C. A. Juttner

Rapid hematopoietic recovery after multicycle high-dose chemotherapy: enhancement of filgrastim-induced progenitor-cell mobilization by recombinant human stem-cell factor.

PURPOSE To assess the mobilization potential and safety of recombinant human stem-cell factor (SCF) when coadministered with filgrastim to untreated women with poor-prognosis breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible women had breast cancer with 10 or more positive axillary nodes, or estrogen receptor-negative tumor with 4 positive nodes, or stage III disease. Patients were randomized to receive SCF plus filgrastim or filgrastim alone. Filgrastim 12 microg/kg daily was administered for 6 days by continuous subcutaneous infusion. SCF was administered by daily subcutaneous injection at 5, 10, or 15 microg/kg concurrent with filgrastim for 7 days, or 10 microg/kg daily starting 3 days before filgrastim for a total of 10 days (SCF pretreatment). Apheresis was performed on days 5, 6, and 7 of filgrastim administration. Patients then had three cycles of epirubicin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 every 28 days, each supported by one third of the apheresis product. RESULTS Sixty-two women were treated. Greater yields occurred in patients who received SCF 10 microg/kg daily plus filgastim than those who received filgrastim alone (P=.013 for CD34+ cells; P=.07 for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells [GM-CFCs]). The difference was more marked with SCF-pretreatment than concurrent SCF. Fewer aphereses were required to reach the predetermined target of peripheral-blood progenitor/stem cells (PBPCs) in women who received SCF. SCF was generally well tolerated. Hematologic recovery was rapid after each of the three cycles of chemotherapy. There was no difference in recovery between the different treatment groups. CONCLUSION Mobilization of PBPCs by filgrastim is significantly enhanced by coadministration of SCF, and commencing SCF before filgrastim can optimize this effect. SCF has the potential to reduce the number of aphereses required to collect a target number of PBPCs.

Multicycle High-Dose Chemotherapy and Filgrastim-Mobilized Peripheral-Blood Progenitor Cells in Women With High-Risk Stage II or III Breast Cancer: Five-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE To determine the safety and efficacy of multiple cycles of dose-intensive, nonablative chemotherapy in women with poor-prognosis breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with stage II breast cancer and 10 or more involved nodes or four or more involved nodes and estrogen receptor-negative tumors and women with stage III disease received three cycles of epirubicin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2, with progenitor cell and filgrastim support every 28 days (n = 79) or 21 days (n = 20). Patients were reviewed at least twice yearly thereafter. Twenty-six patients had bone marrow and apheresis collections assessed for the presence of micrometastatic tumor cells. RESULTS Ninety-nine women (median age, 43 years; range, 24 to 60 years) were treated. Ninety-two completed all three cycles of chemotherapy. The major toxicity was severe, reversible myelosuppression that was more prolonged with successive cycles, and this did not differ between patients given treatment every 28 days and those treated every 21 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 176 (61%) of 287 cycles. Severe mucositis (grade 3 or 4) occurred in 23% of cycles but tended to be short-lived and was reversible. The cardiac ejection fraction fell by a median of 4% during treatment, and three patients developed evidence of cardiac failure after chemotherapy. Two patients (2%) died of acute toxicity. Three of 26 patients had evidence of circulating micrometastatic tumor cells. The actuarial distant disease-free and overall survival rates at 60-month follow-up were 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 75%) and 67% (95% CI, 56% to 78%), respectively. CONCLUSION Multiple cycles of dose-intensive, nonablative chemotherapy is a feasible and safe approach. Disease control and survival are similar to those in other studies of myeloablative chemotherapy in poor-prognosis breast cancer. The regimen is being evaluated in a randomized trial of the International Breast Cancer Study Group.