C. Molins-Legua

New micromethod combining miniaturized matrix solid-phase dispersion and in-tube in-valve solid-phase microextraction for estimating polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in bivalves.

Miniaturized matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) was developed for the extraction of common polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from bivalve samples (100mg, dry weight). Additional clean-up and analyte enrichment was accomplished by in-tube solid-phase microextraction (SPME). For this purpose the extracts collected after MSPD were diluted with water and injected into a capillary column coated with the extractive phase. This capillary column was connected to the analytical column by means of a switching valve. Separation and quantification of the PAHs were carried out using a monolithic LC column and fluorescence detection. Since the in-tube SPME device allowed the processing of large volumes of the extracts (2.0 mL) excellent sensitivity was achieved, thus making solvent evaporation operations unnecessary. The overall recoveries ranged from 10% to 28% for the studied compounds. The relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 2% to 10% for intra-day variation (n=3), and the limits of detection (LODs) were < or =0.6 ng/g (dry weight). The proposed procedure was very simple and rapid (total analysis time was approximately 20 min), and the consumption of organic solvents and extractive phases was drastically reduced. The reliability of the proposed MSPD/in-tube SPME method was tested by analysing several bivalves (mussels and tellins) as well as a standard reference material (SRM).

Urine polyamines determination using dansyl chloride derivatization in solid-phase extraction cartridges and HPLC

The derivatization of biogenic amines such as putrescine, cadaverine, spermidine and spermine with dansyl chloride in solid phase extraction cartridges is described. Different types of filling materials were tested in order to have the highest retention of the different analytes. The best results were obtained by using C18 cartridges. The optimal conditions were: amine solution buffered at pH 12, 2 mM dansyl chloride (acetone-bicarbonate solution 20 mM (pH 9-9.5), 2 + 3 v/v) as reagent concentration, room temperature and 30 min reaction time. The developed procedure was applied to the determination of these polyamines in urine samples from healthy controls and cancer patients using HPLC with 1,7-diaminoheptane as internal standard. The concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 5 micrograms mL-1 and the detection limits were 10 ng mL-1 for all polyamines. By concentrating the urine extracts, the detection limits were improved down to 2 ng mL-1. The accuracy and the precision of the method were tested. The proposed dansylation method is advantageous with respect to solution dansylation. It improves the total analysis time, avoids high temperatures that can affect the thermal stability of the derivatives and could make possible the automation of the procedure.

Miniaturized matrix solid phase dispersion procedure and solid phase microextraction for the analysis of organochlorinated pesticides and polybrominated diphenylethers in biota samples by gas chromatography electron capture detection

This work has developed a miniaturized method based on matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) using C18 as dispersant and acetonitrile-water as eluting solvent for the analysis of legislated organochlorinated pesticides (OCPs) and polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs) in biota samples by GC with electron capture (GC-ECD). The method has compared Florisil-acidic Silica and C18 as dispersant for samples as well as different solvents. Recovery studies showed that the combination of C18-Florisil was better when using low amount of samples (0.1 g) and with low volumes of acetonitrile-water (2.6 mL). The use of SPME for extracting the analytes from the solvent mixture before the injection resulted in detection limits between 0.3 and 7.0 microg kg(-1) (expressed as wet mass). The miniaturized procedure was easier, faster, less time consuming than the conventional procedure and reduces the amounts of sample, dispersant and solvent volume by approximately 10 times. The proposed procedure was applied to analyse several biota samples from different parts of the Comunidad Valenciana.

Generalized H-point standard additions method for analyte determinations in unknown samples

The generalized H-point standard additions method (GHPSAM) is proposed. The method locates the linear spectral behaviour for the unknown global interference, if it exists, in all the spectral regions measured. The linear spectral interval for the interference is located from second derivative data. After this, the method validates the linearity supposition and estimates the analyte concentration free from bias error. So, only the data measured from the method are enough to obtain the unbiased analyte concentration in the presence of unknown interferences. Mixtures of phenol and 4-chloro-2-nitrophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol have been tested in order to check the validity of the method. The method also has been applied to the determination of amphetamine in urine samples. It works well in a lot of spectral situations, except in the cases when the global interference and the analyte are linear in the same spectral region.

Study of the behaviour of the absorbent blanks in analytical procedures by using the H-Point standard additions method (HPSAM)

This paper studies the behaviour of reagent blank in different extractive-colorimetric procedures (determination of sympathomimetic amines with NQS reagent) by using the H-Point Standard Additions Method (HPSAM) in order to study and characterize the different possibilities that the blank can introduce in an analytical procedure. We define two kinds of blanks: the external blank (from reagent alone solutions data) and the internal blank (from extrapolation of reagent plus analyte solutions data). Comparison between both gives the information about the reproducibility of the behaviour of the reagent blank. A procedure to evaluate, and characterize, errors (if they exist) is described, and a guide for optimizing the measuring procedure is presented.

In-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled by in valve mode to capillary LC-DAD: Improving detectability to multiresidue organic pollutants analysis in several whole waters.

A simple and fast capillary chromatographic method has been developed to identify and quantify organic pollutants at sub-ppb levels in real water samples. The major groups of pesticides (organic halogens, organic phosphorous, and organic nitrogen compounds), some hydrocarbons (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), phthalates and some phenols such as phenol and bisphenol A (endocrine disruptors) were included in this study. The procedure was based on coupling, in-tube solid-phase microextraction (IT-SPME) by using a conventional GC capillary column (95% methyl-5% phenyl substituted backbone, 80cmx0.32mm i.d., 3microm film thickness) in the injection valve to capillary liquid chromatography with diode array detection. A comparative study between the IT-SPME manifold and a column-switching device using a C(18) column (35mmx0.5mm i.d., 5microm particle size) has been performed. The IT-SPME procedure was optimal, it allows reaching limits of detection (LODs) between 0.008 and 0.2microg/L. No matrix effect was found and recoveries between 70 and 116% were obtained. The precision of the method was good, and the achieved intra- and inter-day variation coefficients were between 2 and 30%. This procedure has been applied to the screening analysis of 28 compounds in whole waters from several points of the Mediterranean coast (Valencia Community, Spain).

Amphetamine and methamphetamine determination in urine by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with simultaneous sample clean-up and derivatization with 1,2-naphthoquinone 4-sulphonate on solid-phase cartridges

A liquid-solid procedure is proposed for sample clean-up and derivatization of amphetamine and methamphetamine in urine samples. The reagent was 1,2-naphthoquinone 4-sulphonate, and a commercial C18 packing cartridge was used. The samples derivatized at room temperature were chromatographed on a 5-microns Hypersil ODS (250 x 4 mm I.D.) with an elution gradient of acetonitrile-water containing propylamine. Under these conditions, the amines were eluted with short retention times. The procedure was used to determine amphetamine, or methamphetamine with its metabolite amphetamine, in spiked urine samples. The detection limit (at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3) for amphetamine (0.1 microgram/ml) was similar to that obtained with liquid-liquid derivatization and to those obtained with immobilized reagents on a polymeric solid support. The detection limit for methamphetamine (0.4 microgram/ml) was higher than with the liquid-liquid procedure because of the lower reactivity on the cartridge. The precision and accuracy of the method were also studied.

Advantages of monolithic over particulate columns for multiresidue analysis of organic pollutants by in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled to capillary liquid chromatography

The performance of a monolithic C(18) column (150 mm×0.2 mm i.d.) for multiresidue organic pollutants analysis by in-tube solid-phase microextraction (IT-SPME)-capillary liquid chromatography has been studied, and the results have been compared with those obtained using a particulate C(18) column (150 mm×0.5 mm i.d., 5 μm). Chromatographic separation has been carried out under isocratic elution conditions, and for detection and identification of the analytes a UV-diode array detector has been employed. Several compounds of different chemical structure and hydrophobicity have been used as model compounds: simazine, atrazine and terbutylazine (triazines), chlorfenvinphos and chlorpyrifos (organophosphorous), diuron and isoproturon (phenylureas), trifluralin (dinitroaniline) and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate. The results obtained revealed that the monolithic column was clearly advantageous in the context of multiresidue organic pollutants analysis for a number of reasons: (i) the selectivity was considerably improved, which is of particular interest for the most polar compounds triazines and phenyl ureas that could not be resolved in the particulate column, (ii) the sensitivity was enhanced, and (iii) the time required for the chromatographic separation was substantially shortened. In this study it is also proved that the mobile-phase flow rates used for separation in the capillary monolithic column are compatible with the in-valve IT-SPME methodology using extractive capillaries of dimensions similar to those used in conventional scale liquid chromatography (LC). On the basis of these results a new method is presented for the assessment of pollutants in waters, which permits the characterization of whole samples (4 mL) in less than 30 min, with limits of detection in the range of 5-50 ng/L.

Ammonium Determination in Water Samples by Using Opa-Nac Reagent: A Comparative Study with Nessler and Ammonium Selective Electrode Methods

A selective and sensitive method based on the ammonium derivatisation with o -phthaldialdehyde (OPA) and N -acetyl-cysteine (NAC) has been developed for ammonium determination in real water samples. The proposed procedure has been compared with ammonium reference methods such as Nessler reagent method and ammonium selective electrode. All procedures have been chemometrically tested and compared in terms of the main analytical properties. These procedures have been used to determine ammonium in unknown water samples. The OPA-NAC reagent method does not present any systematic error (proportional or constant), while Nessler reagent presents both of them for some samples assayed. The ammonium selective electrode is free of corrigible systematic errors, however presents amine interference. The OPA-NAC ammonium method is able to achieve a detection limit (LOD) of 0.07 mg/L in the sample, with a linear dynamic range up to 1.4 mg/L of ammonium.

Amphetamine and Methamphetamine Determinations in Biological Samples by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. A Review

Abstract This critical review shows the different high performance liquid chromatography methods proposed for amphetamine and methamphetamine determinations. It is directed mainly towards sample clean up and derivatizations steps, because of their significance in such determinations.