Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where C. Keith Conners is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by C. Keith Conners.


Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology | 1978

Normative data on revised Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales.

Charles H. Goyette; C. Keith Conners; Richard F. Ulrich

Normative data are presented for 570 children on newly revised versions of the Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales. Symptom ratings were factor analyzed and structures compared favorably with those obtained using earlier versions of the questionnaires. Interrater correlations (mother-father, parent-teacher) were also reported. Age and sex effects were found to be significant determinants of children s scores, while social class effects were nonsignificant.


Biological Psychiatry | 2005

Patterns and predictors of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder persistence into adulthood : Results from the national comorbidity survey replication

Ronald C. Kessler; Lenard A. Adler; Russell A. Barkley; Joseph Biederman; C. Keith Conners; Stephen V. Faraone; Laurence L. Greenhill; Savina A. Jaeger; Kristina Secnik; Thomas J. Spencer; T. Bedirhan Üstün; Alan M. Zaslavsky

BACKGROUND Despite growing interest in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), little is known about predictors of persistence of childhood cases into adulthood. METHODS A retrospective assessment of childhood ADHD, childhood risk factors, and a screen for adult ADHD were included in a sample of 3197 18-44 year old respondents in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Blinded adult ADHD clinical reappraisal interviews were administered to a sub-sample of respondents. Multiple imputation (MI) was used to estimate adult persistence of childhood ADHD. Logistic regression was used to study retrospectively reported childhood predictors of persistence. Potential predictors included socio-demographics, childhood ADHD severity, childhood adversity, traumatic life experiences, and comorbid DSM-IV child-adolescent disorders (anxiety, mood, impulse-control, and substance disorders). RESULTS Blinded clinical interviews classified 36.3% of respondents with retrospectively assessed childhood ADHD as meeting DSM-IV criteria for current ADHD. Childhood ADHD severity and childhood treatment significantly predicted persistence. Controlling for severity and excluding treatment, none of the other variables significantly predicted persistence even though they were significantly associated with childhood ADHD. CONCLUSIONS No modifiable risk factors were found for adult persistence of ADHD. Further research, ideally based on prospective general population samples, is needed to search for modifiable determinants of adult persistence of ADHD.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1993

The diagnostic interview schedule for children-revised version (DISC-R). I: Preparation, field testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability

David Shaffer; Mary Schwab-Stone; Prudence Fisher; Patricia Cohen; John Placentini; Mark Davies; C. Keith Conners; Darrel A. Regier

OBJECTIVE To describe the history and assessment strategies used to investigate and revise the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), a highly structured interview form used by lay interviewers to elicit diagnostic criteria for the common psychiatric disorders of childhood and adolescence. METHOD Revision was based on clinical and community data that identified unreliable and undiscriminating items in an earlier version of the instrument (DISC-1). A field study was carried out with 74 parent-child pairs. Interrater reliability and acceptability to patients was high. Accompanying papers describe the test-retest and construct validity of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, the findings suggest that the DISC is an acceptable, brief, inexpensive, and convenient instrument for ascertaining a comprehensive range of child and adolescent diagnoses whose methodological properties are comparable with other child diagnostic instruments.


Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics | 2001

Findings from the NIMH Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD (MTA): implications and applications for primary care providers

Peter S. Jensen; Stephen P. Hinshaw; James M. Swanson; Laurence L. Greenhill; C. Keith Conners; L. Eugene Arnold; Howard B. Abikoff; Glen R. Elliott; Lily Hechtman; Betsy Hoza; John S. March; Jeffrey H. Newcorn; Joanne B. Severe; Benedetto Vitiello; Karen C. Wells; Timothy Wigal

In 1992, the National Institute of Mental Health and 6 teams of investigators began a multisite clinical trial, the Multimodal Treatment of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA) study. Five hundred seventy-nine children were randomly assigned to either routine community care (CC) or one of three study-delivered treatments, all lasting 14 months. The three MTA treatments-monthly medication management (usually methylphenidate) following weekly titration (MedMgt), intensive behavioral treatment (Beh), and the combination (Comb)-were designed to reflect known best practices within each treatment approach. Children were assessed at four time points in multiple outcome. Results indicated that Comb and MedMgt interventions were substantially superior to Beh and CC interventions for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. For other functioning domains (social skills, academics, parent-child relations, oppositional behavior, anxiety/depression), results suggested slight advantages of Comb over single treatments (MedMgt, Beh) and community care. High quality medication treatment characterized by careful yet adequate dosing, three times daily methylphenidate administration, monthly follow-up visits, and communication with schools conveyed substantial benefits to those children that received it. In contrast to the overall study findings that showed the largest benefits for high quality medication management (regardless of whether given in the MedMgt or Comb group), secondary analyses revealed that Comb had a significant incremental effect over MedMgt (with a small effect size for this comparison) when categorical indicators of excellent response and when composite outcome measures were used. In addition, children with parent-defined comorbid anxiety disorders, particularly those with overlapping disruptive disorder comorbidities, showed preferential benefits to the Beh and Comb interventions. Parental attitudes and disciplinary practices appeared to mediate improved response to the Beh and Comb interventions.


Psychopharmacology | 1998

Transdermal nicotine effects on attention

Edward D. Levin; C. Keith Conners; Donna Silva; Sean C. Hinton; Warren H. Meck; John S. March; Jed E. Rose

Abstract Nicotine has been shown to improve attentiveness in smokers and attenuate attentional deficits in Alzheimer’s disease patients, schizophrenics and adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The current study was conducted to determine whether nicotine administered via transdermal patches would improve attentiveness in non-smoking adults without attentional deficits. The subjects underwent the nicotine and placebo exposure in a counterbalanced double-blind manner. Measures of treatment effect included the Profile of Mood States (POMS), Conners’ computerized Continuous Performance Test (CPT) of attentiveness and a computerized interval-timing task. The subjects were administered a 7 mg/day nicotine transdermal patch for 4.5 h during a morning session. Nicotine significantly increased self-perceived vigor as measured by the POMS test. On the CPT, nicotine significantly decreased the number of errors of omission without causing increases in either errors of commission or correct hit reaction time. Nicotine also significantly decreased the variance of hit reaction time and the composite measure of attentiveness. This study shows that, in addition to reducing attentional impairment, nicotine administered via transdermal patches can improve attentiveness in normal adult nonsmokers.


Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology | 2002

Observed Classroom Behavior of Children with ADHD: Relationship to Gender and Comorbidity

Howard Abikoff; Peter S. Jensen; L. Eugene Arnold; Betsy Hoza; Lily Hechtman; Simcha Pollack; Diane Martin; Jose Alvir; John S. March; Stephen P. Hinshaw; Benedetto Vitiello; Jeffrey H. Newcorn; Andrew R. Greiner; Dennis P. Cantwell; C. Keith Conners; Glen R. Elliott; Laurence L. Greenhill; Helena C. Kraemer; William E. Pelham; Joanne B. Severe; James M. Swanson; Karen C. Wells; Tim Wigal

Examined hypothesized gender and comorbidity differences in the observed classroom behavior of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The behavior of 403 boys and 99 girls with ADHD, ages 7–10, was compared (a) to observed, sex-specific classroom behavior norms, (b) by sex, and (c) by comorbid subgroups. Boys and girls with ADHD deviated significantly from classroom norms on 15/16 and 13/16 categories, respectively. Compared to comparison girls, girls with ADHD had relatively high rates of verbal aggression to children. Boys with ADHD engaged in more rule-breaking and externalizing behaviors than did girls with ADHD, but the sexes did not differ on more “neutral,” unobtrusive behaviors. The sex differences are consistent with notions of why girls with ADHD are identified and referred later than boys. Contrary to hypothesis, the presence of comorbid anxiety disorder (ANX) was not associated with behavioral suppression; yet, as hypothesized, children with a comorbid disruptive behavior disorder (DBD) had higher rates of rule-breaking, and impulsive and aggressive behavior, than did children with ADHD alone and those with ADHD+ANX. Elevated rates of ADHD behaviors were also observed in children with comorbid DBD, indicating that these behaviors are truly present and suggesting that reports of higher ADHD ratings in this subgroup are not simply a consequence of negative halo effects and rater biases.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 1996

Bupropion Hydrochloride in Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity

C. Keith Conners; Charles D. Casat; C. Thomas Gualtieri; Elizabeth B. Weller; Mark J. Reader; Allan L. Reiss; Ronald A. Weller; Moise Khayrallah; John Ascher

OBJECTIVE This is a multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of bupropion in the treatment of children with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADDH). METHOD In a four-center, double-blind comparison of bupropion (n = 72) and placebo (n = 37), children aged 6 to 12 years meeting DSM-III criteria for ADDH were randomized to receive bupropion 3 to 6 mg/kg per day or placebo, administered twice daily, at 7 A.M. and 7 P.M. Measures of efficacy included the Conners Parent and Teacher Questionnaires (93-item, 39-item, and 10 item), Clinical Global Impressions Scales of Severity and Improvement, the Sternberg Short-Term Memory Task, and the Continuous Performance Test. Screen and posttreatment physical examinations, electrocardiograms, electroencephalograms, and clinical laboratory evaluations were performed. Height, weight, and vital signs were measured and adverse experiences were assessed weekly. RESULTS A significant treatment effect, apparent as early as day 3, was present for both conduct problems and hyperactivity on the Conners 10-item and 39-item teachers checklist, and at day 28 for conduct problems and restless-impulsive behavior on the 93-item parent questionnaire. Findings were of smaller magnitude for parent ratings than teacher ratings. Significant treatment effects were present on both the Continuous Performance Test and memory retrieval test. Effect sizes of bupropion/placebo differences for teacher and parent ratings in this study were somewhat smaller than for standard stimulant drugs used to treat ADDH. Bupropion appeared to be well tolerated in most children. Dermatological reactions were twice as frequent in the drug group as the placebo group, with four reactions involving rash and urticaria that were serious enough to require discontinuation of medication. CONCLUSIONS Bupropion may be a useful addition to available treatments for ADDH. Comparative trials with such standard drugs as methylphenidate are warranted to determine the relative clinical merits of bupropion.


Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 2001

Impairment and Deportment Responses to Different Methylphenidate Doses in Children With ADHD: The MTA Titration Trial

Laurence L. Greenhill; James M. Swanson; Benedetto Vitiello; Mark Davies; Walter Clevenger; Min Wu; L. Eugene Arnold; Howard B. Abikoff; Oscar G. Bukstein; C. Keith Conners; Glen R. Elliott; Lily Hechtman; Stephen P. Hinshaw; Betsy Hoza; Peter S. Jensen; Helena C. Kraemer; John S. March; Jeffrey H. Newcorn; Joanne B. Severe; Karen C. Wells; Timothy Wigal

OBJECTIVE Results of the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA) were analyzed to determine whether a double-blind, placebo-controlled methylphenidate (MPH) titration trial identified the best MPH dose for each child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD Children with ADHD assigned to MTA medication treatment groups (n = 289) underwent a controlled 28-day titration protocol that administered different MPH doses (placebo, low, middle, and high) on successive days. RESULTS A repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed main effects for MPH dose with greater effects on teacher ratings of impairment and deportment (F3 = 100.6, n = 223, p = .0001; effect sizes 0.8-1.3) than on parent ratings of similar endpoints (F3 = 55.61, n = 253, p = .00001; effect sizes 0.4-0.6). Dose did not interact with period, dose order, comorbid diagnosis, site, or treatment group. CONCLUSIONS The MTA titration protocol validated the efficacy of weekend MPH dosing and established a total daily dose limit of 35 mg of MPH for children weighing less than 25 kg. It replicated previously reported MPH response rates (77%), distribution of best doses (10-50 mg/day) across subjects, effect sizes on impairment and deportment, as well as dose-related adverse events.


Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology | 2000

Family Processes and Treatment Outcome in the MTA: Negative/Ineffective Parenting Practices in Relation to Multimodal Treatment

Stephen P. Hinshaw; Elizabeth B. Owens; Karen C. Wells; Helena C. Kraemer; Howard Abikoff; L. Eugene Arnold; C. Keith Conners; Glen R. Elliott; Laurence L. Greenhill; Lily Hechtman; Betsy Hoza; Peter S. Jensen; John S. March; Jeffrey H. Newcorn; William E. Pelham; James M. Swanson; Benedetto Vitiello; Timothy Wigal

To elucidate processes underlying therapeutic change in a large-scale randomized clinical trial, we examined whether alterations in self-reported parenting practices were associated with the effects of behavioral, medication, or combination treatments on teacher-reported outcomes (disruptive behavior, social skills, internalizing symptoms) in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Participants were 579 children with Combined-type ADHD, aged 7–9.9 years, in the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (MTA). We uncovered 2 second-order factors of parenting practices, entitled Positive Involvement and Negative/Ineffective Discipline. Although Positive Involvement was not associated with amelioration of the school-based outcome measures, reductions in Negative/Ineffective Discipline mediated improvement in childrens social skills at school. For families showing the greatest reductions in Negative/Ineffective Discipline, effects of combined medication plus behavioral treatment were pronounced in relation to regular community care. Furthermore, only in combination treatment (and not in behavioral treatment alone) was decreased Negative/Ineffective Discipline associated with reduction in childrens disruptive behavior at school. Here, children in families receiving combination treatment who showed the greatest reductions in Negative/Ineffective Discipline had teacher-reported disruptive behavior that was essentially normalized. Overall, the success of combination treatment for important school-related outcomes appears related to reductions in negative and ineffective parenting practices at home; we discuss problems in interpreting the temporal sequencing of such process-outcome linkages and the means by which multimodal treatment may be mediated by psychosocial processes related to parenting.


Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology | 2003

Which Treatment for Whom for ADHD? Moderators of Treatment Response in the MTA

Elizabeth B. Owens; Stephen P. Hinshaw; Helen C. Kraemer; L. Eugene Arnold; Howard B. Abikoff; Dennis P. Cantwell; C. Keith Conners; Glen R. Elliott; Laurence L. Greenhill; Lily Hechtman; Betsy Hoza; Peter S. Jensen; John S. March; Jeffrey H. Newcorn; William E. Pelham; Joanne B. Severe; James M. Swanson; Benedetto Vitiello; Karen C. Wells; Timothy Wigal

Using receiver operating characteristics, the authors examined outcome predictors (variables associated with outcome regardless of treatment) and moderators (variables identifying subgroups with differential treatment effectiveness) in the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD; MTA). Treatment response was determined using parent- and teacher-reported ADHD and oppositional defiant symptoms, with levels near or within the normal range indicating excellent response. Among 9 baseline child and family characteristics, none predicted but 3 moderated treatment response. In medication management and combined treatments, parental depressive symptoms and severity of child ADHD were associated with decreased rates of excellent response; when these 2 characteristics were present, below-average child IQ was an additional moderator. No predictors or moderators emerged for behavioral and community comparison treatments. The authors discuss conceptual and clinical implications of research on treatment moderators.

Collaboration


Dive into the C. Keith Conners's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James M. Swanson

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John S. March

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Betsy Hoza

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey H. Newcorn

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge