Bryan M. Ball
Florida Institute of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bryan M. Ball.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2001
Richard L. Kaufmann; Bryan M. Ball; W. R. Paterson; L. A. Frank
Two years of Geotail data in the (−30 < x < −8, |y| < 15) RE region first were sorted into (x, y, β) boxes. Direct measurements of the average electron and ion current densities, symmetry assumptions, and the momentum equation were used to get three different estimates of the electric current in each box. The momentum equation method gave the most consistent results, while the other two methods provided complementary information about particle drifts. The average common drift of electrons and ions was found to be comparable to the average differential drift of ions with respect to electrons. These two components of the ion drift velocity tended to cancel on the dawnside, resulting in currents that were primarily carried by electrons moving at the common drift speed. The two ion drifts added on the duskside where ions carried most of the cross-tail current. The particle and magnetic field measurements were used to estimate the z thickness of each β box. A concentration of the long-term-averaged cross-tail current was seen near the neutral sheet. The region of nonadiabatic orbital motion had an average characteristic length scale of ∼0.4 RE. The principal plasma sheet extended to ∼2.5 RE from the neutral sheet at midnight and to ∼5 RE in the flanks. The final result is a method to create models in (x, y, z) coordinates of the long-term-averaged values of any of the measured fluid parameters or fields. The isotropic portion of the pressure tensor was used as an example of one parameter that can be modeled. These pressure plots showed that the z component of the long-term-averaged magnetic field line tension force is important everywhere, that the y component is small everywhere, and that the y component is significant in the flanks.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1997
Richard L. Kaufmann; Ioannis D. Kontodinas; Bryan M. Ball; D. J. Larson
Thick and thin models of the middle magnetotail were developed using a consistent orbit tracing technique. It was found that currents carried near the equator by groups of ions with anisotropic distribution functions are not well approximated by the guiding center expressions. The guiding center equations fail primarily because the calculated pressure tensor is not magnetic field aligned. The pressure tensor becomes field aligned as one moves away from the equator, but here there is a small region in which the guiding center equations remain inadequate because the two perpendicular components of the pressure tensor are unequal. The significance of nonguiding center motion to substorm processes then was examined. One mechanism that may disrupt a thin cross-tail current sheet involves field changes that cause ions to begin following chaotic orbits. The lowest-altitude chaotic region, characterized by an adiabaticity parameter kappa approx. equal to 0.8, is especially important. The average cross-tail particle drift is slow, and we were unable to generate a thin current sheet using such ions. Therefore, any process that tends to create a thin current sheet in a region with kappa approaching 0.8 may cause the cross-tail current to get so low that it becomes insufficient to support the lobes. A different limit may be important in resonant orbit regions of a thin current sheet because particles reach a maximum cross-tail drift velocity. If the number of ions per unit length decreases as the tail is stretched, this part of the plasma sheet also may become unable to carry the cross-tail current needed to support the lobes. Thin sheets are needed for both resonant and chaotic orbit mechanisms because the distribution function must be highly structured. A description of current continuity is included to show how field aligned currents can evolve during the transition from a two-dimensional (2-D) to a 3-D configuration.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2005
Bryan M. Ball; Ming Zhang; Hamid K. Rassoul; Timur Linde
An example of Galactic cosmic-ray modulation in a fully three-dimensional heliosphere is presented here. We use a stochastic particle method to solve for modulation without requiring symmetric boundaries or fields. We include all typical modulation terms, including full three-dimensional drift. We have applied this to an MHD heliosphere appropriate for solar minimum conditions. This field includes nonradial solar wind velocity components, as well as a built-in nonspherical termination shock. Parameters that are of interest in modulation can be analyzed in detail, particularly the momentum change of cosmic rays during their transport through the heliosphere. We show radial profiles of modulation at different energies, latitude, and longitude, as well as the more traditional modulated spectra at various locations. Finally, we are able to show in detail where particles at a particular energy and location gain and lose energy. We are able to conclude that the radial profiles of modulation are strongly dependent on the latitudinal angle with respect to the stagnation point. We see that modulation of GCRs near the stagnation point takes place mostly upstream of the shock but that modulation continues far outside the shock as the stochastic particles will random walk across the shock several times before entering our observation region. The modulation profiles remain similar with differing longitude, although the exact shape of the radial profile and spectra are strongly dependent on the termination shock location. Cosmic-ray intensity at high energies can be higher than the ISM intensity, while at low energies cosmic rays still experience solar modulation. The termination shock and heliosheath regions were important to modulation in the outer heliosphere. Finally, the sign of the latitudinal gradient is not a simple function of the qA direction, in general.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1997
Richard L. Kaufmann; D. J. Larson; Ioannis D. Kontodinas; Bryan M. Ball
A model of the quiet time middle magnetotail is developed using a consistent orbit tracing technique. The momentum equation is used to calculate geocentric solar magnetospheric components of the particle and electromagnetic forces throughout the current sheet. Ions generate the dominant x and z force components. Electron and ion forces almost cancel in the y direction because the two species drift earthward at comparable speeds. The force viewpoint is applied to a study of some substorm processes. Generation of the rapid flows seen during substorm injection and bursty bulk flow events implies substantial force imbalances. The formation of a substorm diversion loop is one cause of changes in the magnetic field and therefore in the electromagnetic force. It is found that larger forces are produced when the cross-tail current is diverted to the ionosphere than would be produced if the entire tail current system simply decreased. Plasma is accelerated while the forces are unbalanced resulting in field lines within a diversion loop becoming more dipolar. Field lines become more stretched and the plasma sheet becomes thinner outside a diversion loop. Mechanisms that require thin current sheets to produce current disruption then can create additional diversion loops in the newly thinned regions. This process may be important during multiple expansion substorms and in differentiating pseudoexpansions from full substorms. It is found that the tail field model used here can be generated by a variety of particle distribution functions. However, for a given energy distribution the mixture of particle mirror or reflection points is constrained by the consistency requirement. The study of uniqueness also leads to the development of a technique to select guiding center electrons that will produce charge neutrality all along a flux tube containing nonguiding center ions without the imposition of a parallel electric field.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2005
Bryan M. Ball; Richard L. Kaufmann; W. R. Paterson; L. A. Frank
Geophysical monograph | 2013
Richard L. Kaufmann; Bryan M. Ball; W. R. Paterson; L. A. Frank
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2005
Bryan M. Ball; Richard L. Kaufmann; W. R. Paterson; L. A. Frank
Archive | 2004
Bryan M. Ball; Ming Zhang; G. Qin; Hamid K. Rassoul
Archive | 2003
Bryan M. Ball; Ming Zhang; Hamid K. Rassoul; Tony Linde
Archive | 2003
Ming Zhang; Bryan M. Ball; G. Qin; Hamid K. Rassoul