C. Kees Mahutte
University of California, Irvine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by C. Kees Mahutte.
Clinical Biochemistry | 1998
C. Kees Mahutte
OBJECTIVESnTo summarize the rationale for and the principles of blood gas and pH measurement with photochemical sensors (optodes) placed in the arterial line--either intravascularly (in vivo) or extravascularly (ex vivo). To review the specific problems that occur with in vivo measurement; the clinical data that have been obtained with continuous intravascular and on-demand extravascular systems; and, the role of this technology in the intensive care unit.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnThe principles of absorbance and fluorescent optical sensors are described. The accuracy of intravascular PO2 optodes can be affected by thrombosis, the wall effect (if the sensor touches the arterial wall it may read tissue values) and reduced blood flow past the sensor. Current optical pH, PCO2 and PO2 probe/cannula designs, including hybrid probes with electrochemical PO2 sensors, have not yet fully overcome these problems of the intravascular milieu. On-demand blood gas monitors that locate the optodes extravascularly, within the radial artery line, avoid these intravascular measurement problems. On-demand systems can have accuracy comparable to conventional laboratory blood gas analyzers. With either intravascular or extravascular measurement large patient studies are lacking and the relevant cost benefit ratios are not known.nnnCONCLUSIONnBefore intravascular monitors can be used routinely for clinical care, reliability, consistency and accuracy will have to be demonstrated in large and widely divergent patient groups. Extravascular on-demand blood gas analysis is accurate, allows trend monitoring of blood gases and decreases the risk of infection, the therapeutic decision time and patient blood loss. As large patient studies are lacking the clinical role of on-line blood gas analysis cannot be clearly delineated.
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 1993
David H. Wong; Paul Weir; C. Kees Mahutte; Robin Onishi; Suanne Daves; Wayne Foran; Lucia M. Ferraro; Steven J. Barker
AbstractObjective. We wished to determine whether the individual bias (mean difference) and precision (standard deviation of the difference) values of 2 variables, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and mixed venous oxygen saturation (S⊻O2), could be used to predict the bias and precision values of the combined dual oximetry variable (SaO2- S⊻O2).Methods. We simultaneously measured SaO2 by pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas co-oximetry and S⊻O2 by fiberoptic reflectance oximetry pulmonary artery catheter and venous blood gas co-oximetry in 238 data sets from 55 patients. Three different methods were used to predict the standard deviation of the difference ofn
Chest | 1989
Richard W. Light; C. Kees Mahutte; David W. Stansbury; Claudia E. Fischer; Stephen E. Brown
Chest | 1993
C. Kees Mahutte; Michael B. Jaffe; Scott A. Sasse; Priscilla A. Chen; Richard B. Berry; Catherine S.H. Sassoon
(SaO_2 - Sbar vO_2 )[s_{Delta (SaO_2 - Sbar vO_2 )} ]
Chest | 1994
Kota G. Chetty; Fady Kadifa; Richard B. Berry; C. Kees Mahutte
Chest | 1988
Richard W. Light; C. Kees Mahutte; Stephen E. Brown
n: simple sum, root mean square (RMS) error, and RMS error with correction term. We derived the equation for the RMS error with correction term because initial results showed that the simple sum and RMS error methods did not predictn
Chest | 1997
Kota G. Chetty; Cameron Dick; Jeffery McGovern; Robert M. Conroy; C. Kees Mahutte
Critical Care Clinics | 1990
Catherine S.H. Sassoon; C. Kees Mahutte; Richard W. Light
s_{Delta (SaO_2 - Sbar vO_2 )}
Chest | 1993
Richard B. Berry; C. Kees Mahutte; James L. Kirsch; David W. Stansbury; Richard W. Light
Chest | 1993
Kota G. Chetty; Maria M. Ramirez; C. Kees Mahutte
n well. The correction term accounts for the non-independence of simultaneous SaO2 and S⊻O2 measurements.Results. The observed overall bias of the SaO2, SvO2, and (SaO2 - S⊻O2) measurement methods were 0.17, –1.76, and 1.94, respectively. The observed overalln