C. Bradley Kramer
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by C. Bradley Kramer.
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2009
Tam N. Pham; C. Bradley Kramer; Jiangping Wang; Frederick P. Rivara; David M. Heimbach; Nicole S. Gibran; Matthew B. Klein
Improvements in outcomes for older adults sustaining burn injuries have lagged far behind those of younger patients. As this segment of the population grows, there has been an increasing interest in better understanding the epidemiology and outcomes of injury in older adults. The National Burn Repository (NBR) provides a unique opportunity to examine burn injuries on a national level. We aimed to characterize specific injury and outcome trends in older adult with burns through analysis of the NBR. We examined the records of all patients in the NBR aged 55 and older. To characterize age effects on injury and outcomes, patients were stratified into three age categories: 55 to 64 years, 65 to 74 years, and 75 years and older. Baseline characteristics, details of hospital treatment, mortality, and disposition were compared among these three age groups using &khgr;2 or analysis of variance. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of age on burn mortality. A total of 180,401 patient records were available from 1991 to 2005, of which 23,180 (14%) met age inclusion criteria. Mean burn size (9.6% TBSA) and percent with inhalation injury (11.3%) did not markedly differ by age. Men predominated overall (ratio 1.4:1), although women (4290) outnumbered men (3439) in the oldest age category. Length of stay per TBSA and median hospital charges increased with increasing age category, suggesting higher resource consumption with aging. Mean number of operations per patient, however, decreased with age. Mortality rates and discharge to nonindependent status increased with age. By logistic regression, the adjusted odds ratio for mortality was 2.3 (95% CI 2.1–2.7) in the 65 to 74 age group, and 5.4 (95% CI 4.8–6.1) in the oldest group when compared with the 55 to 64 age group. Mortality rates decreased significantly after 2001 across all age groups. This analysis demonstrates age-dependent differences in resource utilization and mortality risk within the older burn population and highlights the need for a national research agenda focused on management practices and outcomes in older adult with burns.
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2009
Rachel S. Lundgren; C. Bradley Kramer; Frederick P. Rivara; Jin Wang; David M. Heimbach; Nicole S. Gibran; Matthew B. Klein
Despite advances in medical and surgical techniques, older adults tend to be at high risk for adverse outcomes following burn injury. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative impacts of age and medical comorbidities on outcome following injury in a cohort of older adults. This was a retrospective study of all patients age 55 and over admitted to the University of Washington Burn Center from 1999 to 2003. To examine the effect of baseline medical comorbidities on outcome, a Charlson Comorbidity Index score was calculated for each patient. Multivariate regression analyses were used to examine the impact of age and comorbidities on mortality and other complications. Patient records were also matched with the National Death Index to determine the effects of age and comorbidities on mortality within 1 year following hospital discharge. A total of 325 patients who were of 55 years and older were admitted to the burn center during the 5-year study period. The overall mortality rate was 18.5%. Mortality was independently associated with age, inhalation injury, and burn size. One-year mortality was significantly associated with those older than age 75 and the Charlson score. Longer length of stay was significantly associated with burn size, inhalation injury, and total number of in-hospital complications. This study demonstrates that patient age—independent of baseline medical comorbidities—and TBSA burn are the most significant factors impacting in-hospital mortality risk following burn injury. Higher number of medical comorbidities was associated with increased mortality risk within 1 year following discharge.
JAMA | 2009
Matthew B. Klein; C. Bradley Kramer; Jason Nelson; Frederick P. Rivara; Nicole S. Gibran; Thomas W. Concannon
CONTEXT The delivery of burn care is a resource-intensive endeavor that requires specialized personnel and equipment. The optimal geographic distribution of burn centers has long been debated; however, the current distribution of centers relative to geographic area and population is unknown. OBJECTIVE To estimate the proportion of the US population living within 1 and 2 hours by rotary air transport (helicopter) or ground transport of a burn care facility. DESIGN AND SETTING A cross-sectional analysis of geographic access to US burn centers utilizing the 2000 US census, road and speed limit data, the Atlas and Database of Air Medical Services database, and the 2008 American Burn Association Directory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The proportion of state, regional, and national population living within 1 and 2 hours by air transport or ground transport of a burn care facility. RESULTS In 2008, there were 128 self-reported burn centers in the United States including 51 American Burn Association-verified centers. An estimated 25.1% and 46.3% of the US population live within 1 and 2 hours by ground transport, respectively, of a verified burn center. By air, 53.9% and 79.0% of the population live within 1 and 2 hours, respectively, of a verified center. There was significant regional variation in access to verified burn centers by both ground and rotary air transport. The greatest proportion of the population with access was highest in the northeast region and lowest in the southern United States. CONCLUSION Nearly 80% of the US population lives within 2 hours by ground or rotary air transport of a verified burn center; however, there is both state and regional variation in geographic access to these centers.
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2008
Matthew B. Klein; William Hollingworth; Frederick P. Rivara; C. Bradley Kramer; Shelley Wiechman Askay; David M. Heimbach; Nicole S. Gibran
Modern burn care is a resource intensive endeavor requiring specialized equipment, personnel, and facilities in order to provide optimum care. The costs associated with burn injury to both patients and society as a whole can be multifaceted and large. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between hospital costs, patient characteristics, and injury factors in a cohort of pediatric patients admitted to a regional burn center. We performed a review of the hospital charges accrued by pediatric patients (age <16 years) admitted to our burn center from 1994 to 2004 and explored the relationship between baseline patient, injury and hospital course characteristics and total costs. Hospital charges were converted to 2005 dollar costs using an inflation index and a cost to charge ratio. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to identify the factors most significantly associated with cost. In addition, we performed a subset cost analysis for patients with burns more than 20% TBSA. A total of 1443 pediatric patients (age <16) were admitted to our burn center during the study period. The overall mean hospital cost in 2005 dollars was
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2010
C. Bradley Kramer; Frederick P. Rivara; Matthew B. Klein
9026 (SD =
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2009
Matthew B. Klein; James A. Edwards; C. Bradley Kramer; Theresa Nester; David M. Heimbach; Nicole S. Gibran
25,483; median =
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2008
Matthew B. Klein; Christopher D. Mack; C. Bradley Kramer; David M. Heimbach; Nicole S. Gibran; Frederick P. Rivara
2138). Area of full thickness burn was the only patient or injury factor significantly associated with greater hospital costs (P < .05) on multivariate analysis. No single anatomic area was associated with increased hospital costs when adjusted for total overall burn size. Injury severity was the most significant factor impacting index hospitalization costs following pediatric burn injury. Further studies defining the long-term societal costs impact of burn injury are needed as are studies that evaluate the impact of burn injury on quality of life.
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2013
Jordan W. Swanson; Andrew Otto; Nicole S. Gibran; Matthew B. Klein; C. Bradley Kramer; David M. Heimbach; Tam N. Pham
An understanding of population-specific variation in pediatric burn injuries is essential to the development of effective prevention strategies. The purpose of this study was to examine the etiology of pediatric burn injury considering age and race categories using the National Burn Repository. The authors reviewed the records of all pediatric patients (age <18 years) in the American Burn Associations National Burn Registry injured between 1995 and 2007. The authors compared patient and injury characteristics across race, age, etiology, and payor status. A total of 46,582 patients were included in this study. The etiology of burn injury varied by both age and race. Populations of color were younger, constituting 53.8% of patients younger than 5 years, whereas 53.9% of the total study population identified as Caucasian. Scald etiology was disproportionately less common in patients identifying as Caucasian (39.9 vs 61.4%, P < .001), and scald was a common etiology in older children identifying as African American, Asian, and Hispanic. Inhalation injuries were also higher in patients identifying as Native American (5.4%), Hispanic (4.2%), and African American (3.7%). Pediatric burn injury etiology varies with age and race. These data should encourage careful consideration of race, age, and other differences in formulating the most effective, population-specific prevention and outreach strategies.
Journal of Burn Care & Research | 2008
C. Bradley Kramer; Nicole S. Gibran; David M. Heimbach; Frederick P. Rivara; Matthew B. Klein
Severe burn injury results in a systemic inflammatory response that leads to increased capillary permeability and fluid leak into the interstitium. This global systemic capillary leak can be attributed, at least in part, to inflammatory mediators produced as a result of cellular injury. Plasma exchange has been used in the management of a number of illnesses with a significant inflammatory component, and, therefore, may have a role in the early management of burn injury. The purpose of this study was to review our institutional experience using plasma exchange in the management of severe burn injury. We performed a retrospective review of all patients receiving plasma exchange at our burn center between 2001 and 2005. Data collected included the following: burn size, presence of inhalation injury, resuscitation fluid received, urine output, lactate levels, base deficit levels, and hematocrit before and after the exchange procedure. A total of 37 patients underwent plasma exchange during the 5-year study period and seven patients underwent two plasma exchange treatments. Average TBSA burned was 48.6% (range 18-82) and 73% of patients sustained an inhalation injury. After plasma exchange, hourly fluid volume received significantly decreased (P < .05) and base deficit, lactate, and hematocrit levels significantly improved. Plasma exchange in the early resuscitation period was associated with decreased fluid administration, as well as increased urine output in the period during and immediately after the procedure. These data suggest that plasma exchange may provide a useful tool in the management of severe burn injury.
Environmental Health Perspectives | 2005
C. Bradley Kramer; Alison C. Cullen; Elaine M. Faustman
The provision of optimal burn care is a resource-intensive endeavor. The American Burn Association has developed criteria to help guide the decision to refer a patient to a burn center for definitive injury care. The purpose of this study was to compare the patient and injury characteristics of patients admitted to the single verified burn center in Washington State with those treated at other facilities in the state. We performed a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a hospital with a burn injury in Washington State from 1987 to 2005 using the state’s discharge database (Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System). Patient and injury factors of patients admitted to the state’s single verified burn center or at other hospitals were compared. Multivariate poisson regression was used to calculate the relative risk of injury and patient factors that were significantly associated with admission to the verified burn center. From 1987 to 2005, a total of 16,531 patients were admitted to a Washington State hospital after burn injury. Of these patients, 8624 (52.2%) were treated definitively at the University of Washington Burn Center. Patients treated at this verified center had larger overall burn size (7.4% vs 4.5% TBSA, P < .001), higher percent full-thickness burn (4.3% vs 1.2%, P < .001), and higher rates of inhalation injury (2.3% vs 1.5%, P = .005). Uninsured status (relative risk = 1.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.4–1.5) was also significantly associated with treatment at the verified burn center. Injury severity and payer status were both found to be independent predictors of treatment at the single verified burn center in Washington.