C. R. M. Hay

The diagnosis and management of factor VIII and IX inhibitors : a guideline from the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation

The revised UKHCDO factor (F) VIII/IX Inhibitor Guidelines (2000) are presented. A schema is proposed for inhibitor surveillance, which varies according to the severity of the haemophilia and the treatment type and regimen used. The methodological and pharmacokinetic approach to inhibitor surveillance in congenital haemophilia has been updated. Factor VIII/IX genotyping of patients is recommended to identify those at increased risk. All patients who develop an inhibitor should be considered for immune tolerance induction (ITI). The decision to attempt ITI for FIX inhibitors must be carefully weighed against the relatively high risk of reactions and the nephrotic syndrome and the relatively low response rate observed in this group. The start of ITI should be deferred until the inhibitor has declined below 10 Bethesda Units/ml, where possible. ITI should continue, even in resistant patients, where it is well tolerated and so long as there is a convincing downward trend in the inhibitor titre. The choice of treatment for bleeding in inhibitor patients is dictated by the severity of the bleed, the current inhibitor titre, the previous anamnestic response to FVIII/IX, the previous clinical response and the side‐effect profile of the agents available. We have reviewed novel dose‐regimens and modes of administration of FEIBA (factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity) and recombinant activated FVII (rVIIa) and the extent to which these agents may be used for prophylaxis and surgery. Bleeding in acquired haemophilia is usually treated with FEIBA or rVIIa. Immunosuppressive therapy should be initiated at the time of diagnosis with Prednisolone 1 mg/kg/d ± cyclophosphamide. In the absence of a response to these agents within 6 weeks, second‐line therapy with Rituximab, Ciclosporin A, or other multiple‐modality regimens may be considered.

Development of resistance to activated protein C during pregnancy

Summary. We measured activated protein C (APC) anticoagulant activity in 20 healthy women at 14‐20, 28 and 36 weeks gestation, and at 1 d post‐partum. Significant reductions in the mean APC sensitivity ratio (APC‐SR) were observed at all stages of pregnancy studied compared with the mean APC‐SR obtained for baseline measurements carried out at > 8 weeks post‐partum. APC resistance was seen in 8/19 (42%) and in 11/20 (55%) women at 14‐20 and 28 weeks gestation respectively. The development of resistance to APC may contribute to the increased risk of thrombosis during pregnancy.

The prothrombin gene G20210A variant : prevalence in a U.K. anticoagulant clinic population

We have investigated the prevalence of a recently reported genetic variation in the prothrombin gene (G20210A) in patients with an objectively confirmed history of venous thrombosis. 12/219 patients (5.5%) were found to be heterozygous carriers of the 20210 A allele. The incidence of the 20210 A allele in a group of 164 healthy controls was 1.2% (allele frequency 0.61%, 95% CI 0.08–2.19). When patients with a known alternative hereditary risk factor for venous thrombosis (factor V Leiden mutation or deficiency of antithrombin, protein C or protein S) were excluded, the G20210A variant was found to increase the risk for venous thrombosis by approximately 5‐fold (odds ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.16–25.0). This prothrombin gene sequence variation adds further to the list of recognized genetic risk factors for thrombophilia.

1 Acquired haemophilia

Acquired haemophilia is a rare but life-threatening acquired bleeding diathesis caused by autoimmune depletion of factor VIII. This occurs most frequently in elderly patients who lack disease associations. Acquired haemophilia may also arise in association with SLE rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogrens syndrome, other autoimmune conditions, lymphoproliferative malignancy, pregnancy and as a drug reaction. Acquired haemophilia has an equal sex distribution. The aims of treatment are to eliminate the inhibitor by immunosuppression and to treat the bleeding, which is the most common cause of death in patients with acquired haemophilia. The inhibitor is abolished in up to 70% of patients using prednisolone and cyclophosphamide, although other immunosuppressive regimens may also be used. These include azathioprine, vincristine and other cytotoxic agents, high-dose immunoglobulin and cyclosporin A. Bleeding may be controlled using porcine factor VIII or recombinant factor VIIa, although human factor VIII and prothrombin complex concentrates also have a limited role as haemostatic agents in this condition.

Clinical evaluation of an advanced category antihaemophilic factor prepared using a plasma/albumin-free method: pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in previously treated patients with haemophilia A

Summary.  The efficacy and safety of an advanced category recombinant antihaemophilic factor produced by a plasma‐ and albumin‐free method (rAHF‐PFM) was studied in 111 previously treated subjects with haemophilia A. The study comprised a randomized, double‐blinded, crossover pharmacokinetic comparison of rAHF‐PFM and RECOMBINATE rAHF (R‐FVIII); prophylaxis (three to four times per week with 25–40 IU kg−1 rAHF‐PFM) for at least 75 exposure days; and treatment of episodic haemorrhagic events. Median age was 18 years, 96% of subjects had baseline factor VIII <1%, and 108 received study drug. Bioequivalence, based on area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve and adjusted in vivo recovery, was demonstrated for rAHF‐PFM and R‐FVIII. Mean (±SD) half‐life for rAHF‐PFM was 12.0 ± 4.3 h. Among 510 bleeding events, 473 (93%) were managed with one or two infusions of rAHF‐PFM and 439 (86%) had efficacy ratings of excellent or good. Subjects who were less adherent to the prophylactic regimen had a higher bleeding rate (9.9 episodes subject−1 year−1) than subjects who were more adherent (4.4 episodes subject−1 year−1; P < 0.03). One subject developed a low titre, non‐persistent inhibitor (2.0 BU) after 26 exposure days. These data demonstrate that rAHF‐PFM is bioequivalent to R‐FVIII, and suggest that rAHF‐PFM is efficacious and safe, without increased immunogenicity, for the treatment of haemophilia A.

An investigation of the von Willebrand factor genotype in UK patients diagnosed to have type 1 von Willebrand disease

Forty families diagnosed by UK centres to have type 1 VWD were recruited. Following review, six families were re-diagnosed to have type 2 VWD, one to have a platelet storage pool disorder, and one family was determined to be unaffected. Direct DNA sequencing of the promoter region and all exons and intronic boundaries of the VWF gene identified six mutations likely to be causative of VWD in index cases of nine of the 32 (28%) confirmed type 1 VWD families. These included R1205H (3614G > A) VWD Vicenza, P1648fsX45 (4944delT), D141G (422A > G) and three splice site mutations: 3108 + 5G > A, 7437 + 1G > A and 3379 + 1G > A. The Y1584C (4751A > G) polymorphism was present in eight additional families. No significant VWF gene mutation or polymorphism was identified in 15 of the 32 type 1VWD index cases (47%). Haplotype studies were performed using a panel of VWF polymorphisms to investigate the segregation in families of VWD phenotype with the VWF gene. In 13 of the 32 families it was likely that VWD segregated with the VWF gene. In eight families (25%) VWD clearly did not segregate with the VWF gene. We suggest that mutation screening of the VWF gene has limited general utility in genetic diagnostic and family studies in type 1 VWD. If genetic studies are performed, the incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity of type 1 VWD must be taken into account. Unless linkage of VWD phenotype with the VWF gene can be clearly demonstrated, the results of any genetic family studies should be interpreted with caution.

Diagnosis and treatment of factor VIII and IX inhibitors in congenital haemophilia: (4th edition)

Peter W. Collins, Elizabeth Chalmers, Daniel P. Hart, Ri Liesner, Savita Rangarajan, Kate Talks, Mike Williams and Charles R. Hay School of Medicine, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Wales, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Royal London Hospital, Barts, Queen Mary University, London, Great Ormond Street NHS Trust, London, Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, Birmingham Childrens’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham and Central Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK

Factor VIII gene (F8) mutation and risk of inhibitor development in nonsevere hemophilia A

Neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) toward factor VIII form a severe complication in nonsevere hemophilia A, profoundly aggravating the bleeding pattern. Identification of high-risk patients is hampered by lack of data that take exposure days to therapeutic factor VIII concentrates into account. In the INSIGHT study, we analyzed the association between F8 mutation and inhibitor development in patients with nonsevere hemophilia A (factor VIII 2-40 IU/dL). This analysis included 1112 nonsevere hemophilia A patients from 14 centers in Europe and Australia that had genotyped at least 70% of their patients. Inhibitor risk was calculated as Kaplan-Meier incidence with cumulative number of exposure days as the time variable. During 44 800 exposure days (median, 24 exposure days per patient; interquartile range [IQR], 7-90), 59 of the 1112 patients developed an inhibitor; cumulative incidence of 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-6.6) after a median of 28 exposure days (IQR, 12-71). The inhibitor risk at 50 exposure days was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.5-8.9) and at 100 exposure days the risk further increased to 13.3% (95% CI, 9.6-17.0). Among a total of 214 different F8 missense mutations 19 were associated with inhibitor development. These results emphasize the importance of F8 genotyping in nonsevere hemophilia A.

Inhibitor treatment in haemophilias A and B: summary statement for the 2006 international consensus conference.

Summary.  Participants in an international conference on the management of haemophilia patients with inhibitors developed a jointly authored summary of the findings and conclusions of the conference. Current knowledge of the genetic and immunologic mechanisms underlying inhibitor development was briefly summarized. Concerning the purported treatment‐related risk factors, conference participants commented on the limitations of the available evidence and the need for more rigorous prospective research in a fully genotyped population. Other clinical considerations discussed included the unproved utility of routine surveillance, the need for assay standardization, the management of acute bleeding and approaches to joint disease prophylaxis and immune tolerance induction (ITI). A number of issues were identified as needing further investigation in larger prospective studies, ideally through international cooperation. Such studies should enrol cohorts that have been scrupulously defined in terms of mutation status and treatment exposure. Finally, conference participants urged their colleagues to participate in the currently ongoing international trials of ITI.

Factor VIII brand and the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated UK children with severe hemophilia A, 2000-2011.

The effect of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) brand on inhibitor development was investigated in all 407 severe hemophilia A previously untreated patients born in the United Kingdom (UK) between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2011. Eighty-eight (22%) had been in the RODIN study. Information was extracted from the National Haemophilia Database. Because exposure days (EDs) were not known for some patients, time from first treatment was used as a surrogate for rFVIII exposure. An inhibitor developed in 118 (29%) patients, 60 high and 58 low titer, after a median (interquartile range) of 7.8 (3.3-13.5) months from first exposure and 16 (9-30) EDs. Of 128 patients treated with Kogenate Bayer/Helixate NexGen, 45 (35.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.4-43.8) developed an inhibitor compared with 42/172 (24.4%, 95% CI 18.6% to 31.4%) with Advate (P = .04). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for Kogenate Bayer/Helixate NexGen compared with Advate was 2.14 (1.12-4.10) (P = .02) for high titer and 1.75 (1.11-2.76) (P = .02) for all inhibitors. When excluding UK-RODIN patients, the adjusted HR (95% CI) for high-titer inhibitors was 2.00 (0.93-4.34) (P = .08). ReFacto AF was associated with a higher incidence of all, but not high-titer, inhibitors than Advate. These results will help inform debate around the relative immunogenicity and use of rFVIII brands.