Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where C.L. Barnett is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by C.L. Barnett.


Journal of Environmental Radioactivity | 2008

Derivation of transfer parameters for use within the ERICA Tool and the default concentration ratios for terrestrial biota.

N.A. Beresford; C.L. Barnett; B.J. Howard; W.A. Scott; J.E. Brown; David Copplestone

An ability to predict radionuclide activity concentrations in biota is a requirement of any method assessing the exposure of biota to ionising radiation. Within the ERICA Tool fresh weight whole-body activity concentrations in organisms are estimated using concentration ratios (the ratio of the activity concentration in the organism to the activity concentration in an environmental media). This paper describes the methodology used to derive the default terrestrial ecosystem concentration ratio database available within the ERICA Tool and provides details of the provenance of each value for terrestrial reference organisms. As the ERICA Tool considers 13 terrestrial reference organisms and the radioisotopes of 31 elements, a total of 403 concentration ratios were required for terrestrial reference organisms. Of these, 129 could be derived from literature review. The approaches taken for selecting the remaining values are described. These included, for example, assuming values for similar reference organisms and/or biogeochemically similar elements, and various simple modelling approaches.


Journal of Environmental Radioactivity | 2013

The IAEA handbook on radionuclide transfer to wildlife

B.J. Howard; N.A. Beresford; David Copplestone; D. Telleria; G. Proehl; Ross Jeffree; T. Yankovich; J.E. Brown; Kathryn A. Higley; Mathew P. Johansen; H. Mulye; Hildegarde Vandenhove; S. Gashchak; Michael D. Wood; Hyoe Takata; P. Andersson; Paul Dale; J. Ryan; A. Bollhöfer; C. Doering; C.L. Barnett; C. Wells

An IAEA handbook presenting transfer parameter values for wildlife has recently been produced. Concentration ratios (CRwo-media) between the whole organism (fresh weight) and either soil (dry weight) or water were collated for a range of wildlife groups (classified taxonomically and by feeding strategy) in terrestrial, freshwater, marine and brackish generic ecosystems. The data have been compiled in an on line database, which will continue to be updated in the future providing the basis for subsequent revision of the Wildlife TRS values. An overview of the compilation and analysis, and discussion of the extent and limitations of the data is presented. Example comparisons of the CRwo-media values are given for polonium across all wildlife groups and ecosystems and for molluscs for all radionuclides. The CRwo-media values have also been compared with those currently used in the ERICA Tool which represented the most complete published database for wildlife transfer values prior to this work. The use of CRwo-media values is a pragmatic approach to predicting radionuclide activity concentrations in wildlife and is similar to that used for screening assessments for the human food chain. The CRwo-media values are most suitable for a screening application where there are several conservative assumptions built into the models which will, to varying extents, compensate for the variable data quality and quantity, and associated uncertainty.


Radiation and Environmental Biophysics | 2008

Inter-comparison of models to estimate radionuclide activity concentrations in non-human biota

N.A. Beresford; C.L. Barnett; J.E. Brown; J.-J. Cheng; David Copplestone; V. Filistovic; A. Hosseini; B.J. Howard; Steve R Jones; S. Kamboj; A. Kryshev; T. Nedveckaite; G. Olyslaegers; R. Saxén; Tatiana G. Sazykina; J. Vives i Batlle; S. Vives-Lynch; T. Yankovich; C. Yu

A number of models have recently been, or are currently being, developed to enable the assessment of radiation doses from ionising radiation to non-human species. A key component of these models is the ability to predict whole-organism activity concentrations in a wide range of wildlife. In this paper, we compare the whole-organism activity concentrations predicted by eight models participating within the IAEA Environmental Modelling for Radiation Safety programme for a range of radionuclides to terrestrial and freshwater organisms. In many instances, there was considerable variation, ranging over orders of magnitude, between the predictions of the different models. Reasons for this variability (including methodology, data source and data availability) are identified and discussed. The active participation of groups responsible for the development of key models within this exercise is a useful step forward in providing the transparency in methodology and data provenance required for models which are either currently being used for regulatory purposes or which may be used in the future. The work reported in this paper, and supported by other findings, demonstrates that the largest contribution to variability between model predictions is the parameterisation of their transfer components. There is a clear need to focus efforts and provide authoritative compilations of those data which are available.


Journal of Radiological Protection | 2004

Estimating radionuclide transfer to wild species—data requirements and availability for terrestrial ecosystems

N.A. Beresford; Martin R. Broadley; B.J. Howard; C.L. Barnett; Philip J. White

Assessment of the transfer of radionuclides to wild species is an important component in the estimation of predicted doses to biota. Reviews of available data for the many potential radionuclide-biota combinations which may be required for environmental assessments highlight many data gaps for terrestrial species. Here, we discuss different approaches which have been suggested to compensate for these data gaps. All of the reviewed approaches have merit; however, there is a requirement for transparency in methodology and data provenance which in some instances is currently missing. Furthermore, there is a need to validate the various methodologies to enable their use with confidence. The requirements of improving our ability to predict radionuclide transfer to wild species are discussed and recommendations made.


Science of The Total Environment | 1994

Novel approaches to the estimation of intake and bioavailability of radiocaesium in ruminants grazing forested areas

R.W. Mayes; N.A. Beresford; C.S. Lamb; C.L. Barnett; B.J. Howard; Bernt Jones; O. Eriksson; Knut Hove; Ø. Pedersen; B.W. Staines

It is difficult to measure transfer of radiocaesium to the tissues of forest ruminants because they can potentially ingest a wide range of plant types. Measurements on undomesticated forest ruminants incur further difficulties. Existing techniques of estimating radiocaesium intake are imprecise when applied to forest systems. New approaches to measure this parameter are discussed. Two methods of intake estimation are described and evaluated. In the first method, radiocaesium intake is estimated from the radiocaesium activity concentrations of plants, combined with estimates of dry-matter (DM) intake and plant species composition of the diet, using plant and orally-dosed hydrocarbons (n-alkanes) as markers. The second approach estimates the total radiocaesium intake of an animal from the rate of excretion of radiocaesium in the faeces and an assumed value for the apparent absorption coefficient. Estimates of radiocaesium intake, using these approaches, in lactating goats and adult sheep were used to calculate transfer coefficients for milk and muscle; these compared favourably with transfer coefficients previously obtained under controlled experimental conditions. Potential variations in bioavailability of dietary radiocaesium sources to forest ruminants have rarely been considered. Approaches that can be used to describe bioavailability, including the true absorption coefficient and in vitro extractability, are outlined.


Science of The Total Environment | 1999

Radiocaesium activity concentrations in the fruit-bodies of macrofungi in Great Britain and an assessment of dietary intake habits

C.L. Barnett; N.A. Beresford; P.L. Self; B.J. Howard; J.C. Frankland; M.J. Fulker; B.A. Dodd; J.V.R. Marriott

Radiocaesium activity concentrations in the fruit-bodies of some species of macrofungi are higher than in many other foodstuffs. The consumption of fruit-bodies contributes significantly to radiocaesium intake of humans in some countries. In the United Kingdom, the collection of wild fungi has generally been considered to be of minor importance and there are few data on consumption rates or radiocaesium activity concentrations in most edible species. Samples of commonly eaten species in Great Britain have been collected to assess radiocaesium contamination levels and geographical variation. Concurrently, surveys of consumption habits were conducted. A total of 425 samples representing 37 different species were collected. Significantly higher radiocaesium activity concentrations occurred in mycorrhizal compared to saprotrophic or parasitic species. The highest 137Cs activity concentration of 30.5 kBq kg-1 dry wt. was determined in a sample of Hydnum repandum collected in Wales. The transfer of radiocaesium from soil to fungal fruit-bodies was highly variable, ranging over three orders of magnitude within individual species. A number of approaches to quantifying radiocaesium transfer from soil to fungal fruit-bodies were used. Although these were in general agreement with previously measured values in other countries, all the approaches gave variable results. Over 200 people responded to the dietary habits questionnaire. The median intake rate was 0.75 kg year-1 (fresh wt.) and 60% of respondents consumed only one species (generally Agaricus campestris). However, intakes of up to 26 kg year-1 were recorded and a total of 82 species were consumed. The intake of 137Cs was determined by the amount of mycorrhizal fungi in the diet rather than the total intake of fungi. Assuming median recorded 137Cs activity concentrations in each fungal species, the estimated annual committed effective dose for over 95% of respondents was < 1 microSv. Hence, currently, the consumption of wild fungi in the UK would not be expected to significantly increase the dose above that attributable to the normal diet of most consumers. However, the results of this study demonstrate that, in the event of any future accidental release of radiocaesium, the potential ingestion dose received from the consumption of wild fungi would need to be considered.


Radiation and Environmental Biophysics | 2010

Whole-body to tissue concentration ratios for use in biota dose assessments for animals

T. Yankovich; N.A. Beresford; Michael D. Wood; Tasuo Aono; P. Andersson; C.L. Barnett; Pamela Bennett; J.E. Brown; J. Fesenko; A. Hosseini; B.J. Howard; Mathew P. Johansen; Marcel M. Phaneuf; Keiko Tagami; Hyoe Takata; John R. Twining; Shigeo Uchida

Environmental monitoring programs often measure contaminant concentrations in animal tissues consumed by humans (e.g., muscle). By comparison, demonstration of the protection of biota from the potential effects of radionuclides involves a comparison of whole-body doses to radiological dose benchmarks. Consequently, methods for deriving whole-body concentration ratios based on tissue-specific data are required to make best use of the available information. This paper provides a series of look-up tables with whole-body:tissue-specific concentration ratios for non-human biota. Focus was placed on relatively broad animal categories (including molluscs, crustaceans, freshwater fishes, marine fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals) and commonly measured tissues (specifically, bone, muscle, liver and kidney). Depending upon organism, whole-body to tissue concentration ratios were derived for between 12 and 47 elements. The whole-body to tissue concentration ratios can be used to estimate whole-body concentrations from tissue-specific measurements. However, we recommend that any given whole-body to tissue concentration ratio should not be used if the value falls between 0.75 and 1.5. Instead, a value of one should be assumed.


Journal of Environmental Radioactivity | 2008

Background exposure rates of terrestrial wildlife in England and Wales

N.A. Beresford; C.L. Barnett; D.G. Jones; Michael D. Wood; J.D. Appleton; N. Breward; David Copplestone

It has been suggested that, when assessing radiation impacts on non-human biota, estimated dose rates due to anthropogenically released radionuclides should be put in context by comparison to dose rates from natural background radiation. In order to make these comparisons, we need data on the activity concentrations of naturally occurring radionuclides in environmental media and organisms of interest. This paper presents the results of a study to determine the exposure of terrestrial organisms in England and Wales to naturally occurring radionuclides, specifically (40)K, (238)U series and (232)Th series radionuclides. Whole-body activity concentrations for the reference animals and plants (RAPs) as proposed by the ICRP have been collated from literature review, data archives and a targeted sampling campaign. Data specifically for the proposed RAP are sparse. Soil activity concentrations have been derived from an extensive geochemical survey of the UK. Unweighted and weighted absorbed dose rates were estimated using the ERICA Tool. Mean total weighted whole-body absorbed dose rates estimated for the selected terrestrial organisms was in the range 6.9 x 10(-2) to 6.1 x 10(-1) microGy h(-1).


Biological Conservation | 2002

A comparison of the ecological quality of land between an English agri-environment scheme and the countryside as a whole

P. D. Carey; C.L. Barnett; P.D Greenslade; S. E. Hulmes; R.A Garbutt; E.A Warman; D Myhill; R. J. Scott; Simon M. Smart; S.J Manchester; J Robinson; Kevin J. Walker; D.C. Howard; L. G. Firbank

Abstract A survey of 451 Countryside Stewardship Scheme (CSS) agreements was carried out across England in 1998–1999 to characterise the ecological quality of the land. The land within the agreements was mapped using the UK Biodiversity Action Plan Broad and Priority Habitats and the vegetation of the agreements was sampled using random quadrats. By far the most widespread Broad Habitat was Improved Grassland, accounting for around 50% of all agreement land. Of this, the majority was semi-improved. Priority Habitats accounted for 15% of all agreement land (equivalent to around 18,500 ha). In addition to the 15%, there was also land within habitat mosaics containing one or more Priority Habitat. The analysis of vegetation revealed that 53% of all randomly-placed quadrats were categorised as Infertile Grassland and 24% as Fertile Grassland. Survey data were compared with results from the Countryside Survey 2000, a national assessment of vegetation undertaken in 1998. In the lowland areas of England, CSS land had a much higher proportion of grassland habitats and was much more likely to be typical of low fertility situations than the countryside as a whole. In the marginal uplands and uplands, CSS agreement land contained a greater proportion of grassland, but with a reduced proportion of important upland Broad Habitats, such as Dwarf Shrub Heath and Bog, although these do tend to be found more in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas. The differences between the CSS and the countryside as a whole clearly reflect the priorities of the CSS, especially the high proportion of grassland. The CSS has targeted Broad and Priority Habitats and in this respect has been successful.


Journal of Environmental Radioactivity | 2008

Estimating the exposure of small mammals at three sites within the Chernobyl exclusion zone - a test application of the ERICA Tool

N.A. Beresford; S. Gaschak; C.L. Barnett; B.J. Howard; I. Chizhevsky; G. Strømman; Deborah Oughton; S.M. Wright; Andrey M. Maksimenko; David Copplestone

An essential step in the development of any modelling tool is the validation of its predictions. This paper describes a study conducted within the Chernobyl exclusion zone to acquire data to conduct an independent test of the predictions of the ERICA Tool which is designed for use in assessments of radiological risk to the environment. Small mammals were repeatedly trapped at three woodland sites between early July and mid-August 2005. Thermoluminescent dosimeters mounted on collars were fitted to Apodemus flavicollis, Clethrionomys glareolus and Microtus spp. to provide measurements of external dose rate. A total of 85 TLDs were recovered. All animals from which TLDs were recovered were live-monitored to determine (90)Sr and (137)Cs whole-body activity concentrations. A limited number of animals were also analysed to determine (239,240)Pu activity concentrations. Measurements of whole-body activity concentrations and dose rates recorded by the TLDs were compared to predictions of the ERICA-Tool. The predicted (90)Sr and (137)Cs mean activity concentrations were within an order of magnitude of the observed data means. Whilst there was some variation between sites in the agreement between measurements and predictions this was consistent with what would be expected from the differences in soil types at the sites. Given the uncertainties of conducting a study such as this, the agreement observed between the TLD results and the predicted external dose rates gives confidence to the predictions of the ERICA Tool.

Collaboration


Dive into the C.L. Barnett's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B.J. Howard

Natural Environment Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.E. Brown

Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deborah Oughton

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hildegarde Vandenhove

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Real

Complutense University of Madrid

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge