C. McGrew
Stony Brook University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by C. McGrew.
Physical Review Letters | 2003
M. H. Ahn; S. Aoki; Hyoung Chan Bhang; S. Boyd; David William Casper; Jin-Oh Choi; Satoru Fukuda; Y. Fukuda; W. Gajewski; T. Hara; M. Hasegawa; T. Hasegawa; Y. Hayato; J. Hill; Atsushi Ichikawa; A. Ikeda; T. Inagaki; T. Ishida; T. Ishii; M. Ishitsuka; Y. Itow; T. Iwashita; H.I. Jang; J. S. Jang; E. J. Jeon; C. K. Jung; T. Kajita; J. Kameda; K. Kaneyuki; I. Kato
The K2K experiment observes indications of neutrino oscillation: a reduction of nu(mu) flux together with a distortion of the energy spectrum. Fifty-six beam neutrino events are observed in Super-Kamiokande (SK), 250 km from the neutrino production point, with an expectation of 80.1(+6.2)(-5.4). Twenty-nine one ring mu-like events are used to reconstruct the neutrino energy spectrum, which is better matched to the expected spectrum with neutrino oscillation than without. The probability that the observed flux at SK is explained by statistical fluctuation without neutrino oscillation is less than 1%.
arXiv: Instrumentation and Detectors | 2007
T. Abe; H. Aihara; C. Andreopoulos; A. Ankowski; A. Badertscher; G. Battistoni; A. Blondel; J. Bouchez; A. Bross; A. Bueno; L. Camilleri; A. Cazes; A. Cervera-Villanueva; G. De Lellis; F. Di; M. Ellis; A. Ereditato; C. Fukushima; E. Gschwendtner; M. Iwasaki; K. Kaneyuki; Y. Karadzhov; V. Kashikhin; Y. Kawai; M. Komatsu; E. Kozlovskaya; Y. Kudenko; A. Kusaka; H. Kyushima; A. Longhin
This report summarises the conclusions from the detector group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and Super-Beam neutrino facility. The baseline detector options for each possible neutrino beam are defined as follows: 1. A very massive (Megaton) water Cherenkov detector is the baseline option for a sub-GeV Beta Beam and Super Beam facility. 2. There are a number of possibilities for either a Beta Beam or Super Beam (SB) medium energy facility between 1-5 GeV. These include a totally active scintillating detector (TASD), a liquid argon TPC or a water Cherenkov detector. 3. A 100 kton magnetized iron neutrino detector (MIND) is the baseline to detect the wrong sign muon final states (golden channel) at a high energy (20-50 GeV) neutrino factory from muon decay. A 10 kton hybrid neutrino magnetic emulsion cloud chamber detector for wrong sign tau detection (silver channel) is a possible complement to MIND, if one needs to resolve degeneracies that appear in the δ-θ13 parameter space.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 1993
R. Becker-Szendy; R. M. Bionta; C. B. Bratton; David William Casper; R. Claus; B. G. Cortez; S. T. Dye; S. Errede; G. W. Foster; W. Gajewski; K. S. Ganezer; M. Goldhaber; P. G. Halverson; Eric Hazen; T. W. Jones; D. Kielczewska; W. R. Kropp; J. G. Learned; J. M. LoSecco; S. Matsuno; J. A. J. Matthews; G. McGrath; C. McGrew; R. S. Miller; M. S. Mudan; Hae-Sim Park; L. R. Price; F. Reines; J. Schultz; Sally Seidel
Abstract The IMB experiment, a large water Cherenkov detector which began data collection in September 1982, has undergone several upgrades to improve light collection, on-line processing power, data throughput and buffering, calibration, and operating efficiency. The current device, known as IMB-3, enjoys a factor of four light collection advantage over its precursor. Since May 1986, it has been used to search for such diverse phenomena as nucleon decay, dark matter, neutrino oscillation, and magnetic monopoles, and to study stellar collapse and cosmic rays. Due to its large size and long exposure time IMB presents unique challenges. The design and operation of the IMB-3 detector are described in detail.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2012
S. Assylbekov; G. Barr; B. E. Berger; H. G. Berns; D. Beznosko; A. Bodek; R. Bradford; N. J. Buchanan; H. S. Budd; Y. Caffari; K. Connolly; I. Danko; R. Das; S. Davis; M. Day; S. A. Dytman; M. Dziomba; R. Flight; D. A. Forbush; K. Gilje; D. Hansen; J. Hignight; J. Imber; R. A. Johnson; C. K. Jung; V. Kravtsov; P. T. Le; G. D. Lopez; C.J. Malafis; S. Manly
Abstract The pi–zero detector (POD) is one of the subdetectors that makes up the off-axis near detector for the Tokai-to-Kamioka (T2K) long baseline neutrino experiment. The primary goal for the POD is to measure the relevant cross-sections for neutrino interactions that generate π 0 s, especially the cross-section for neutral current π 0 interactions, which are one of the dominant sources of background to the ν μ → ν e appearance signal in T2K. The POD is composed of layers of plastic scintillator alternating with water bags and brass sheets or lead sheets and is one of the first detectors to use Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (MPPCs) on a large scale.
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science | 2005
Shoji Yamamoto; S. Andringa; S. Aoki; Suyong Choi; U. Dore; X. Espinal; J.J. Gómez-Cadenas; R. Gran; M. Hasegawa; Kouichi Hayashi; Y. Hayato; K. Hiraide; Atsushi Ichikawa; Masataka Iinuma; J. S. Jang; E. J. Jeon; Kk Joo; G. Jover-Manas; C. K. Jung; I. Kato; D. Kerr; J. Y. Kim; S. B. Kim; K. Kobayashi; Akitsugu Kohara; J. Kubota; Y. Kudenko; Y. Kuno; M.J. Lee; E. Lessac-Chenin
A new near detector for the K2K long baseline neutrino experiment, the SciBar, was constructed and started data taking to study neutrino interactions. In K2K, neutrino oscillation is studied by comparing the number of neutrino interactions and energy spectrum between near and far detectors. In order to study neutrino oscillations more precisely, it is necessary to improve the measurement of neutrino spectrum and interactions below 1 GeV, where the latest K2K results suggest maximum oscillation. For that purpose, SciBar is designed to be fully active with fine segmentation. We present the design and basic performance. All detector components have been working as expected. Also presented are the measurements of charged current interactions which are used in the latest K2K oscillation analysis
Journal of Instrumentation | 2009
T. Abe; H. Aihara; C Andreop oulos; A. Ankowski; A Badertscher; G. Battistoni; A. Blondel; J. Bouchez; A. Bross; A. Bueno; L. Camilleri; J. E. Campagne; A. Cazes; A. Cervera-Villanueva; G. De Lellis; F. Di Capua; M. Ellis; A. Ereditato; Luigi Salvatore Esposito; C. Fukushima; E.M. Gschwendtner; J.J. Gómez-Cadenas; M. Iwasaki; K. Kaneyuki; Y. Karadzhov; V Kashikhin; Y Kawai; M. Komatsu; E. Kozlovskaya; Y. Kudenko
This report summarises the conclusions from the detector group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and Super-Beam neutrino facility. The baseline detector options for each possible neutrino beam are defined as follows: 1. A very massive (Megaton) water Cherenkov detector is the baseline option for a sub-GeV Beta Beam and Super Beam facility. 2. There are a number of possibilities for either a Beta Beam or Super Beam (SB) medium energy facility between 1-5 GeV. These include a totally active scintillating detector (TASD), a liquid argon TPC or a water Cherenkov detector. 3. A 100 kton magnetized iron neutrino detector (MIND) is the baseline to detect the wrong sign muon final states (golden channel) at a high energy (20-50 GeV) neutrino factory from muon decay. A 10 kton hybrid neutrino magnetic emulsion cloud chamber detector for wrong sign tau detection (silver channel) is a possible complement to MIND, if one needs to resolve degeneracies that appear in the δ-θ13 parameter space.
Journal of Instrumentation | 2009
T. Abe; H. Aihara; C. Andreopoulos; A. Ankowski; A. Badertscher; G. Battistoni; A. Blondel; J. Bouchez; A. Bross; A. Bueno; L. Camilleri; J. E. Campagne; A. Cazes; A. Cervera-Villanueva; G. De Lellis; F. Di Capua; M. Ellis; A. Ereditato; L. S. Esposito; C. Fukushima; E. Gschwendtner; J.J. Gomez-Cadenas; M. Iwasaki; K. Kaneyuki; Y. Karadzhov; V. Kashikhin; Y. Kawai; M. Komatsu; E. Kozlovskaya; Y. Kudenko
This report summarises the conclusions from the detector group of the International Scoping Study of a future Neutrino Factory and Super-Beam neutrino facility. The baseline detector options for each possible neutrino beam are defined as follows: 1. A very massive (Megaton) water Cherenkov detector is the baseline option for a sub-GeV Beta Beam and Super Beam facility. 2. There are a number of possibilities for either a Beta Beam or Super Beam (SB) medium energy facility between 1-5 GeV. These include a totally active scintillating detector (TASD), a liquid argon TPC or a water Cherenkov detector. 3. A 100 kton magnetized iron neutrino detector (MIND) is the baseline to detect the wrong sign muon final states (golden channel) at a high energy (20-50 GeV) neutrino factory from muon decay. A 10 kton hybrid neutrino magnetic emulsion cloud chamber detector for wrong sign tau detection (silver channel) is a possible complement to MIND, if one needs to resolve degeneracies that appear in the δ-θ13 parameter space.
Physical Review D | 1992
R. Becker-Szendy; C. B. Bratton; David William Casper; S. T. Dye; W. Gajewski; M. Goldhaber; P. G. Halverson; D. Kielczewska; W. R. Kropp; J. G. Learned; J. M. LoSecco; S. Matsuno; G. McGrath; C. McGrew; R. S. Miller; L. R. Price; F. Reines; J. Schultz; H. W. Sobel; J. L. Stone; L. Sulak; Svoboda R
Physical Review Letters | 1991
David William Casper; R. Becker-Szendy; C. B. Bratton; Donald Robert Cady; R. Claus; S. T. Dye; W. Gajewski; M. Goldhaber; P. G. Halverson; T. W. Jones; D. Kielczewska; W. R. Kropp; J. G. Learned; J. M. LoSecco; C. McGrew; S. Matsuno; J. N. Matthews; M. S. Mudan; L. R. Price; F. Reines; J. Schultz; D. Sinclair; H. W. Sobel; J. L. Stone; L. Sulak; R. Svoboda; G. Thornton; J. C. van der Velde
Physical Review Letters | 1992
R. Becker-Szendy; C. B. Bratton; David William Casper; S. T. Dye; W. Gajewski; M. Goldhaber; P. G. Halverson; T. J. Jones; D. Kielczewska; W. R. Kropp; J. G. Learned; J. M. LoSecco; G. McGrath; C. McGrew; J. A. J. Matthews; S. Matsuno; R. S. Miller; M. S. Mudan; L. R. Price; F. Reines; J. Schultz; D. Sinclair; H. W. Sobel; J. L. Stone; L. Sulak; R. Svoboda; J. Van Der Velde