Bryen A. Jordan

G-protein-coupled receptor heterodimerization modulates receptor function

The opioid system modulates several physiological processes, including analgesia, the stress response, the immune response and neuroendocrine function. Pharmacological and molecular cloning studies have identified three opioid-receptor types, δ, κ and µ, that mediate these diverse effects,. Little is known about the ability of the receptors to interact to form new functional structures, the simplest of which would be a dimer. Structural and biochemical studies show that other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) interact to form homodimers,. Moreover, two non-functional receptors heterodimerize to form a functional receptor, suggesting that dimerization is crucial for receptor function. However, heterodimerization between two fully functional receptors has not been documented. Here we provide biochemical and pharmacological evidence for the heterodimerization of two fully functional opioid receptors, κ and δ. This results in a new receptor that exhibits ligand binding and functional properties that are distinct from those of either receptor. Furthermore, the κ–δ heterodimer synergistically binds highly selective agonists and potentiates signal transduction. Thus, heterodimerization of these GPCRs represents a novel mechanism that modulates their function.

G-protein-coupled receptor dimerization: Modulation of receptor function

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of transmembrane receptors in the human genome that respond to a plethora of signals, including neurotransmitters, peptide hormones, and odorants, to name a few. They couple to second messenger signaling cascade mechanisms via heterotrimeric G-proteins. Recently, many studies have revealed that GPCRs exist as dimers, which may be present as homo- or heterodimers/oligomers. These recent findings have been met with skepticism, since they are contradictory to the dogma that GPCRs function as monomers. Although the existence of GPCR dimers/oligomers was predicted from early pharmacological and biochemical studies, further studies to critically evaluate this phenomenon were impeded by the lack of appropriate reagents. The availability of cDNAs for GPCRs, of highly selective ligands and of antibodies for these receptors has made it possible to visualize and investigate the functional effects of GPCR oligomers. Pharmacological studies, along with biochemical techniques, such as cross-linking and immunoprecipitation with differentially epitope-tagged receptors, have been employed to demonstrate the oligomerization of a number of GPCRs. Moreover, recent biophysical techniques, such as bioluminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer, now make it possible to examine GPCR dimerization/oligomerization in living cells. In this review, we provide a brief overview of some of the techniques employed to describe GPCR dimers, and we discuss their respective limitations. We also examine the implications of dimerization/oligomerization on GPCR function. In addition, we discuss domains of the receptors that are thought to facilitate dimerization/oligomerization. Finally, we consider recent evidence for the subcellular localization of the dimer/oligomer assembly.

Identification and Verification of Novel Rodent Postsynaptic Density Proteins

The postsynaptic density (PSD) is a cellular structure specialized in receiving and transducing synaptic information. Here we describe the identification of 452 proteins isolated from biochemically purified PSD fractions of rat and mouse brains using nanoflow HPLC coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Fluorescence microscopy and Western blotting were used to verify that many of the novel proteins identified exhibit subcellular distributions consistent with those of PSD-localized proteins. In addition to identifying most previously described PSD components, we also detected proteins involved in signaling to the nucleus as well as regulators of ADP-ribosylation factor signaling, ubiquitination, RNA trafficking, and protein translation. These results suggest new mechanisms by which the PSD helps regulate synaptic strength and transmission.

G protein coupled receptor dimerization: implications in modulating receptor function

Abstract Protein-protein interactions are involved in the regulation of a large number of biological processes. It is well established that a variety of cell surface receptors interact with each other to form dimers, and that this is essential for their activation. Although the existence of G protein coupled receptor dimers was predicted from early pharmacological and biochemical analysis, solid evidence supporting dimerization has come within the past few years following the cloning of G protein coupled receptor cDNAs. Using differential epitope tagging and selective immunoisolation of receptor complexes, dimerization of a number of G protein coupled receptors including members of the rhodopsin, secretin, and metabotropic glutamate receptor families have been reported. More recently fluorescence or bioluminescence resonance energy transfer techniques have been used to examine dimerization of these receptors in live cells. These studies have found that whereas in some cases there is an agonist induced increase in the level of dimers, in others there is a decrease or no change in dimer levels. Several recent studies have also reported the ability of related members of G protein coupled receptors to heterodimerize. These heterodimers exhibit distinct physical and functional properties. Examination of possible sites of interactions between receptors has implicated a role for extracellular, transmembrane and/or C-terminal region in dimerization. The functional consequences of dimerization, explored mainly using mutant receptors, have demonstrated a role in modulating agonist affinity, efficacy, and/or trafficking properties. Thus dimerization appears to be a universal phenomenon that provides an additional mechanism for modulation of receptor function as well as cross-talk between G protein coupled receptors.

Opioids and Their Complicated Receptor Complexes

No field more eagerly awaits a molecular clarification for G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) dimerization than the opioid receptor field. Extensive evidence of pharmacological and functional interactions between opioid receptor types has primed this field for such a resolution. In retrospect, much of the data collected on synergy between different opioid receptor types may represent the functional correlate for the newly found opioid receptor dimerization. While previous reports of functional synergy have been, for the most part, consistent in demonstrating cross-regulation between two receptor types, the lack of highly receptor-selective ligands allowed skeptics to remain doubtful over the interpretations of these results. Today, two important developments in the opioid receptor field help reinvigorate the hypothesis of functional, cross-modulating opioid receptor complexes: (1) The existence of highly selective ligands which eliminate any possibility of cross-reactivity between receptor types, and (2) the discovery that opioid receptors and a number of other GPCRs exist as dimers in biochemical, functional and pharmacological assays. It is with these new tools that we seek to understand the mechanisms and implications of dimerization. Initial results of these studies have demonstrated that the dimerization of opioid receptors may help consolidate several pharmacological findings that have remained unanswered. In this review we present biochemical, pharmacological and functional evidence for opioid receptor complexes and add evidence from our recent studies on opioid receptor dimerization. We believe a thorough understanding of receptor dimerization is crucial in clarifying the mechanism of action of opioids and other drugs and may serve a more practical purpose in aiding the development of novel therapeutic drugs. [Neruopsychopharmacology 23:S5–S18, 2000]

Membrane Localization of Membrane Type 5 Matrix Metalloproteinase by AMPA Receptor Binding Protein and Cleavage of Cadherins

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been proposed to remodel the extracellular environment of neurons. Here, we report that the metalloproteinase membrane-type 5 MMP (MT5-MMP) binds to AMPA receptor binding protein (ABP) and GRIP (glutamate receptor interaction protein), two related postsynaptic density (PSD) PDZ (postsynaptic density-95/Discs large/zona occludens-1) domain proteins that target AMPA receptors to synapses. The MT5-MMP C terminus binds ABP PDZ5 and the two proteins coimmunoprecipitated and colocalized in heterologous cells and neurons. MT5-MMP localized in filopodia at the tips of growth cones in young [2–5 d in vitro (DIV)] cultured embryonic hippocampal neurons, and at synapses in mature (21 DIV) neurons. Its enrichment in synaptosomes also indicated a synaptic localization in the mature brain. Deletion of the PDZ binding site impaired membrane trafficking of MT5-MMP, whereas exogenous ABP splice forms that are associated either with the plasma membrane or with the cytosol, respectively, colocalized with MT5-MMP in synaptic spines or recruited MT5-MMP to intracellular compartments. We show that endogenous MT5-MMP is found in cultured neurons and brain lysates in a proenzyme form that is activated by furin and degraded by auto-proteolysis. We also identify cadherins as MT5-MMP substrates. These results suggest that ABP directs MT5-MMP proteolytic activity to growth cones and synaptic sites in neurons, where it may regulate axon pathfinding or synapse remodeling through proteolysis of cadherins or other ECM or cell adhesion molecules.

Activity-dependent AIDA-1 nuclear signaling regulates nucleolar numbers and protein synthesis in neurons

Neuronal development, plasticity and survival require activity-dependent synapse-to-nucleus signaling. Most studies implicate an activity-dependent regulation of gene expression in this phenomenon. However, little is known about other nuclear functions that are regulated by synaptic activity. Here we show that a newly identified component of rat postsynaptic densities (PSDs), AIDA-1d, can regulate global protein synthesis by altering nucleolar numbers. AIDA-1d binds to the first two postsynaptic density–95/Discs large/zona occludens-1 (PDZ) domains of the scaffolding protein PSD-95 via its C-terminal three amino acids. Stimulation of NMDA receptors (NMDARs), which are also bound to PSD-95, results in a Ca2+-independent translocation of AIDA-1d to the nucleus, where it couples to Cajal bodies and induces Cajal body–nucleolar association. Long-term neuronal stimulation results in an AIDA-1–dependent increase in nucleolar numbers and protein synthesis. We propose that AIDA-1d mediates a link between synaptic activity and control of protein biosynthetic capacity by regulating nucleolar assembly.

Oligomerization of opioid receptors

Opioid receptors belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors characterized by their seven transmembrane domains. The activation of these receptors by agonists such as morphine and endogenous opioid peptides leads to the activation of inhibitory G-proteins followed by a decrease in the levels of intracellular cAMP. Opioid receptor activation is also associated with the opening of K(+) channels and the inhibition of Ca(2+) channels. A number of investigations, prior to the development of opioid receptor cDNAs, suggested that opioid receptor types interacted with each other. Early pharmacological studies provided evidence for the probable interaction between opioid receptors. More recent studies using receptor selective antagonists, antisense oligonucleotides, or animals lacking opioid receptors further suggested that interactions between opioid receptor types could modulate their activity. We examined opioid receptor interactions using biochemical, biophysical, and pharmacological techniques. We used differential epitope tagging and selective immunoisolation of receptor complexes to demonstrate homotypic and heterotypic interactions between opioid receptor types. We also used the proximity-based bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assay to explore opioid receptor-receptor interactions in living cells. In this article we describe the biochemical and biophysical methods involved in the detection of receptor dimers. We also address some of the concerns and suggest precautions to be taken in studies examining receptor-receptor interactions.

Nucleocytoplasmic protein shuttling: the direct route in synapse-to-nucleus signaling

In neurons multiple signaling pathways converge in the nucleus to regulate the expression of genes associated with long-term structural changes of synapto-dendritic input. Of pivotal importance for this type of transcriptional regulation is synapse-to-nucleus communication. Several studies suggest that the nuclear transport of proteins from synapses is involved in this signaling process, including evidence that synapses contain proteins with nuclear localization sequences and components of the nuclear import machinery. Here, we review the evidence for synapse-to-nucleus signaling by means of retrograde transport of proteins from distal processes. We discuss the mechanisms involved in their translocation and their role in the control of nuclear gene expression. Finally, we summarize the current thinking regarding the functional implications of nuclear signaling and address open questions in this evolving area of neuroscience.

Kappa opioid receptor endocytosis by dynorphin peptides.

Internalization and downregulation are important steps in the modulation of receptor function. Recent work with the beta2 adrenergic and opioid receptors have implicated these processes in receptor-mediated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). We have used CHO cells expressing epitope-tagged rat kappa opioid receptors (rKORs) and prodynorphin-derived peptides to characterize the agonist-mediated endocytosis of rKORs and activation of MAPK. Kappa receptor-selective peptides induced receptor internalization and downregulation whereas nonpeptide agonists did not. An examination of the ability of dynorphin A-17-related peptides (lacking C-terminal amino acids) to promote KOR internalization, inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, and MAPK phosphorylation revealed that the N-terminal seven residues play an important role in eliciting these responses. Both dynorphin peptides and nonpeptide agonists induced rapid and robust phosphorylation of MAPKs. Taken together, these results point to a difference in the ability of dynorphin peptides and nonpeptide ligands to promote rKOR endocytosis and support the view that rKOR internalization is not required for MAPK activation.