Bryan R. Wheaton

Connecting the macro and microstrain responses in technical porous ceramics. Part II: microcracking

Following previous study on non-microcracked porous ceramics (SiC and alumina), we studied the micro and macrostrain response of honeycomb porous microcracked ceramics under applied uniaxial compressive stress. Cordierites of different porosities were compared. Both macroscopic and microscopic strains were measured, by extensometry and neutron diffraction, respectively. Lattice strains were determined using a single diffraction peak (steady-state neutron source) in both the axial and the transverse sample directions. Complementarily, we measured the macroscopic Young’s modulus of these materials as a function of temperature, at zero load, using high-temperature laser ultrasound spectroscopy. This allowed having a non-microcracked reference state for all the materials investigated. Confirming our previous study, we observed that macrostrain relaxation occurs at constant load, which is not observed in non-microcracked compounds, such as SiC. This relaxation effect increases as a function of porosity. Moreover, we generally observed a linear dependence of the diffraction modulus on porosity. However, for low and very high applied stress, the lattice strain behavior versus stress seems to be influenced by microcracking and shows considerable strain release, as already observed in other porous microcracked ceramics. We extended to microcracked porous ceramics (cordierite) the macro to microstrain and stress relations previously developed for non-microcracked ceramics, making use of the integrity factor (IF) model. Using the whole set of data available, the IF could also be calculated as a function of applied stress. It was confirmed that highly porous microcracked materials have great potential to become stiffer and more connected.

Structural comparison of GdF 3 films grown on CaF 2 (111) and SiO 2 substrates

Wide bandgap metal fluorides are the materials of choice for optical coating applications at 193 nm. Low loss and environmentally stable optics requires a mitigating fluoride film structure on a nanometer scale. To understand the growth mechanism of fluoride materials, GdF3 films grown on CaF2 (111) and SiO2 substrates were investigated. Film inhomogeneity and surface roughness were modeled by fitting ellipsometric data with an effective medium approximation, indicating a correlation between film inhomogeneity and surface roughness. The modeled surface roughness was compared with the atomic force microscope measurement. Film inhomogeneity was correlated to the cone-shaped columnar structure revealed by cross-sectional images from a scanning electron microscope. The film crystalline structure was determined by x-ray diffraction measurement, suggesting a different growth mechanism of GdF3 films on crystalline and amorphous substrates.

Crystallization, Microstructure, and Viscosity Evolutions in Lithium Aluminosilicate Glass-Ceramics

Lithium aluminosilicate glass-ceramics have found widespread commercial success in areas such as consumer products, telescope mirrors, fireplace windows, etc. However, there is still much to learn regarding the fundamental mechanisms of crystallization, especially related to the evolution of viscosity as a function of the crystallization (ceramming) process. In this study, the impact of phase assemblage and microstructure on the viscosity was investigated using high temperature X-ray diffraction (HTXRD), beam bending viscometry (BBV), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results from this study provide a first direct observation of viscosity evolution as a function of ceramming time and temperature. Sharp viscosity increases due to phase separation, nucleation and phase transformation are noticed through BBV measurement. A near-net shape ceramming can be achieved in TiO2-containing compositions by keeping the glass at a high viscosity (> 109 Pa.s) throughout the whole thermal treatment.