C. Baufreton

Preservation of the aortic valve in acute aortic dissection : long-term echocardiographic assessment and clinical outcome

The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term status of the native aortic valve after surgical treatment of acute aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta. From 1972 to 1991, 93 patients underwent operation for type I or II aortic dissection. There were 76 men and 17 women. Mean age was 54 +/- 13 years. Eighty patients (86%) had a conservative procedure regarding the aortic root and aortic cusps: 74 had prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta and 6, complete replacement of the aortic arch. Thirteen patients (14%) had simultaneous replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta. The overall hospital mortality rate was 29% (27/93). The overall actuarial survival rate was 60.2% +/- 5.2%, 49.7% +/- 6.1%, and 35.9% +/- 8.1% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. The survival rates for patients who had an ascending aortic procedure only were 63% +/- 5.5%, 54% +/- 6.5%, and 39% +/- 8.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, and for patients who required aortic valve replacement, 45% +/- 14% and 22% +/- 17.5% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Fifty long-term survivors (94% follow-up) with preservation of the aortic valve and aortic root were studied. Among them, 9 (18%) died within a mean interval of 97 +/- 46 months after operation. Causes of death were ischemic cardiac failure (2), aortic rupture or extension of dissection (4), renal disease (1), stroke (1), and sudden death (1). Forty-one patients had long-term clinical and echocardiographic evaluation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Heparin-coated circuits and aprotinin prime for coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND The biocompatibility of an extracorporeal circuit is improved by heparin bonding onto its inner surface. To determine the effect of heparin-coated circuits for cardiopulmonary bypass with aprotinin prime on postoperative recovery and resource utilization, a prospective study was done in 102 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with full systemic heparinization. METHODS Patients were randomly allocated to be treated with either a heparin-coated circuit (n = 51) or an uncoated circuit (n = 51). Differences in blood loss, need for blood transfusion, morbidity, and intensive care stay were analyzed. RESULTS No differences in blood loss and need for blood transfusion were found between the groups. The relative risk for adverse events in the heparin-coated group was 0.29 (95% confidence interval ranging from 0.10 to 0.80). Adverse events included myocardial infarction (2 patients in the uncoated group versus 0 in the heparin-coated group), rethoracotomy for excessive bleeding (1 versus 2), rhythm disturbance (7 versus 2), respiratory insufficiency (4 versus 0), and neurologic dysfunction (2 versus 0). The lower incidence of adverse events in the heparin-coated group was associated with a shorter intensive care stay (median, 2 days; range, 2 to 5 days) compared with the uncoated group (median, 3 days; range, 2 to 19 days, p = 0.03). The cost savings of 1 day of intensive care stay counterbalanced the additional costs of heparin-coated circuits. CONCLUSIONS The use of heparin-coated circuits for cardiopulmonary bypass with aprotinin prime resulted in a significant reduction in mobidity in the early postoperative phase and a concomitant decrease in intensive care stay, resulting in important cost savings.

Clinical outcome after coronary surgery with heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits for cardiopulmonary bypass

In this prospective randomized trial, we studied whether heparin-coated extracorporeal circuits (ECC), known to reduce complement activation, could improve the clinical outcome of 200 patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Patients have been divided into two groups (heparin-coated ECC and uncoated ECC groups) which were similar in terms of age, gender, left ventricle function, preoperative aspirin use and consequent intraoperative aprotinin use, number of grafts, duration of aortic cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass. Univariate analysis showed that heparin coating did not reduce significantly postoperative bleeding (640 ± 311 versus 682 ± 342 ml with uncoated ECC) nor the need for transfusion (19% of patients versus 25% with uncoated ECC). Adverse events, including all mortality and morbidity noticed during the five first postoperative days, occurred in 20 patients of the uncoated ECC group and in eight patients of the heparin-coated ECC group (p = 0.013). The most frequent complications were supraventricular arrhythmias that occurred in 13 patients of the uncoated ECC group and in four patients of the heparin-coated ECC group (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis by stepwise logistic regression showed that only heparin coating of the ECC was shown as a significant predictive factor of adverse events reduction (p = 0.01; odds ratio = 0.34). These data suggest that heparin coating reduced postoperative complications in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery.

Measures to control blood activation during assisted circulation

Major improvements in heart assist devices have allowed prolonged mechanical circulatory support with successful subsequent weaning or heart transplantation. The contact of blood with biomaterials used in life-sustaining devices and numerous biomaterial-independent factors elicit a systemic inflammatory response, which involves activation of various plasma protein systems and blood cells. Prolonged mechanical circulatory support elicits a systemic inflammatory response and hemostatic perturbations similar to that reported during cardiopulmonary bypass. However, in the setting of prolonged assistance, time has a complex and ill-known influence on blood activation. Methods to reduce blood activation during prolonged assisted circulation are derived from cardiopulmonary bypass investigations. Improving the biocompatibility of artificial devices can be achieved either by biomaterial surface modifications, by inhibition of biologic cascades leading to blood activation, or by controlling end points of biologic cascades. However, the necessity to respect the integrity of the organism during prolonged assistance precludes most systemic interventions and limits the control of blood activation to the area of the device.

Reduction of blood activation in patients receiving aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery surgery.

Aprotinin reduces blood loss after cardiac surgery, particularly in patients taking aspirin. This study was performed to evaluate whether the reduction of contact phase activation by aprotinin is related to decreased complement activation during blood activation. Two hundred patients were prospectively operated on for coronary artery bypass. Aprotinin was used in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) prime if aspirin was not discontinued 10 days before surgery and in patients undergoing second operation (n = 102). Blood loss was significantly reduced in patients receiving aprotinin (596 +/- 309 ml vs 754 +/- 329 ml without aprotinin; p = 0.0001), as was the need for transfusion (13% vs 34% without aprotinin; p = 0.0001) after surgery. Blood activation has been studied in 60 patients. Multivariate analysis showed that contact phase activation, as assessed by maximum values of C1 inhibitor/kallikrein complexes, was reduced by aprotinin treatment (p < 0.0001). Fibrinolytic activity decreased with aprotinin treatment, as reflected by lower values of D-dimers at the end of CPB (p < 0.0001). In addition, thrombin generation, as assessed by F1 + 2 scission peptide, was reduced by aprotinin (p = 0.01). However, the stepwise regression model emphasized that activation of the alternative and classic complement pathways, as reflected by C3b/c and C4b/c levels, was not affected by aprotinin; neither was leukocyte activation, as reflected by elastase release. These results suggest that aprotinin does not combine the reduction of complement activation with the reduced activation of the contact phase, fibrinolysis, or coagulation during CPB for coronary artery surgery.

The wearable Novacor LVAS at Henri Mondor Hospital

From March 1993 to February 1996, 8 patients have been selected, from a group of 40 patients in cardiogenic shock, referred for urgent cardiac transplantation. Immediate hemodynamical improvement allowed a rapid favorable evolution of organ dysfunction, a weaning off any IV inotropic support. The late evolution was as follows: one patient still on device after 164 days living at home. One patient died at 201 days as a result of the psychological sequellae of an embolic episode. Six patients have been transplanted, with a successful outcome in 5.