Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where C. E. J. Watt is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by C. E. J. Watt.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2009

Wavelet-based ULF wave diagnosis of substorm expansion phase onset

Kyle R. Murphy; I. Jonathan Rae; Ian R. Mann; David K. Milling; C. E. J. Watt; L. G. Ozeke; Harald U. Frey; V. Angelopoulos; C. T. Russell

[1] Using a discrete wavelet transform with a Meyer wavelet basis, we present a new quantitative algorithm for determining the onset time of Pi1 and Pi2 ULF waves in the nightside ionosphere with � 20- to 40-s resolution at substorm expansion phase onset. We validate the algorithm by comparing both the ULF wave onset time and location to the optical onset determined by the Imager for Magnetopause-to-Aurora Global Exploration (IMAGE)–Far Ultraviolet Imager (FUV) instrument. In each of the six events analyzed, five substorm onsets and one pseudobreakup, the ULF onset is observed prior to the global optical onset observed by IMAGE at a station closely conjugate to the optical onset. The observed ULF onset times expand both latitudinally and longitudinally away from an epicenter of ULF wave power in the ionosphere. We further discuss the utility of the algorithm for diagnosing pseudobreakups and the relationship of the ULF onset epicenter to the meridians of elements of the substorm current wedge. The importance of the technique for establishing the causal sequence of events at substorm onset, especially in support of the multisatellite Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions During Substorms (THEMIS) mission, is also described.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

In situ spatiotemporal measurements of the detailed azimuthal substructure of the substorm current wedge

C. Forsyth; Andrew N. Fazakerley; I. J. Rae; C. E. J. Watt; Kyle R. Murphy; J. A. Wild; Tomas Karlsson; R. L. Mutel; C. J. Owen; R. E. Ergun; Arnaud Masson; Matthieu Berthomier; E. Donovan; H. U. Frey; J. Matzka; Claudia Stolle; Y. Zhang

The substorm current wedge (SCW) is a fundamental component of geomagnetic substorms. Models tend to describe the SCW as a simple line current flowing into the ionosphere toward dawn and out of the ionosphere toward dusk, linked by a westward electrojet. We use multispacecraft observations from perigee passes of the Cluster 1 and 4 spacecraft during a substorm on 15 January 2010, in conjunction with ground-based observations, to examine the spatial structuring and temporal variability of the SCW. At this time, the spacecraft traveled east-west azimuthally above the auroral region. We show that the SCW has significant azimuthal substructure on scales of 100 km at altitudes of 4000–7000 km. We identify 26 individual current sheets in the Cluster 4 data and 34 individual current sheets in the Cluster 1 data, with Cluster 1 passing through the SCW 120–240 s after Cluster 4 at 1300–2000 km higher altitude. Both spacecraft observed large-scale regions of net upward and downward field-aligned current, consistent with the large-scale characteristics of the SCW, although sheets of oppositely directed currents were observed within both regions. We show that the majority of these current sheets were closely aligned to a north-south direction, in contrast to the expected east-west orientation of the preonset aurora. Comparing our results with observations of the field-aligned current associated with bursty bulk flows (BBFs), we conclude that significant questions remain for the explanation of SCW structuring by BBF-driven “wedgelets.” Our results therefore represent constraints on future modeling and theoretical frameworks on the generation of the SCW. Key Points The substorm current wedge (SCW) has significant azimuthal structure Current sheets within the SCW are north-south aligned The substructure of the SCW raises questions for the proposed wedgelet scenario


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2003

Anomalous resistivity in non-Maxwellian plasmas

Panagiota Petkaki; C. E. J. Watt; Richard B. Horne; M. P. Freeman

Vlasov simulations of the current-driven ion-acoustic instability produced in Maxwellian and non-Maxwellian (Lorentzian, kappa = 2) electron-ion plasma with number density 7 x 10(6) cm(-3), reduced mass ratio m(i)/m(e) = 25, and electron to ion temperature ratio T-e/T-i = 1 are presented and compared. A concise stability analysis of current-driven ion-acoustic waves in Maxwellian and non-Maxwellian plasmas modeled by generalized Lorentzian distribution function with index 2 less than or equal to kappa less than or equal to 7 and electron to ion temperature ratio 1 less than or equal to T-e/T-i less than or equal to 100 is also presented. The ion-acoustic instability is excited in low temperature ratio Lorentzian (kappa = 2) plasma for lower absolute electron drift velocity (up to half the critical electron drift velocity of a Maxwellian). The anomalous resistivity resulting from ion acoustic waves in a Lorentzian plasma is a strong function of the electron drift velocity and in the work presented here varies by a factor of similar to100 for a 1.5 increase in the electron drift velocity. Furthermore, ion-acoustic anomalous resistivity is excited for electron drift velocities that would be stable for Maxwellian plasmas. The magnitude of resistivity which can be generated by unstable ion-acoustic waves may be important for magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause.


Space Weather-the International Journal of Research and Applications | 2016

On the origins and timescales of geoeffective IMF

Mike Lockwood; M. J. Owens; L. Barnard; Sarah Bentley; Chris J. Scott; C. E. J. Watt

Southward Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) in the Geocentric Solar Magnetospheric (GSM) reference frame is the key element that controls the level of space-weather disturbance in Earth’s magnetosphere, ionosphere and thermosphere. We discuss the relation of this geoeffective IMF component to the IMF in the Geocentric Solar Ecliptic (GSE) frame and, using the almost continuous interplanetary data for 1996-2015 (inclusive), we show that large geomagnetic storms are always associated with strong southward, out-of-ecliptic field in the GSE frame: dipole tilt effects, that cause the difference between the southward field in the GSM and GSE frames, generally make only a minor contribution to these strongest storms. The time-of-day/time-of-year response patterns of geomagnetic indices and the optimum solar wind coupling function are both influenced by the timescale of the index response. We also study the occurrence spectrum of large out-of-ecliptic field and show that for one-hour averages it is, surprisingly, almost identical in ICMEs (Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections), around CIRs/SIRs (Corotating and Stream Interaction Regions) and in the “quiet” solar wind (which is shown to be consistent with the effect of weak SIRs). However, differences emerge when the timescale over which the field remains southward is considered: for longer averaging timescales the spectrum is broader inside ICMEs, showing that these events generate longer intervals of strongly southward average IMF and consequently stronger geomagnetic storms. The behavior of out-of-ecliptic field with timescale is shown to be very similar to that of deviations from the predicted Parker spiral orientation, suggesting the two share common origins.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015

Statistical characterization of the growth and spatial scales of the substorm onset arc

N. M. E. Kalmoni; I. J. Rae; C. E. J. Watt; Kyle R. Murphy; C. Forsyth; C. J. Owen

Abstract We present the first multievent study of the spatial and temporal structuring of the aurora to provide statistical evidence of the near‐Earth plasma instability which causes the substorm onset arc. Using data from ground‐based auroral imagers, we study repeatable signatures of along‐arc auroral beads, which are thought to represent the ionospheric projection of magnetospheric instability in the near‐Earth plasma sheet. We show that the growth and spatial scales of these wave‐like fluctuations are similar across multiple events, indicating that each sudden auroral brightening has a common explanation. We find statistically that growth rates for auroral beads peak at low wave number with the most unstable spatial scales mapping to an azimuthal wavelength λ≈ 1700–2500 km in the equatorial magnetosphere at around 9–12 R E. We compare growth rates and spatial scales with a range of theoretical predictions of magnetotail instabilities, including the Cross‐Field Current Instability and the Shear Flow Ballooning Instability. We conclude that, although the Cross‐Field Current instability can generate similar magnitude of growth rates, the range of unstable wave numbers indicates that the Shear Flow Ballooning Instability is the most likely explanation for our observations.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2009

Reply to comment by K. Liou and Y.-L. Zhang on “Wavelet-based ULF wave diagnosis of substorm expansion phase onset”

Kyle R. Murphy; I. Jonathan Rae; Ian R. Mann; A. P. Walsh; David K. Milling; C. E. J. Watt; L. G. Ozeke; Harald U. Frey; V. Angelopoulos; C. T. Russell

Citation: Murphy, K. R., I. J. Rae, I. R. Mann, A. P. Walsh, D. K. Milling, C. E. J. Watt, L. Ozeke, H. U. Frey, V. Angelopoulos, andC. T. Russell (2009), Reply to comment by K. Liou and Y.-L. Zhang on ‘‘Wavelet-based ULF wave diagnosis of substorm expansionphase onset,’’ J. Geophys. Res., 114, A10207, doi:10.1029/2009JA014351.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Field line resonances as a trigger and a tracer for substorm onset

I. Jonathan Rae; Kyle R. Murphy; C. E. J. Watt; Gordon Rostoker; R. Rankin; Ian R. Mann; C. R. Hodgson; H. U. Frey; A. W. Degeling; C. Forsyth

In this paper, we show that periodic auroral arc structures are seen at the location of one particular auroral substorm onset for the 15 min preceding onset, suggesting that field line resonances should be considered a strong candidate for triggering substorm onset. Irrespective of whether this field line resonance is coincidentally or causally linked to this substorm onset, the characteristics of the field line resonance can be used to remote sense the characteristics of the geomagnetic field line that supports substorm onset. In this instance, the eigenfrequency of this resonance is around 12 mHz. Interestingly, however, there is no evidence of this field line resonance in a seven satellite major Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS)-GOES conjunction, ranging from geosynchronous orbit to ~30 RE. However, using space-based cross-phase measurements of the local field line eigenfrequency at the inner THEMIS locations, we find that the local field line eigenfrequency is 6–10 mHz. Hence, we can reliably say that this 12 mHz Field Line Resonance (FLR) must lie inside of THEMIS locations. Our conclusion is that a high-m field line resonance can both represent a strong candidate for a trigger for substorm onset, as first proposed by Samson et al. (1992), and that its characteristics can provide invaluable information as to where substorm onset occurs in the magnetosphere.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

What effect do substorms have on the content of the radiation belts

C. Forsyth; I. J. Rae; Kyle R. Murphy; M. P. Freeman; C.-L. Huang; Harlan E. Spence; A. J. Boyd; J. C. Coxon; C. M. Jackman; N. M. E. Kalmoni; C. E. J. Watt

Abstract Substorms are fundamental and dynamic processes in the magnetosphere, converting captured solar wind magnetic energy into plasma energy. These substorms have been suggested to be a key driver of energetic electron enhancements in the outer radiation belts. Substorms inject a keV “seed” population into the inner magnetosphere which is subsequently energized through wave‐particle interactions up to relativistic energies; however, the extent to which substorms enhance the radiation belts, either directly or indirectly, has never before been quantified. In this study, we examine increases and decreases in the total radiation belt electron content (TRBEC) following substorms and geomagnetically quiet intervals. Our results show that the radiation belts are inherently lossy, shown by a negative median change in TRBEC at all intervals following substorms and quiet intervals. However, there are up to 3 times as many increases in TRBEC following substorm intervals. There is a lag of 1–3 days between the substorm or quiet intervals and their greatest effect on radiation belt content, shown in the difference between the occurrence of increases and losses in TRBEC following substorms and quiet intervals, the mean change in TRBEC following substorms or quiet intervals, and the cross correlation between SuperMAG AL (SML) and TRBEC. However, there is a statistically significant effect on the occurrence of increases and decreases in TRBEC up to a lag of 6 days. Increases in radiation belt content show a significant correlation with SML and SYM‐H, but decreases in the radiation belt show no apparent link with magnetospheric activity levels.


Environmental Research Letters | 2014

Modulation of UK lightning by heliospheric magnetic field polarity

M. J. Owens; Chris J. Scott; Mike Lockwood; L. Barnard; R. G. Harrison; Keri Nicoll; C. E. J. Watt; A. J. Bennett

Observational studies have reported solar magnetic modulation of terrestrial lightning on a range of time scales, from days to decades. The proposed mechanism is two-step: lightning rates vary with galactic cosmic ray (GCR) flux incident on Earth, either via changes in atmospheric conductivity and/or direct triggering of lightning. GCR flux is, in turn, primarily controlled by the heliospheric magnetic field (HMF) intensity. Consequently, global changes in lightning rates are expected. This study instead considers HMF polarity, which doesnʼt greatly affect total GCR flux. Opposing HMF polarities are, however, associated with a 40–60% difference in observed UK lightning and thunder rates. As HMF polarity skews the terrestrial magnetosphere from its nominal position, this perturbs local ionospheric potential at high latitudes and local exposure to energetic charged particles from the magnetosphere. We speculate as to the mechanism(s) by which this may, in turn, redistribute the global location and/or intensity of thunderstorm activity.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

A direct examination of the dynamics of dipolarization fronts using MMS

Zhonghua Yao; I. J. Rae; R. L. Guo; Andrew N. Fazakerley; C. J. Owen; R. Nakamura; W. Baumjohann; C. E. J. Watt; K.-J. Hwang; B. L. Giles; C. T. Russell; R. B. Torbert; A. Varsani; Huishan Fu; Q. Q. Shi; X.-J. Zhang

Energy conversion on the dipolarization fronts (DFs) has attracted much research attention through the suggestion that intense current densities associated with DFs can modify the more global magnetotail current system. The current structures associated with a DF are at the scale of one to a few ion gyroradii, and their duration is comparable to a spacecrafts spin period. Hence, it is crucial to understand the physical mechanisms of DFs with measurements at a timescale shorter than a spin period. We present a case study whereby we use measurements from the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission, which provides full 3-D particle distributions with a cadence much shorter than a spin period. We provide a cross validation amongst the current density calculations and examine the assumptions that have been adopted in previous literature using the advantages of MMS mission (i.e., small-scale tetrahedron and high temporal resolution). We also provide a cross validation on the terms in the generalized Ohms law using these advantageous measurements. Our results clearly show that the majority of the currents on the DF are contributed by both ion and electron diamagnetic drifts. Our analysis also implies that the ion frozen-in condition does not hold on the DF, while electron frozen-in condition likely holds. The new experimental capabilities allow us to accurately calculate Joule heating within the DF, which shows that plasma energy is being converted to magnetic energy in our event.

Collaboration


Dive into the C. E. J. Watt's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kyle R. Murphy

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Rankin

University of Alberta

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

I. Jonathan Rae

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

I. J. Rae

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. Forsyth

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

I. J. Rae

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harald U. Frey

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge