Burghard Thiesen

Clinical applications of magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia

Magnetic fluids are increasingly used for clinical applications such as drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic fluid hyperthermia. The latter technique that has been developed as a cancer treatment for several decades comprises the injection of magnetic nanoparticles into tumors and their subsequent heating in an alternating magnetic field. Depending on the applied temperature and the duration of heating this treatment either results in direct tumor cell killing or makes the cells more susceptible to concomitant radio- or chemotherapy. Numerous groups are working in this field worldwide, but only one approach has been tested in clinical trials so far. Here, we summarize the clinical data gained in these studies on magnetic fluid induced hyperthermia.

Morbidity and quality of life during thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles in locally recurrent prostate cancer: Results of a prospective phase I trial

Purpose: To investigate the treatment-related morbidity and quality of life (QoL) during thermotherapy using superparamagnetic nanoparticles in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Ten patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer following primary therapy with curative intent and no detectable metastases were entered on a prospective phase I trial. Endpoints were feasibility, toxicity and QoL. Following intraprostatic injection of a nanoparticle dispersion, six thermal therapy sessions of 60 min duration were delivered at weekly intervals using an alternating magnetic field. National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria (CTC) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 questionnaires were used to evaluate toxicity and QoL, respectively. In addition, prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurements were carried out. Results: Maximum temperatures up to 55°C were achieved in the prostates at 25–30% of the available magnetic field strength. Nanoparticle deposits were detectable in the prostates one year after thermal therapy. At a median follow-up of 17.5 months (3–24), no systemic toxicity was observed. Acute urinary retention occurred in four patients with previous history of urethral stricture. Treatment-related morbidity was moderate and QoL was only temporarily impaired. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines were observed in eight patients. Conclusions: Interstitial heating using magnetic nanoparticles was feasible and well tolerated in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer. Deposition of nanoparticles in the prostate was highly durable. Further refinement of the technique is necessary to allow application of higher magnetic field strengths.

Post-mortem studies in glioblastoma patients treated with thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles

Patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most common primary brain tumor in adults, have still a poor prognosis though new strategies of radio- and chemotherapy have been developed. Recently, our group demonstrated the feasibility, tolerability and anti-tumoral effects of a newly developed therapeutic approach, termed thermotherapy using magnetic nanoparticles or magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH), in a murine model of malignant glioma. Currently, the efficacy of MFH is being evaluated in a phase II study. Here, we report on post-mortem neuropathological findings of patients with GBM receiving MFH. In brain autopsies the installed magnetic nanoparticles were dispersed or distributed as aggregates within geographic tumor necroses, restricted in distribution to the sites of instillation. Therefore, our results underscore the need for multiple trajectories of instillation. The typical GBM necrosis with pseudopalisading was free of particles. Dispersed particles and particle aggregates were phagocytosed mainly by macrophages whereas glioblastoma cells showed an uptake to a minor extent. MFH therapy further promotes uptake of nanoparticles in macrophages, likely as a consequence of tumor inherent and therapy induced formation of necrosis with subsequent infiltration and activation of phagocytes. We did not observe bystander effects of MFH such as sarcomatous tumour formation, formation of a sterile abscess or foreign body giant cell reaction. Furthermore, all patients did not present any clinical symptoms related to possible adverse effects of MFH.

Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia for prostate cancer

Magnetic nanoparticles are increasingly used for clinical applications such as drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic fluid hyperthermia. A novel method of interstitial heating of tumours following direct injection of magnetic nanoparticles has been evaluated in humans in recent clinical trials. In prostate cancer this approach has been investigated in two separate phase I studies, employing magnetic nanoparticle thermotherapy alone and in combination with permanent seed brachytherapy. The feasibility and good tolerability was shown in both trials, using the first prototype of an alternating magnetic field applicator. As with any other heating technique, this novel approach requires specific tools for planning, quality control and thermal monitoring, based on appropriate imaging and modelling techniques. In these first clinical trials a newly developed method for planning and non-invasive calculations of the 3-dimensional temperature distribution based on computed tomography was validated. Limiting factors of the new approach at present are patient discomfort at high magnetic field strengths and irregular intratumoural heat distribution. Until these limitations are overcome and thermoablation can safely be applied as a monotherapy, this treatment modality is being evaluated in combination with irradiation in patients with localised prostate cancer.

Termoterapia en cáncer de próstata mediante el uso de nanopartículas magnéticas

A novel method of interstitial heating using magnetic nanoparticles and a direct injection technique has been evaluated in human cancers in recent clinical trials. In prostate cancer, this approach was investigated in two separate phase-I-studies, employing magnetic nanoparticle thermotherapy alone and in combination with permanent seed brachytherapy. The feasibility and good tolerability was shown in both trials, using the first prototype of a magnetic field applicator. As with any other heating technique, this novel approach requires specific tools for planning, quality control and thermal monitoring, based on appropriate imaging and modelling techniques. In these first clinical trials, a newly developed method for planning and non-invasive calculations of the 3-dimensional temperature distribution based on computed tomography could be validated. Limiting factors of this approach at present are patient discomfort at high magnetic field strengths and suboptimal intratumoral distribution of nanoparticles. Until these limitations will be overcome and thermal ablation can safely be applied as a monotherapy, this treatment modality is being evaluated in combination with irradiation in patients with localized prostate cancer.