C. Busettini

Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception

Primates use vergence eye movements to align their two eyes on the same object and can correct misalignments by sensing the difference in the positions of the two retinal images of the object (binocular disparity). When large random-dot patterns are viewed dichoptically and small binocular misalignments are suddenly imposed (disparity steps), corrective vergence eye movements are elicited at ultrashort latencies. Here we show that the same steps applied to dense anticorrelated patterns, in which each black dot in one eye is matched to a white dot in the other eye, initiate vergence responses that are very similar, except that they are in the opposite direction. This sensitivity to the disparity of anticorrelated patterns is shared by many disparity-selective neurons in cortical area V1 (ref. 3), despite the fact that human subjects fail to perceive depth in such stimuli. These dataindicate that the vergence eye movements initiated at ultrashort latencies result solely from locally matched binocular features, and derive their visual input from an early stage of cortical processing before the level at which depth percepts are elaborated.

Human ocular responses to translation of the observer and of the scene: dependence on viewing distance

Recent experiments on monkeys have indicated that the eye movements induced by brief translation of either the observer or the visual scene are a linear function of the inverse of the viewing distance. For the movements of the observer, the room was dark and responses were attributed to a translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (TVOR) that senses the motion through the otolith organs; for the movements of the scene, which elicit ocular following, the scene was projected and adjusted in size and speed so that the retinal stimulation was the same at all distances. The shared dependence on viewing distance was consistent with the hypothesis that the TVOR and ocular following are synergistic and share central pathways. The present experiments looked for such dependencies on viewing distance in human subjects. When briefly accelerated along the interaural axis in the dark, human subjects generated compensatory eye movements that were also a linear function of the inverse of the viewing distance to a previously fixated target. These responses, which were attributed to the TVOR, were somewhat weaker than those previously recorded from monkeys using similar methods. When human subjects faced a tangent screen onto which patterned images were projected, brief motion of those images evoked ocular following responses that showed statistically significant dependence on viewing distance only with low-speed stimuli (10°/s). This dependence was at best weak and in the reverse direction of that seen with the TVOR, i.e., responses increased as viewing distance increased. We suggest that in generating an internal estimate of viewing distance subjects may have used a confounding cue in the ocular-following paradigm the size of the projected scene -which was varied directly with the viewing distance in these experiments (in order to preserve the size of the retinal image). When movements of the subject were randomly interleaved with the movements of the scene to encourage the expectation of ego-motion -the dependence of ocular following on viewing distance altered significantly: with higher speed stimuli (40°/s) many responses (63%) now increased significantly as viewing distance decreased, though less vigorously than the TVOR. We suggest that the expectation of motion results in the subject placing greater weight on cues such as vergence and accommodation that provide veridical distance information in our experimental situation: cue selection is context specific.

The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study: Design and Clinical Measures at Enrollment

OBJECTIVE To compare the use of contact lenses and intraocular lenses (IOLs) for the optical correction of unilateral aphakia during infancy. METHODS In a randomized, multicenter (12 sites) clinical trial, 114 infants with unilateral congenital cataracts were assigned to undergo cataract surgery with or without IOL implantation. Children randomized to IOL treatment had their residual refractive error corrected with spectacles. Children randomized to no IOL treatment had their aphakia treated with a contact lens. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Grating acuity at 12 months of age and HOTV visual acuity at 4 1/2 years of age. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE This study should determine whether either treatment for an infant with a visually significant unilateral congenital cataract results in a better visual outcome. RESULTS Enrollment began December 23, 2004, and was completed January 16, 2009. The median age at the time of cataract surgery was 1.8 months. Fifty patients were 4 to 6 weeks of age at the time of enrollment; 32, 7 weeks to 3 months of age; and the remaining 32, more than 3 to less than 7 months of age. Fifty-seven children were randomized to each treatment group. Eyes with cataracts had shorter axial lengths and steeper corneas on average than the fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS The optimal optical treatment of aphakia in infants is unknown. However, the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study was designed to provide empirical evidence of whether optical treatment with an IOL or a contact lens after unilateral cataract surgery during infancy is associated with a better visual outcome.

Radial optic flow induces vergence eye movements with ultra-short latencies

An observer moving forwards through the environment experiences a radial pattern of image motion on each retina. Such patterns of optic flow are a potential source of information about the observers rate of progress, direction of heading and time to reach objects that lie ahead. As the viewing distance changes there must be changes in the vergence angle between the two eyes so that both foveas remain aligned on the object of interest in the scene ahead. Here we show that radial optic flow can elicit appropriately directed (horizontal) vergence eye movements with ultra-short latencies (roughly 80 ms) in human subjects. Centrifugal flow, signalling forwards motion, increases the vergence angle, whereas centripetal flow decreases the vergence angle. These vergence eye movements are still evident when the observers view of the flow pattern is restricted to the temporal hemifield of one eye, indicating that these responses do not result from anisotropies in motion processing but from a mechanism that senses the radial pattern of flow. We hypothesize that flow-induced vergence is but one of a family of rapid ocular reflexes, mediated by the medial superior temporal cortex, compensating for translational disturbance of the observer.

Short-latency ocular following in humans: sensitivity to binocular disparity

We show that the initial ocular following responses elicited by motion of a large pattern are modestly attenuated when that pattern is shifted out of the plane of fixation by altering its binocular disparity. If the motion is applied to only restricted regions of the pattern, however, then altering the disparity of those regions severely attenuates their ability to generate ocular following. This sensitivity of the ocular tracking mechanism to local binocular disparity would help the observer who moves through a cluttered 3-D world to stabilize objects in the plane of fixation and ignore all others.

Ocular Compensation for Self‐Motion. Visual Mechanisms

In monkeys, there are several reflexes that generate eye movements to compensate for the observers own movements. Two vestibuloocular reflexes compensate selectively for rotational (RVOR) and translational (TVOR) disturbances of the head, receiving their inputs from the semicircular canals and otolith organs, respectively. Two independent visual tracking systems that deal with residual disturbances of gaze are manifest in the two components of the optokinetic response: the indirect or delayed component (OKNd) and the direct or early component (OKNe). We hypothesize that OKNd--like the RVOR--is phylogenetically old, being found in all animals with mobile eyes, and that it evolved as a backup to the RVOR to compensate for rotational disturbances of gaze. Indeed, optically induced changes in the gain of the RVOR result in parallel changes in the gain of OKNd, consistent with the idea of shared pathways as well as shared functions. In contrast, OKNe--like the TVOR--seems to have evolved much more recently in frontal-eyed animals and, we suggest, acts as a backup to the TVOR to deal primarily with translational disturbances of gaze. Frontal-eyed animals with good binocular vision must be able to keep both eyes directed at the object of regard irrespective of proximity, and in order to achieve this during translational disturbances, the output of the TVOR is modulated inversely with the viewing distance. OKNe shares this sensitivity to absolute depth, consistent with the idea that it is synergistic with the TVOR and shares some of its central pathways. There is evidence that OKNe is also sensitive to relative depth cues such as motion parallax, which we suggest helps the system to segregate the object of regard from other elements in the scene. However, there are occasions when the global optic flow cannot be resolved into a single vector useful to the oculomotor system (e.g., when the moving observer looks towards the direction of heading). We suggest that on such occasions a third independent tracking mechanism, the smooth pursuit system, is deployed to stabilize gaze on the local feature of interest. In this scheme, the pursuit system has an attentional focusing mechanism that spatially filters the visual motion inputs driving the oculomotor system. The major distinguishing features of the 3 visual tracking mechanisms are summarized in Table 1.

Short-latency eye movements: evidence for rapid, parallel processing of optic flow

As we go about our daily activities we view the world from a constantly shifting platform and some visual functions are compromised if the images on the retina are not reasonably stable. For example, visual acuity begins to deteriorate when retinal image speeds exceed a few degrees per second (Westheimer & McKee, 1975). There are a number of visual reflexes that help to stabilize our gaze on particular objects of interest by generating eye movements to offset our head movements. However, it is important to remember that these visual mechanisms normally operate in close synergy with vestibuloocular reflexes that rely on two types of end-organ embedded in the base of the skull: the semicircular canals, which are selectively sensitive to angular accelerations of the head, and the otolith organs, which are selectively sensitive to linear accelerations (Goldberg & Fernandez, 1975). Thus, the vestibular end-organs decompose head movements into their angular and linear components and support two quite independent reflexes, the RVOR and TVOR, that compensate selectively for rotational and translational disturbances of the head respectively with latencies <10 msec. These vestibular reflexes operate open-loop—because their output, eye movement, does not influence their input, head movement—and neither is perfect, hence motion of the observer must often be associated with some residual retinal image motion and this is where the visual stabilization mechanisms become involved. However, the visual end-organs — the two retinas — see all visual disturbances, regardless of whether they result from rotation and/or translation of gaze so that if any visual decomposition is to be done it must be by signal processing in the central nervous system (CNS). It is our contention that the visual system does attempt to perform such decomposition, using visual filters to sense the pattern of optic flow and thereby infer the observer’s motion and the eye movements that best compensate for that motion.

Stereopsis Results at 4.5 Years of Age in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study

PURPOSE To determine whether stereopsis of infants treated for monocular cataracts varies with the type of optical correction used. DESIGN Randomized prospective clinical trial. METHODS The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study randomized 114 patients with unilateral cataracts at age 1-7 months to either primary intraocular lens (IOL) or contact lens correction. At 4.5 years of age a masked examiner assessed stereopsis on these patients using 3 different tests: (1) Frisby; (2) Randot Preschool; and (3) Titmus Fly. RESULTS Twenty-eight patients (25%) had a positive response to at least 1 of the stereopsis tests. There was no statistically significant difference in stereopsis between the 2 treatment groups: Frisby (contact lens, 6 [11%]; IOL, 7 [13%]; P = .99), Randot (contact lens, 3 [6%]; IOL, 1 [2%]; P = .62), or Titmus (contact lens, 8 [15%]; IOL, 13 [23%]; P = .34). The median age at surgery for patients with stereopsis was younger than for those without stereopsis (1.2 vs 2.4 months; P = .002). The median visual acuity for patients with stereopsis was better than for those without stereopsis (20/40 vs 20/252; P = .0003). CONCLUSION The type of optical correction did not influence stereopsis outcomes. However, 2 other factors did: age at surgery and visual acuity in the treated eye at age 4.5 years. Early surgery for unilateral congenital cataract and the presence of visual acuity better than or equal to 20/40 appear to be more important than the type of initial optical correction used for the development of stereopsis.

Macaque Pontine Omnipause Neurons Play No Direct Role in the Generation of Eye Blinks

We recorded the activity of pontine omnipause neurons (OPNs) in two macaques during saccadic eye movements and blinks. As previously reported, we found that OPNs fire tonically during fixation and pause about 15 ms before a saccadic eye movement. In contrast, for blinks elicited by air puffs, the OPNs paused <2 ms before the onset of the blink. Thus the burst in the agonist orbicularis oculi motoneurons (OOMNs) and the pause in the antagonist levator palpabrae superioris motoneurons (LPSMNs) necessarily precede the OPN pause. For spontaneous blinks there was no correlation between blink and pause onsets. In addition, the OPN pause continued for 40-60 ms after the time of the maximum downward closing of the eyelids, which occurs around the end of the OOMN burst of firing. LPSMN activity is not responsible for terminating the OPN pause because OPN resumption was very rapid, whereas the resumption of LPSMN firing during the reopening phase is gradual. OPN pause onset does not directly control blink onset, nor does pause offset control or encode the transition between the end of the OOMN firing and the resumption of the LPSMNs. The onset of the blink-related eye transients preceded both blink and OPN pause onsets. Therefore they initiated while the saccadic short-lead burst neurons were still fully inhibited by the OPNs and cannot be saccadic in origin. The abrupt dynamic change of the vertical eye transients from an oscillatory behavior to a single time constant exponential drift predicted the resumption of the OPNs.

Short-term saccadic adaptation in the macaque monkey: a binocular mechanism

Saccadic eye movements are rapid transfers of gaze between objects of interest. Their duration is too short for the visual system to be able to follow their progress in time. Adaptive mechanisms constantly recalibrate the saccadic responses by detecting how close the landings are to the selected targets. The double-step saccadic paradigm is a common method to simulate alterations in saccadic gain. While the subject is responding to a first target shift, a second shift is introduced in the middle of this movement, which masks it from visual detection. The error in landing introduced by the second shift is interpreted by the brain as an error in the programming of the initial response, with gradual gain changes aimed at compensating the apparent sensorimotor mismatch. A second shift applied dichoptically to only one eye introduces disconjugate landing errors between the two eyes. A monocular adaptive system would independently modify only the gain of the eye exposed to the second shift in order to reestablish binocular alignment. Our results support a binocular mechanism. A version-based saccadic adaptive process detects postsaccadic version errors and generates compensatory conjugate gain alterations. A vergence-based saccadic adaptive process detects postsaccadic disparity errors and generates corrective nonvisual disparity signals that are sent to the vergence system to regain binocularity. This results in striking dynamical similarities between visually driven combined saccade-vergence gaze transfers, where the disparity is given by the visual targets, and the double-step adaptive disconjugate responses, where an adaptive disparity signal is generated internally by the saccadic system.