Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where C. Carr is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by C. Carr.


Journal of Animal Science | 2013

National Beef Tenderness Survey–2010: Warner-Bratzler shear force values and sensory panel ratings for beef steaks from United States retail and food service establishments

M. R. Guelker; A. N. Haneklaus; J. C. Brooks; C. Carr; R. J. Delmore; D. B. Griffin; D. S. Hale; Kerri B. Harris; G. G. Mafi; D.D. Johnson; Carol L. Lorenzen; R. J. Maddock; J.N. Martin; R.K. Miller; C. R. Raines; D. L. VanOverbeke; L. L. Vedral; B.E. Wasser; J. W. Savell

The tenderness and palatability of retail and food service beef steaks from across the United States (12 cities for retail, 5 cities for food service) were evaluated using Warner-Bratzler shear (WBS) and consumer sensory panels. Subprimal postfabrication storage or aging times at retail establishments averaged 20.5 d with a range of 1 to 358 d, whereas postfabrication times at the food service level revealed an average time of 28.1 d with a range of 9 to 67 d. Approximately 64% of retail steaks were labeled with a packer/processor or store brand. For retail, top blade had among the lowest (P < 0.05) WBS values, whereas steaks from the round had the greatest (P < 0.05) values. There were no differences (P > 0.05) in WBS values between moist-heat and dry-heat cookery methods for the top round and bottom round steaks or between enhanced (contained salt or phosphate solution) or nonenhanced steaks. Food service top loin and rib eye steaks had the lowest (P < 0.05) WBS values compared with top sirloin steaks. Retail top blade steaks and food service top loin steaks received among the greatest (P < 0.05) consumer sensory panel ratings compared with the other steaks evaluated. Prime food service rib eye steaks received the greatest ratings (P < 0.05) for overall like, like tenderness, tenderness level, like juiciness, and juiciness level, whereas ungraded rib eye steaks received the lowest ratings (P < 0.05) for like tenderness and tenderness level. The WBS values for food service steaks were greater (P < 0.05) for the Select and ungraded groups compared with the Prime, Top Choice, and Low Choice groups. The WBS values and sensory ratings were comparable to the last survey, signifying that no recent or substantive changes in tenderness have occurred.


Journal of Animal Science | 2017

National Beef Quality Audit–2016: In-plant survey of carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers

C. A. Boykin; L. C. Eastwood; M. K. Harris; D. S. Hale; C. R. Kerth; D. B. Griffin; A. N. Arnold; J. D. Hasty; K. E. Belk; D. R. Woerner; R. J. Delmore; J. N. Martin; D. L. VanOverbeke; G. G. Mafi; M. M. Pfeiffer; T. E. Lawrence; T. J. McEvers; Ty B. Schmidt; R. J. Maddock; D.D. Johnson; C. Carr; J. M. Scheffler; T. D. Pringle; A. M. Stelzleni; J. Gottlieb; J. W. Savell

The National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA)-2016 used in-plant cooler assessments to benchmark the current status of the fed steer and heifer beef industry in the United States. In-plant cooler assessments ( = 9,106 carcasses) were conducted at 30 facilities, where approximately 10% of a single days production were evaluated for USDA quality grade (QG) and yield grade (YG) factors. Frequencies of evaluated traits were 66.5% steer and 33.4% heifer sex classes and 82.9% native, 15.9% dairy-type, and 1.2% estimated breed types. Mean USDA YG factors were 1.42 cm for adjusted fat thickness, 89.5 cm for LM area, 390.3 kg for HCW, and 1.9% for KPH. Mean USDA YG was 3.1, with a frequency distribution of 9.6% YG 1, 36.7% YG 2, 39.2% YG 3, 12.0% YG 4, and 2.5% YG 5. Mean USDA QG traits were Small for marbling score, A for overall maturity, A55 for lean maturity, and A for skeletal maturity. Mean USDA QG was Select with a frequency distribution of QG of 3.8% Prime, 67.3% Choice, 23.2% Select, and 5.6% lower score. Lower score included dark cutter (1.9%), blood splash (0.1%), and hard bone, which are USDA overall maturity scores of C or older (1.8%). Marbling score distributions were 0.85% Slightly Abundant or greater, 7.63% Moderate, 23.54% Modest, 39.63% Small, 23.62% Slight, and 0.83% Traces or less. Carcasses that were Choice or Select and USDA YG 2 or 3 accounted for 70.7% of the carcasses evaluated. Compared with the previous NBQA, we found a numerical increase in mean USDA YG, USDA QG, adjusted fat thickness, HCW, LM area, and marbling score with an increase in dairy-type carcasses and percentage of carcasses grading USDA Prime and Choice as well as frequency of USDA YG 4 and 5. The findings from this study will be used by all segments of the industry to understand and improve the quality of fed steer and heifer beef that is being produced.


Meat Science | 2018

Brahman genetics influence muscle fiber properties, protein degradation, and tenderness in an Angus-Brahman multibreed herd

Shelby A. Wright; Patricia Ramos; D.D. Johnson; J. M. Scheffler; Mauricio A. Elzo; Raluca G. Mateescu; Amy L. Bass; C. Carr; Tracy L. Scheffler

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of Brahman genetics on muscle contractile and metabolic phenotype and postmortem proteolysis. Cattle used in this study represent a continuous spectrum of Angus-Brahman genetic variation. Steers were harvested and Longissimus samples were collected at 1.5h, 24h, and 14d postmortem. Proteolysis during the 14d aging period was evaluated, along with Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) and trained sensory panel tenderness. Myosin heavy chain composition and enzymatic activity were used to evaluate fiber type characteristics. As Brahman influence increased, WBSF increased and sensory tenderness decreased. Calpain-1 autolysis decreased as Brahman percentage increased, and corresponded with reduced degradation of troponin-T, desmin, and titin. Increasing Brahman percentage was associated with greater citrate synthase activity and greater cross-sectional area of type IIx fibers. Brahman-influenced cattle produced tougher steaks and exhibited decreased protein degradation. Thus, Brahman genetics impacted not only the calpain-calpastatin system, but also muscle fiber size and metabolic properties.


Translational Animal Science | 2017

National Beef Quality Audit–2016: Transportation, mobility, live cattle, and carcass assessments of targeted producer-related characteristics that affect value of market cows and bulls, their carcasses, and associated by-products

M. K. Harris; L. C. Eastwood; C. A. Boykin; A. N. Arnold; Kerri B. Gehring; D. S. Hale; C. R. Kerth; D. B. Griffin; J. W. Savell; K. E. Belk; D. R. Woerner; J. D. Hasty; R. J. Delmore; J. N. Martin; T. E. Lawrence; T. J. McEvers; D. L. VanOverbeke; G. G. Mafi; M. M. Pfeiffer; Ty B. Schmidt; R. J. Maddock; D.D. Johnson; C. Carr; J. M. Scheffler; T. D. Pringle; A. M. Stelzleni

Abstract The National Beef Quality Audit–2016 marks the fourth iteration in a series assessing the quality of live beef and dairy cows and bulls and their carcass counterparts. The objective was to determine the incidence of producer-related defects, and report cattle and carcass traits associated with producer management. Conducted from March through December of 2016, trailers (n = 154), live animals (n = 5,470), hide-on carcasses (n = 5,278), and hide-off hot carcasses (n = 5,510) were surveyed in 18 commercial packing facilities throughout the United States. Cattle were allowed 2.3 m2 of trailer space on average during transit indicating some haulers are adhering to industry handling guidelines for trailer space requirements. Of the mixed gender loads arriving at processing facilities, cows and bulls were not segregated on 64.4% of the trailers surveyed. When assessed for mobility, the greatest majority of cattle surveyed were sound. Since the inception of the quality audit series, beef cows have shown substantial improvements in muscle. Today over 90.0% of dairy cows are too light muscled. The mean body condition score for beef animals was 4.7 and for dairy cows and bulls was 2.6 and 3.3, respectively. Dairy cattle were lighter muscled, yet fatter than the dairy cattle surveyed in 2007. Of cattle surveyed, most did not have horns, nor any visible live animal defects. Unbranded hides were observed on 77.3% of cattle. Carcass bruising was seen on 64.1% of cow carcasses and 42.9% of bull carcasses. However, over half of all bruises were identified to only be minor in severity. Nearly all cattle (98.4%) were free of visible injection-site lesions. Current results suggest improvements have been made in cattle and meat quality in the cow and bull sector. Furthermore, the results provide guidance for continued educational and research efforts for improving market cow and bull beef quality.


Translational Animal Science | 2017

National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Transportation, mobility, and harvest-floor assessments of targeted characteristics that affect quality and value of cattle, carcasses, and by-products

L. C. Eastwood; C. A. Boykin; M. K. Harris; A. N. Arnold; D. S. Hale; C. R. Kerth; D. B. Griffin; J. W. Savell; K. E. Belk; D. R. Woerner; J. D. Hasty; R. J. Delmore; J. N. Martin; T. E. Lawrence; T. J. McEvers; D. L. VanOverbeke; G. G. Mafi; M. M. Pfeiffer; Ty B. Schmidt; R. J. Maddock; D.D. Johnson; C. Carr; J. M. Scheffler; T. D. Pringle; A. M. Stelzleni

Abstract The National Beef Quality Audit-2016 (NBQA-2016) was conducted to assess current transportation, mobility, and quality characteristics of U.S. fed steers and heifers. Data were collected at 17 beef processing facilities between March and November 2016. About 8,000 live cattle were evaluated for transportation and mobility, and about 25,000 carcasses were evaluated on the slaughter floor. Cattle were in transit to the slaughter facility for a mean duration of 2.7 h from a mean distance of 218.5 km using trailers with dimensions ranging from 17.84 m2 to 59.09 m2. Area allotted per animal averaged 1.13 m2 and ranged from 0.85 m2 to 2.28 m2. A total of 96.8% of cattle received a mobility score of 1 (walks easily, no apparent lameness). Identification types (35.1% had multiple) were lot visual tags (61.5%), individual tags (55.0%), electronic tags (16.9%), metal-clip tags (9.2%), bar-coded tags (0.05%), wattles (0.01%), and other (2.6%). Cattle were black-hided (57.8%), Holstein (20.4%), red-hided (10.5%), yellow-hided (4.8%), gray-hided (2.9%), brown-hided (1.3%), and white-hided (1.1%). Unbranded hides were observed on 74.3% of cattle; 18.6% had brands located on the butt, 6.3% on the side, and 1.3% on the shoulder (values exceed 100% due to multiple brands). For hide-on carcasses, 37.7% displayed no mud or manure; specific locations for mud or manure were legs (40.8%), belly (33.0%), tail region (15.5%), side (6.8%), and top-line (3.9%). Cattle without horns represented 83.3% of the sample, and cattle that did have horns measured: < 2.54 cm (5.5%), 2.54 to 12.7 cm (8.3%), and > 12.7 cm (2.9%). Carcasses without bruises represented 61.1% of those sampled, whereas 28.2% had 1, 8.2% had 2, 2.1% had 3, and 0.3% had 4 bruises. Of those carcasses with a bruise, the bruise was located on the loin (29.7%), round (27.8%), chuck (16.4%), rib (14.4%), and brisket/plate/flank (11.6%). Frequencies of offal condemnations were livers (30.8%), lungs (18.2%), viscera (16.3%), hearts (11.1%), heads (2.7%), and tongues (2.0%). Compared to NBQA-2011, fewer cattle were identified for traceability, fewer were black-hided, a greater number were Holstein cattle, more with no brand and no horns, fewer without bruises, more liver, lung, and viscera condemnations, and fewer heads and tongues were condemned. The NBQA remains an influential survey for the U.S. beef industry to provide benchmarks and strategic plans for continued improvement of beef quality and consistency.


Journal of Animal Science | 2017

National Beef Quality Audit – 2016: Survey of carcass characteristics through instrument grading assessments

C. A. Boykin; L. C. Eastwood; M. K. Harris; D. S. Hale; C. R. Kerth; D. B. Griffin; A. N. Arnold; J. D. Hasty; K. E. Belk; D. R. Woerner; R. J. Delmore; J. N. Martin; D. L. VanOverbeke; G. G. Mafi; M. M. Pfeiffer; T. E. Lawrence; T. J. McEvers; Ty B. Schmidt; R. J. Maddock; D.D. Johnson; C. Carr; J. M. Scheffler; T. D. Pringle; A. M. Stelzleni; J. Gottlieb; J. W. Savell

The instrument grading assessment portion of the National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA) - 2016 allows the unique opportunity to evaluate beef carcass traits over the course of a year. One week of instrument grading data was collected each month from 5 beef processing corporations encompassing 18 facilities from January 2016 through December 2016 ( = 4,544,635 carcasses). Mean USDA yield grade (YG) was 3.1 with 1.37 cm fat thickness (FT), 88.9 cm LM area, 393.6 kg HCW, and 2.1% KPH. Frequency distribution of USDA YG was 9.5% YG 1, 34.6% YG 2, 38.8% YG 3, 14.6% YG 4, and 2.5% YG 5. Increases in HCW and FT since the NBQA-2011 were major contributors to differences in mean YG and the (numerically) increased frequency of YG 3, 4, and 5 carcasses found in the current audit. Mean marbling score was Small, and the distribution of USDA quality grades was 4.2% Prime, 71.4% Choice, 21.7% Select, and 2.7% other. Frequency of carcasses grading Prime on Monday (6.43%) was numerically higher than the average frequency of carcasses grading Prime overall (4.2%). Monthly HCW means were 397.6 kg in January, 397.2 kg in February, 396.5 kg in March, 389.3 kg in April, 384.8 kg in May, 385.0 kg in June, 386.1 kg in July, 394.1 kg in August, 399.1 kg in September, 403.9 kg in October, 406.5 kg in November, and 401.9 kg in December. Monthly mean marbling scores were Small in January, Small in February, Small in March, Small in April, Small in May, Small in June, Small in July, Small in August, Small in September, Small in October, Small in November, and Small in December. Both mean HCW and mean marbling score declined in the months of May and June. The month with the greatest numerical frequency of dark cutters was October (0.74%). Comparison of overall data from in-plant carcass and instrument grading assessments revealed close alignment of information, especially for YG (3.1 for in-plant assessment versus 3.1 for instrument grading) and marbling (Small for in-plant assessment versus Small for instrument grading). These findings allow the beef industry access to the greatest volume of beef value-determining characteristics for the U.S. fed steer and heifer population than ever reported, resulting in potentially more precise targeting of future quality and consistency efforts.


Science Communication | 2015

Communicating Sensitive Scientific Issues The Interplay Between Values, Attitudes, and Euphemisms in Communicating Livestock Slaughter

Katie M. Abrams; Thais Zimbres; C. Carr

In demands for transparency in livestock production, how should the industry deal with communicating the sensitive topic of slaughter? This study examined the different effects of livestock slaughter transparency (via video) on slaughter and transparency attitudes based on people’s animal value orientation and the effects on the clarity and comfort of euphemisms. Findings indicated the video increased slaughter acceptance among all animal value orientations. All groups expected a high level of transparency from the industry regardless of the video. With respect to euphemisms, while slaughter was considered clearer, harvest was more comfortable.


Translational Animal Science | 2018

National Beef Quality Audit–2016: assessment of cattle hide characteristics, offal condemnations, and carcass traits to determine the quality status of the market cow and bull beef industry

M. K. Harris; L. Clay Eastwood; Courtney A Boykin; A. N. Arnold; Kerri B. Gehring; Dan Hale; C. R. Kerth; D. B. Griffin; J. W. Savell; K. E. Belk; D. R. Woerner; Josh D Hasty; R. J. Delmore; J. N. Martin; T. E. Lawrence; Trenton J McEvers; D. L. VanOverbeke; G. G. Mafi; M. M. Pfeiffer; Ty B. Schmidt; R. J. Maddock; D.D. Johnson; C. Carr; J. M. Scheffler; T. Dean Pringle; A. M. Stelzleni

Abstract To continue the series that began in 1994, the National Beef Quality Audit (NBQA) – 2016 was conducted to quantify the quality status of the market cow and bull beef sector, as well as determine improvements made in the beef and dairy industry since 2007. The NBQA-2016 was conducted from March through December of 2016, and assessed hide-on carcasses (n = 5,278), chilled carcasses (n = 4,285), heads (n = 5,720), and offal items (n = 4,800) in 18 commercial processing facilities throughout the United States. Beef cattle were predominantly black-hided; 68.0% of beef cows and 67.2% of beef bulls possessed a black hide. Holstein was the predominant type of dairy animal observed. Just over half (56.0%) of the cattle surveyed had no mud contamination on the hide, and when mud was present, 34.1% of cattle only had small amounts. Harvest floor assessments found 44.6% of livers, 23.1% of lungs, 22.3% of hearts, 20.0% of viscera, 8.2% of heads, and 5.9% of tongues were condemned. Liver condemnations were most frequently due to abscess presence. In contrast, contamination was the primary reason for condemnation of all other offal items. Of the cow carcasses surveyed, 17.4% carried a fetus at the time of harvest. As expected, mean carcass weight and loin muscle area values observed for bulls were heavier and larger than cows. The marbling scores represented by cull animal carcasses were most frequently slight and traces amounts. Cow carcasses manifested a greater amount of marbling on average than bull carcasses. The predominant fat color score showed all carcasses surveyed had some level of yellow fat. Only 1.3% of carcasses exhibited signs of arthritic joints. Results of the NBQA-2016 indicate there are areas in which the beef and dairy industries have improved and areas that still need attention to prevent value loss in market cows and bulls.


Livestock Science | 2017

Genomic-polygenic and polygenic predictions for nine ultrasound and carcass traits in Angus-Brahman multibreed cattle using three sets of genotypes

Mauricio A. Elzo; Raluca G. Mateescu; D.D. Johnson; Tracy L. Scheffler; J. M. Scheffler; C. Carr; D. O. Rae; J.G. Wasdin; M.D. Driver; J.D. Driver


Meat and Muscle Biology | 2017

National Beef Tenderness Survey–2015: Palatability and Shear Force Assessments of Retail and Foodservice Beef

Hillary A. Martinez; A. N. Arnold; J. Chance Brooks; C. Carr; Kerri B. Gehring; D. B. Griffin; Dan Hale; G. G. Mafi; D.D. Johnson; Carol L. Lorenzen; R. J. Maddock; R.K. Miller; D. L. VanOverbeke; Bridget E. Wasser; J. W. Savell

Collaboration


Dive into the C. Carr's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. J. Maddock

North Dakota State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. R. Woerner

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. J. Delmore

Colorado State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge