C. Fiorino

Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Accurate contouring of the clinical target volume (CTV) is a fundamental prerequisite for successful conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate (P) and seminal vesicles (SV) and its impact on conformal treatment planning in our working conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Inter-observer variability was investigated by asking five well-trained radiotherapists of contouring on CT images the P and the SV of six supine-positioned patients previously treated with conformal techniques. Short-term intra-observer variability was assessed by asking the radiotherapists to contour the P and SV of one patient for a second time, just after the first contouring. The differences among the inserted volumes were considered for both intra- and inter-observer variability. Regarding intra-observer variability, the differences between the two inserted contours were estimated by taking the relative differences in correspondence to the CT slices on BEV plots (antero-posterior and left-right beams). Concerning inter-observer variability, the distances between the internal and external envelopes of the inserted contours (named projected diagnostic uncertainties or PDUs) and the distances from the mean inserted contours (named mean contour distances or MCDs) were measured from BEV plots (i.e. parallel to the CT slices). RESULTS Intra-observer variability was relatively small (the average percentage variation of the volume was approximately 5%; SD of the differences measured on BEV plots within 1.8 mm). Concerning inter-observer variability, the percentage SD of the inserted volumes ranged from 10 to 18%. Differences equal to 1 cm in the cranio-caudal extension of P + SV were found in four out of six patients. The largest inter-observer variability was found when considering the anterior margin in the left-right beam of P top (MCD = 7.1 mm, 1 SD). Relatively high values for MCDs were also found for P bottom, for the posterior and lateral margins of P top (2.6 and 3.1 mm, respectively, I SD) and for the anterior margin of SV (2.8 mm, 1 SD). Relatively small values were found for P central (from 1.4 to 2.0 mm, 1 SD) and the posterior margin of SV (1.5 mm, 1 SD). CONCLUSIONS The application of larger margins taking inter-observer variability into account should be taken into consideration for the anterior and the lateral margins of SV and P top and for the lateral margin of P. The impact of short-term intra-observer variability does not seem to be relevant.

Dose–volume effects for normal tissues in external radiotherapy: Pelvis

A great deal of quantitative information regarding the dose-volume relationships of pelvic organs at risk has been collected and analysed over the last 10 years. The need to improve our knowledge in the modelling of late and acute toxicity has become increasingly important, due to the rapidly increasing use of inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and the consequent need of a quantitative assessment of dose-volume or biological-based cost functions. This comprehensive review concerns most organs at risk involved in planning optimisation for prostate and other types of pelvic cancer. The rectum is the most investigated organ: the largest studies on dose-volume modelling of rectal toxicity show quite consistent results, suggesting that sufficiently reliable dose-volume/EUD-based constraints can be safely applied in most clinical situations. Quantitative data on bladder, bowel, sexual organs and pelvic bone marrow are more lacking but are rapidly emerging; however, for these organs, further investigation on large groups of patients is necessary.

Rectal dose–volume constraints in high-dose radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE To investigate the relationship between rectal bleeding and dosimetric-clinical parameters in patients receiving three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS In a retrospective national study (AIROPROS01-01, AIRO: Associazione Italiana Radioterapia Oncologica), planning/clinical data for 245 consecutive patients with stage T1-4N0-x prostate carcinoma who underwent 3D-CRT to 70-78 Gy (ICRU point) were pooled from four Italian institutions. The correlation between late rectal bleeding and rectal dose-volume data (the percentage of rectum receiving more than 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 Gy [V(50-70)]) and other dosimetric and clinical parameters were investigated in univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox regression model) analyses. Median follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS Twenty-three patients were scored as late bleeders according to a modified RTOG definition (Grade 2: 16; Grade 3: 7); the actuarial 2-year rate was 9.2%. Excepting V75, all median and third quartile V(50-70) values were found to be significantly correlated with late bleeding at univariate analysis. The smallest p value was seen for V(50) below/above the third quartile value (66%). The V70 (cut-off value: 30%) was found to be also predictive for late bleeding. In the high-dose subgroup (74-78 Gy), Grade 3 bleeding was highly correlated with this constraint. The predictive value of both V(50) and V(70) was confirmed by multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS The present article provides evidence for correlation between rectal DVH parameters and late rectal bleeding in patients treated with curative intent with 3D-CRT. To keep the rate of moderate/severe rectal bleeding below 5-10%, it seems advisable to limit V(50) to 60-65%, V(60) to 45-50%, and V70 to 25-30%.

Significant correlation between rectal DVH and late bleeding in patients treated after radical prostatectomy with conformal or conventional radiotherapy (66.6 –70.2 Gy

PURPOSE Investigating the correlation between dosimetric/clinical parameters and late rectal bleeding in patients treated with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data of 154 consecutive patients, including three-dimensional treatment planning and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the rectum (including filling), were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-six of 154 patients presenting a (full) rectal volume >100 cc were excluded from the analysis. All patients considered for the analysis (n = 128) were treated at a nominal dose equal to 66.6-70.2 Gy (ICRU dose 68-72.5 Gy; median 70 Gy) with conformal (n = 76) or conventional (n = 52) four-field technique (1.8 Gy/fr). Clinical parameters such as diabetes mellitus, acute rectal bleeding, hypertension, age, and hormonal therapy were considered. Late rectal bleeding was scored using a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, and patients experiencing >or=Grade 2 were considered bleeders. Median follow-up was 36 months (range 12-72). Mean and median rectal dose were considered, together with rectal volume and the % fraction of rectum receiving more than 50, 55, 60, and 65 Gy (V50, V55, V60, V65, respectively). Median and quartile values of all parameters were taken as cutoff for statistical analysis. Univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox hazard model) analyses were performed. RESULTS Fourteen of 128 patients experienced >or=Grade 2 late bleeding (3-year actuarial incidence 10.5%). A significant correlation between a number of cutoff values and late rectal bleeding was found. In particular, a mean dose >or=54 Gy, V50 >or=63%, V55 >or=57%, and V60 >or=50% was highly predictive of late bleeding (p <or= 0.01). A rectal volume <60 cc and type of treatment (conventional vs. conformal) were also significantly predictive of late bleeding (p = 0.05). Concerning clinical variables, acute bleeding (p < 0.001) was significantly related to late bleeding, and a trend was found for hypertension (p = 0.11). After patients were grouped into those with V50 >or=63% and those with V50 <63% (DVH grouping), data were fitted with a Cox regression hazard model using DVH grouping, rectal volume, and the main clinical parameters as independent variables. Results of the analysis showed that DVH grouping (relative risk 3.3; p = 0.04) and acute bleeding (relative risk 7.1; p = 0.001) are independently predictive of late bleeding. CONCLUSIONS DVHs of the rectum are significantly correlated with late bleeding for patients irradiated at 66.6-70.2 Gy after radical prostatectomy.

IMRT significantly reduces acute toxicity of whole-pelvis irradiation in patients treated with post-operative adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE To investigate the role of IMRT in reducing the risk of acute genito-urinary (GU), upper gastrointestinal (uGI) and lower gastrointestinal (lGI) toxicity following whole-pelvis irradiation (WPRT) after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS 172 consecutive patients with prostate cancer were post-operatively irradiated to the prostatic bed (PB) and pelvic lymph-nodal area with adjuvant (n=100) or salvage (n=72) intent. Eighty-one patients underwent three-dimensional conformal (3DCRT) WPRT, while the remaining 91 underwent IMRT (54/91 with helical tomotherapy (HTT); 37/91 with Linac intensity-modulated RT (LinacIMRT)). RESULTS Patients treated with IMRT experienced a decreased risk of acute toxicity. The crude incidence of grade > or =2 toxicity was GU 12.3% vs. 6.6% (p=0.19); lGI 8.6% vs. 3.2% (p=0.14); uGI 22.2% vs. 6.6% (p=0.004), for 3DCRT and IMRT, respectively. With respect to uGI and lGI, the acute toxicity profile of the HTT patients was even better when compared to that of 3DCRT patients (crude incidence:1.8% and 0.0%, respectively). Treatment interruptions due to uGI toxicity were 11/81 in the 3DCRT group vs. 2/91 in the IMRT group (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS The risk of acute toxicity following post-operative WPRT delivered by means of IMRT was reduced compared to that of 3DCRT. The most significant reduction concerned uGI, mainly owing to better bowel sparing with IMRT.

Selecting the Optimal Candidate for Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Long-term Survival Analysis

BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) after radical prostatectomy (RP) on survival of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is still controversial. OBJECTIVE We tested the impact of ART on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and overall mortality (OM) in PCa patients according to pathologic PCa features. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We evaluated 1049 PCa patients treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection alone or in combination with adjuvant treatments between 1998 and 2008. All patients had positive surgical margins and/or pT3/pT4 disease with or without positive lymph nodes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Cox regression analyses tested the relationship between pathologic characteristics and CSM rates. Independent predictors of survival were used to develop a novel risk score based on the number of risk factors. Finally, Cox regression models tested the relationship between ART and survival according to the number of risk factors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS On multivariable analyses, only pathologic Gleason score ≥ 8, pT3b/T4 stage, and presence of positive lymph nodes represented independent predictors of CSM (all p ≤ 0.02). The cumulative number of these pathologic findings was used to develop a risk score, which was 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 43.6%, 22.1%, 20.7%, and 13.6% of patients, respectively. In patients sharing more than two mentioned predictors of CSM (primarily having a risk score of 0 or 1), ART did not significantly improve survival (all p ≥ 0.4). Conversely, in patients with a risk score ≥ 2, ART was associated with lower CSM and OM rates (all p=0.006). The observational nature of the cohort represents a limitation of the study. CONCLUSIONS ART significantly improved survival only in patients with at least two of the following pathologic features at RP: Gleason score ≥ 8, pT3/pT4 disease, and positive lymph nodes. These patients represent the ideal candidates for ART after RP.

Need for High Radiation Dose (≥70 Gy) in Early Postoperative Irradiation After Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-Institution Analysis of 334 High-Risk, Node-Negative Patients

PURPOSE To determine the clinical benefit of high-dose early adjuvant radiotherapy (EART) in high-risk prostate cancer (hrCaP) patients submitted to radical retropubic prostatectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS The clinical outcome of 334 hrCaP (pT3-4 and/or positive resection margins) node-negative patients submitted to radical retropubic prostatectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy before 2004 was analyzed according to the EART dose delivered to the prostatic bed, <70.2 Gy (lower dose, median 66.6 Gy, n = 153) or >or=70.2 Gy (median 70.2 Gy, n = 181). RESULTS The two groups were comparable except for a significant difference in terms of median follow-up (10 vs. 7 years, respectively) owing to the gradual increase of EART doses over time. Nevertheless, median time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure was almost identical, 38 and 36 months, respectively. At univariate analysis, both 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly higher (83% vs. 71% [p = 0.001] and 94% vs. 88% [p = 0.005], respectively) in the HD group. Multivariate analysis confirmed EART dose >or=70 Gy to be independently related to both bRFS (hazard ratio 2.5, p = 0.04) and DFS (hazard ratio 3.6, p = 0.004). Similar results were obtained after the exclusion of patients receiving any androgen deprivation. After grouping the hormone-naïve patients by postoperative PSA level the statistically significant impact of high-dose EART on both 5-year bRFS and DFS was maintained only for those with undetectable values, possibly owing to micrometastatic disease outside the irradiated area in case of detectable postoperative PSA values. CONCLUSION This series provides strong support for the use of EART doses >or=70 Gy after radical retropubic prostatectomy in hrCaP patients with undetectable postoperative PSA levels.

LETHAL PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS SIGNIFICANTLY CORRELATE WITH INDIVIDUALLY ASSESSED MEAN LUNG DOSE IN PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES TREATED WITH TOTAL BODY IRRADIATION

PURPOSE To assess the impact of lung dose on lethal pulmonary complications (LPCs) in a single-center group of patients with hematologic malignancies treated with total body irradiation (TBI) in the conditioning regimen for bone marrow transplantation (BMT). METHODS The mean lung dose of 101 TBI-conditioned patients was assessed by a thorough (1 SD around 2%) in vivo transit dosimetry technique. Fractionated TBI (10 Gy, 3.33 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction/d, 0.055 Gy/min) was delivered using a lateral-opposed beam technique with shielding of the lung by the arms. The median lung dose was 9.4 Gy (1 SD 0.8 Gy, range 7.8--11.4). The LPCs included idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) and non-idiopathic IP (non-IIP). RESULTS Nine LPCs were observed. LPCs were observed in 2 (3.8%) of 52 patients in the group with a lung dose < or = 9.4 Gy and in 7 (14.3%) of 49 patients in the >9.4 Gy group. The 6-month LPC risk was 3.8% and 19.2% (p = 0.05), respectively. A multivariate analysis adjusted by the following variables: type of malignancy (acute leukemia, chronic leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma), type of BMT (allogeneic, autologous), cytomegalovirus infection, graft vs. host disease, and previously administered drugs (bleomycin, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide, nitrosoureas), revealed a significant and independent association between lung dose and LPC risk (p = 0.02; relative risk = 6.7). Of the variables analyzed, BMT type (p = 0.04; relative risk = 6.6) had a risk predictive role. CONCLUSION The mean lung dose is an independent predictor of LPC risk in patients treated with the 3 x 3.33-Gy low-dose-rate TBI technique. Allogeneic BMT is associated with a higher risk of LPCs.

Rectum contouring variability in patients treated for prostate cancer: impact on rectum dose–volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability

BACKGROUND Recent investigations showed some correlation between three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning dose-volume data (dose-volume histograms: DVH, dose statistics) and rectal toxicity for patients treated for prostate cancer. However, no data are available about the possible impact of inter-institute variability in contouring the rectum, so that the possibility of reliably using information from single-centre studies remains doubtful. PURPOSE Within a retrospective three-institutes study on correlation between dose-volume treatment planning data and rectum bleeding in patients treated for prostate cancer, an investigation about the impact of inter- and intra-observer variability in contouring the rectum was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten patients were considered for a dummy run exercise and three observers (one per Institute) contoured the rectum (including filling). An anatomically based definition of rectum extension was previously accepted by the three observers. Six of the ten patients were randomly chosen in the subgroup of patients (large spacing, LS) with a distance between computed tomography (CT) slices (outside the prostate region) equal to 10 mm; for the remaining four patients the distance between CT slices was 5 mm over the whole rectum volume (small spacing, SS). The original 3D treatment planning was recovered on the Cadplan treatment planning system for each patient and rectum dose statistics (mean, median and maximum rectum dose), volume, DVH and NTCP values were calculated for each observer. For DVH analysis, the values of V(50), V(55), V(60), V(65) and V(70) (defined as the % of rectum volume receiving at least 50, 55, 60, 65, 70 Gy) were considered. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were calculated for the original ICRU dose and for a 75.6 Gy ICRU dose (NTCP and NTCP(75.6), respectively). Intra-observer variability was investigated by asking the observers to redraw the same rectum contours 6 months later and comparing the two contouring sessions. RESULTS In general, a good agreement was found for most patients and, in particular, for all SS patients. The impact of inter-observer variability was quite significant on dose statistics and DVH in two of six LS patients. Looking at the patient population, some systematic deviations, even if quite small, were demonstrated between institute B and institute C (volume, P = 0.02) and between institute A and institute B (mean/median dose, V(50)-V(65), NTCP(75.6); P < 0.05). Four of six LS patients (0/4 in the SS group) presented a maximum difference among observers at the cranial and/or caudal limit of the rectum equal to 1 cm. For these patients, inter-observer variability was significantly higher than for the others (P < 0.03). When inter-observer variability was expressed in terms of standard deviations (SD), values around 2-3 Gy and 0.5 Gy for LS and SS patients, respectively, were found for mean/median dose; values around 3-4% and 0.5-2% for LS and SS patients, respectively, were found for V(50)-V(70). The average SD for NTCP and NTCP(75.6) were 0.4 and 0.6%, respectively (0.5 and 0.9% for LS patients; 0.2 and 0.3% for SS patients). Intra-observer variability was found to be lower than inter-observer variability even if the impact on dose statistics and DVH was visible. CONCLUSIONS Once a robust definition of rectum is assessed, inter- and intra-institute variability in contouring the rectum appear relatively modest. However, the results suggest that the number of LS patients in DVH correlation studies should be as low as possible; the low number of these patients in the multi-centric trial involving our institutions should not have significant impact on the results of the study.

THE IMPACT OF CONTOURING UNCERTAINTY ON RECTAL 3D DOSE- VOLUME DATA: RESULTS OF A DUMMY RUN IN A MULTICENTER TRIAL (AIROPROS01- 02)

PURPOSE To estimate the impact of the uncertainty in contouring the rectum on rectal dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) in a prospective (AIROPROS01-02) investigation about rectal toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS The participants in a prospective trial (18 observers) were asked to draw the external contour of the rectum of 4 sample patients (3 patients undergoing radical conformal radiotherapy, 1 patient undergoing post-prostatectomy) on CT images (0.5 cm spacing) using a 3D treatment planning system. A previously accepted definition of cranial and caudal borders of the rectum was applied. For each patient, four- and six-field 3D-conformal techniques (70-76 Gy, ICRU dose) were planned and DVH/dose statistics of the rectum were calculated. The impact of interobserver variability on rectal volume, cranial and caudal borders, mean, maximum, and median rectal dose, percentage of rectum receiving more than 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 Gy (V(40)-V(75)), and NTCP were investigated. RESULTS Concerning DVHs, 9/18 observers tended to have some systematic deviation. However, deviations from the mean values greater than 5% were found only in 1/9 because of a systematic discrepancy in the caudal limit assessment (mean deviation from the most frequently chosen slice: 8 mm). No other observers showed a mean deviation in the cranial or the caudal limit definition greater than 5.8 mm. For another observer, it was possible to clearly assess the cause of a relatively large systematic deviation for DVH parameters. In both cases, the observers were contacted to avoid these systematic deviations. When considering the remaining 16/18 observers, the average values of SD for V(40)-V(75) ranged between 1% and 4% and were found to be lower (<3%) for the 3 nonoperated patients. The average values of the SD were around 1.5-2 Gy and less than 1.5% for mean/median dose and NTCPs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Concerning the uncertainty in rectum definition, the collection of rectal dose-volume data in multicenter investigations seems to be feasible after a clear and previously accepted definition of rectum is assessed. However, even with a general agreement on rectum definition, contouring appears to be a quite significant source of uncertainty. A dummy run procedure is useful in identifying possible discrepancies among single observers and in assessing reliable confidence levels on dose-volume constraints because of contouring uncertainty, making the dummy run mandatory in multicenter trials evaluating 3D dose-volume data.