C. W. Taat

Cumulative risk of developing polyps or malignancy at the ileal pouch—anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

Restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is performed in an increasing number of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Two techniques are currently used to construct an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: (1) a double-stapled anastomosis between the pouch and the anal canal and (2) mucosectomy with a hand-sewn iteoanal anastomosis at the dentate line. Although this procedure is thought to abolish the risk of colorectal adenoma, an increasing number of case reports have been published concerning the development of adenoma at the anastomotic site. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall cumulative risk of developing adenomatous polyps after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and to compare the cumulative risk after either anastomotic technique. A total of 126 consecutive FAP patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy were identified from polyposis registries in The Netherlands, Denmark, Italy, Germany, and New York. Life-table analysis was used to calculate the cumulative risk of developing polyps in 97 patients with at least 1 year of endoscopic follow-up (median 66 months, range 12 to 188 months). A double-stapled anastomosis was used in 35 patients, whereas in 62 patients a handsewn anastomosis with a mucosectomy was performed. In 13 patients polyps developed at the anastomotic site, four with severe and four with moderate dysplasia. None of the patients developed a carcinoma at the anastomotic site. The cumulative risk of developing a polyp at the anastomotic site was 8% (95% confidence interval 2% to 14%) at 3.5 years and 18% (95% confidence interval 8% to 28%) at 7 years, respectively. The risk of developing a polyp at the anastomotic site within 7 years was 31 % for patients with a double-stapled vs. 10% for patients with a hand-sewn anastomosis with mucosectomy (P = 0.03 [log-rank test]). Because FAP patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy with either a double-stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis have a substantial risk of developing adenomatous polyps at the anastomotic site, lifelong endoscopic surveillance is mandatory in both groups.

Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared with proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

OBJECTIVEnTo compare the long-term functional results of ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) with those of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).nnnSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATAnIn patients with FAP, hundreds of colorectal adenomas develop, and the patient will die of colorectal cancer if left untreated. The surgeon must choose between colectomy with IRA and restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. One factor crucial to decision making is the functional outcome after either procedure. To date, studies on this issue have reported conflicting results and have been based on small series of patients.nnnMETHODSnTo assess various functional variables, a questionnaire was sent to 323 patients with FAP who underwent either IRA or IPAA and who were registered at the Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumors. The overall response rate was 86%; the responders comprised 161 patients who underwent IRA and 118 patients who underwent IPAA.nnnRESULTSnPatients who underwent IRA scored significantly better for daytime and nighttime stool frequency, soiling, occasional passive incontinence, flatus and feces discrimination, stool consistency, and need for antidiarrheal medication. There was no difference with regard to perianal irritation, episodes of bowel discomfort, or dietary restrictions. The functional results according to the aggregate score of the Gastro-Intestinal Functional Outcome Scale, where the items specified above were integrated (0 indicating a poor and 100 a good overall function), were significantly better in patients with an IRA (74.5) than in patients with an IPAA (66.0) (p < 0.01).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe functional outcome after IRA is significantly better than after IPAA. On the basis of these results, IRA might still be considered in patients with a mild phenotypic expression of the disease in the rectum.

Prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma with or without preoperative radiotherapy

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Anorectal function is greatly disturbed after rectal surgery with or without radiotherapy (RT). To clarify the underlying mechanisms, we designed a prospective study to evaluate the effect of RT and surgery on anorectal function and clinical outcome of patients with a rectal carcinoma. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with a rectal carcinoma participated in this study. They filled out a symptom questionnaire and underwent anal manometry, anal and rectal mucosal electrosensitivity testing, and a rectal barostat, before surgery, 4 and 12 months postoperatively. Thirteen patients were lost to follow-up, 14 underwent surgery alone (total mesorectal excision [TME]), and seven also received RT (RT + TME). RESULTS: Functional outcome was disappointing in both groups, with at 4 months a significantly higher defecation frequency after RT + TME as compared with TME. Anal sphincter function and rectal sensitivity to pressure-controlled distention were not affected by either treatment. Rectal compliance, however, was significantly reduced after RT + TME at 4 and 12 months, resulting in lower rectal volumes at the thresholds for first sensation and desire to defecate. Rectal but not anal mucosal electrosensitivity was higher after TME + RT. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal function after rectal surgery with or without RT is greatly hampered because of a decreased rectal compliance. After 12 months, partial improvement is shown, especially in the absence of RT.

What is the benefit of preoperative sperm preservation for patients who undergo restorative proctocolectomy for benign diseases

PURPOSE: In patients with benign colorectal diseases undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, semen cryopreservation seems rational to enable the possibility of procreation in case surgery leads to sexual disorders or impotence. The aim of this study was to determine the preoperative and postoperative semen quality in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In addition, the study sought to determine the incidence of surgery-induced sexual dysfunction to evaluate the economic efficiency of semen cryopreservation as compared with alternatives such as microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative semen analyses were offered to 97 patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with benign colorectal diseases since 1989. The direct costs of the semen cryopreservation program were determined and compared with those of alternatives. RESULTS: In 34 of 40 consecutive patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis who made use of preoperative semen preservation, normal sperm concentrations, motility, and morphology were found. Mean semen characteristics of all 23 patients who returned for postoperative analysis were not different from preoperative values, but they were for total sperm number. Two patients developed temporary retrograde ejaculation postoperatively. None of the preserved semen samples was used, thus semen cryopreservation benefited none of these patients. The total costs of semen cryopreservation are between 2.2 and 5 times higher than the costs for one microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative semen cryopreservation in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis because of benign colorectal diseases is quite feasible. However, most likely because of improved surgical techniques and the increasing number of effective alternatives, preoperative semen cryopreservation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is no longer cost effective.

Functional outcome after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis compared to proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)

Background Data In patients with FAP, hundreds of colorectal adenomas develop, and the patient will die of colorectal cancer if left untreated. The surgeon must choose between colectomy with IRA and restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA. One factor crucial to decision making is the functional outcome after either procedure. To date, studies on this issue have reported conflicting results and have been based on small series of patients.