C. Adams
University of Toronto
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by C. Adams.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
X. Zhao; Kimberly Strong; C. Adams; Robyn Schofield; X. Yang; Andreas Richter; U. Friess; A.-M. Blechschmidt; J.‐H. Koo
Ozone depletion events in the polar troposphere have been linked to extremely high concentrations of bromine, known as bromine explosion events (BEE). However, the optimum meteorological conditions for the occurrence of these events remain uncertain. On 4–5 April 2011, a combination of both blowing snow and a stable shallow boundary layer was observed during a BEE at Eureka, Canada (86.4°W, 80.1°N). Measurements made by a Multi-Axis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy spectrometer were used to retrieve BrO profiles and partial columns. During this event, the near-surface BrO volume mixing ratio increased to ~20 parts per trillion by volume, while ozone was depleted to ~1 ppbv from the surface to 700 m. Back trajectories and Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 satellite tropospheric BrO columns confirmed that this event originated from a bromine explosion over the Beaufort Sea. From 30 to 31 March, meteorological data showed high wind speeds (24 m/s) and elevated boundary layer heights (~800 m) over the Beaufort Sea. Long-distance transportation (~1800 km over 5 days) to Eureka indicated strong recycling of BrO within the bromine plume. This event was generally captured by a global chemistry-climate model when a sea-salt bromine source from blowing snow was included. A model sensitivity study indicated that the surface BrO at Eureka was controlled by both local photochemistry and boundary layer dynamics. Comparison of the model results with both ground-based and satellite measurements confirmed that the BEE observed at Eureka was triggered by transport of enhanced BrO from the Beaufort Sea followed by local production/recycling under stable atmospheric shallow boundary layer conditions.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
C. Adams; Chris A. McLinden; Mark W. Shephard; Nolan Dickson; E. Dammers; Jack Chen; P. A. Makar; Karen E. Cady-Pereira; Naomi Tam; Shailesh K. Kharol; Lok N. Lamsal; Nickolay A. Krotkov
In May 2016, the Horse River wildfire led to the evacuation of ∼ 88 000 people from Fort McMurray and surrounding areas and consumed∼ 590 000 ha of land in Northern Alberta and Saskatchewan. Within the plume, satellite instruments measured elevated values of CO, NH3, and NO2. CO was measured by two Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometers (IASI-A and IASI-B), NH3 by IASI-A, IASIB, and the Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS), and NO2 by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI). Daily emission rates were calculated from the satellite measurements using fire hotspot information from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and wind information from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA5 reanalysis, combined with assumptions on lifetimes and the altitude range of the plume. Sensitivity tests were performed and it was found that uncertainties of emission estimates are more sensitive to the plume shape for CO and to the lifetime for NH3 and NOx . The satellite-derived emission rates were ∼ 50–300 kt d−1 for CO, ∼ 1–7 kt d−1 for NH3, and∼ 0.5–2 kt d−1 for NOx (expressed as NO) during the most active fire periods. The daily satellite-derived emission estimates were found to correlate fairly well (R ∼ 0.4–0.7) with daily output from the ECMWF Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS) and the Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) FireWork models, with agreement within a factor of 2 for most comparisons. Emission ratios of NH3/CO, NOx/CO, and NOx/NH3 were calculated and compared against enhancement ratios of surface concentrations measured at permanent surface air monitoring stations and by the Alberta Environment and Parks Mobile Air Monitoring Laboratory (MAML). For NH3/CO, the satellite emission ratios of ∼ 0.02 are within a factor of 2 of the model emission ratios and surface enhancement ratios. For NOx/CO satellite-measured emission ratios of ∼ 0.01 are lower than the modelled emission ratios of 0.033 for GFAS and 0.014 for FireWork, but are larger than the surface enhancement ratios of ∼ 0.003, which may have been affected by the short lifetime of NOx . Total emissions from the Horse River fire for May 2016 were calculated and compared against total annual anthropogenic emissions for the province of Alberta in 2016 from the ECCC Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory (APEI). Satellite-measured emissions of CO are ∼ 1500 kt for the Horse River fire and exceed the total annual Alberta anthropogenic CO emissions of 992.6 kt for 2016. The satellite-measured emissions during the Horse River fire of ∼ 30 kt of NH3 and ∼ 7 kt of NOx (expressed as NO) are approximately 20 % and 1 % of the magnitude of total annual Alberta anthropogenic emissions, respectively. Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 2578 C. Adams et al.: Satellite-derived emissions of CO, NH3, and NO2 from the 2016 Horse River wildfire
web science | 2010
Howard K. Roscoe; Van M Roozendael; C. Fayt; du A Piesanie; Nader Abuhassan; C. Adams; M. Akrami; A. Cede; J. Chong; K. Clémer; Udo Friess; M Gil Ojeda; Florence Goutail; R. Graves; Alexandra Griesfeller; Katja Grossmann; G. Hemerijckx; F. Hendrick; Jay R. Herman; C. Hermans; Hitoshi Irie; P. V. Johnston; Yugo Kanaya; K. Kreher; Roland J. Leigh; Alexis Merlaud; George H. Mount; Monica Navarro; H. Oetjen; Andrea Pazmino
Geophysical Research Letters | 2012
C. Adams; Kimberly Strong; X. Zhao; Matt Bassford; M. P. Chipperfield; W. H. Daffer; James R. Drummond; E. Farahani; W. Feng; A. Fraser; Florence Goutail; G. L. Manney; C. A. McLinden; Andrea Pazmino; Markus Rex; Kaley A. Walker
Environmental Science & Technology | 2016
Chris A. McLinden; Vitali E. Fioletov; Nickolay A. Krotkov; Can Li; K. Folkert Boersma; C. Adams
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2012
C. Adams; K. Strong; R. L. Batchelor; Peter F. Bernath; Samuel Brohede; C. D. Boone; D. A. Degenstein; W. H. Daffer; James R. Drummond; P. F. Fogal; E. Farahani; C. Fayt; A. Fraser; Florence Goutail; F. Hendrick; Felicia Kolonjari; Rodica Lindenmaier; G. Manney; C. T. McElroy; C. A. McLinden; J. Mendonca; J.-H. Park; B. Pavlovic; Andrea Pazmino; Chris Roth; V. Savastiouk; Kaley A. Walker; Dan Weaver; X. Zhao
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer | 2009
A. Fraser; C. Adams; James R. Drummond; Florence Goutail; G. L. Manney; Kimberly Strong
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2012
C. Adams; Kimberly Strong; X. Zhao; W. H. Daffer; D. A. Degenstein; James R. Drummond; E. Farahani; A. Fraser; N. D. Lloyd; G. L. Manney; C. A. McLinden; Markus Rex; Chris Roth; S. E. Strahan; Kaley A. Walker; Ingo Wohltmann
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | 2013
Zen Mariani; Kimberly Strong; Mathias Palm; Rodica Lindenmaier; C. Adams; X. Zhao; V. Savastiouk; C. T. McElroy; Florence Goutail; James R. Drummond
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013
Cynthia Whaley; K. Strong; C. Adams; W. H. Daffer; D. A. Degenstein; H. Fast; P. F. Fogal; G. L. Manney; R. L. Mittermeier; B. Pavlovic; A. Wiacek