Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where C. Naegelen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by C. Naegelen.


Transfusion | 2013

Plasma transfusion in liver transplantation: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical comparison of three virally secured plasmas

Tonine Bartelmaos; Anne Chabanel; Julie Léger; Loïc Villalon; Marie Christine Gillon; Claude Rouget; Alexandra Gomola; Marie Hélène Denninger; R. Tardivel; C. Naegelen; Françoise Courtois; L. Bardiaux; Bruno Giraudeau; Yves Ozier

BACKGROUND: The clinical equivalence of plasma treated to reduce pathogen transmission and untreated plasma has not been extensively studied. A clinical trial was conducted in liver transplant recipients to compare the efficacy of three plasmas.


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2009

Évolution des techniques de préparation des produits sanguins labiles (PSL): inactivation des pathogènes dans les PSL

C. Naegelen; H. Isola; D. Dernis; J.-P. Maurel; R. Tardivel; S. Bois; C. Vignoli; J.-P. Cazenave

Résumé Les techniques d’inactivation des agents pathogènes dans les produits sanguins labiles (PSL) apparaissent comme la nouvelle stratégie permettant d’augmenter la sécurité transfusionnelle face aux risques de transmission d’agents pathogènes par les PSL. Différentes techniques sont en cours de développement ou déjà validées et utilisées en France. Ces dernières ne s’appliquent que pour le plasma ou les concentrés plaquettaires. Les mécanismes d’action ainsi que l’efficacité d’inactivation et d’atténuation des agents pathogènes varient en fonction des différentes techniques. Chacune d’elles constitue un procédé de préparation composé d’opérations unitaires dont il faut s’assurer de la maîtrise dans le but de garantir la qualité et l’efficacité transfusionnelle du produit traité. Abstract The techniques for inactivation of pathogens in labile blood products (LBP) would appear to be the new strategy which will permit us to increase transfusion safety in the face of the risks of transmission of pathogenic agents by LBP. Various methods are in the course of development or already validated and used in France. The latter only apply however to plasma or platelet concentrates. The mechanisms of action and the efficacy of inactivation and attenuation of pathogenic agents vary with the different techniques. Each of these constitutes a preparative procedure composed of unit steps which have to be fully mastered in order to ensure the quality and transfusion efficacy of the treated product.


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2013

Prévention du risque bactérien : inactivation des pathogènes/détection des bactéries

Pascal Morel; C. Naegelen; Marie Deschaseaux; L. Bardiaux

Bacterial contamination of blood products remains the most important infectious risk of blood transfusion in 2013. Platelet concentrates (PC) are in cause in the majority of the transfusion reaction due to bacterial contaminations. A lot of prevention methods have been developed over the last 10 years (pre-donation interview, skin decontamination, diversion of the first 30 mL of the donation, leuko-reduction...), they have focused on limiting the contamination of the donations and prevent the bacterial growth in donations and/or in the blood products. These measures were effective and led to significantly reducing the risk of adverse effects associated with bacterial growth. However, every year there are about six accidents (with a high level of imputability) and one death. The reduction of the bacterial risk remains a priority for the French Blood Establishment (EFS). The procedure for skin disinfection is going to be improved in order to further strengthen this crucial step to avoid the contamination of donation. Methods of pathogen inactivation applied to plasma and PC are available in France and their effectiveness is demonstrated on the bacterial risk. Methods for bacterial detection of PC are used in many countries now. Automated culture is the most common. Alternatives are now available in the form of rapid tests able to analyze the PC just before the delivery and avoid false negatives observed with automated culture. Assessments are under way to confirm these benefits in 2013.


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2013

Séance éducationnellePrévention du risque bactérien : inactivation des pathogènes/détection des bactériesPrevention of bacterial risk: Pathogen inactivation/detection of bacteria

P. Morel; C. Naegelen; Marie Deschaseaux; L. Bardiaux

Bacterial contamination of blood products remains the most important infectious risk of blood transfusion in 2013. Platelet concentrates (PC) are in cause in the majority of the transfusion reaction due to bacterial contaminations. A lot of prevention methods have been developed over the last 10 years (pre-donation interview, skin decontamination, diversion of the first 30 mL of the donation, leuko-reduction...), they have focused on limiting the contamination of the donations and prevent the bacterial growth in donations and/or in the blood products. These measures were effective and led to significantly reducing the risk of adverse effects associated with bacterial growth. However, every year there are about six accidents (with a high level of imputability) and one death. The reduction of the bacterial risk remains a priority for the French Blood Establishment (EFS). The procedure for skin disinfection is going to be improved in order to further strengthen this crucial step to avoid the contamination of donation. Methods of pathogen inactivation applied to plasma and PC are available in France and their effectiveness is demonstrated on the bacterial risk. Methods for bacterial detection of PC are used in many countries now. Automated culture is the most common. Alternatives are now available in the form of rapid tests able to analyze the PC just before the delivery and avoid false negatives observed with automated culture. Assessments are under way to confirm these benefits in 2013.


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2003

Transfusion et bactéries : risque résiduel et perspectives de prévention

Pascal Morel; Marie Deschaseaux; Xavier Bertrand; C. Naegelen; D. Talon


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2002

Dépistage des bactéries dans les concentrés de plaquettes : perspectives

Pascal Morel; Marie Deschaseaux; Xavier Bertrand; C. Naegelen; Michelle Thouverez; D. Talon


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2013

Maîtrise du risque bactérien transfusionnel en France en 2013

P. Morel; Marie Deschaseaux; Xavier Bertrand; C. Naegelen; M.-F. Leconte des Floris; L. Bardiaux


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2009

Automatisation de la préparation des produits sanguins labiles

R. Tardivel; S. Bois; C. Vignoli; C. Naegelen; H. Isola


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2005

De la détection bactérienne à l'inactivation des pathogènes

P. Morel; Marie Deschaseaux; C. Naegelen; L. Bardiaux; M.-F. Leconte des Floris; Fabienne Pouthier


Transfusion Clinique Et Biologique | 2017

Évaluation de la qualité de plasmas issus de sang total inactivés par le procédé THERAFLEX MB-PLASMA

Béatrice Belcour; Colette Geschier; Maryse Morel; Arnaud Dupuis; Christian Gachet; Sébastien Bois; Sophie Requiem; Marie Colombat; C. Naegelen; N. Marpaux

Collaboration


Dive into the C. Naegelen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marie Deschaseaux

University of Franche-Comté

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pascal Morel

University of Franche-Comté

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. Isola

University of Strasbourg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Talon

University of Franche-Comté

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arnaud Dupuis

University of Strasbourg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M. Laforet

University of Strasbourg

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge