C. Cussac-Pillegand
Sorbonne
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by C. Cussac-Pillegand.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2014
Emmanuel Cosson; C. Cussac-Pillegand; Amélie Benbara; I. Pharisien; Y. Jaber; I. Banu; Minh Tuan Nguyen; P. Valensi; L. Carbillon
CONTEXT The performance of standard selective screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may vary according to ethnicity. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of a selective screening tool to determine whether it accurately predicts GDM and events in women of different ethnicities. The tool selectively screens based on patients having one or more of the following risk factors (RFs): body mass index ≥25 kg/m(2), age ≥35 years, family history of diabetes, and personal history of GDM or macrosomia. DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted an observational prospective study at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS We included 17 344 women of European (30.9%), North African (29.6%), Sub-Saharan African (22.2%), Caribbean (8.7%), Indian-Pakistani-Sri Lankan (5.5%), and Asian (3.3%) ethnicities who were without pregravid diabetes and had singleton deliveries (2002-2010). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We universally screened GDM and GDM-related events (pre-eclampsia, birth weight ≥4000 g, or dystocia). RESULTS Independent of confounding factors, North African (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-1.52; P < .001) and Indian-Pakistani-Sri Lankan (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 2.13-3.00; P < .001) women had more GDM than Europeans, whereas Sub-Saharan African women had less (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.94; P < .01). Having one or more RFs was associated with GDM among Europeans (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22-1.76), North African (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55), Sub-Saharan African (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.20-1.83), and Caribbean (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.12-2.14) women. Having one or more RFs was also associated with GDM-related events only in European (P < .01) and North African (P < .05) women, with the following incidences in Europeans: no GDM/no RF, 6.9%; no GDM/RF, 9.0%; GDM/no RF, 14.7%; and GDM/RF, 12.6%. CONCLUSION Standard selective screening criteria were not predictive of GDM in women from India-Pakistan-Sri Lanka and Asia and were associated with GDM-related events only in European and North African women. However, the women with GDM, who were routinely treated, had a poor prognosis, even for those free of RFs. These results support universal screening, irrespective of ethnicity.
Diabetes Care | 2013
Emmanuel Cosson; I. Banu; C. Cussac-Pillegand; Qinda Chen; Sabrina Chiheb; Y. Jaber; Minh Tuan Nguyen; Nathalie Charnaux; P. Valensi
OBJECTIVE We investigated whether glycation gap (G-Gap), an index of intracellular glycation of proteins, was associated with diabetes complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We measured concomitantly HbA1c and fructosamine in 925 patients with type 2 diabetes to calculate the G-Gap, defined as the difference between measured HbA1c, and fructosamine-based predicted HbA1c. Patients were explored for retinopathy, nephropathy, peripheral neuropathy, cardiac autonomic neuropathy (n = 512), and silent myocardial ischemia (n = 506). RESULTS Macroproteinuria was the only complication that was associated with G-Gap (prevalence in the first, second, and third tertile of G-Gap: 2.9, 6.2, and 11.0%, respectively; P < 0.001). The G-Gap was higher in patients with macroproteinuria than in those without (1.06 ± 1.62 vs. 0.03 ± 1.30%; P < 0.0001). Because HbA1c was associated with both G-Gap (HbA1c 7.0 ± 1.4, 7.9 ± 1.4, and 10.1 ± 1.8% in the first, second, and third G-Gap tertile, respectively; P < 0.0001) and macroproteinuria (HbA1c 8.8 ± 2.2% if macroproteinuria, 8.3 ± 2.0% if none; P < 0.05), and because it could have been a confounder, we matched 54 patients with macroproteinuria and 200 patients without for HbA1c. Because macroproteinuria was associated with lower serum albumin and fructosamine levels, which might account for higher G-Gap, we calculated in this subpopulation albumin-indexed fructosamine and G-Gap; macroproteinuria was independently associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.2 [95% CI 1.5–6.7]; P < 0.01), hypertension (2.9 [1.1–7.5]; P < 0.05), and the third tertile of albumin-indexed G-Gap (2.3 [1.1–4.4]; P < 0.05) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS In type 2 diabetic patients, G-Gap was associated with macroproteinuria, independently of HbA1c, albumin levels, and confounding factors, suggesting a specific role of intracellular glycation susceptibility on kidney glomerular changes.
Diabetes & Metabolism | 2016
Emmanuel Cosson; A. Diallo; M. Docan; D. Sandre-Banon; I. Banu; C. Cussac-Pillegand; S. Chiheb; I. Pharisien; P. Valensi; L. Carbillon
AIM This study assessed whether male fetal gender increases the risk of maternal gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and investigated the association with placental weight. METHODS The study included 20,149 women without pregestational diabetes who delivered singletons at our hospital between January 2002 and December 2010. There was universal screening for GDM, and all placentas were weighed at delivery. RESULTS GDM (affecting 14.2% of women) was not associated with fetal gender (male fetuses in women without and with GDM: 51.8% vs. 51.7%, respectively; P=0.957), and remained likewise after logistic-regression analysis of risk factors for GDM (OR: 1.007, 95% CI: 0.930-1.091; P=0.858). Placental weights were 600±126g, 596±123g, 584±118g and 587±181g in women with GDM/female, GDM/male, no GDM/female and no GDM/male fetuses, respectively (GDM effect: P=0.017; gender effect: P=0.41; GDM * gender effect: P=0.16). CONCLUSION The present results suggest that fetal gender is not associated with GDM and, while placental weights were higher in cases of GDM, there were still no gender effects.
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements | 2013
Isabelle Sagnet-Pham; Minh Tuan Nguyen; Isabela Banu; S. Chiheb; C. Cussac-Pillegand; Paul Valensi; Emmanuel Cosson
Background The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of subclinical cardiomyopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes without hypertension or coronary artery disease (CAD). Materials and methods: 656 patients with type 2 diabetes for 14±8 yrs (359 men, 59.7±8.7 years, HbA1c 8.7±2.1%), without cardiac symptom and at least one cardiovascular risk factor (hypertension 74%; dyslipidemia 70%; smoking habits 22%; peripheral occlusive arterial disease 10%, nephropathy 39%) had a contributive cardiac echography at rest; underwent a stress cardiac scintigraphy to screen for silent myocardial ischemia (SMI), and in case of SMI, a coronary angiography to screen for silent CAD. Results SMI was diagnosed in 206 patients, and 71 of them had silent CAD. In the patients without hypertension or CAD (n=157), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH: 24.1%) was the most frequent abnormality, followed by left ventricular dilation (8.6%), hypokinesia (5.3%), abnormal type 1 relaxation (4.8%) and systolic dysfunction (3.8%). No parameter was associated with LVH neither with LV dilation nor with abnormal relaxation. In multivariate analysis, the parameters associated with hypokinesia were SMI (Odds ratio 14.7 [2.7-81.7] p Conclusion In asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients, diabetic cardiomyopathy is highly prevalent and is characterized by LVH. SMI, obesity and poor glycemic control contribute to systolic dysfunction and/or hypokinesia. Hypertension is associated with more LVH, and CAD with more hypokinesia.
Diabetes & Metabolism | 2016
Emmanuel Cosson; C. Cussac-Pillegand; A. Benbara; I. Pharisien; Minh Tuan Nguyen; S. Chiheb; P. Valensi; L. Carbillon
Diabetes & Metabolism | 2018
Emmanuel Cosson; Françoise Gary; M.T. Nguyen; Lucio Bianchi; D. Sandre-Banon; L. Biri; Y. Jaber; C. Cussac-Pillegand; I. Banu; S. Chiheb; L. Carbillon; P. Valensi
Diabetes & Metabolism | 2017
Sarah Bathaei; C. Cussac-Pillegand; Alice Seroka; Veronica Arama; S. Chiheb; Emmanuel Cosson; Paul Valensi
Diabetes & Metabolism | 2017
C. Cussac-Pillegand; Eliane Hamo-Tchatchouang; Isabela Banu; Minh Tuan Nguyen; Emmanuel Cosson; Paul Valensi
Diabetes & Metabolism | 2016
Sarah Bathaei; C. Cussac-Pillegand; S. Chiheb; R. Dutheil; M. Fysekidis; E. Cosson; P. Valensi
Diabetes & Metabolism | 2016
E. Cosson; Baz Baz; Françoise Gary; M. Docan; D. Sandre-Banon; Y. Jaber; C. Cussac-Pillegand; I. Banu; S. Chiheb; P. Valensi