C. Klöpping

Exercise Performance in Patients With End-Stage Heart Failure After Implantation of a Left Ventricular Assist Device and After Heart Transplantation An Outlook for Permanent Assisting?

OBJECTIVES We sought to study exercise capacity at different points in time after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and subsequent heart transplantation (HTx). BACKGROUND The lack of donor organs warrants alternatives for transplantation. METHODS Repeat treadmill testing with respiratory gas analysis was performed in 15 men with a LVAD. Four groups of data are presented. In group A (n = 10), the exercise capacities at 8 weeks and 12 weeks after LVAD implantation were compared. In group B (n = 15), the data at 12 weeks are presented in more detail. In group C (n = 9), sequential analysis of exercise capacity was performed at 12 weeks after LVAD implantation and at 12 weeks and one year after HTx. In group D, exercise performance one year after HTx in patients with (n = 10) and without (n = 20) a previous assist device was compared. RESULTS In group A, peak oxygen consumption (Vo2) increased from 21.3+/-3.8 to 24.2+/-4.8 ml/kg body weight per min (p < 0.003), accompanied by a decrease in peak minute ventilation/ carbon dioxide production (VE/Vco2) (39.4+/-10.1 to 36.3+/-8.2; p < 0.03). In group B, peak Vo2 12 weeks after LVAD implantation was 23.0+/-4.4 ml/kg per min. In group C, levels of peak Vo2 12 weeks after LVAD implantation and 12 weeks and one year after HTx were comparable (22.8+/-5.3, 24.6+/-3.3 and 26.2+/-3.8 ml/kg per min, respectively; p = NS). In group D, there appeared to be no difference in percent predicted peak Vo2 in patients with or without a previous LVAD (68+/-13% vs. 74+/-15%; p < 0.37), although, because of the small numbers, the power of this comparison is limited (0.45 to detect a difference of 10%). CONCLUSIONS Exercise capacity in patients with a LVAD increases over time; 12 weeks after LVAD implantation, Vo2 is comparable to that at 12 weeks and one year after HTx. Previous LVAD implantation does not seem to adversely affect exercise capacity after HTx.

Circulating growth differentiation factor‐15 correlates with myocardial fibrosis in patients with non‐ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and decreases rapidly after left ventricular assist device support

Growth differentiation factor‐15 (GDF‐15) is a stress‐responsive cytokine and is emerging as a biomarker of cardiac remodelling. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide unloading of the left ventricle, resulting in partial reverse remodelling. Our aim was to study GDF‐15 in patients with a non‐ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) during LVAD support.

Left ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery in a young woman admitted with peripartum cardiomyopathy

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are an effective therapeutic option for end-stage heart failure patients as a bridge to cardiac transplantation in those who deteriorate despite maximal therapy and when a donor heart is not ready available. In some patients, cardiac recovery has been reported while supported by an LVAD. In this case report, we describe a 29-year-old female who was admitted to our centre because of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). Despite intensive treatment with intravenous inotropes and intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation she had a persisting low cardiac index and an LVAD was implanted. In the months following implantation the left ventricular systolic function improved and the left ventricular dimensions normalised. Eventually the LVAD could be ex-planted nine months after implantation. At this moment, three years after explantation, echo-cardiography shows a normal-sized left ventricle and almost completely recovered systolic function. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:426-8).

Guidelines for heart transplantation

Based on the changes in the field of heart transplantation and the treatment and prognosis of patients with heart failure, these updated guidelines were composed by a committee under the supervision of both the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Association for Cardiothoracic surgery (NVVC and NVT).The indication for heart transplantation is defined as: ‘End-stage heart disease not remediable by more conservative measures’.Contraindications are: irreversible pulmonary hypertension/elevated pulmonary vascular resistance; active systemic infection; active malignancy or history of malignancy with probability of recurrence; inability to comply with complex medical regimen; severe peripheral or cerebrovascular disease and irreversible dysfunction of another organ, including diseases that may limit prognosis after heart transplantation.Considering the difficulties in defining end-stage heart failure, estimating prognosis in the individual patient and the continuing evolution of available therapies, the present criteria are broadly defined. The final acceptance is done by the transplant team which has extensive knowledge of the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure on the one hand and thorough experience with heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support on the other hand. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:79-87.)

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support in patients with advanced heart failure: points of interest for the daily management

Today, continuous‐flow left ventricular assist devices (cf‐LVADs) are implanted more often in patients with end‐stage heart failure. Because of greater durability they can be implanted for an extended period of time. As a result of increased numbers of patients on cf‐LVAD support, healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential complications inherent to this therapy. Both bleeding and thrombosis may occur, and also complications related either to the device itself or to the ensuing altered haemodynamics, valvular pathology, and rhythm disturbances such as ventricular tachycardias and fibrillation. Accurate clinical evaluation, together with an electrocardiogram and, if necessary, combined with an echocardiogram, is obligatory in these situations. This review summarizes common complications complemented by a few clinical cases.

Left ventricular assist device: a functional comparison with heart transplantation.

AbstractBackground A growing number of patients with end-stage heart failure undergo implantation of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation.Objectives In this study we investigated whether functional and haemodynamic recovery after implantation is sufficient to warrant the use of them as long-term alternative to heart transplantation.Methods We compared peak VO2 of a group of patients three months after implantation of a ventricular assist device and three months after heart transplantation. Furthermore, we analysed the degree of haemodynamic recovery, by comparing plasma levels of BNP and creatinine before and after implantation of the device.Results After implantation of a ventricular assist device, exercise capacity improved considerably; three months after implantation peak VO2 was 20.0±4.9 ml/kg/min (52% of predicted for age and gender). After heart transplantation exercise capacity improved even further; 24.0±3.9 ml/ kg/min (62% of predicted for age and gender) (p<0.001). In the three months after implantation, BNP plasma levels decreased from 570±307 pmol/l to 31±25 pmol/l and creatinine levels decreased from 191±82 μmol/l to 82±25 μmol/l, indicating significant unloading of the ventricles and haemodynamic recovery.Conclusion With regard to functional and haemodynamic recovery, the effect of implantation of a ventricular assist device is sufficient to justify its use as an alternative to heart transplantation. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:41-6.)

Exercise hemodynamics during extended continuous flow left ventricular assist device support : the response of systemic cardiovascular parameters and pump performance

Patients on continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (cf-LVADs) are able to return to an active lifestyle and perform all sorts of physical activities. This study aims to evaluate exercise hemodynamics in patients with a HeartMate II cf-LVAD (HM II). Thirty (30) patients underwent a bicycle exercise test. Along with exercise capacity, systemic cardiovascular responses and pump performance were evaluated at 6 and 12 months after HM II implantation. From rest to maximum exercise, heart rate increased from 87 ± 14 to 140 ± 32 beats/minute (bpm) (P<0.01), while systolic arterial blood pressure increased from 93 ± 12 to 116 ± 21 mm Hg (P<0.01). Total cardiac output (TCO) increased from 4.1 ± 1.1 to 8.5 ± 2.8 L/min (P<0.01) while pump flow increased less, from 5.1 ± 0.7 to 6.4 ± 0.6 L/min (P<0.01). Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) decreased from 1776 ± 750 to 1013 ± 83 dynes.s/cm(5) (P<0.001) and showed the strongest correlation with TCO (r= -0.72; P<0.01). Exercise capacity was affected by older age, while blood pressure increased significantly in men compared with women. Exercise capacity remained consistent at 6 and 12 months after HM II implantation, 51% ± 13% and 52% ± 13% of predicted VO2 max for normal subjects corrected for age and gender. In conclusion, pump flow of the HM II may contribute partially to TCO during exercise, while SVR was the strongest determinant of TCO.

Single-centre experience of 85 patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: clinical practice and outcome after extended support

OBJECTIVES We evaluated our single-centre clinical experience with the HeartMate II (HM II) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) in end-stage heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS Survival rates, echocardiographic parameters, laboratory values and adverse events of 85 consecutive patients supported with a HM II were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, mean age was 45 ± 13 years, 62 (73%) were male and non-ischaemic dilatated cardiomyopathy was present in 60 (71%) patients. The median duration of mechanical support was 387 days (IQR 150-600), with a range of 1-1835 days. The 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year survival rates during HM II LVAD support were 85, 81, 76, 76 and 68%, respectively. Echocardiographic parameters demonstrated effective left ventricular unloading, while laboratory results reflected adequate organ perfusion. However, HM II support was associated with adverse events, such as infections in 42 patients (49%; 0.67 events/patient-year), cardiac arrhythmia in 44 (52%; 0.86 events/patient-year), bleeding complications in 32 (38%; 0.43 events/patient-year) and neurological dysfunction in 17 (20%; 0.19 events/patient-year). CONCLUSIONS In view of the increasing shortage of donor hearts, HM II LVAD support may be considered a life-saving treatment in end-stage HF patients, with good survival. However, it is still associated with some serious adverse events, of which neurological complications are the most critical.

Functional and haemodynamic recovery after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices in comparison with pulsatile left ventricular assist devices in patients with end-stage heart failure.

Caused by ageing of the population, better survival from ischaemic heart disease, and improved treatment of chronic heart disease, the incidence of heart failure has increased enormously. Worldwide, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly being used as a bridge or alternative to heart transplantation. In this study, we investigated whether there is difference in functional and haemodynamic recovery after implantation of pulsatile and continuous‐flow pumps.

Myocardial high‐energy phosphate metabolism in heart transplant patients is temporarily altered irrespective of rejection

A reliable, sensitive, non‐invasive alternative for transvenous endomyocardial biopsy in detecting cardiac allograft rejection is desirable for optimal management of heart transplant patients. To establish whether 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy can become a non‐invasive tool for detecting cardiac allograft rejection, the cardiac high‐energy phosphate metabolism of human heart transplants was serially examined in 13 patients by means of 31P MRS from post‐operative day 13 to day 294, and compared with histologic evaluation of endomyocardial biopsies. Biopsy scores of 2 or higher, according to the Working Formulation criteria of Billingham et al., were considered to indicate rejection. Logistic regression, which was corrected for differences between the individual patients and the time after transplantation, showed no significant correlation between the occurrence of histologically detected rejection and the PCr:ATP ratio. However, using an analysis of variance, the PCr:ATP ratios of non‐rejecting cases obtained within 50 days after transplantation (mean: 27 ± 11 days) appeared to be significantly different from those obtained after post‐operative day 50 [0.95 ± 0.17 (n = 25) vs 1.17 ± 0.17 (n = 32), mean ± SD; p < 0.01]. No significant difference was observed between the PCr:ATP ratios obtained 100 days after transplantation (mean: 162 ± 52 days) and the PCr:ATP ratios in the hearts of healthy volunteers [1.18 ± 0.18 (n = 19) and 1.23 ± 0.17 (n = 6), mean ± SD, respectively; p = 0.55]. The PCr:ATP ratio in transplanted human hearts is not a sensitive indicator for the detection of early acute human cardiac allograft rejection. This may be due to a temporarily altered high‐energy phosphate metabolism early after transplantation irrespective of rejection. Copyright