C.G. Lee
Yonsei University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by C.G. Lee.
Radiation oncology journal | 2015
Soo Yoon Sung; Min Kyu Kang; Chul Seung Kay; Ki Chang Keum; Sung Hwan Kim; Yeon-Sil Kim; Won Taek Kim; Ji-Yoon Kim; Jin-Hee Kim; Sung Ho Moon; Yong Chan Ahn; Young Taek Oh; Hong-Gyun Wu; C.G. Lee; Woong-Ki Chung; Kwan Ho Cho; Moon-June Cho; Jin Hwa Choi
Purpose To investigate the patterns of care for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in South Korea. Materials and Methods A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed (Korean Radiation Oncology Group [KROG] 11-06) on a total of 1,445 patients from 15 institutions. Results Of the 1,445 patients, more than half were stages III (39.9%) and IV (35.8%). In addition to patterns of care, we also investigated trends over time with the periods 1988-1993, 1994-2002, and 2003-2011. The frequencies of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography were markedly increased in the third period compared to previous 2 periods. Concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) was performed on 894 patients (61.9%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy on 468 patients (32.4%), and adjuvant chemotherapy on 366 patients (25.3%). Of stage II-IV patients, CCRT performed on 78.8% in 2003-2011 compared to 15.0% in 1988-1993. For patients treated with CCRT, cisplatin was the most commonly used agent in 81.3% of patients. Over the periods of time, commonly used radiotherapy (RT) techniques were changed from 2-dimensional RT (1988-1993, 92.5%) to 3-dimensional RT (2003-2011, 35.5%) or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT; 2003-2011, 56.5%). Median RT doses given to primary tumors, high-risk lymphatics, and low-risk lymphatics were 70.0 Gy, 58.1 Gy, and 48.0 Gy, respectively. Adoption of IMRT increased the dose per fraction and escalated total radiation dose. Conclusion Assessment of the patterns of care for NPC patients in South Korea demonstrated that management for NPC including diagnostic imaging, treatment regimen, RT techniques and dose schedule, advanced in accordance with the international guidelines.
Cancer Research and Treatment | 2018
Boram Ha; Kwan Ho Cho; Sung Ho Moon; C.G. Lee; Ki Chang Keum; Yeon-Sil Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jin-Ho Kim; Yong Chan Ahn; Dongryul Oh; Jae Myoung Noh; Jong Hoon Lee; Sung Hwan Kim; Won Taek Kim; Young-Taek Oh; Min Kyu Kang; Jin Hee Kim; Jiyoon Kim; Moon-June Cho; Chul Seoung Kay; Jin Hwa Choi
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and Methods Data on 1,073 patients with cT1-4N0-3M0 NPC were collected from a multi-institutional retrospective database (KROG 11-06). All patients received definitive radiotherapy (RT) either with three-dimensional-conformal RT (3D-CRT) (n=576) or intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) (n=497). The patients were divided into two groups treated at high volume institution (HVI) (n=750) and low volume institution (LVI) (n=323), defined as patient volume ≥ 10 (median, 13; range, 10 to 18) and < 10 patients per year (median, 3; range, 2 to 6), respectively. Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS). Results At a median follow-up of 56.7 months, the outcomes were significantly better in those treated at HVI than at LVI. For the 614 patients of propensity score-matched cohort, 5-year OS and LRPFS were consistently higher in the HVI group than in the LVI group (OS: 78.4% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001; LRPFS: 86.2% vs. 65.8%, p < 0.001, respectively). According to RT modality, significant difference in 5-year OS was observed in patients receiving 3D-CRT (78.7% for HVI vs. 58.9% for LVI, p < 0.001) and not in those receiving IMRT (77.3% for HVI vs. 75.5% for LVI, p=0.170). Conclusion A significant relationship was observed between HVI and LVI for the clinical outcomes of patients with NPC. However, the difference in outcome becomes insignificant in the IMRT era, probably due to the standardization of practice by education.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2008
Sung-Koo Lee; Hong-Gyun Wu; Si Yeol Song; Young-Kyoon Kim; Young-Taek Oh; C.G. Lee; Ki Chang Keum; Y. Ahn
Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie | 2016
Sung Ho Moon; Kwan Ho Cho; C.G. Lee; Ki Chang Keum; Yeon-Sil Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jin-Ho Kim; Yong Chan Ahn; Dongryul Oh; Jong Hoon Lee
Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie | 2016
Sung Ho Moon; Kwan Ho Cho; C.G. Lee; Ki Chang Keum; Young Suk Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jin Hee Kim; Yong Chan Ahn; Do-Youn Oh; Jong Hoon Lee
Iranian Journal of Radiation Research | 2018
C.G. Lee; J. Lee; S. Kim; Sung (Joshua) Hyun You
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2018
Y. Kim; Y. Ahn; C.G. Lee; Kwan Ho Cho; Sung Ho Moon; Hong-Gyun Wu; Young Taek Oh; Woong-Ki Chung
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2017
Yeona Cho; H. Yoon; C.G. Lee; K.C. Keum
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2017
Sung-Ji Park; Yu Ji Cho; J. Lee; K.C. Keum; C.G. Lee
Strahlentherapie Und Onkologie | 2016
Sung Ho Moon; Kwan Ho Cho; C.G. Lee; Ki Chang Keum; Yeon-Sil Kim; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jin-Ho Kim; Yong Chan Ahn; Dongryul Oh; Jong Hoon Lee