action makes it an attractive potential therapy.


Diseases of The Colon & Rectum | 2002

Quantification of histologic regression of rectal cancer after irradiation: A proposal for a modified staging system

J. M. D. Wheeler; Bryan F. Warren; N. J. McC. Mortensen; N. Ekanyaka; H. Kulacoglu; A. C. Jones; Bruce D. George; M. G. W. Kettlewell

AbstractPURPOSE: Long-course preoperative radiotherapy has been recommended for rectal carcinoma when there is concern about the ability to perform a curative resection, for example, in larger tethered tumors or those sited anteriorly or near the anal sphincter. “Downstaging” of the tumor may occur, and this is of importance when estimating the prognosis and selecting postoperative therapy for patients. We studied the effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on the pathology of rectal cancer, and we propose a simplified measurement of tumor regression, the Rectal Cancer Regression Grade. METHODS: We have reviewed those patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection for carcinomas of the mid or distal third of the rectum found to be Stage T3/4 on transrectal ultrasound or CT between January 1995 and December 1998. Patients received 45 to 50 Gy irradiation and an infusion of 5-fluorouracil. The surgical specimens were examined by one pathologist, and the Rectal Cancer Regression Grade was quantified. RESULTS: Forty-two patients, mean age 60 (range, 42–86) years, underwent chemoradiotherapy before surgery for rectal carcinoma. There were 28 anterior resections (67 percent; 9 with a colonic pouch), 12 abdominoperineal resections (27 percent), and 2 Hartmann’s procedures (5 percent). Comparison of preoperative and pathologic staging revealed that the depth of invasion was downstaged in 17 patients (38 percent), and the status of involved lymph nodes was downstaged in 13 (50 percent) of 26 patients. Tumor regression was more than 50 percent (Rectal Cancer Regression Grades 1 and 2) in 36 patients (86 percent), with 7 patients (17 percent) having complete regression with absence of residual cancer cells. CONCLUSION: Significant tumor regression was seen in 86 percent of cases after chemoradiotherapy, with 19 patients showing a “good” responsiveness. We propose a modified pathologic staging system for irradiated rectal cancer, the Rectal Cancer Regression Grade, which includes a measurement of tumor regression. The utility of the proposed Rectal Cancer Regression Grade must be tested against long-term outcomes before its value in predicting prognosis and survival can be determined.


Lancet Oncology | 2012

Feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced, operable colon cancer: the pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial

U. K. D Morton; Matthew T. Seymour; Laura Magill; Kelly Handley; G Brown; David Ferry; Nicholas P. West; P. Quirke; Bryan F. Warren; Richard Gray; Grp Foxtrot Collaborative

Background Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and radiotherapy are more effective than similar postoperative treatment for oesophageal, gastric, and rectal cancers, perhaps because of more effective micrometastasis eradication and reduced risk of incomplete excision and tumour cell shedding during surgery. The FOxTROT trial aims to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer. Methods In the pilot stage of this randomised controlled trial, 150 patients with radiologically staged locally advanced (T3 with >= 5 mm invasion beyond the muscularis propria or T4) tumours from 35 UK centres were randomly assigned (2:1) to preoperative (three cycles of OxMdG [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), l-folinic acid 175 mg, fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) bolus, then 2400 mg/m(2) by 46 h infusion] repeated at 2-weekly intervals followed by surgery and a further nine cycles of OxMdG) or standard postoperative chemotherapy (12 cycles of OxMdG). Patients with KRAS wild-type tumours were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive panitumumab (6 mg/kg; every 2 weeks with the first 6 weeks of chemotherapy) or not. Treatment allocation was through a central randomisation service using a minimised randomisation procedure including age, radiological T and N stage, site of tumour, and presence of defunctioning colostomy as stratification variables. Primary outcome measures of the pilot phase were feasibility, safety, and tolerance of preoperative therapy, and accuracy of radiological staging. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN 87163246. Findings 96% (95 of 99) of patients started and 89% (85 of 95) completed preoperative chemotherapy with grade 3-4 gastrointestinal toxicity in 7% (seven of 94) of patients. All 99 tumours in the preoperative group were resected, with no significant differences in postoperative morbidity between the preoperative and control groups: 14% (14 of 99) versus 12% (six of 51) had complications prolonging hospital stay (p=0.81). 98% (50 of 51) of postoperative chemotherapy patients had T3 or more advanced tumours confirmed at post-resection pathology compared with 91% (90 of 99) of patients following preoperative chemotherapy (p=0.10). Preoperative therapy resulted in significant downstaging of TNM5 compared with the postoperative group (p=0.04), including two pathological complete responses, apical node involvement (1% [one of 98] vs 20% [ten of 50], p<0.0001), resection margin involvement (4% [four of 99] vs 20% [ten of 50], p=0.002), and blinded centrally scored tumour regression grading: 31% (29 of 94) vs 2% (one of 46) moderate or greater regression (p=0.0001). Interpretation Preoperative chemotherapy for radiologically staged, locally advanced operable primary colon cancer is feasible with acceptable toxicity and perioperative morbidity. Proceeding to the phase 3 trial, to establish whether the encouraging pathological responses seen with preoperative therapy translates into improved long-term oncological outcome, is appropriate. Funding Cancer Research UK.Summary Background Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and radiotherapy are more effective than similar postoperative treatment for oesophageal, gastric, and rectal cancers, perhaps because of more effective micrometastasis eradication and reduced risk of incomplete excision and tumour cell shedding during surgery. The FOxTROT trial aims to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer. Methods In the pilot stage of this randomised controlled trial, 150 patients with radiologically staged locally advanced (T3 with ≥5 mm invasion beyond the muscularis propria or T4) tumours from 35 UK centres were randomly assigned (2:1) to preoperative (three cycles of OxMdG [oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, l-folinic acid 175 mg, fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus, then 2400 mg/m2 by 46 h infusion] repeated at 2-weekly intervals followed by surgery and a further nine cycles of OxMdG) or standard postoperative chemotherapy (12 cycles of OxMdG). Patients with KRAS wild-type tumours were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive panitumumab (6 mg/kg; every 2 weeks with the first 6 weeks of chemotherapy) or not. Treatment allocation was through a central randomisation service using a minimised randomisation procedure including age, radiological T and N stage, site of tumour, and presence of defunctioning colostomy as stratification variables. Primary outcome measures of the pilot phase were feasibility, safety, and tolerance of preoperative therapy, and accuracy of radiological staging. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN 87163246. Findings 96% (95 of 99) of patients started and 89% (85 of 95) completed preoperative chemotherapy with grade 3–4 gastrointestinal toxicity in 7% (seven of 94) of patients. All 99 tumours in the preoperative group were resected, with no significant differences in postoperative morbidity between the preoperative and control groups: 14% (14 of 99) versus 12% (six of 51) had complications prolonging hospital stay (p=0·81). 98% (50 of 51) of postoperative chemotherapy patients had T3 or more advanced tumours confirmed at post-resection pathology compared with 91% (90 of 99) of patients following preoperative chemotherapy (p=0·10). Preoperative therapy resulted in significant downstaging of TNM5 compared with the postoperative group (p=0·04), including two pathological complete responses, apical node involvement (1% [one of 98] vs 20% [ten of 50], p<0·0001), resection margin involvement (4% [four of 99] vs 20% [ten of 50], p=0·002), and blinded centrally scored tumour regression grading: 31% (29 of 94) vs 2% (one of 46) moderate or greater regression (p=0·0001). Interpretation Preoperative chemotherapy for radiologically staged, locally advanced operable primary colon cancer is feasible with acceptable toxicity and perioperative morbidity. Proceeding to the phase 3 trial, to establish whether the encouraging pathological responses seen with preoperative therapy translates into improved long-term oncological outcome, is appropriate. Funding Cancer Research UK.


British Journal of Surgery | 2008

Management of early rectal cancer

M. G. Tytherleigh; Bryan F. Warren; N. J. McC. Mortensen

Early rectal cancer (ERC) is adenocarcinoma that has invaded into, but not extended beyond, the submucosa of the rectum (that is a T1 tumour). Local excision is curative for low‐risk ERCs but for high‐risk cancers such management is controversial.


Diseases of The Colon & Rectum | 2004

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: Correlation with rectal cancer regression Grade

J. M. D. Wheeler; E. Dodds; Bryan F. Warren; C. Cunningham; Bruce D. George; Adrian C. Jones; N. J. McC. Mortensen

PURPOSEPreoperative long-course chemoradiotherapy is recommended for rectal carcinoma when there is concern that surgery alone may not be curative. Downstaging of the tumor can be measured as rectal cancer regression grade (1-3) and may be of importance when estimating the prognosis. The aim of this study was to look at the long-term results of tumor regression in patients receiving long-course chemotherapy before surgical resection of rectal cancer.METHODSWe reviewed those patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection for carcinoma of the mid rectum or distal rectum found to be stage T3/4 between January 1995 and November 1999. Patients received 45 to 50 Gy irradiation in 2-Gy fractions and an infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Surgical specimens were assessed for rectal cancer regression grade. Patients were followed up routinely with clinical examination, computed tomography, and colonoscopy.RESULTSSixty-five patients with a mean age 65 (range, 32–83) years underwent chemoradiotherapy before surgical resection. Thirty patients (46 percent) were classified as rectal cancer regression Grade 1, with 9 patients (14 percent) having complete sterilization of the tumor. Fifty-three patients (82 percent) underwent a curative resection. Overall survival, with a median follow-up of 39 (range, 24–83) months, was 67 percent and was associated with tumor downstaging. The local recurrence rate was 5.8 percent in those patients who underwent a curative resection and was significantly lower with rectal cancer regression Grade 1 tumors (P = 0.03). Eight of nine patients (89 percent) whose tumor had been sterilized were alive and well with no recurrence of tumor at a median follow-up of 41 (range, 24–70) months.CONCLUSIONSPreoperative chemoradiotherapy resulted in significant regression of tumor. Overall survival was high and was associated with downstaging of tumor. The local recurrence rate was significantly lower with rectal cancer regression Grade 1 tumors and was not seen in patients with sterilized tumors.

Collaboration


Dive into the Bryan F. Warren's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil A. Shepherd

Cheltenham General Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Simon Travis

John Radcliffe Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge